3
|
Wang Z, Zhang J, Wen Y, Wang P, Fan L. Bupivacaine inhibits the malignant biological behavior of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells by inhibiting the activation of ERK1/2 and STAT3. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:839. [PMID: 34164473 PMCID: PMC8184410 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-1414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is an aggressive malignant tumor. Bupivacaine (Bupi), a local anesthetic drug, has been shown to display anti-tumor activity against a variety of tumors. Methods We selected OSCC CAL-27 cells as the in vitro model. Cell toxicity, proliferation, apoptosis, and stemness were conducted, respectively. The protein levels of Ki67, PCNA, caspase-3, caspase-9, survivin, SOX2, NANOG, OCT4, STAT3, p-STAT3, ERK1/2, and p-ERK1/2 were evaluated by western blotting. Male BALB/c nude mice xenograft model was used to evaluate the effect of Bupi on tumor growth in vivo. Results Compared with the control group, Bupi (0.2, 0.5, or 1 µm) significantly decreased the cell viability and the proliferation of CAL-27 cells. Meanwhile, Bupi significantly promoted apoptosis of CAL-27 cells compared with the control group. Additionally, Bupi inhibited the stemness of CAL-27 cells which was evidenced by a sphere formation assay. Bupi decreased the phosphorylation level of STAT3 and ERK1/2 in a dose-dependent manner. The addition of interferon-γ (IFN-γ, 20 ng/mL) in the experiment verified the role of Bupi on STAT3 and ERK1/2 signaling. In vivo, Bupi (40 µmol/kg) obviously suppressed the weight and size of the xenograft tumor, the number of apoptotic cells and Ki67+ decreased. Also, Bupi treatment inhibited the expression of stem-like marker proteins. Conclusions Bupi could be used as an anticancer drug against the growth and stemness ability of OSCC. The underlying mechanism may be due to down-regulation of STAT3 and ERK1/2 signaling. This study provides a new insight for the application of Bupi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongchao Wang
- Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration Laboratory, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.,Department of Periodontics & Oral Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Medical Administration Department, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Yongmei Wen
- Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration Laboratory, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.,Department of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Pin Wang
- Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration Laboratory, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.,Department of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Liyuan Fan
- Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration Laboratory, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.,Department of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Santonastaso DP, de Chiara A, Russo E, Gamberini E, Lucchi L, Sibilio A, Bagaphou C, Zani G, Righetti R, Rispoli M, Fusari M, Agnoletti V. A possible future for anaesthesia in breast surgery: thoracic paravertebral block and awake surgery. A prospective observational study. TUMORI JOURNAL 2020; 107:125-131. [PMID: 32842912 DOI: 10.1177/0300891620951626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Quadrantectomy is a surgical procedure traditionally performed under general anaesthesia with intraoperative and postoperative opioid-based analgesia. The use of locoregional anaesthesia techniques in breast surgery has become widespread and allows excellent management of intraoperative and postoperative pain with reduced opioid consumption. We chose thoracic paravertebral block as regional anaesthesia technique in breast surgery to investigate the possibility of carrying out this surgery with the patient awake. METHODS A prospective observational study on 50 patients was designed. The primary outcome for this study was the possibility to carry out the surgery with only the paravertebral block associated with mild sedation without general anaesthesia. Forty minutes before the start of the surgery, an ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block was performed at two thoracic levels, and for each level, 7 mL of ropivacaine 0.7% was injected. Sedation was obtained with target-controlled infusion of propofol. RESULTS Forty-nine patients underwent the operation awake; in one case, we had to place an I-gel and perform general anaesthesia. No patient needed intraoperative or postoperative opioids. The numeric rating scale, recorded at 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36 hours, was greater than 3 in only five patients. CONCLUSIONS We believe that if in the future we try to make quadrantectomy an intervention in which the anaesthesia is exclusively regional, therefore with a patient awake and collaborating, it will not be possible to ignore the use of thoracic paravertebral block.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Annabella de Chiara
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, M. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena (FC), Italy
| | - Emanuele Russo
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, M. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena (FC), Italy
| | - Emiliano Gamberini
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, M. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena (FC), Italy
| | - Leonardo Lucchi
- Day Surgery-Breast Unit, AUSL Romagna, M. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena (FC), Italy
| | - Andrea Sibilio
- General Surgery Unit, AUSL Romagna, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Claude Bagaphou
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, USL Umbria 1 Ospedale di Città di Castello, Città di Castello (PG), Italy
| | - Gianluca Zani
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Roberto Righetti
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Marco Rispoli
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Vincenzo Monaldi Hospital, Napoli, Italy
| | - Maurizio Fusari
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, M. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena (FC), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Župčić M, Dedić D, Graf Župčić S, Đuzel V, Šimurina T, Šakić L, Grubješić I, Šutić I, Šutić I, Korušić A. THE ROLE OF PARAVERTEBRAL BLOCKS IN AMBULATORY SURGERY: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. Acta Clin Croat 2019; 58:43-47. [PMID: 31741558 PMCID: PMC6813485 DOI: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.s1.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Ambulatory surgery often involves surgical procedures on the thorax, abdomen and limbs, which can be associated with substantial postoperative pain. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an analysis of the effectiveness of paravertebral block (PVB) alone or in combination with general anaesthesia, in this setting, with an emphasis on satisfactory postoperative analgesia in comparison to other modalities. We have conducted a search of current medical literature written in English through PubMed, Google Scholar and Ovid Medline®. Peer-reviewed professional articles, review articles, retrospective and prospective studies, case reports and case series were systematically searched for during the time period between November 2003 and February 2019. The literature used for the purpose of creating this review showed that utilisation of paravertebral block either alone or in combination with general anaesthesia, has a positive effect on satisfactory analgesia in ambulatory surgery. With a multimodal analgesic approach of PVB and other techniques of anaesthesia and analgesia there is a reduction in postoperative opioid consumption, fewer side effects, lower pain scores, decreased mortality, earlier mobilisation of patients and reduced hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miroslav Župčić
- 1Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology and Immunology, Rijeka, Croatia; 3J. J. Strossmayer University, Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia; 4Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Neurology, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Anaesthesia, London, United Kingdom; 7General Hospital Zadar, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 8Department of Health Studies University of Zadar, Zadar,Croatia; 9Department of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Zagreb, Croatia; 10University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family medicine, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - David Dedić
- 1Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology and Immunology, Rijeka, Croatia; 3J. J. Strossmayer University, Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia; 4Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Neurology, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Anaesthesia, London, United Kingdom; 7General Hospital Zadar, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 8Department of Health Studies University of Zadar, Zadar,Croatia; 9Department of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Zagreb, Croatia; 10University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family medicine, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Sandra Graf Župčić
- 1Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology and Immunology, Rijeka, Croatia; 3J. J. Strossmayer University, Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia; 4Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Neurology, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Anaesthesia, London, United Kingdom; 7General Hospital Zadar, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 8Department of Health Studies University of Zadar, Zadar,Croatia; 9Department of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Zagreb, Croatia; 10University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family medicine, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Viktor Đuzel
- 1Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology and Immunology, Rijeka, Croatia; 3J. J. Strossmayer University, Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia; 4Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Neurology, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Anaesthesia, London, United Kingdom; 7General Hospital Zadar, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 8Department of Health Studies University of Zadar, Zadar,Croatia; 9Department of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Zagreb, Croatia; 10University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family medicine, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Tatjana Šimurina
- 1Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology and Immunology, Rijeka, Croatia; 3J. J. Strossmayer University, Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia; 4Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Neurology, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Anaesthesia, London, United Kingdom; 7General Hospital Zadar, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 8Department of Health Studies University of Zadar, Zadar,Croatia; 9Department of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Zagreb, Croatia; 10University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family medicine, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Livija Šakić
- 1Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology and Immunology, Rijeka, Croatia; 3J. J. Strossmayer University, Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia; 4Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Neurology, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Anaesthesia, London, United Kingdom; 7General Hospital Zadar, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 8Department of Health Studies University of Zadar, Zadar,Croatia; 9Department of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Zagreb, Croatia; 10University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family medicine, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Igor Grubješić
- 1Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology and Immunology, Rijeka, Croatia; 3J. J. Strossmayer University, Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia; 4Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Neurology, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Anaesthesia, London, United Kingdom; 7General Hospital Zadar, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 8Department of Health Studies University of Zadar, Zadar,Croatia; 9Department of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Zagreb, Croatia; 10University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family medicine, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Ingrid Šutić
- 1Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology and Immunology, Rijeka, Croatia; 3J. J. Strossmayer University, Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia; 4Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Neurology, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Anaesthesia, London, United Kingdom; 7General Hospital Zadar, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 8Department of Health Studies University of Zadar, Zadar,Croatia; 9Department of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Zagreb, Croatia; 10University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family medicine, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Ivana Šutić
- 1Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology and Immunology, Rijeka, Croatia; 3J. J. Strossmayer University, Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia; 4Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Neurology, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Anaesthesia, London, United Kingdom; 7General Hospital Zadar, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 8Department of Health Studies University of Zadar, Zadar,Croatia; 9Department of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Zagreb, Croatia; 10University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family medicine, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Andjelko Korušić
- 1Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology and Immunology, Rijeka, Croatia; 3J. J. Strossmayer University, Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia; 4Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Clinic of Neurology, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Anaesthesia, London, United Kingdom; 7General Hospital Zadar, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 8Department of Health Studies University of Zadar, Zadar,Croatia; 9Department of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Zagreb, Croatia; 10University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family medicine, Rijeka, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zupcic SG, Zupcic M, Duzel V, Šimurina T, Milošević M, Basic S, Vuletic V, Kapural L. Effect of clonidine on the cutaneous silent period during spinal anesthesia. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6:1136-1145. [PMID: 30613672 PMCID: PMC6306629 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i16.1136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Revised: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate the effect of clonidine on the cutaneous silent period (CSP) during spinal anesthesia. METHODS A total of 67 adult patients were included in this randomized, prospective, single-center, double-blind trial. They did not have neurological disorders and were scheduled for inguinal hernia repair surgery. This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NTC03121261). The patients were randomized into two groups with regards to the intrathecally administered solution: (1) 15 mg of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 50 µg of 0.015% clonidine, or (2) 15 mg of 0.5% levobupivacaine alone. There were 34 patients in the levobupivacaine-clonidine (LC) group and 33 patients in the levobupivacaine (L) group. CSP and its latency were measured four times: prior to the subarachnoid block (SAB), after motor block regression to the 0 level of the Bromage scale, with ongoing sensory blockade, and both 6 and 24 h after SAB. RESULTS Only data from 30 patients in each group were analyzed. There were no significant differences between the groups investigated preoperatively and after 24 h. The CSP of the L group at the time point when the Bromage scale was 0 was 44.8 ± 8.1 ms, while in the LC group it measured 40.2 ± 3.8 ms (P = 0.007). The latency in the L group at the time point when the Bromage scale was 0 was 130.3 ± 10.2 ms, and in the LC group it was 144.7 ± 8.3 ms (P < 0.001). The CSP of the L group after 6 h was 59.6 ± 9.8 ms, while in the LC group it was 44.5 ± 5.0 ms (P < 0.001). The latency in the L group after 6 h was 110.4 ± 10.6 ms, while in LC group it was 132.3 ± 9.7 ms (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Intrathecal addition of clonidine to levobupivacaine for SAB in comparison with levobupivacaine alone results in a diminished inhibitory tonus and shortened CSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Graf Zupcic
- Clinic of Neurology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka 51000, Croatia
| | - Miroslav Zupcic
- Faculty of Medicine, J. J. Strossmayer University, Osijek 31000, Croatia
- Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka 51000, Croatia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka 51000, Croatia
| | - Viktor Duzel
- Department of Anaesthesia, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London RM7 0AG, United Kingdom
| | - Tatjana Šimurina
- Faculty of Medicine, J. J. Strossmayer University, Osijek 31000, Croatia
- Department of Health Studies University of Zadar, Zadar 23000, Croatia
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, General Hospital Zadar, Zadar 23000, Croatia
| | - Milan Milošević
- University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Stampar School of Public Health WHO Collaborative Centre for Occupational Health, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Silvio Basic
- Faculty of Medicine, J. J. Strossmayer University, Osijek 31000, Croatia
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Vladimira Vuletic
- Clinic of Neurology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka 51000, Croatia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka 51000, Croatia
| | - Leonardo Kapural
- Center for Clinical Research, Winston Salem, NC 27103, United States
| |
Collapse
|