1
|
Fonseca R, Rossi A, Medhekar R, Voelker J, Homan T, Wilcock J, Karakusevic A, Cochrane J, Bridge D, Perry R, Kaila S, Davies FE. Clinical consensus on treatments for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: double-blinded Delphi panel. Future Oncol 2024:1-12. [PMID: 38861282 DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2342228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: Obtain clinical consensus on factors impacting first-line prescribing for transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Materials & methods: A double-blinded, modified Delphi panel was employed. USA-based hematologists/oncologists who treat TIE patients with NDMM were selected as expert panelists. Results: Consensus was reached that patient frailty, performance status, comorbidities, treatment efficacy, and adverse event profile affect first-line prescribing. All panelists agreed it is important to use the most efficacious treatment first; 88% of panelists considered daratumumab-containing regimens the most efficacious. Panelists agreed treatment should be continued until progression while benefits outweigh risk. Conclusion: Findings reinforce the importance of using the most efficacious regimen upfront for TIE NDMM, and nearly all panelists considered daratumumab-containing regimens the most efficacious treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Fonseca
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Adriana Rossi
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Faith E Davies
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Costa BA, Mouhieddine TH, Ortiz RJ, Richter J. Revisiting the Role of Alkylating Agents in Multiple Myeloma: Up-to-Date Evidence and Future Perspectives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 187:104040. [PMID: 37244325 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023] Open
Abstract
From the 1960s to the early 2000s, alkylating agents (e.g., melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and bendamustine) remained a key component of standard therapy for newly-diagnosed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Later on, their associated toxicities (including second primary malignancies) and the unprecedented efficacy of novel therapies have led clinicians to increasingly consider alkylator-free approaches. Meanwhile, new alkylating agents (e.g., melflufen) and new applications of old alkylators (e.g., lymphodepletion before chimeric antigen receptor T-cell [CAR-T] therapy) have emerged in recent years. Given the expanding use of antigen-directed modalities (e.g., monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and CAR-T therapy), this review explores the current and future role of alkylating agents in different treatment settings (e.g., induction, consolidation, stem cell mobilization, pre-transplant conditioning, salvage, bridging, and lymphodepleting chemotherapy) to ellucidate the role of alkylator-based regimens in modern-day MM management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Almeida Costa
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside and West, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tarek H Mouhieddine
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ricardo J Ortiz
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside and West, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua Richter
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Botta C, Gigliotta E, Paiva B, Anselmo R, Santoro M, Otero PR, Carlisi M, Conticello C, Romano A, Solimando AG, Cerchione C, Vià MD, Bolli N, Correale P, Di Raimondo F, Gentile M, San Miguel J, Siragusa S. Network meta-analysis of randomized trials in multiple myeloma: Efficacy and safety in frontline therapy for patients not eligible for transplant. Hematol Oncol 2022; 40:987-998. [PMID: 35794705 PMCID: PMC10084226 DOI: 10.1002/hon.3041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The treatment scenario for newly-diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma patients (NEMM) is quickly evolving. Currently, combinations of proteasome inhibitors and/or immunomodulatory drugs +/- the monoclonal antibody Daratumumab are used for first-line treatment, even if head-to-head comparisons are lacking. To compare efficacy and safety of these regimens, we performed a network meta-analysis of 27 phase 2/3 randomized trials including a total of 12,935 patients and 23 different schedules. Four efficacy/outcome and one safety indicators were extracted and integrated to obtain (for each treatment) the surface under the cumulative ranking-curve (SUCRA), a metric used to build a ranking chart. With a mean SUCRA of 83.8 and 80.08 respectively, VMP + Daratumumab (DrVMP) and Rd + Daratumumab (DrRd) reached the top of the chart. However, SUCRA is designed to work for single outcomes. To overcome this limitation, we undertook a dimensionality reduction approach through a principal component analysis, that unbiasedly grouped the 23 regimens into three different subgroups. On the bases of our results, we demonstrated that first line treatment for NEMM should be based on DrRd (most active, but continuous treatment), DrVMP (quite "fixed-time" treatment), or, alternatively, VRD and that, surprisingly, melphalan as well as Rd doublets still deserve a role in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cirino Botta
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Emilia Gigliotta
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Bruno Paiva
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, CCUN Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Rita Anselmo
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marco Santoro
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Paula Rodriguez Otero
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, CCUN Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Melania Carlisi
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Concetta Conticello
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Policlinico-OVE, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Alessandra Romano
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Policlinico-OVE, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Giovanni Solimando
- Guido Baccelli Unit of Internal Medicine, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology (DIMO), School of Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Claudio Cerchione
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy
| | - Matteo Da Vià
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Hematology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Niccolò Bolli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Hematology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Correale
- Medical Oncology Unit, Grand Metropolitan Hospital "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli", Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Raimondo
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Policlinico-OVE, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Massimo Gentile
- Hematology Unit, Department of Hemato-Oncology, Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Jesus San Miguel
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, CCUN Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Sergio Siragusa
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Facon T, San-Miguel J, Dimopoulos MA, Mateos MV, Cavo M, van Beekhuizen S, Yuan Z, Mendes J, Lam A, He J, Ammann E, Kumar S. Treatment Regimens for Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis. Adv Ther 2022; 39:1976-1992. [PMID: 35246820 PMCID: PMC9056460 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02083-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Many treatment regimens have been evaluated in transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of relevant therapies for the treatment of TIE patients with NDMM. Methods Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating different treatment options for TIE patients with NDMM were compared in a network meta-analysis (NMA). The NMA includes recent primary and long-term OS readouts from SWOG S0777, ENDURANCE, MAIA, and ALCYONE. Relevant trials were identified through a systematic literature review. Relative efficacy measures (i.e., hazard ratios [HRs] for PFS and OS) were extracted and synthesised in random-effects NMAs. Results A total of 122 publications describing 45 unique RCTs was identified. Continuous lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) was selected as the referent comparator. Daratumumab-containing treatments (daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone [D-Rd], daratumumab/bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone [D-VMP]) and bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd) had the highest probabilities of being more effective than Rd continuous for PFS (HR: D-Rd, 0.53; D-VMP, 0.57, VRd, 0.77) and OS (HR: D-Rd, 0.68; VRd, 0.77, D-VMP, 0.78). D-Rd had the highest chance of being ranked as the most effective treatment with respect to PFS and OS. Results using a smaller network focusing on only those regimens that are relevant in Europe were consistent with the primary analysis. Conclusions These comparative effectiveness data may help inform treatment selection in TIE patients with NDMM. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02083-8.
Collapse
|
5
|
Efficacy of first-line treatment options in transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: A network meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 168:103504. [PMID: 34673218 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite major therapeutic advances, the rational choice of the most appropriate first-line regimen in newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma (TIE-MM) is currently undefined. AIM We aimed to identify the most effective first-line treatment for TIE-MM patients. METHODS A total of 37 articles, including 34 treatments and 16,681 patients, were included in this Bayesian network meta-analysis. The outcomes of interest were risk ratios (RR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Based on surface under cumulative ranking curve values, daratumumab-bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (Dara-VMP) and daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Dara-Rd28) showed superiority compared to other combinations regarding 12-, 24-, 36-, and 48-month PFS. Dara-VMP also ranked first for 12-, 24-, 36-, and 48-month OS. CONCLUSION Our finding supports the incorporation of daratumumab into first-line regimens. Additionally, these results highlight the relative benefit of incorporating novel agents like monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory derivatives, and proteasome inhibitors in combination with the currently existing treatment options.
Collapse
|
6
|
Blommestein HM, Franken MG, van Beurden-Tan CHY, Blijlevens NMA, Huijgens PC, Sonneveld P, Uyl-de Groot CA, Zweegman S. Cost-effectiveness of Novel Treatment Sequences for Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Multiple Myeloma. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e213497. [PMID: 33779744 PMCID: PMC8008287 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Although the number of treatments for elderly patients with non-transplant-eligible (NTE) multiple myeloma (MM) has increased substantially, evidence is lacking on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of novel treatment sequences. OBJECTIVE To determine the optimal sequence of treatment for patients with NTE MM from the perspective of the patient, physician, and society. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Using data from a Dutch observational registry, this economic evaluation combined evidence from network meta-analyses in a patient-level simulation model and modeled time-to-event and types of events from a hospital perspective with a lifetime horizon. Data analysis was performed from June 2019 to September 2020. INTERVENTIONS Thirty treatment sequences, including up to 3 lines of therapy, were compared with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP)-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (LenDex)-pomalidomide-dexamethasone (PomDex). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes of the model were overall survival (OS), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS Sequences starting with daratumumab-VMP (second line: carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone or elotuzumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone) or bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide-maintenance bortezomib-thalidomide (VMPT-VT) (second line: daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone) had the largest expected OS (7.5 years), which is 3.5 additional life-years compared with VMP-LenDex-PomDex. Total costs per patient for these sequences ranged between $786 024 and $1 085 794. The sequence VMPT-VT-carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone-panobinostat-bortezomib-dexamethasone had the most favorable cost-effectiveness ratio ($98 585 per life-year gained and $132 707 per QALY gained vs VMP-LenDex-PomDex). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that sequences including novel treatments were highly effective, but the cost-effectiveness ratios were above currently accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds. Treating MM with novel agents necessitates either a large increase in budget or a substantial reduction of drug costs by price negotiations, and these findings can support these reimbursement decisions and price negotiations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedwig M. Blommestein
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet G. Franken
- Institute of Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Peter C. Huijgens
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carin A. Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Institute of Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Franchi M, Vener C, Garau D, Kirchmayer U, Di Martino M, Romero M, De Carlo I, Scondotto S, Stival C, Della Porta MG, Passamonti F, Corrao G. Bortezomib-based therapy in non-transplant multiple myeloma patients: a retrospective cohort study from the FABIO project. Ther Adv Hematol 2021; 12:2040620721996488. [PMID: 33747423 PMCID: PMC7905486 DOI: 10.1177/2040620721996488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Randomized clinical trials showed that bortezomib, in addition to
conventional chemotherapy, improves survival and disease progression in
multiple myeloma (MM) patients not eligible for stem cell transplantation.
The aim of this retrospective population-based cohort study is the
evaluation of both clinical and economic profile of bortezomib-based
versus conventional chemotherapy in daily clinical
practice. Methods: Healthcare utilization databases of six Italian regions were used to identify
adult patients with non-transplant MM, who started a first-line therapy with
bortezomib-based or conventional chemotherapy. Patients were matched by
propensity score and were followed from treatment start until death, lost to
follow-up or study end-point. Overall survival (OS) and restricted mean
survival time (RMST) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method.
Association between first-line treatment and risk of death was estimated by
a conditional Cox proportional regression model. Average mean cumulative
costs were estimated and compared between groups. Results: In the period 2010–2016, 3509 non-transplant MM patients met the inclusion
criteria, of which 1157 treated with bortezomib-based therapy were matched
to 1826 treated with conventional chemotherapy. Median OS and RMST were 33.9
and 27.9 months, and 42.9 and 38.4 months, respectively, in the two
treatment arms. Overall, these values corresponded to a HR of death of 0.79
(95% CI 0.71–0.89) over a time horizon of 84 months. Average cumulative cost
were 83,839 € and 54,499 €, respectively, corresponding to an incremental
cost-effectiveness ratio of 54,333 € per year of life gained, a cost
coherent with the willingness-to-pay thresholds frequently adopted from
Western countries. Conclusions: These data suggested that, in a large cohort of non-transplant MM patients
treated outside the experimental setting, first-line treatment with
bortezomib-based therapy was associated with a favourable effectiveness and
cost-effectiveness profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Franchi
- Laboratory of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Building U7, Via Bicocca degli Arcimboldi 8, Milan, 20126, Italy
| | - Claudia Vener
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ursula Kirchmayer
- Department of Epidemiology ASL Roma 1, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | - Mirko Di Martino
- Department of Epidemiology ASL Roma 1, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | - Marilena Romero
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences - Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Chieti, Italy
| | - Ilenia De Carlo
- Regional Centre of Pharmacovigilance, Regional Health Authority, Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Scondotto
- Department of Health Services and Epidemiological Observatory, Regional Health Authority, Palermo, Sicily Region, Palermo, Italy
| | - Chiara Stival
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, ItalyLaboratory of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Matteo Giovanni Della Porta
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Francesco Passamonti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria and ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo of Varese, Varese, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Corrao
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
He J, He D, Han X, Zheng G, Wei G, Zhao Y, Yang Y, Wu W, Fu J, Shou L, Kong H, Huang H, Cai Z. Bortezomib-Based Regimens for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in China: A Report of 12-Year Real-World Data. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:561601. [PMID: 33362538 PMCID: PMC7759685 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.561601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Improve the treatment quality might affect patients’ efficacy and survival. Methods: Five hundred thirty multiple myeloma patients treated in four hematological centers in China from February 2006 to August 2018 were enrolled. General characteristics, treatment regimens and cycles, efficacy, survival and adverse events of the patients treated before and after August 2013 (later refer to as the before-2013 and after-2013 group) were analyzed and compared. Results: The results suggested that patients who received optimized treatment regimen and route of administration completed more cycles of treatment in the after-2013 group. Although the overall response rate was similar between the two groups (88.6 vs. 90.5%), patients in the after-2013 group had higher complete remission rate (39.1 vs. 28.6%) and better progression-free survival. Subgroup analysis suggested that patients aged 65 years and older, with non-high-risk D-S, ISS, and R-ISS stages, had a significant benefit in progression-free survival. Conclusion: Therefore, in clinical practice in China, by reducing the economic burden brought by the treatment on patients and optimizing the treatment regimen, more patients can be treated with better regimens in a prolonged duration to achieve better efficacy and survival, especially in elderly and non-high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingsong He
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Donghua He
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyan Han
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Gaofeng Zheng
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Guoqing Wei
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi Zhao
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wenjun Wu
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiaping Fu
- Department of Hematology, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China
| | - Lihong Shou
- Department of Hematology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, China
| | - Hongwei Kong
- Department of Hematology, People's Hospital of Quzhou City, Quzhou, China
| | - He Huang
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhen Cai
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Durie BGM, Kumar SK, Usmani SZ, Nonyane BAS, Ammann EM, Lam A, Kobos R, Maiese EM, Facon T. Daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs standard-of-care regimens: Efficacy in transplant-ineligible untreated myeloma. Am J Hematol 2020; 95:1486-1494. [PMID: 32804408 PMCID: PMC7754114 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide‐dexamethasone (D‐Rd) recently received FDA approval for the treatment of transplant‐ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The present PEGASUS study compared progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients treated with D‐Rd in the MAIA trial and patients treated with common standard‐of‐care regimens from the Flatiron Health electronic health record‐derived deidentified database, which has data from patients treated primarily at community‐based oncology practices in the United States. Individual‐level patient data from both data sources were used to perform an anchored indirect treatment comparison (ITC) of D‐Rd to bortezomib‐lenalidomide‐dexamethasone (VRd) and bortezomib‐dexamethasone (Vd); lenalidomide‐dexamethasone (Rd) was the common anchor for the ITC. Hazard ratios (HRs) reflecting direct comparisons of PFS within MAIA (D‐Rd vs Rd) and Flatiron Health (VRd vs Rd; Vd vs Rd) were used to make ITCs for D‐Rd vs VRd and Vd, respectively. After application of MAIA inclusion/exclusion criteria and propensity‐score weighting, the Flatiron Health patients resembled the MAIA trial population on measured baseline characteristics. Based on the direct comparison within MAIA, treatment with D‐Rd was associated with a significantly lower risk of progression or death compared to Rd (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.42, 0.71). Based on the ITCs, D‐Rd was associated with a significantly lower risk of progression or death compared to VRd (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.48, 0.98) and Vd (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.33, 0.69). In the absence of head‐to‐head trials comparing D‐Rd to VRd or Vd, the present ITC may help inform treatment selection in transplant‐ineligible patients with NDMM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Annette Lam
- Janssen Global Services Raritan New Jersey USA
| | - Rachel Kobos
- Janssen Research & Development Raritan New Jersey USA
| | | | - Thierry Facon
- Department of Haematology Lille University Hospital Lille France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Giri S, Aryal MR, Yu H, Grimshaw A, Pathak R, Huntington SP, Dhakal B. Efficacy and safety of frontline regimens for older transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:1285-1292. [PMID: 32513568 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several treatment options are available for the management of older adults with newly diagnosed patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) who are ineligible for hematopoietic cell transplantation (tiMM). We aimed to identify treatment options that provide the best balance in terms of efficacy and safety. METHODS We searched bibliographic databases and meeting libraries for search terms reflecting newly diagnosed and older and/or transplant-ineligible patients from inception to October 21, 2018. Phase II/III randomized trials comparing at least two first line treatment regimens for newly diagnosed tiMM were included. We extracted data on efficacy (progression free survival, PFS, overall survival and overall response rate) and safety (grade ¾ toxicities) and conducted network meta-analysis using Bayesian methods and random effects models. Relative ranking of treatment regimens was assessed using Surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. RESULTS We identified 27 trials involving 12,194 patients. For PFS, the four most effective regimens were: Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone (SUCRA 0.960) followed by Daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Dara_RD, SUCRA 0.847), Bortezomib, melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide maintenance with bortezomib-thalidomide (SUCRA 0.834) and Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (SUCRA 0.739). Among these four most efficacious regimens, toxicity profile was most favorable for Dara_RD (median additional AEs per patient vs dexamethasone = 0.74; 95% CrI 0.51-1.17; SUCRA 0.430). CONCLUSION Among first line tiMM regimens, increasing efficacy is associated with increased toxicity. We provide relative ranking of these regimens for both efficacy and safety. Future studies should incorporate geriatric assessments and frailty biomarkers to refine treatment decision-making for each individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smith Giri
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
| | - Madan Raj Aryal
- Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States of America
| | - Han Yu
- Department of Biostatistics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States of America
| | - Alyssa Grimshaw
- Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Ranjan Pathak
- Division of Hematology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Scott P Huntington
- Division of Hematology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Binod Dhakal
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schoenbeck KL, Wildes TM. Updated Perspectives on the Management of Multiple Myeloma in Older Patients: Focus on Lenalidomide. Clin Interv Aging 2020; 15:619-633. [PMID: 32440105 PMCID: PMC7210019 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s196087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma is a hematologic malignancy that predominantly affects older adults, with a median age at diagnosis of 70 years old. A mainstay of multiple myeloma treatment is lenalidomide, which is an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) that changed the treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma. This is particularly true for older adults who do not undergo autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Several pivotal trials summarized in this review demonstrate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in older adults with multiple myeloma, including significant improvements in response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival in the first-line and relapsed/refractory settings. Potential adverse effects include venous thromboembolism, cytopenias, and second malignancies and the doses tolerated in real-world older patients are often lower than those utilized in clinical trials enrolling select older patients. Given the heterogeneity of aging, several approaches to measuring frailty have been developed and validated to aid in predicting which older adults may benefit from empiric dose reduction to reduce the risk of toxicity and improve the tolerability of treatment. A number of randomized trials have explored a range of approaches utilizing lenalidomide in older adults in both the up-front and relapsed setting, ranging from attenuated maintenance strategies through quadruplet combination therapies including proteasome inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. This wealth of literature provides a great number of options, which can make it difficult for a clinician to determine a single optimal recommendation for an individual patient. While lenalidomide is currently part of standard of care, the treatment of multiple myeloma is growing rapidly. There is a need to expand clinical trials participation to older adults with multiple myeloma. Incorporation of validated comprehensive geriatric assessments in clinical trials for multiple myeloma could provide a more accurate depiction of the older patient population and is an area for future exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly L Schoenbeck
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tanya M Wildes
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Musto P, La Rocca F. Monoclonal antibodies in newly diagnosed and smoldering multiple myeloma: an updated review of current clinical evidence. Expert Rev Hematol 2020; 13:501-517. [PMID: 32290723 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1753502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) are rapidly changing the therapeutic scenario of multiple myeloma. Most of the available data, however, come from studies performed in patients with relapsed or refractory disease.Area covered: Here, the most recent results from clinical trials that have investigated (or are investigating) efficacy and safety of MoAbs as front-line treatments in both transplant-eligible and not-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, as well as in smoldering myeloma, are reviewed. PubMed reported articles before 28 March 2020, and abstracts presented at the last ASCO, ASH, EHA, and IMW meetings were considered. Among others, pertinent data regarding daratumumab, isatuximab, elotuzumab, and pembrolizumab will be analyzed.Expert opinion: Introduction of MoAbs as first-line therapy will likely provide a significant improvement in the clinical outcome of patients with multiple myeloma. This will also require an appropriate re-positioning of salvage therapies. The role of MoAbs in smoldering myeloma appears to be promising, but adequate follow-up is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pellegrino Musto
- Chair of Hematology and Unit of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, "Aldo Moro" University School of Medicine, AOU Consorziale Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco La Rocca
- Laboratory of Advanced Diagnostics and Clinical Research, IRCCS-CROB, Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture (Pz), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gil‐Sierra MD, Gimeno‐Ballester V, Fenix‐Caballero S, Alegre‐Del Rey EJ. Network meta‐analysis of first‐line treatments in transplant‐ineligible multiple myeloma patients. Eur J Haematol 2020; 105:56-65. [DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel David Gil‐Sierra
- Pharmacy Department Hospital Doctor Jose Molina Orosa Arrecife Spain
- Pharmacology Department Facultad de Farmacia Universidad de Sevilla Sevilla Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Piechotta V, Jakob T, Langer P, Monsef I, Scheid C, Estcourt LJ, Ocheni S, Theurich S, Kuhr K, Scheckel B, Adams A, Skoetz N. Multiple drug combinations of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and thalidomide for first-line treatment in adults with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2019:CD013487. [PMID: 31765002 PMCID: PMC6876545 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple myeloma is a bone marrow-based hematological malignancy accounting for approximately two per cent of cancers. First-line treatment for transplant-ineligible individuals consists of multiple drug combinations of bortezomib (V), lenalidomide (R), or thalidomide (T). However, access to these medicines is restricted in many countries worldwide. OBJECTIVES To assess and compare the effectiveness and safety of multiple drug combinations of V, R, and T for adults with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma and to inform an application for the inclusion of these medicines into the World Health Organization's (WHO) list of essential medicines. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL and MEDLINE, conference proceedings and study registries on 14 February 2019 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing multiple drug combinations of V, R and T for adults with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma. SELECTION CRITERIA We included RCTs comparing combination therapies of V, R, and T, plus melphalan and prednisone (MP) or dexamethasone (D) for first-line treatment of adults with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma. We excluded trials including adults with relapsed or refractory disease, trials comparing drug therapies to other types of therapy and trials including second-generation novel agents. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included trials. As effect measures we used hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and risk ratios (RRs) for adverse events. An HR or RR < 1 indicates an advantage for the intervention compared to the main comparator MP. Where available, we extracted quality of life (QoL) data (scores of standardised questionnaires). Results quoted are from network meta-analysis (NMA) unless stated. MAIN RESULTS We included 25 studies (148 references) comprising 11,403 participants and 21 treatment regimens. Treatments were differentiated between restricted treatment duration (treatment with a pre-specified amount of cycles) and continuous therapy (treatment administered until disease progression, the person becomes intolerant to the drug, or treatment given for a prolonged period). Continuous therapies are indicated with a "c". Risk of bias was generally high across studies due to the open-label study design. Overall survival (OS) Evidence suggests that treatment with RD (HR 0.63 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 0.99), median OS 55.2 months (35.2 to 87.0)); TMP (HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.97), median OS: 46.4 months (35.9 to 60.0)); and VRDc (HR 0.49 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.92), median OS 71.0 months (37.8 to 133.8)) probably increases survival compared to median reported OS of 34.8 months with MP (moderate certainty). Treatment with VMP may result in a large increase in OS, compared to MP (HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.07), median OS 49.7 months (32.5 to 77.3)), low certainty). Progression-free survival (PFS) Treatment withRD (HR 0.65 (95% CI0.44 to 0.96), median PFS: 24.9 months (16.9 to 36.8)); TMP (HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.78), median PFS:25.7 months (20.8 to 32.4)); VMP (HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.90), median PFS: 28.9 months (18.0 to 46.3)); and VRDc (HR 0.34 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.58), median PFS: 47.6 months (27.9 to 81.0)) may result in a large increase in PFS (low certainty) compared to MP (median reported PFS: 16.2 months). Adverse events The risk of polyneuropathies may be lower with RD compared to treatment with MP (RR 0.57 (95% CI 0.16 to 1.99), risk for RD: 0.5% (0.1 to 1.8), mean reported risk for MP: 0.9% (10 of 1074 patients affected), low certainty). However, the CIs are also compatible with no difference or an increase in neuropathies. Treatment with TMP (RR 4.44 (95% CI1.77 to 11.11), risk: 4.0% (1.6 to 10.0)) and VMP (RR 88.22 (95% CI 5.36 to 1451.11), risk: 79.4% (4.8 to 1306.0)) probably results in a large increase in polyneuropathies compared to MP (moderate certainty). No study reported the amount of participants with grade ≥ 3 polyneuropathies for treatment with VRDc. VMP probably increases the proportion of participants with serious adverse events (SAEs) compared to MP (RR 1.28 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.54), risk for VMP: 46.2% (38.3 to 55.6), mean risk for MP: 36.1% (177 of 490 patients affected), moderate certainty). RD, TMP, and VRDc were not connected to MP in the network and the risk of SAEs could not be compared. Treatment with RD (RR 4.18 (95% CI 2.13 to 8.20), NMA-risk: 38.5% (19.6 to 75.4)); and TMP (RR 4.10 (95% CI 2.40 to 7.01), risk: 37.7% (22.1 to 64.5)) results in a large increase of withdrawals from the trial due to adverse events (high certainty) compared to MP (mean reported risk: 9.2% (77 of 837 patients withdrew)). The risk is probably slightly increased with VMP (RR 1.06 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.81), risk: 9.75% (5.8 to 16.7), moderate certainty), while it is much increased with VRDc (RR 8.92 (95% CI 3.82 to 20.84), risk: 82.1% (35.1 to 191.7), high certainty) compared to MP. Quality of life QoL was reported in four studies for seven different treatment regimens (MP, MPc, RD, RMP, RMPc, TMP, TMPc) and was measured with four different tools. Assessment and reporting differed between studies and could not be meta-analysed. However, all studies reported an improvement of QoL after initiation of anti-myeloma treatment for all assessed treatment regimens. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on our four pre-selected comparisons of interest, continuous treatment with VRD had the largest survival benefit compared with MP, while RD and TMP also probably considerably increase survival. However, treatment combinations of V, R, and T also substantially increase the incidence of AEs, and lead to a higher risk of treatment discontinuation. Their effectiveness and safety profiles may best be analysed in further randomised head-to-head trials. Further trials should focus on consistent reporting of safety outcomes and should use a standardised instrument to evaluate QoL to ensure comparability of treatment-combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Piechotta
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50937
| | - Tina Jakob
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50937
| | - Peter Langer
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50937
| | - Ina Monsef
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50937
| | - Christof Scheid
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Stem Cell Transplantation Program, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50937
| | - Lise J Estcourt
- NHS Blood and Transplant, Haematology/Transfusion Medicine, Level 2, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 9BQ
| | - Sunday Ocheni
- University of Nigeria, Department of Haematology & Immunology, Ituku-Ozalla Campus, Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria
| | - Sebastian Theurich
- University Hospital LMU, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Medicine III, Marchioninistrasse 15, Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 81377
| | - Kathrin Kuhr
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, Germany, 50937
| | - Benjamin Scheckel
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50937
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Gleueler Str. 176-178, Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50935
| | - Anne Adams
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, Germany, 50937
| | - Nicole Skoetz
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cochrane Cancer, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, Germany, 50937
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ramasamy K, Dhanasiri S, Thom H, Buchanan V, Robinson S, D'Souza VK, Weisel K. Relative efficacy of treatment options in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results from a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. Leuk Lymphoma 2019; 61:668-679. [PMID: 31709875 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1683736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Established treatments for transplant-ineligible (TNE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) include melphalan and prednisone (MP) combined with either bortezomib (VMP) or thalidomide (MPT), or lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd). New treatments for TNE NDMM include Rd plus bortezomib (RVd) and daratumumab plus VMP (VMP + D), daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D + Rd). Relative efficacy of these treatments was compared using a network meta-analysis. Eight trials identified by a systematic literature review were included in the primary analysis; hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were used. Rd was superior to other MP-based regimens for OS and PFS. There was strong evidence that, compared with Rd, both D + Rd and RVd improved PFS (HR 0.57; 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.43, 0.73 and HR 0.72; 95% CrI 0.56, 0.91, respectively). However, there was strong evidence only for RVd in respect to OS (HR 0.72; 95% CrI 0.52, 0.96).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karthik Ramasamy
- National Institute for Health Research, Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Howard Thom
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | | - Katja Weisel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Monoclonal Antibody Therapies in Multiple Myeloma: A Challenge to Develop Novel Targets. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2019; 2019:6084012. [PMID: 31781214 PMCID: PMC6875016 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6084012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The treatment options in multiple myeloma (MM) has changed dramatically over the past decade with the development of novel agents such as proteasome inhibitors (PIs); bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs); thalidomide, and lenalidomide which revealed high efficacy and improvement of overall survival (OS) in MM patients. However, despite these progresses, most patients relapse and become eventually refractory to these therapies. Thus, the development of novel, targeted immunotherapies has been pursued aggressively. Recently, next-generation PIs; carfilzomib and ixazomib, IMiD; pomalidomide, histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDADi); panobinostat and monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs); and elotuzumab and daratumumab have emerged, and especially, combination of mAbs plus novel agents has led to dramatic improvements in the outcome of MM patients. The field of immune therapies has been accelerating in the treatment of hematological malignancies and has also taken center stage in MM. This review focuses on an overview of current status of novel MoAb therapy including bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody (BsAb), antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, in relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). Lastly, investigational novel MoAb-based therapy to overcome immunotherapy resistance in MM is shown.
Collapse
|
17
|
Sekine L, Ziegelmann PK, Manica D, Pithan CDF, Sosnoski M, Morais VD, Falcetta FS, Ribeiro MR, Salazar AP, Ribeiro RA. Upfront treatment for newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 14,533 patients over 29 randomized clinical trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 143:102-116. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2018] [Revised: 05/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|