The VR1-Positive Primary Afferent-Mediated Expression of pERK in the Lumbosacral Neurons in Response to Mechanical and Chemical Stimulation of the Urinary Bladder in Rats

Intrathecally administered substance P activated the spinal defecation center and enhanced colorectal motility in anesthetized rats

Noxious stimuli on the colorectum cause colorectal contractions through activation of descending monoaminergic pathways projecting from the supraspinal defecation center to the spinal defecation center. Since it is known that substance P is involved in the response to peripheral noxious stimuli in the spinal cord, we investigated the effects of intrathecally administered substance P at L6-S1 levels on colorectal motility in rats that were anesthetized with α-chloralose and ketamine. Intrathecally administered substance P enhanced colorectal motility, even after transection of the thoracic spinal cord at the T4 level. Severing the pelvic nerves, but not the colonic nerves, abolished substance P enhanced colorectal motility. In the spinal cord at L6-S1 levels, expression of mRNA coding neurokinin (NK) 1-3 receptors was detected by RT-PCR. Immunohistological experiments revealed that preganglionic neurons of the pelvic nerves express NK1 receptors, whereas expression of NK2 receptors was not found. In addition, substance P-containing fibers densely innervated around the preganglionic neurons expressing NK1 receptors. An intrathecally administered NK1 receptor antagonist (spantide) attenuated capsaicin-induced colorectal contractions. These results suggest that the colokinetic action of substance P is mediated by the NK1 receptor in the spinal defecation center. Our findings indicate that substance P may function as a neurotransmitter in the spinal defecation center.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We found that intrathecally administered substance P enhanced colorectal motility in anesthetized rats. Neurokinin (NK) 1 receptors, but not NK2 receptors, were detected in preganglionic neurons of the pelvic nerves. Blockade of NK1 receptors in the spinal cord attenuated the enhanced colorectal motility in response to intracolonic noxious stimuli. The findings indicate that substance P may function as a neurotransmitter in the spinal reflex pathway controlling defecation.

Serotonergic paraneurones in the female mouse urethral epithelium and their potential role in peripheral sensory information processing

AIM

The mechanisms underlying detection and transmission of sensory signals arising from visceral organs, such as the urethra, are poorly understood. Recently, specialized ACh-expressing cells embedded in the urethral epithelium have been proposed as chemosensory sentinels for detection of bacterial infection. Here, we examined the morphology and potential role in sensory signalling of a different class of specialized cells that express serotonin (5-HT), termed paraneurones.

METHODS

Urethrae, dorsal root ganglia neurones and spinal cords were isolated from adult female mice and used for immunohistochemistry and calcium imaging. Visceromotor reflexes (VMRs) were recorded in vivo.

RESULTS

We identified two morphologically distinct groups of 5-HT+ cells with distinct regional locations: bipolar-like cells predominant in the mid-urethra and multipolar-like cells predominant in the proximal and distal urethra. Sensory nerve fibres positive for calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P, and TRPV1 were found in close proximity to 5-HT+ paraneurones. In vitro 5-HT (1 μm) stimulation of urethral primary afferent neurones, mimicking 5-HT release from paraneurones, elicited changes in the intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+ ]i ) mediated by 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptors. Approximately 50% of 5-HT responding cells also responded to capsaicin with changes in the [Ca2+ ]i . In vivo intra-urethral 5-HT application increased VMRs induced by urethral distention and activated pERK in lumbosacral spinal cord neurones.

CONCLUSION

These morphological and functional findings provide insights into a putative paraneurone-neural network within the urethra that utilizes 5-HT signalling, presumably from paraneurones, to modulate primary sensory pathways carrying nociceptive and non-nociceptive (mechano-sensitive) information to the central nervous system.

Role of C-fibers in pain and morphine induced analgesia/hyperalgesia in rats

BACKGROUND

Usual dosage of morphine (10 mg/kg) induces analgesia and ultra-low dose (ULD) of morphine (1 µg/kg); hyperalgesia, and C-fibers are also bearing µ-opioid receptors; here the importance of C-fibers on pain and morphine induced analgesia/hyperalgesia is questioned and investigated using pain evaluation methods and infant capsaicin treating for C-fibers lesioning.

METHODS

Wistar male rats (200-250 grams) were assigned to three categories i.e. control, sham (receiving neonatal capsaicin vehicle) and c-lesion (receiving neonatal capsaicin), each one with three groups (n=7). They were injected intraperitoneally with single dosage of saline, 10 mg/kg or 1 µg/kg morphine, respectively. Thermal pain threshold was evaluated using the tail flick test before and 30 minutes after the injections. Chemical pain was assessed using the formalin test (FT) 30 minutes after the administrations.

RESULTS

Results indicated that thermal (P < 0.001) and chemical pains in both neurogenic and inflammatory phases of FT (P < 0.05) were reduced in C-lesion animals. In the C-normal and C-lesion animals, 10 mg/kg morphine exerted analgesia both in thermal (P < 0.001) and two phases of FT (P < 0.01), but it was more potent in C-lesion animals (P < 0.05). Although ULD of morphine in C-normal animals produced hyperalgesic effect in thermal and chemical pains (P < 0.001), in C-lesion animals, it produced analgesia (P < 0.05) at the neurogenic phase of FT.

CONCLUSION

Results can raise the C-fibers involvement for a significant portion of nociceptive transmission, because C-lesioning potentiated morphine induced analgesia and eliminated ULD of morphine induced hyperalgesia. Therefore C and Aδ fibers can be involved in morphine analgesia; while, just C-fibers are possibly responsible for only presynaptically hyperalgesic/excitatory action of ULD in morphine.