Rescue factor VIII replacement to secure hemostasis in a patient with hemophilia A and inhibitors on emicizumab prophylaxis undergoing hip replacement

Shifting Paradigms and Arising Concerns in Severe Hemophilia A Treatment

The management of hemophilia A has undergone a remarkable revolution, in line with technological advancement. In the recent past, the primary concern associated with Factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates was the risk of infections, which is now almost resolved by advanced blood screening and viral inactivation methods. Improving patients' compliance with prophylaxis has become a key focus, as it can lead to improved health outcomes and reduced health care costs in the long term. Recent bioengineering research is directed toward prolonging the recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) coagulant activity and synthesising higher FVIII yields. As an outcome, B-domain deleted, polyethylene glycolated, single-chain, Fc-fused rFVIII, and rFVIIIFc-von Willebrand Factor-XTEN are available for patients. Moreover, emicizumab, a bispecific antibody, is commercially available, whereas fitusiran and tissue factor pathway inhibitor are in clinical trial stages as alternative strategies for patients with inhibitors. With these advancements, noninfectious complications, such as inhibitor development, allergic reactions, and thrombosis, are emerging concerns requiring careful management. In addition, the recent approval of gene therapy is a major milestone toward a permanent cure for hemophilia A. The vast array of treatment options at our disposal today empowers patients and providers alike, to tailor therapeutic regimens to the unique needs of each individual. Despite significant progress in modern treatment options, these highly effective therapies are markedly more expensive than conventional replacement therapy, limiting their access for patients in developing countries.

Pharmacodynamics Monitoring of Emicizumab in Patients with Hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

 Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody mimicking coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) employed to treat patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) regardless of FVIII inhibitor status. The identification of biological markers reflecting the hemostatic competence of patients under emicizumab therapy would have a great clinical value. Unfortunately, emicizumab over-corrects standard coagulation assays, precluding their use for evaluating the hemostatic correction achieved in vivo. Here, we investigated whether global coagulation assays (GCA) would allow monitoring the biological response to non-factor replacement therapy with emicizumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Six adults PwHA received a weekly dose of emicizumab of 3 mg/kg during weeks (W) 1 4 and 1.5 mg/kg from W5 onwards. Response to treatment was monitored weekly by emicizumab plasma concentration, thrombin generation (TG), and fibrin clot formation (FCF) and structure. TG and FCF results were compared to patient baseline, FVIII replacement, and healthy donors.

RESULTS

 TG and FCF significantly increased in PwHA after the loading period, reaching a plateau that lasted until the end of monitoring. Similarly, fibrin clot network became denser with thinner fibrin fibers. However, TG contrary to FCF remained at the lower limits of reference values. Remarkably, despite having similar plateau concentrations of emicizumab some patients showed markedly different degrees of TG and FCF improvement.

CONCLUSION

 Our study enriches the knowledge on the use of GCA to monitor non-factor replacement therapy, indicating that TG and FCF could act as direct markers of emicizumab biological activity. GCA allow to capture and visualize the individually variable response to emicizumab, leading a step forward to the personalization of patient treatment.

Two pediatric cases of severe hemophilia A in which emicizumab prophylaxis failed to prevent traumatic extra-articular hemorrhage

Emicizumab reduces bleeding episodes in patients with severe hemophilia A (PwHA). Little information is available on hemostatic management of severe traumatic hemorrhages in emicizumab-treated pediatric PwHA. We assessed therapeutic efficacy and global coagulation potentials in two pediatric cases of emicizumab-treated pediatric PwHA with intracranial or retroperitoneal/iliopsoas hemorrhage. A modified clot waveform analysis (CWA) triggered by mixtures of tissue factor and ellagic acid was used to assess coagulant potentials, and maximum coagulant velocity (Ad|min1|) was calculated. One patient with intracranial hemorrhage was treated with continuous infusions of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) at a dose of 4-4.6 IU/kg/hr for 9 days, followed by bolus infusion at 66 IU/kg/day for 2 days and 33 IU/kg/day for an additional 2 days. The Ad|min1| was increased from 5.5 (at baseline) to 7.0-8.1 under concomitant treatment and maintained within or near normal range (IQR; 6.9-7.7). The other patient with retroperitoneal/iliopsoas hemorrhage received bolus infusions of rFVIII at 50 IU/kg/day for 20 days and every-other-day infusion of rFVIII for 8 days. The Ad|min1| was increased from 5.2 (at baseline) to 5.8-6.8 under concomitant treatment and maintained within the normal range. We successfully managed a treatment plan for severe traumatic bleeding in emicizumab-treated pediatric PwHA using modified CWA.

Emicizumab: a novel drug in hemophilia A prophylaxis - a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A is a genetically conditioned disease leading to hemostatic disorders due to factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency. The treatment of hemophilia has evolved throughout the past years and has significantly changed. One of the newest drugs for prophylactic treatment is the humanized bispecific IgG antibody - emicizumab, which binds with factor IXa and factor X, bridging those factors and thus mimicking the activity of factor VIII.

AREAS COVERED

The literature search was made via PubMed database, with the emphasis on clinical trials and case reports, describing the off-label emicizumab use. This review presents an extensive summary and considers advantages and disadvantages (side-effects) of emicizumab, describing additional clinical situations, where emicizumab has been successfully used. In our review we cover information about the mechanisms of action, indications, efficacy and discuss some chosen case reports about off-label emicizumab use.

EXPERT OPINION

Its convenient administration method (subcutaneous) and frequency of injections (from once a week to once a month) makes it a more comfortable treatment, limiting injection-site reactions, hospital stays, costs of prophylaxis, and significantly increasing patients' quality of life. Adverse effects are scarce and rarely serious - the most common ones are reactions at the injection-site and upper respiratory tract infections.

Surgical outcomes in people with hemophilia A taking emicizumab prophylaxis: experience from the HAVEN 1-4 studies

Many people with hemophilia A (PwHA) undergo surgery in their lifetime, often because of complications of their disease. Emicizumab is the first bispecific monoclonal antibody prophylactic therapy for PwHA, and its efficacy and safety have been previously demonstrated; however, there is a need to build an evidence base on the management of PwHA on emicizumab undergoing surgery. Data from the HAVEN 1-4 phase 3 clinical trials were pooled to provide a summary of all minor and major surgeries in PwHA with or without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors who were receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. Overall, 233 surgeries were carried out during the HAVEN 1-4 trials: 215 minor surgeries (including minor dental and joint procedures, central venous access device placement or removal, and endoscopies) in 115 PwHA (64 with FVIII inhibitors) and 18 major surgeries (including arthroplasty and synovectomy) in 18 PwHA (10 with FVIII inhibitors). Perioperative hemostatic support was at the discretion of the treating physician. Overall, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 33.5 (13.0-49.0) years and the median (IQR) emicizumab exposure time before surgery was 278.0 (177.0-431.0) days. Among the 215 minor surgeries, 141 (65.6%) were managed without additional prophylactic factor concentrate, and of those, 121 (85.8%) were not associated with a postoperative bleed. The majority (15 of 18 [83.3%]) of major surgeries were managed with additional prophylactic factor concentrate. Twelve (80.0%) of these 15 surgeries were associated with no intraoperative or postoperative bleeds. The data demonstrate that minor and major surgeries can be performed safely in PwHA receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. These trials are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02622321, #NCT02795767, #NCT02847637, and #NCT03020160.

Managing invasive procedures in haemophilia patients with limited resources, extended half-life concentrates or non-replacement therapies in 2022

New treatment possibilities and modalities are now available globally for patients with haemophilia requiring surgery or invasive procedures. The first is the appropriate application of low-dose protocols of clotting factor concentrates (CFC) achieving adequate perioperative haemostasis in resources constraint environments. The increasing availability of CFC through humanitarian aid programs allows more invasive surgeries to be performed for which efficacy and safety data should be more widely collected and reported. Second, extended half-life CFC that are increasingly available in many countries represent valuable alternatives to standard half-life products in surgical patients allowing reduced number of infusions and lower consumption, in particular for extended half-life factor IX. Third, in the era of recently introduced nonfactor prophylaxis, some minor surgical procedures can now be performed without additional haemostatic treatment, others with few low-dose administrations of CFC or bypassing agents. Additional factor VIII/IX or recombinant activated factor VII has proven to be safe and effective in association with emicizumab for major surgeries and it was effectively given at low doses in association with fitusiran (including activated prothrombin complex concentrate). No thrombotic complications have been reported in the surgical setting so far. A multidisciplinary team/facility remains crucial to manage major surgery in patients on prophylaxis with these new agents.

Thrombin generation for monitoring hemostatic therapy in hemophilia A: A narrative review

Patients with severe hemophilia A (HA) have an increased risk of spontaneous and trauma-related bleeding because of a congenital absence of factor VIII (FVIII). Most severe HA patients use prophylactic FVIII concentrate, the effect of which can be monitored with FVIII activity level measurement. However, FVIII activity level is less valuable in predicting the potential clinical bleeding risk. Some patients still experience breakthrough bleeds despite adequate FVIII trough levels, whereas others do not bleed with trough levels below threshold. This difference may be caused by inter-individual differences in pro- and anticoagulant factors, the so-called hemostatic balance. Thrombin generation assays (TGAs) measure the hemostatic balance as a whole. Thereby, the TGAs may be a better tool in the guidance and monitoring of treatment in HA patients. In addition, TGAs offer the opportunity to determine the response to bypassing agents and treatment with non-factor replacement therapy, in which FVIII activity assays are not suitable for monitoring. This review summarizes the current knowledge about monitoring different HA treatment modalities by TGA, as a single treatment option and when used in a concomitant fashion.

Monitoring of new therapies for hemophilia

Nonreplacement therapies, such as emicizumab (Hemlibra, Roche) and other myriad of molecules are still under study as concizumab (and other anti-TFPI) and fitusiran are transforming the quality of life and treatment of this group of patients. So far, laboratory monitorization has not been an obligate condition for the use of these novel therapies, though in some cases like their combination with bypassing agents to control breakthrough/surgical bleeds may seek for laboratory assays to ensure a well tolerated and effective utilization withing these special scenarios. In the next pages, application of global coagulation assays, for example, thrombinography or rotational thrombelastography will be referred looking to the works of some groups from around the world including our own experience.

Challenges of biological monitoring in a hemophilia A patient without inhibitors on emicizumab undergoing major orthopedic surgery: a case report

A man with severe hemophilia A (HA) without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors was admitted for total arthroplasty of his elbow. The patient was being treated with emicizumab, with his last administration given 8 days before surgery. Preoperatively, he received a bolus of 4000 international units (IU) of recombinant (r)FVIII. Throughout the operation, a continuous infusion of 4 IU/kg/h was administered and maintained over 24 hours. On the first postoperative day, the FVIII infusion rate was reduced to 225 IU/h for 4 days and stopped on the fifth day. Under this treatment, no bleeding complications occurred. Emicizumab is known to interfere with a wide range of coagulation assays, thereby challenging replacement therapy monitoring before, during, and after surgery. In this case study, we report on the assessment of FVIII levels at different time points using various reagents. We conclude that for both hematologists and non-hematology clinicians, it is crucial to be aware of emicizumab interferences with routine coagulation tests so as to avoid misinterpretation. In addition, laboratory specialists must be familiar with this treatment in order to select appropriate coagulation tests and provide rapid and reliable result interpretations.

Concomitant use of bypassing agents with emicizumab for people with haemophilia A and inhibitors undergoing surgery

INTRODUCTION

Surgery in people with haemophilia and factor VIII inhibitors is typically managed with perioperative administration of haemostatic agents to prevent or control the occurrence of bleeding events. Practical experience of surgery in patients with inhibitors who are receiving treatment with emicizumab is growing; however, the novelty of the situation means that standardised guidelines are lacking with regard to the concomitant administration of haemostatic agents, including dose and laboratory monitoring.

AIM

To review approaches to haemostatic management during major and minor invasive procedures in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors, and to provide recommendations for controlling bleeding events.

METHODS

A search was conducted, limited to the past 4 years (January 2016-April 2020), pertaining to published evidence of surgery for patients receiving emicizumab. Publications identified from the search were manually reviewed to determine studies and case reports relevant for inclusion.

RESULTS

Identified literature and practical experience of the authors were used to build a consensus of practical recommendations for the concomitant administration of haemostatic agents during the perioperative period for elective surgery in patients with inhibitors who are receiving emicizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence base indicates that surgery can be successfully performed in patients with inhibitors who are receiving emicizumab and that bypassing agents can be used concomitantly. Data from prospective studies are required to further support recommendations for haemostatic management of surgery in patients receiving emicizumab.

Bispecific antibodies for the treatment of hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody exerting cofactor function of FVIIIa irrespective of the presence of FVIII inhibitors. Long-term data of phase 1/2 and phase 3 studies have been accumulated. Various questions such as indicated patients, ITI, application to PUPs, hemostatic treatment including surgeries, and emicizumab-related morbidity remain to be solved.

AREAS COVERED

The review describes the mode of action, data from pre-/post-marketing and ongoing clinical studies according to PubMed search and our own works.

EXPERT OPINION

For patients with a persistent inhibitor, emicizumab is a definite therapeutic option, although the possibility of BPAs-associated thromboembolic/TMA events raises concerns. The use of ITI together with emicizumab prophylaxis is being examined in clinical trials. For non-inhibitor, especially pediatric patients, emicizumab prophylaxis can be an option. Outcome assessment 'beyond ABR' such as joint health, physical/mental activity, QOL is required. Furthermore, continuous data collection for emicizumab-related adverse events and morbidity would be recommended.

Practical considerations for nonfactor-replacement therapies in the treatment of haemophilia with inhibitors

New therapeutic agents for haemophilia with inhibitors that are in development or already licensed are expected to provide transformative treatment options. Many of these new therapies are not based on simply replacing the missing factor; new strategies include bispecific antibody technology that mimics factor VIII coagulation function (emicizumab), and inhibition of anticoagulant proteins such as tissue factor pathway inhibitor (eg PF-06741086) and antithrombin (eg fitusiran). These agents are administered subcutaneously and should significantly reduce treatment burden and increase the ability to deliver prophylaxis for patients. Limited real-world data and validated practical guidance on these recently licensed/upcoming treatments resulted in the authors convening to discuss recommendations on their use. Emicizumab is currently the only licenced nonfactor therapy; thus, our recommendations focus on this product. Target candidates for emicizumab prophylaxis are difficult-to-treat patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors and/or venous access issues, frequent bleeds and target joints. In case of breakthrough bleeding while receiving emicizumab, patients still require treatment with bypassing agents; the adjunct treatment of choice is recombinant activated factor VII. This treatment is also recommended to prevent bleeds in patients with inhibitors undergoing surgery. Our recommendations on suitable laboratory assays and monitoring new products, as well as the benefit of patient-reported outcomes (such as pain and physical activity levels), are included. We also briefly discuss future treatment options for patients with haemophilia B and inhibitors. Although these nonfactor treatments offer great promise, further data and real-world evidence are needed.

Emicizumab prophylaxis: Prospective longitudinal real-world follow-up and monitoring

INTRODUCTION

Real-world data on prophylaxis of severe haemophilia A (HA) patients treated by emicizumab are scarce.

AIM

To study the efficacy and safety of longitudinal emicizumab prophylaxis and assess laboratory monitoring correlations in a large patient cohort.

METHODS

HA patients with and without FVIII inhibitors, initiating emicizumab prophylaxis, were prospectively enrolled. Bleeding, adverse events and surgeries were documented. FVIII inhibitors, emicizumab levels and thrombin generation (TG) were sequentially measured.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients, including 58 children (whose median (IQR) age was 6 (1-11) years) with severe HA, composed the study cohort. Twenty-nine per cent (31/107) of our HA patients had FVIII inhibitors. Patients were followed for a median of 67 weeks (up to 144 weeks). Fifty-three patients, whose median follow-up was 53 weeks, experienced zero bleeds. Most bleeds (94%) among children were trauma-related, whereas 61% of adults sustained spontaneous joint bleeds. Four patients experienced major bleeds, with a fatal outcome in one infant, who also presented with central venous line thrombosis. No other serious adverse events were encountered. Seven patients have decided to stop emicizumab treatment for various reasons. Emicizumab plasma levels increased after emicizumab prophylaxis initiation, and values were maintained during follow-up, in all but one patient, suspected of anti-drug antibodies. A significant reduction of FVIII inhibitor levels was noted among inhibitor patients. TG was increased and sustained yet could not prognosticate bleeding risk.

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab prophylaxis was mostly well tolerated, although 50% of patients experienced breakthrough bleeds. Routine TG monitoring is not obligatory, and further studies are warranted in selected patient populations.

Emicizumab prophylaxis in haemophilia patients older than 50 years with cardiovascular risk factors: Real-world data

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab (Hemlibra™) is approved for prophylaxis of Haemophilia A (HA) patients with and without inhibitors. However, real-world data on emicizumab use in the elderly HA patients with concomitant cardiovascular risk factors are lacking.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of emicizumab in a real-world cohort of elderly HA patients.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal observational study on HA patients over 50 years old treated, followed and monitored during emicizumab prophylaxis was conducted. We documented any bleeding or adverse events and collected plasma samples for emicizumab levels, aPTT and thrombin generation (TG).

RESULTS

Seventeen HA patients (2 with inhibitor), whose median age was 62.4 years (range: 51.5-77.1) composed the cohort, including 9/17 with multiple cardiovascular risk factors (high risk group). Seven patients had chronic HIV infection. The median follow-up of our cohort was 400 days (range 89-805, IQR 211-479 days). The median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) significantly decreased for all patients. Among patients who displayed significant bleeding tendencies, emicizumab steady state levels as well as TG were lower as compared with the group. The ABR of four patients concomitantly treated by antiplatelet agents was significantly higher compared with the rest of the cohort. Neither thrombosis nor thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) was encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

Emicizumab prophylaxis for HA patients older than 50 years including those with cardiovascular risk factors was well tolerated. As lower emicizumab and TG levels were observed among bleeding patients, we suggest that monitoring laboratory assays could be of value within this age group.

The changing treatment landscape in haemophilia: from standard half-life clotting factor concentrates to gene editing

Congenital haemophilia A (factor VIII deficiency) and B (factor IX deficiency) are X-linked bleeding disorders. Replacement therapy has been the cornerstone of the management of haemophilia, aiming to reduce the mortality and morbidity of chronic crippling arthropathy. Frequent intravenous injections are burdensome and costly for patients, consequently with poor adherence and restricted access to therapy for many patients worldwide. Bioengineered clotting factors with enhanced pharmacokinetic profiles can reduce the burden of treatment. However, replacement therapy is associated with a risk for inhibitor development that adversely affects bleeding prevention and outcomes. Novel molecules that are subcutaneously delivered provide effective prophylaxis in the presence or absence of inhibitors, either substituting for the procoagulant function of clotting factors (eg, emicizumab) or targeting the natural inhibitors of coagulation (ie, antithrombin, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, or activated protein C). The ultimate goal of haemophilia treatment would be a phenotypical cure achievable with gene therapy, currently under late phase clinical investigation.

Clot waveform analysis for perioperative hemostatic monitoring of arthroscopic synovectomy in a pediatric patient with hemophilia A and inhibitor receiving emicizumab prophylaxis

Emicizumab reduces bleeding in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors (PwHA-I). Coagulation potential during the perioperative period in emicizumab-treated PwHA-I undergoing surgery remains to be evaluated. We describe a 14-year-old boy with HA-I receiving emicizumab prophylaxis who experienced arthroscopic synovectomy. He was treated with a bolus infusion of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa; 80 μg/kg) immediately before surgery, and treatment continued at the same dose every 3 h on day 1, every 4 h on day 2, and every 6 h on day 3. Treatment with rFVIIa was discontinued on day 4. No perioperative bleeding or thrombotic events were observed. Coagulation potential throughout the perioperative period was retrospectively assessed with an easy-to-use clot waveform analysis (CWA). Measurements from CWA returned to within or near the normal range, suggesting successful hemostatic management. Coagulation potentials assessed by CWA showed a significant correspondence with those from a thrombin generation assay (TGA) that is already in use. CWA and TGA could both provide useful data for assessing coagulation potential in the perioperative hemostatic management of emicizumab-treated PwHA-I.

Origins, Development, Current Challenges and Future Directions with Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for the Treatment of Patients with Congenital Haemophilia with Inhibitors

Congenital haemophilia A (HA) is caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) activity, leading to spontaneous or traumatic bleeding events. While FVIII replacement therapy can treat and prevent bleeds, approximately 30% of patients with severe HA develop inhibitor antibodies that render FVIII replacement therapy ineffective. The bypassing agents (BPAs), activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and recombinant activated FVII, first approved in 1977 and 1996, respectively, act to generate thrombin independent of pathways that involve factors IX and VIII. Both may be used in patients with congenital haemophilia and inhibitors (PwHIs) for the treatment and prevention of acute bleeds and quickly became standard of care. However, individual patients respond differently to different agents. While both agents are approved for on-demand treatment and perioperative management for patients with congenital haemophilia with inhibitors, aPCC is currently the only BPA approved worldwide for prophylaxis in PwHI. Non-factor therapies (NFTs) have a mechanism of action distinct from BPAs and have reported higher efficacy rates as prophylactic regimens. Nonetheless, treatment challenges remain with NFTs, particularly regarding the potential for synergistic action on thrombin generation with concomitant use of other haemostatic agents, such as BPAs, for the treatment of breakthrough bleeds and in perioperative management. Concomitant use of NFTs with other haemostatic agents could increase the risk of adverse events such as thromboembolic events or thrombotic microangiopathy. This review focuses on the origins, development and on-going role of aPCC in the evolving treatment landscape in the management of PwHI.

Optimizing the management of patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors in the era of emicizumab: Recommendations from a German expert panel

Standard treatment of haemophilia A is based on replacing the missing coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) to treat and prevent bleeding episodes. The most challenging complication of FVIII therapy is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) that can render treatment ineffective. Eradication of the inhibitor through immune tolerance induction (ITI) remains the most effective strategy for managing these patients. Bypassing agents can be used to help restore haemostasis in inhibitor patients. Several novel agents have recently been developed, such as the FVIII mimetic agent emicizumab, which has been effective in reducing the annualized bleeding rate in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. When coadministered with repetitive high doses of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (ie >100 U/kg/d for ≥24 hours), emicizumab was associated with thrombotic microangiopathy and thrombosis events. As a consequence the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centres Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO) issued the first guidance on the treatment of bleeding episodes in patients receiving emicizumab. To build on and extend this work, a panel of German haemophilia specialists met to discuss the UK guidance, review current evidence and provide additional guidance for German healthcare professionals on how to optimize the management of patients with haemophilia A receiving emicizumab. Recommendations are provided on the use of bypassing and other agents to manage breakthrough bleeding, ITI in the emicizumab era, haemostatic support during surgery and issues relating to laboratory monitoring.

Practical Guidance of the GTH Haemophilia Board on the Use of Emicizumab in Patients with Haemophilia A

Emicizumab has been approved for bleeding prophylaxis in patients with haemophilia A (PWHAs) with or without inhibitors. Because of substantial differences between factor VIII (FVIII) and Emicizumab, the 'Ständige Kommission Hämophilie' of the German, Austrian, Swiss Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research (GTH) established a practical guidance for the use of Emicizumab in PWHAs. A systematic literature research was conducted in PubMed. Based on this and on personal experience, this practical guidance has been developed. Each single statement has been discussed among members of the 'Ständige Kommission Hämophilie' and revised accordingly. The final set of recommendations has been approved by all authors analogous to the Delphi method. This practical guidance is provided for physicians treating PWHAs with regard to general aspects, patient education, bleeding treatment, surgery, use of Emicizumab in previously untreated patients (PUPs), patients with newly diagnosed inhibitors and elderly patients. Patients should be treated in expert centres and adequate laboratory tests to monitor Emicizumab levels, FVIII replacement and inhibitors should be available. Early experience of immune tolerance induction protocols integrating Emicizumab is reviewed, and the limited experience in PUPs and very young children is described. So far, no thromboembolic complications have been reported with the concomitant use of FVIII or recombinant activated FVII for bleeding treatment or surgery. Activated prothrombin complex concentrate doses of >100 U/kg for >24 hours should be avoided whenever possible because of the high risk of thrombosis and/or thrombotic microangiopathy. In conclusion, this study is designed to support haemophilia physicians using Emicizumab in physicians treating hemophilia and using (PWHAs). With further post-marketing experience and trials, regular updates are necessary.

Concomitant Use of rFVIIa and Emicizumab in People with Hemophilia A with Inhibitors: Current Perspectives and Emerging Clinical Evidence

Emicizumab, a humanized, bi-specific, monoclonal antibody subcutaneously administered, mimicking the function of FVIIIa, represents a milestone in treatment of patients affected by hemophilia A complicated with inhibitors. The HAVEN 1 and 2 studies have clearly established its superiority compared to bypassing agents for routine prophylaxis in preventing or reducing bleeding episodes in adult and pediatric patients with inhibitors. However, its protection against bleeding is only partial, and concomitant use of a bypassing agent may be required with potential prothrombotic risk. The emicizumab Phase III trials (HAVEN 1, 2 and 4) have shown that the traditional bypassing agents, activated prothrombin complex concentrates or recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), may be necessary for the treatment of breakthrough bleeds or surgery management. A post hoc analysis in particular has shown that the concomitant use of emicizumab and rFVIIa is safe and no thrombotic events have been described. The review describes the state of the art of the concomitant use of emicizumab and rFVIIa for treating acute bleeding and surgeries, its efficacy and safety and the lack of thrombotic events associated with this treatment modality. Data still derive mainly from HAVEN trials; however, the availability of emicizumab in clinical practice is progressively increasing the number of patients treated and no adverse events directly attributed to this agent have occurred. The availability of guidelines for the use and dosing of rFVIIa during emicizumab prophylaxis is useful in clinical practice for managing suspected or ongoing bleeding, emergency situations and elective invasive procedures. In the next years, careful prospective post-licensure surveillance to monitor safety of rFVIIa use during prophylaxis with emicizumab is highly recommended.

Invasive procedures in patients with haemophilia: Review of low-dose protocols and experience with extended half-life FVIII and FIX concentrates and non-replacement therapies

The performance of surgery and invasive procedures in patients with haemophilia is currently facing new challenges globally. The first is the appropriate application of low-dose protocols of clotting factor concentrates (CFC) achieving adequate perioperative haemostasis in resource constraint environments. The increasing availability of CFC through humanitarian aid programmes allows more invasive surgeries to be performed for which efficacy and safety data should be more widely collected and reported. Second, extended half-life CFC that are increasingly available in many countries represent valuable alternatives to standard half-life products in surgical patients allowing reduced number of infusions and lower consumption, in particular for extended half-life factor IX. Third, in the era of recently introduced non-factor prophylaxis, some minor surgical procedures can now be performed without additional haemostatic treatment, others with few low-dose administrations of CFC or bypassing agents. Additional factor VIII or bypassing treatment has proven to be safe and effective in association with emicizumab for major surgeries, and it was effectively given at low doses in association with fitusiran. No thrombotic complications have been reported in the surgical setting so far. A multidisciplinary team/facility remains crucial to manage major surgery in patients on prophylaxis with these new agents.

Emergency management in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors on prophylaxis with emicizumab: AICE practical guidance in collaboration with SIBioC, SIMEU, SIMEUP, SIPMeL and SISET

Emicizumab has been approved in several countries for regular prophylaxis in patients with congenital haemophilia A and FVIII inhibitors because it substantially reduces their bleeding risk and improves quality of life. However, although significantly less frequent, some breakthrough bleeds may still occur while on emicizumab, requiring treatment with bypassing or other haemostatic agents. Thrombotic complications have been reported with the associated use of activated prothrombin complex concentrates. In addition, when surgery/invasive procedures are needed while on emicizumab, their management requires multidisciplinary competences and direct supervision by experts in the use of this agent. Given this, and in order to expand the current knowledge on the use of emicizumab and concomitant haemostatic agents, and reduce the risk of complications in this setting, the Italian Association of Haemophilia Centres (AICE) here provides guidance on the management of breakthrough bleeds and surgery in emergency situations in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors on emicizumab prophylaxis. This paper has been shared with other National Scientific Societies involved in the field.

Management of bleeding and invasive procedures in haemophilia A patients with inhibitor treated with emicizumab (Hemlibra® ): Proposals from the French network on inherited bleeding disorders (MHEMO), the French Reference Centre on Haemophilia, in collaboration with the French Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP)

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab (Hemlibra^® ) recently became available and requires an adaptation for managing bleeding, suspected bleeding and emergency or scheduled invasive procedures in haemophilia A patients with inhibitor. This implicates a multidisciplinary approach and redaction of recommendations for care that must be regularly adapted to the available data.

AIM

The following text aims to provide a guide for the management of people with haemophilia A with inhibitor treated with emicizumab in case of bleeding or invasives procedures.

METHODS

The French network on inherited bleeding disorders (MHEMO), the French Reference Centre on Haemophilia (CRH), in collaboration with the French Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) have been working together to make proposals for the management of these situations.

RESULTS

Haemostatic treatment and other medications should be given stepwise, according to the severity and location of the bleeding or the risk of bleeding of the procedure as well as the haemostatic response obtained at each step in order to ensure an optimal benefit/risk ratio.

CONCLUSION

The lack of data means that it is only possible to issue proposals rather than recommendations.

Management of perioperative hemostasis in a severe hemophilia A patient with inhibitors on emicizumab using global hemostasis assays

Background:

Patients with severe hemophilia A and inhibitors are at risk of bleeding during invasive procedures. The standard of care for preventing perioperative bleeding has been replacement therapy with FVIII concentrates or for patients with high-titer inhibitors, bypassing agents. However, there is no consensus on the appropriate management of surgery in patients receiving the novel agent emicizumab. The aim of this study was to demonstrate a case of a patient on emicizumab undergoing major surgery with bypassing agents with preoperative use of the thrombin generation assay (TGA) and thromboelastography (TEG).

Methods:

We report a patient with hemophilia A with inhibitors who had undergone a total knee replacement while on emicizumab combined with a bypassing agent. We utilized TEG and TGA to determine which bypassing agent to choose as well as to inform about the ideal dose.

Results:

We elected to use recombinant FVIIa as a bypassing agent for the surgery based upon the TGA results.

Conclusion:

The TGA can be utilized to support decision-making in patients on emicizumab undergoing major surgery to both predict efficacy and potentially minimize the risk of thrombotic events.