Dabrafenib in metastatic melanoma: a monocentric 'real life' experience

BRAF and MEK Inhibitors and Their Toxicities: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis summarizes the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AE) of BRAFi and MEKi.

METHODS

A systematic search of Medline/PubMed was conducted to identify suitable articles published in English up to 31 December 2021. The primary outcomes were profiles for all-grade and grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs, and the analysis of single side effects belonging to both categories.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of treatment-related all-grade Aes was 99% for Encorafenib (95% CI: 0.97-1.00) and 97% for Trametinib (95% CI: 0.92-0.99; I² = 66%) and Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.94-0.99; I² = 0%). In combined therapies, the rate was 98% for both Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (95% CI: 0.96-0.99; I² = 77%) and Encorafenib + Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.96-1.00). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 69% of cases for Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.50-0.84; I² = 71%), 68% for Encorafenib (95% CI: 0.61-0.74), and 72% for Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (95% CI: 0.65-0.79; I² = 84%). The most common grade 1-2 AEs were pyrexia (43%) and fatigue (28%) for Dabrafenib + Trametinib and diarrhea for both Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (52%) and Encorafenib + Binimetinib (34%). The most common AEs of grade 3 or higher were pyrexia, rash, and hypertension for Dabrafenib + Trametinib (6%), rash and hypertension for Encorafenib + Binimetinib (6%), and increased AST and ALT for Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides comprehensive data on treatment-related adverse events of BRAFi and MEKi combination therapies, showing related toxicity profiles to offer a helpful tool for clinicians in the choice of therapy.

Prognostic and predictive role of elevated lactate dehydrogenase in patients with melanoma treated with immunotherapy and BRAF inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Levels of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are a recognized prognostic factor in malignant melanoma (MM). It is relevant to confirm its prognostic role in patients treated with targeted therapies [BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) and MEK inhibitors (MEKi)] and immunotherapy (IT). Furthermore, its role as a predictive marker in patients treated with these drugs had still not been investigated. We performed an electronic search for studies reporting information on overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) according to LDH levels and on their predictive effect in patients treated with targeted therapies (BRAFi and MEKi) and IT. Data were pooled using hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and HRs for PFS according to a fixed-effect or a random-effect model. For predictive analysys, effect of new agents versus standard therapy was evaluated in LDH high population. A total of 71 publications were retrieved for a total of 16 159 patients. Overall, elevated LDH levels were associated with an HR for OS of 1.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-1.85; P<0.0001]. Similarly, HR for PFS was 1.83 (95% CI: 1.53-2.2; P<0.0001). In the LDH elevated subgroup, new agents improved OS significantly (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.62-0.82; P<0.0001) and PFS (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.55-0.72; P<0.0001). In advanced MM treated with IT or BRAFi±MEKi, elevated LDH level at baseline represents a poor prognostic factor. However, patients with increased LDH levels and treated with these drugs gain significant benefits in terms of PFS and OS.

Dabrafenib Therapy in 30 Patients with Melanoma Metastatic to the Brain: a Single-centre Controlled Retrospective Study in Hungary

Dabrafenib is a potent BRAF inhibitor, which showed intracranial tumor activity. The purpose of our retrospective analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of dabrafenib for patients with melanoma brain metastasis (BM). We studied 30 BRAF mutant melanoma patients with BM, who received dabrafenib after local control of the brain between 2014 and 2017. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) was 0-2. The control arm consisted of 204 melanoma patients from our institutional melanoma database with BM and ECOG 0-2 treated with local therapies and/or chemotherapy, between 2003 and 2015. We found the intracranial disease control rate (DCR) was 83% including four (13%) complete remissions (CR), nine (30%) partial remissions (PR) and twelve (40%) stable diseases (SD) in contrast to five (17%) progressive diseases (PD). With a median follow-up of 14 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.5 months, and 8.8 months, respectively. If calculated from BM onset, the OS turned to be 11.8 months on the dabrafenib arm, while it was only 6.0 months in the control arm (HR = 0.45, p = 0.0014). Higher risk of progression was observed with increasing ECOG (HR =4.06, p = 0.00027) and if more than 2 extracranial organs were involved (HR = 3.4, p = 0.0077). Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was non-significantly associated with worse clinical outcome. Remarkable intracranial activity of dabrafenib in real practice was confirmed by our analysis.