PD-1 blockade as bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma patients: a retrospective single center case series

Management of classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a look at up to date evidence and current treatment approaches

The treatment landscape of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has undergone significant changes over the past 20 years. Gradual improvements have been made in the management of cHL patients, particularly in prolonging the survival rate for those in the relapsed setting. Most of these improvements came with the addition of brentuximab vedotin and PD1 blockade (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) into the current cHL treatment algorithms. On the other hand, the treatment approach to cHL has become more complex than ever before, with multiple ways to add and sequence therapies to achieve long-term remission. In this review, we will discuss the most up-to-date evidence on the management of cHL patients with the inclusion of ongoing clinical trials in cHL. We will provide a general overview of the current therapeutic landscape of cHL in light of these most recent data. We conclude with our perspective on how the approach to cHL treatment may evolve in the future.

Real-world outcomes of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma in the era of novel therapies: a Canadian perspective

BACKGROUND

Despite high cure rates with frontline therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), about 30% of patients will relapse or have primary refractory disease (R/r). Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is the standard of care for R/r disease and alloHSCT is a curative option for patients in second relapse. Novel agents are being incorporated for the treatment of R/r HL, such that the optimal timing of transplant is currently being challenged. Additionally, because access to these new agents varies amongst transplant centers, we sought to offer a Canadian perspective to the treatment of R/r HL and demonstrate the utility and effectiveness of both AHSCT and alloHSCT for the treatment of R/r HL.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study examined outcomes in 89 consecutive patients with R/r HL treated with AHSCT between January 2007 and December 2019. A total of 17 patients underwent alloHSCT either as a tandem auto-allo approach or as salvage therapy.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 5.0 years, the estimated 5-year PFS and OS for patients undergoing AHSCT were 57.5% (95% CI 45.2-68.0) and 81.3% (95% CI 70.0-88.8), respectively. Corresponding figures for patients who underwent alloHSCT were 76.5% (95% CI 48.8-90.4) and 82.4% (95% CI 54.7-93.9). NRM at 100 days and 5 years was 0% and 9.4% post AHSCT and 0% and 5.9% post alloHSCT. Cumulative incidence (CI) of acute GVHD at day +100 was 35.3% (95% CI 17.7 - 62.3) and CI of chronic GVHD at 1 year was 23.5% (95% CI 6.9 - 45.8).

CONCLUSIONS

AHSCT and alloHSCT can both provide robust and prolonged disease control and new agents should be used as a bridge to improve the curative potential of these definitive cellular therapies.

Allogeneic transplantation after PD-1 blockade for classic Hodgkin lymphoma

Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies yield high response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), but most patients will eventually progress. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) after PD-1 blockade may be associated with increased toxicity, raising challenging questions about the role, timing, and optimal method of transplantation in this setting. To address these questions, we assembled a retrospective cohort of 209 cHL patients who underwent alloHCT after PD-1 blockade. With a median follow-up among survivors of 24 months, the 2-year cumulative incidences (CIs) of non-relapse mortality and relapse were 14 and 18%, respectively; the 2-year graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and relapse-free survival (GRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival were 47%, 69%, and 82%, respectively. The 180-day CI of grade 3-4 acute GVHD was 15%, while the 2-year CI of chronic GVHD was 34%. In multivariable analyses, a longer interval from PD-1 to alloHCT was associated with less frequent severe acute GVHD, while additional treatment between PD-1 and alloHCT was associated with a higher risk of relapse. Notably, post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based GVHD prophylaxis was associated with significant improvements in PFS and GRFS. While awaiting prospective clinical trials, PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis may be considered the optimal transplantation strategy for this patient population.

Emerging Therapies in Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: What Comes Next After Brentuximab Vedotin and PD-1 Inhibition?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The standard of care for relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients is autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients in a first or second relapse. However, a significant number of patients with r/r HL are either medically ineligible for ASCT or relapse post-ASCT. In recent years, significant advances have been made in the management of r/r HL with the introduction of the anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) brentuximab vedotin (BV) and the anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Nonetheless, despite excellent tolerability and high response rates, the large majority of patients will ultimately progress on these agents. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) has offered a potentially curative option for these patients, but high rates of morbidity and mortality have limited its application, and disease relapse is also common post-alloHCT. Thus, effective therapy for HL patients who fail BV and CPI therapy remains an unmet need. This review will cover different treatment strategies for HL patients in this setting with a focus on emerging new therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Investigators have explored methods with the potential to restore sensitivity to BV and CPIs in patients who develop resistance. Additionally, promising new therapeutics are emerging, such as CD25-directed ADC therapy and CD30-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. While no consensus guidelines exist for the management of HL patients refractory to BV and checkpoint blockade, potential novel strategies and therapeutics are currently under investigation in hopes of expanding the treatment landscape for this challenging patient population.