Retrospective analysis of a cohort of 41 de novo B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia patients: impact of genetics and targeted therapies (a FILO study)

Understanding splenic B-cell lymphoma/leukaemia with prominent nucleoli: Diagnosis, underpinnings for disease classification and future directions

The 5th edition of the WHO classification of haematolymphoid tumours (WHO-HAEM5) introduced a new category, splenic B-cell lymphoma/leukaemia with prominent nucleoli (SBLPN). The diagnostic entity B-cell prolymphocytic leukaemia (B-PLL) has been discontinued and the category of hairy cell leukaemia variant (HCLv) has been conceptually reframed. B-PLL and HCLv diagnoses were uncommon. Overlap existed between B-PLL and other indolent lymphomas like chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). HCLv lacked consistent cytomorphological, immunophenotypic and genetic features. To address these issues, the WHO-HAEM5 classification has introduced SBLPN to serve as a temporary holding ground for entities that do not neatly fit into the existing classification. Cases previously classified as CD5-negative B-PLL and HCLv fall under the SBLPN category. Some splenic marginal zone lymphoma and splenic diffuse red pulp small B-cell lymphoma cases with higher number of medium or large nucleolated B cells would also be classified as SBLPN under the WHO-HAEM5. This review explores the rationale for discontinuing B-PLL and HCLv diagnoses. It then examines the concept of SBLPN, offers practical guidance for diagnosis and discusses future directions in classifying splenic B-cell lymphomas.

Prolymphocytic Leukaemia: an Update on Biology and Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarises the recent advances in knowledge regarding the biology and treatment of prolymphocytic leukaemias.

RECENT FINDINGS

Both B-PLL and T-PLL are genetically complex, and the molecular landscape of these diseases has been well characterised recently. Diagnostic criteria for T-PLL have been refined with the publication of the first international consensus criteria, whereas the diagnosis of B-PLL has been thrown into question by the most recent WHO classification. Treatment advances in B-PLL have relied heavily on the advances seen in CLL that have then been extrapolated to B-PLL with just a few case reports to support the use of these targeted inhibitors. Despite increased knowledge of the biology of T-PLL and some elegant pre-clinical models to identify potential treatments, unfortunately, no improvements have been made in the treatment of T-PLL. Unmet need is a term oft used for many diseases, but this is particularly true for patients with prolymphocytic leukaemias. Ongoing improvements in our understanding of these diseases will hopefully lead to improved therapies in the future.

The 2022 classifications of lymphoid neoplasms : Keynote

Classification of hematological neoplasms in the past 25 years has been generated through international efforts to achieve broad consensus among professionals. In recent years, the understanding of lymphoid neoplasms has advanced notably, particularly with the impact of genomic studies. Two classifications of these neoplasms were produced in 2022. The International Consensus Classification (ICC) was generated following the same successful process used for the third, fourth, and updated fourth editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Hematologic Neoplasms, coordinated by a steering committee approved by the Executive Committees of the European Association for Haematopathology and the Society of Hematopathology. The topics were prepared by different working groups and subsequently discussed in the clinical advisory committee (CAC) meeting with the participation of a large group of pathologists, clinicians, and scientists who all approved the classification after reaching consensus on all topics. Simultaneously, the International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC) of the WHO has produced the fifth edition of the classification of these neoplasms with a group of professionals appointed by the agency who discussed the proposed classification in different meetings. The definition and criteria for diagnosis of many entities have been refined in both proposals. Terminology for some diseases has been adapted to the current knowledge of their biology. Major findings from recent genomic studies have impacted the conceptual framework and diagnostic criteria for many entities. Although most categories are similar in both classifications, there are also conceptual differences and differences in the diagnostic criteria for some diseases.