Small-molecule SUMO inhibition for biomarker-informed B-cell lymphoma therapy

SUMOylation inhibitor TAK-981 (subasumstat) synergizes with 5-azacytidine in preclinical models of acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemias (AML) are severe hematomalignancies with dismal prognosis. The post-translational modification SUMOylation plays key roles in leukemogenesis and AML response to therapies. Here, we show that TAK-981 (subasumstat), a first-in-class SUMOylation inhibitor, is endowed with potent anti-leukemic activity in various preclinical models of AML. TAK-981 targets AML cell lines and patient blast cells in vitro and in vivo in xenografted mice with minimal toxicity on normal hematopoietic cells. Moreover, it synergizes with 5-azacytidine (AZA), a DNA-hypomethylating agent now used in combination with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax to treat AML patients unfit for standard chemotherapies. Interestingly, TAK-981+AZA combination shows higher anti-leukemic activity than AZA+venetoclax combination both in vitro and in vivo, at least in the models tested. Mechanistically, TAK-981 potentiates the transcriptional reprogramming induced by AZA, promoting apoptosis, alteration of the cell cycle and differentiation of the leukemic cells. In addition, TAK-981+AZA treatment induces many genes linked to inflammation and immune response pathways. In particular, this leads to the secretion of type-I interferon by AML cells. Finally, TAK-981+AZA induces the expression of natural killer-activating ligands (MICA/B) and adhesion proteins (ICAM-1) at the surface of AML cells. Consistently, TAK-981+AZA-treated AML cells activate natural killer cells and increase their cytotoxic activity. Targeting SUMOylation with TAK-981 may thus be a promising strategy to both sensitize AML cells to AZA and reduce their immune-escape capacities.

Actionable loss of SLF2 drives B-cell lymphomagenesis and impairs the DNA damage response

The DNA damage response (DDR) acts as a barrier to malignant transformation and is often impaired during tumorigenesis. Exploiting the impaired DDR can be a promising therapeutic strategy; however, the mechanisms of inactivation and corresponding biomarkers are incompletely understood. Starting from an unbiased screening approach, we identified the SMC5-SMC6 Complex Localization Factor 2 (SLF2) as a regulator of the DDR and biomarker for a B-cell lymphoma (BCL) patient subgroup with an adverse prognosis. SLF2-deficiency leads to loss of DDR factors including Claspin (CLSPN) and consequently impairs CHK1 activation. In line with this mechanism, genetic deletion of Slf2 drives lymphomagenesis in vivo. Tumor cells lacking SLF2 are characterized by a high level of DNA damage, which leads to alterations of the post-translational SUMOylation pathway as a safeguard. The resulting co-dependency confers synthetic lethality to a clinically applicable SUMOylation inhibitor (SUMOi), and inhibitors of the DDR pathway act highly synergistic with SUMOi. Together, our results identify SLF2 as a DDR regulator and reveal co-targeting of the DDR and SUMOylation as a promising strategy for treating aggressive lymphoma.

N6-methyladenosine reader YTHDF3 contributes to the aerobic glycolysis of osteosarcoma through stabilizing PGK1 stability

PURPOSE

N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) modification is a pivotal transcript chemical modification of eukaryotics, which has been identified to play critical roles on tumor metabolic reprogramming. However, the functions of m⁶A-reading protein YTH N⁶-methyladenosine RNA-binding protein 3 (YTHDF3) in osteosarcoma is still unclear. This research planned to investigate the bio-functions and mechanism in osteosarcoma tumorigenesis.

METHODS

The aerobic glycolysis of osteosarcoma cells were calculated by glucose uptake, lactate production analysis, ATP analysis and metabolic flux analysis for extracellular acidification rate (ECAR). Molecular binding was identified by RIP-qPCR, RNA decay analysis.

RESULTS

Results indicated that YTHDF3 is upregulated in the osteosarcoma tissue samples and cells, and closely correlated to the poor prognosis of osteosarcoma patients. Functionally, gain and loss-of-functional assays illustrated that YTHDF3 promoted the proliferation and aerobic glycolysis of osteosarcoma cells in vitro, and accelerated the tumor growth in vivo. Mechanistically, a m⁶A-modified PGK1 mRNA functioned as the target of YTHDF3, and YTHDF3 enhanced the PGK1 mRNA stability via m⁶A-dependent manner.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, these findings indicated that YTHDF3 functioned as an oncogene in osteosarcoma tumorigenesis through m⁶A/PGK1 manner, providing a therapeutic strategy for human osteosarcoma.