Analytical performance of the FDA-cleared Parsortix® PC1 system

Liquid biopsy: paving a new avenue for cancer research

The current constraints associated with cancer diagnosis and molecular profiling, which rely on invasive tissue biopsies or clinical imaging, have spurred the emergence of the liquid biopsy field. Liquid biopsy involves the extraction of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating free or circulating tumor DNA (cfDNA or ctDNA), circulating cell-free RNA (cfRNA), extracellular vesicles (EVs), and tumor-educated platelets (TEPs) from bodily fluid samples. Subsequently, these components undergo molecular characterization to identify biomarkers that are critical for early cancer detection, prognosis, therapeutic assessment, and post-treatment monitoring. These innovative biosources exhibit characteristics analogous to those of the primary tumor from which they originate or interact. This review comprehensively explores the diverse technologies and methodologies employed for processing these biosources, along with their principal clinical applications.

Improving the Prognostic and Predictive Value of Circulating Tumor Cell Enumeration: Is Longitudinal Monitoring the Answer?

Circulating tumor cell (CTC) numbers in the blood of cancer patients can indicate the progression and invasiveness of tumors, and their prognostic and predictive value has been repeatedly demonstrated. However, the standard baseline CTC count at the beginning of treatment, while informative, is not completely reliable and may not adequately reflect the state of the disease. A growing number of studies indicate that the long-term monitoring of CTC numbers in the same patient provides more comprehensive prognostic data and should be incorporated into clinical practice, as a factor that contributes to therapeutic decisions. This review describes the current status of CTC enumeration as a prognostic and predictive factor, highlights the shortcomings of current solutions, and advocates for longitudinal CTC analysis as a more effective method of the evaluation of developing disease, treatment efficacy, and the long term-monitoring of the minimal residual disease. As evidenced by the described reports, the longitudinal monitoring of CTCs should provide a better and more sensitive prediction of the course of the disease, and its incorporation in clinical practice should be beneficial.

Gene expression markers in peripheral blood and outcome in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: A study of the European GANNET53 consortium

Disease progression is a major problem in ovarian cancer. There are very few treatment options for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC), and therefore, these patients have a particularly poor prognosis. The aim of the present study was to identify markers for monitoring the response of 123 PROC patients enrolled in the Phase I/II GANNET53 clinical trial, which evaluated the efficacy of Ganetespib in combination with standard chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy alone. In total, 474 blood samples were collected, comprising baseline samples taken before the first administration of the study drugs and serial samples taken during treatment until further disease progression (PD). After microfluidic enrichment, 27 gene transcripts were analyzed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and their utility for disease monitoring was evaluated. At baseline, ERCC1 was associated with an increased risk of PD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-2.55; p = 0.005), while baseline CDH1 and ESR1 may have a risk-reducing effect (CDH1 HR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46-0.96; p = 0.024; ESR1 HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39-0.86; p = 0.002). ERCC1 was observed significantly more often (72.7% vs. 53.9%; p = 0.032) and ESR1 significantly less frequently (59.1% vs. 78.3%; p = 0.018) in blood samples taken at radiologically confirmed PD than at controlled disease. At any time during treatment, ERCC1-presence and ESR1-absence were associated with short PFS and with higher odds of PD within 6 months (odds ratio 12.77, 95% CI: 4.08-39.97; p < 0.001). Our study demonstrates the clinical relevance of ESR1 and ERCC1 and may encourage the analysis of liquid biopsy samples for the management of PROC patients.

The prognostic significance of circulating tumor cell enumeration and HER2 expression by a novel automated microfluidic system in metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been extensively studied and verified by the CellSearch® system. Varieties of microfluidic systems have been developed to improve capture efficiency with the lack of standardization and automation. This study systematically verified the positive threshold for prognosis and its guidance value in anti-HER2 therapy based on a novel automated microfluidic system OmiCell®.

METHODS

CTCs isolation, enumeration and labeling were performed using the OmiCell® system. CTCs identification and reporting were performed using the DeepSight® scanning system.

RESULTS

The capture efficiency and specificity of OmiCell® system was 91.9% and 90%, respectively. Then, 65 MBC patients with known HER2 status of their metastatic tumors were enrolled. In the cohort, we detected ≥ 1 CTCs in 59 patients (90.8%, range: 1-55 CTCs, median = 6), < 8 CTCs in 45 (69.2%) and ≥ 8 CTCs in 20 (30.8%) patients at baseline. The patients with < 8 CTCs had longer PFS than ≥ 8 CTCs (median, 7 vs. 4.4 months, p = 0.028). CTC enumeration was found to be an independent prognostic factor in our cohort. Moreover, we found a weak concordance between tissue HER2 (tHER2) status and the corresponding CTCs (k = 0.16, p = 0.266). The patients with tHER2 positive and cHER2 negative had better PFS compared with patients with both tHER2 and cHER2 positive (median, 8.2 vs. 3.3 months, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical study shows the prognosis value of a new threshold of CTC number and meanwhile the guidance value of cHER2 status in anti-HER2 therapy.

A comparative study of circulating tumor cell isolation and enumeration technologies in lung cancer

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have potential as diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in solid tumors. Despite Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of CTC devices in various cancers, the rarity and heterogeneity of CTCs in lung cancer make them technically challenging to isolate and analyze, hindering their clinical integration. Establishing a consensus through comparative analysis of different CTC systems is warranted. This study aimed to evaluate seven different CTC enrichment methods across five technologies using a standardized spike-in protocol: the CellMag™ (EpCAM-dependent enrichment), EasySep™ and RosetteSep™ (blood cell depletion), and the Parsortix® PR1 and the new design Parsortix® Prototype (PP) (size- and deformability-based enrichment). The Parsortix® systems were also evaluated for any differences in recovery rates between cell harvest versus in-cassette staining. Healthy donor blood (5 mL) was spiked with 100 fluorescently labeled EpCAMhigh H1975 cells, processed through each system, and the isolation efficiency was calculated. The CellMag™ had the highest recovery rate (70 ± 14%), followed by Parsortix® PR1 in-cassette staining, while the EasySep™ had the lowest recovery (18 ± 8%). Additional spike-in experiments were performed with EpCAMmoderate A549 and EpCAMlow H1299 cells using the CellMag™ and Parsortix® PR1 in-cassette staining. The recovery rate of CellMag™ significantly reduced to 35 ± 14% with A549 cells and 1 ± 1% with H1299 cells. However, the Parsortix® PR1 in-cassette staining showed cell phenotype-independent and consistent recovery rates among all lung cancer cell lines: H1975 (49 ± 2%), A549 (47 ± 10%), and H1299 (52 ± 10%). Furthermore, we demonstrated that the Parsortix® PR1 in-cassette staining method is capable of isolating heterogeneous single CTCs and cell clusters from patient samples. The Parsortix® PR1 in-cassette staining, capable of isolating different phenotypes of CTCs as either single cells or cell clusters with consistent recovery rates, is considered optimal for CTC enrichment for lung cancer, albeit needing further optimization and validation.

Combined microfluidic enrichment and staining workflow for single-cell analysis of circulating tumor cells in metastatic prostate cancer patients

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are precursors of cancer in the blood and provide an attractive source for dynamic monitoring of disease progression and tumor heterogeneity. However, the scarcity of CTCs in the bloodstream has limited their use in clinical practice. In this study, we present a workflow for easy detection of CTCs by cytokeratin staining using the FDA-cleared Parsortix device for size-based microfluidic enrichment. To minimize sample handling, the isolated cells are stained inside the separation cassette and harvested for subsequent single cell isolation and whole genome copy-number analysis. We validated the workflow on a panel of four prostate cancer cell lines spiked into healthy donor blood collected in CellRescue or EDTA tubes, resulting in mean recoveries of 42% (16-69%). Furthermore, we evaluated the clinical utility in a cohort of 12 metastatic prostate cancer patients and found CTCs in 67% of patients ranging from 0 to 1172 CTCs in 10 mL blood. Additionally, we isolated single patient-derived CTCs and identified genomic aberrations associated with treatment response and clinical outcome. Thus, this workflow provides a readily scalable strategy for analysis of single CTCs, applicable for use in monitoring studies to identify genomic variations important for guiding clinical therapy decision.

Liquid biopsy for gastric cancer: Techniques, applications, and future directions

After the study of circulating tumor cells in blood through liquid biopsy (LB), this technique has evolved to encompass the analysis of multiple materials originating from the tumor, such as nucleic acids, extracellular vesicles, tumor-educated platelets, and other metabolites. Additionally, research has extended to include the examination of samples other than blood or plasma, such as saliva, gastric juice, urine, or stool. LB techniques are diverse, intricate, and variable. They must be highly sensitive, and pre-analytical, patient, and tumor-related factors significantly influence the detection threshold, diagnostic method selection, and potential results. Consequently, the implementation of LB in clinical practice still faces several challenges. The potential applications of LB range from early cancer detection to guiding targeted therapy or immunotherapy in both early and advanced cancer cases, monitoring treatment response, early identification of relapses, or assessing patient risk. On the other hand, gastric cancer (GC) is a disease often diagnosed at advanced stages. Despite recent advances in molecular understanding, the currently available treatment options have not substantially improved the prognosis for many of these patients. The application of LB in GC could be highly valuable as a non-invasive method for early diagnosis and for enhancing the management and outcomes of these patients. In this comprehensive review, from a pathologist's perspective, we provide an overview of the main options available in LB, delve into the fundamental principles of the most studied techniques, explore the potential utility of LB application in the context of GC, and address the obstacles that need to be overcome in the future to make this innovative technique a game-changer in cancer diagnosis and treatment within clinical practice.

Dissemination of Circulating Tumor Cells in Breast and Prostate Cancer: Implications for Early Detection

Burgeoning evidence suggests that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) may disseminate into blood vessels at an early stage, seeding metastases in various cancers such as breast and prostate cancer. Simultaneously, the early-stage CTCs that settle in metastatic sites [termed disseminated tumor cells (DTCs)] can enter dormancy, marking a potential source of late recurrence and therapy resistance. Thus, the presence of these early CTCs poses risks to patients but also holds potential benefits for early detection and treatment and opportunities for possibly curative interventions. This review delves into the role of early DTCs in driving latent metastasis within breast and prostate cancer, emphasizing the importance of early CTC detection in these diseases. We further explore the correlation between early CTC detection and poor prognoses, which contribute significantly to increased cancer mortality. Consequently, the detection of CTCs at an early stage emerges as a critical imperative for enhancing clinical diagnostics and allowing for early interventions.

Molecular Profiling of Circulating Tumour Cells and Circulating Tumour DNA: Complementary Insights from a Single Blood Sample Utilising the Parsortix® System

The study of molecular drivers of cancer is an area of rapid growth and has led to the development of targeted treatments, significantly improving patient outcomes in many cancer types. The identification of actionable mutations informing targeted treatment strategies are now considered essential to the management of cancer. Traditionally, this information has been obtained through biomarker assessment of a tissue biopsy which is costly and can be associated with clinical complications and adverse events. In the last decade, blood-based liquid biopsy has emerged as a minimally invasive, fast, and cost-effective alternative, which is better suited to the requirement for longitudinal monitoring. Liquid biopsies allow for the concurrent study of multiple analytes, such as circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), from a single blood sample. Although ctDNA assays are commercially more advanced, there is an increasing awareness of the clinical significance of the transcriptome and proteome which can be analysed using CTCs. Herein, we review the literature in which the microfluidic, label-free Parsortix® system is utilised for CTC capture, harvest and analysis, alongside the analysis of ctDNA from a single blood sample. This detailed summary of the literature demonstrates how these two analytes can provide complementary disease information.