A longitudinal study of long-term renal outcome after pediatric liver transplantation in relation to CNI exposure

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is reported in 20%-30% of children after liver transplantation (LT). One of the proposed underlying causes is the long-term exposure to tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), which is the main immunosuppressive drug used after LT. Variation in tacrolimus absolute exposure and relative dose requirements are believed to be important risk factors for developing CNI-associated nephrotoxicity.

AIM

To describe the long-term renal outcome of pediatric LT recipients and determine the effects of tacrolimus exposure on renal outcome parameters.

METHODS

Retrospective single center study of renal function (GFR, proteinuria) and pharmacokinetic parameters (C0 , AUC0-12h ) obtained during annual follow-up in children after liver transplantation, between 1998 and 2019. Relevant pharmacogenetic variants for tacrolimus disposition (CYP3A5 and ABCB1) were determined in recipients and donors. The evolution of individual renal function and tacrolimus exposure was evaluated using linear mixed models for repeated measurements.

RESULTS

Twenty-six children were included (mean follow-up: 10.4 years (range 2-18.9)). Mean estimated GFR was 109.3 (SE: 7.4), vs. measured: 91.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 (SE: 6.3), which remained stable during follow-up. CKD stage ≥2 was observed in 32.8% of the visits based on eGFR versus 50.0% on mGFR. CKD stage ≥3 was uncommon (4.1% and 6.2% resp.). Mean tacrolimus C0 was 5.3 ng/mL (SE: 2.5) with a AUC0-12h of 72.7 ng*h/mL (SE: 30.3), which demonstrated a small decrease during follow-up. There was a negative correlation between C0 and mGFR (rS  = -0.3; p < .001). We found no correlation between GFR and tacrolimus dose requirements ((ng/mL)/(mg/kg)) or pharmacogenetic background.

CONCLUSION

Renal function during long-term follow-up after pediatric LT remained stable for the majority of our cohort. However, mild CKD was relatively common, warranting follow-up into adulthood. Although absolute tacrolimus exposure has a small depressing effect on concurrent GFR, there is no progressive deterioration of GFR due to long-term exposure, dose requirements or genetic background under the current target levels. These findings should be confirmed in a larger sample set, ideally including data from multiple centers.

Studying Pregnancy Outcome Risk in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Based on Cluster Analysis

Background. Pregnancy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients is a challenge due to the potential maternal and fetal complications. Therefore, a multidisciplinary assessment of disease risk before and during pregnancy is essential to improve pregnancy outcomes. Objectives. Our purpose was to (i) define clusters of patients with similar history and laboratory features and determine the associative maternal and perinatal outcomes and (ii) evaluate the risk spectrum of maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnancy in SLE patients, represented by our established risk-assessment chart. Methods. Medical records of 119 patients in China were analyzed retrospectively. Significant variables with $p<0.05$ were selected. The self-organizing map was used for clustering the data based on historical background and laboratory features. Results. Clustering was conducted using 21 maternal and perinatal features. Five clusters were recognized, and their prominent maternal manifestations were as follows: cluster 1 (including 27.73% of all patients): preeclampsia and lupus nephritis; cluster 2 (22.69%): oligohydramnios, uterus scar, and femoral head necrosis; cluster 3 (13.45%): upper respiratory tract infection; cluster 4 (15.97%): premature membrane rupture; and cluster 5 (20.17%): no problem. Conclusion. Pregnancy outcomes in SLE women fell into three categories, namely high risk, moderate risk, and low risk. Present manifestations, besides the medical records, are a potential assessment means for better management of pregnant SLE patients.

Diagnostic utility of protein to creatinine ratio (P/C ratio) in spot urine sample within routine clinical practice

The spot (random) urine protein to creatinine ratio (P/C ratio) is an alternative, fast and simple method of detecting and estimating the quantitative assessment of proteinuria. The aim of the work was to review the literature concerning the usefulness of spot urine P/C ratio evaluation in the diagnosis of proteinuria in the course of kidney disease, hypertension, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, immunological diseases, diabetes mellitus, and multiple myeloma, and in the diagnosis of proteinuria in children. We searched the PubMed and Google Scholar databases using the following keywords: proteinuria, spot urine protein to creatinine ratio, spot urine P/C ratio, protein creatinine index, PCR (protein to creatinine ratio), P/C ratio and methods, Jaffe versus enzymatic creatinine methods, urine protein methods, spot urine protein to creatinine ratio versus ACR (albumin to creatinine ratio), proteinuria versus albuminuria, limitations of the P/C ratio. More weight was given to the articles published in the last 10-20 years. A spot urine P/C ratio >20 mg/mmol (0.2 mg/mg) is the most commonly reported cutoff value for detecting proteinuria, while a P/C ratio value >350 mg/mmol (3.5 mg/mg) confirms nephrotic proteinuria. The International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy recommends a P/C ratio of 30 mg/mmol (0.3 mg/mg) for the classification of proteinuria in pregnant women at risk of preeclampsia. A high degree of correlation was observed between P/C ratio values and the protein concentration in 24-h urine collections. The spot urine P/C ratio is a quick and reliable test that can eliminate the need for a daily 24-h urine collection. However, in doubtful situations, it is still recommended to assess proteinuria in a 24-h urine collection. The literature review indicates the usefulness of the spot P/C ratio in various disease states; therefore, this test should be available in every laboratory. However, the challenge for the primary care physician is to know the limitations of the methods used to determine the protein and creatinine concentrations that are used to calculate the P/C ratio. Moreover, the P/C ratio cutoff used should be determined in individual laboratories because it depends on the patient population and the laboratory methodologies.