Lumbo-sacro-pelvic Fixation Using Iliac Screws for the Complex Lumbo-sacral Fractures

Jumper's fracture of the sacrum: a novel and reproducible way for successful reduction and fixation

PURPOSE

Surgical treatment of jumper's fractures is a highly demanding situation for the surgeon due to its rareness and frequent association with severe concomitant injuries. There is no current consensus regarding a standard treatment approach, thus reducing quality of care. Our objectives were to describe, apply and assess a novel surgical technic.

METHODS

The presented research is an observational retrospective study of patients who underwent the described novel surgical intervention in a level 1 trauma center. We conducted analyses of the patient cohort using patient-related outcome measures at least 1 year after surgery, as well as investigating pain, quality of life and the clinical effectiveness of the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients (17 male and 7 female) with an average age 47 ± 16.3 years were included. ISS scores ranged from 9 to 66 with a mean ISS of 40 ± 15. Clinical scores exist of 15 out of 24 patients (62.5%). The mean VAS score was 53.7 ± 12.9. The mean EQ-5D index was 0.68 ± 0.22. Significant negative correlation existed between the ISS value and the EQ-5D index (r =  - 0.704; p < 0.005) and EQ-5D VAS (r =  - 0.809; p < 0.001). Anatomical reduction was achieved in all patients (n = 24). Radiological follow-up was performed in 58%.

CONCLUSION

We present one of the largest studies with operatively treated jumper's fractures of the sacrum. The technique is capable of reproducibly restoring the physiological anatomy of the patient and allows pain-adapted mobilization.

Open reduction and navigated Iliosacral screws for vertically unstable pelvic fractures

AIMS

To evaluate clinical and radiological results of vertically unstable pelvic fractures managed by open reduction and navigated iliosacral screws.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included eleven patients with complex posterior ring fractures with vertical instability admitted to our hospital and managed with CT navigated iliosacral screws. There were 7 type C1, 2 C2 and 2 C3, according to Tile classification. Three patients presented a spino-pelvic dissociation and four a vertical sacral fracture affecting the foramina (Denis 2). Vertical displacement, pelvic deformity and asymmetry were measured. Tornetta and Matta criteria were used to assess the quality of pelvic reduction.

RESULTS

An excellent reduction was achieved in 9 fractures and a good reduction in two. Asymmetry index improved from 13.18 to 2.72. Deformity index improved from 0.049 to 0.010. Only two patients with a Denis 2 fracture showed secondary displacement during follow-up. Four patients presented neurological complications due to their initial injuries. Seven patients were able to resume their previous activities.

CONCLUSION

CT navigated IS screws provide enough stability after an anatomic reduction of the fracture. There was no complication related to screw insertion and adequate screw positioning was achieved in all the cases.

Spinopelvic Dissociation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Spinopelvic dissociation is a rare type of injury which occurs in approximately 2.9% of pelvic disruptions and correlates with high-energy trauma.The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the incidence, demographics, treatment, clinical outcome, and complication rate associated with these injuries.

METHODS

A literature review on Medline, PubMed, and Google was performed. Overall, 216 abstracts were reviewed in English, German, and French, of which 50 articles were included.

RESULTS

Within the 50 studies, 19 publications were case reports and 16 were case series with low-level evidence. Overall, 379 patients with spinopelvic dissociation were identified at a mean age of 31.6 ± 11.6 years and an injury severity score of 23.1 ± 3.8 between 1969 and 2018. Most cases were related to fall from heights (55.7%), followed by road accidents (28.5%). Two hundred fifty-eight patients (68.1%) showed neurologic impairment at initial presentation, which improved in 65.1% after surgery. The treatment of choice was surgery in 93.1% of cases with triangular fixation in 68.8%. Regardless of the technique, the healing/fusion rate was 100% with a complication rate of 29.9% (n = 96/321).

CONCLUSION

Spinopelvic dissociation is a rare type of injury with limited data in the literature. Based on our review, it is possible that a streamlined, evidence-based algorithm may improve care for these difficult patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Review.

Complex Fractures of the Sacrum with Spinopelvic Dissociation Treated Surgically with Iliolumbar Fixation

Objective  To analyze a series of cases of complex fractures of the sacrum with spinopelvic dissociation surgically treated with iliolumbar fixation, and to review the existing medical literature. Methods  For the analysis, the medical records of the cases operated using the Schildhauer et al technique for fixation were retrospectively evaluated, and followed up for at least 12 months. The functional results were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry disability index, version 2.0. The data were compared with those of the existing medical literature. Results  Six cases were analyzed, four of which evolved with moderate disability, one, with minimal disability, and one, with severe disability. Three cases that presented neurological deficits obtained significant improvement. Only one case evolved with pulmonary thromboembolic complications. Conclusion  The Schildhauer et al technique is an efficient technique for the fixation of complex sacral fractures with spinopelvic dissociation. The patients evolved with good functional results. Early weight-bearing has been shown to be safe with the use of this treatment.

Neurological Outcome After Traumatic Transverse Sacral Fractures: A Systematic Review of 521 Patients Reported in the Literature

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the neurological outcome after transverse sacral fractures in patients with neurological impairment.

METHODS

A systematic review of the English, French, German, and Dutch literature was conducted. All study designs, including retrospective cohort studies and case reports, describing transverse sacral fractures were included. Two authors independently extracted the predefined data and scored the neurological impairment according to the Gibbons classification after the trauma and at the time of follow-up. The neurological outcomes were pooled according to the Gibbons classification.

RESULTS

No randomized controlled trials or prospective case series were found. A total of 139 articles were included, consisting of 81 case reports and 58 retrospective case series involving 521 patients. Regardless of the type of management, neurological recovery of at least 1 Gibbons category was reported in 62% of these patients. A comparison of the neurological outcome of nonoperatively treated patients and surgically treated patients showed similar neurological recovery rates. For the surgically treated patients, fixation of the fracture resulted in a better neurological improvement compared with an isolated decompression.

CONCLUSIONS

This review could not provide evidence of improved neurological recovery after surgical treatment compared with nonoperative treatment. When surgical treatment was considered, there was a low level of evidence that fixation of the fracture results in better neurological improvement compared with isolated decompression.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Spinopelvic Dissociation: A Retrospective Case Study and Review of Treatment Controversies

INTRODUCTION

Spinopelvic dissociation is a rare injury resulting in discontinuity between the spine and pelvis. We review the English- language literature and discuss critical treatment controversies. We present a series of spinopelvic dissociation cases from a level I trauma center.

METHODS

In this retrospective review of 18 consecutive cases treated surgically over a period of 4 years, we collected patient, injury, and surgical demographics and clinical and radiographic outcome measures.

RESULTS

Twelve patients had associated injuries, five were intubated on arrival, and six had neurologic deficits at presentation. No patient had spinal decompression, and all patients underwent closed reduction and percutaneous fixation. There were no cases of iatrogenic nerve injury, despite the use of partially threaded sacroiliac screws and closed reduction techniques. Five patients showed progressive neurologic improvement postoperatively. After reduction, eight patients (44%) had radiographic loss of the sacrococcygeal angle at the latest follow-up, but correction of fracture translation was preserved in all.

DISCUSSION

Spinopelvic dissociation represents a heterogeneous group of injuries often in the context of polytraumatized patients with other injuries. Our closed reduction and fixation technique resulted in satisfactory outcomes. We present a treatment algorithm for these rare injuries.

SACRAL FRACTURE TREATMENT WITH A VARIATION OF THE LUMBOPELVIC FIXATION TECHNIQUE

ABSTRACT Spinopelvic instability is an uncommon injury that is caused by high-energy traumas. Surgical treatment is used, in the majority of cases, to restore stability and enable early mobilization. Various stabilization techniques have been used in the treatment of spinopelvic instability, and lumbopelvic fixation (LPF) is currently the technique of choice due to its biomechanical superiority. One of its limitations is the fact that the technique does not directly address the lower sacral segment, permitting a residual kyphotic deformity. This deformity has been attributed to unsatisfactory outcomes, including late development of pelvic floor muscle defects and complications during childbirth. We report a case of a patient with spinopelvic instability due to sacral fracture, which was treated using a variation of the LPF technique, in which rods and screws originally developed for cervicothoracic fixation were adapted to correct sacral deformity in the sagittal plane. The upper sacral segment was reduced indirectly using hip extension and femoral traction manoeuvres, associated with distraction manoeuvres via rods. Bone reduction forceps were used to reduce the kyphotic deviation in the lower sacral fragment, enabling its fixation to the lumbopelvic rod and screws system. There were no complications of infection, suture dehiscence, or breakage of the implants, and at the end of the first year of follow-up, the sacral kyphosis was normal and radiographic consolidation was confirmed. Our technique provides a viable and promising alternative to traditional LPF, making it especially useful in fractures with accentuated deviations of the lower sacral fragment. Level of Evidence: 4.Type of study: Case series

Reduction and fixation of displaced U-shaped sacral fractures using lumbopelvic fixation: technical recommendations

PURPOSE

U-shaped sacral fractures are extremely rare injuries that usually occur as a result of falls from considerable heights. Almost all treatment methods described to date aim solely at stabilizing the fracture but do not contribute to supporting the reduction of such fractures. Using existing implants the purpose of this study is to present a surgical technique that facilitates both the reduction and the stabilization of these injuries. The presented technique was evaluated in a series of three cases.

METHODS

Polyaxial pedicle screws were placed through vertebral bodies L4 and L5. Two long pedicle screws were implanted in the posterior iliac spine. The lumbar pedicle screws were held with two longitudinal rods, and the pelvic screws with one transverse connecting rod. The lumbar longitudinal and pelvic transverse rods were connected via two hinge-like connecting elements. First, distraction was performed between lumbar pedicle screws L5 and the sacral transverse rod. Lordosis was then restored via the hinge joint, thereby eliminating kyphosis. After tightening all moving elements, the fracture was reduced and stabilized.

RESULTS

Computed tomography documented anatomical reduction and fracture healing was achieved in all cases. Two of three patients could be fully mobilized immediately; mobilization of the third patient was delayed due to multiple injuries. Two patients showed neurological symptoms. In one case, complete remission was achieved within 3 weeks, while in the other patient a clear improvement was observed. In all cases, the implant was removed after 8-12 months. There were no post-operative complications, such as infections, wound-healing disorders, neurological deterioration, implant failure, or premature loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical procedure was successful, since it considerably facilitated reduction, thereby shortening surgery time. The stabilization was sufficient to fully mobilize the patients. The procedure is based on existing implant components and is thus routinely available.

Current concepts in spondylopelvic dissociation

INTRODUCTION

Spondylopelvic dissociation is an uncommon and complex injury that results from high-energy trauma with axial overloading through the sacrum. Due to the life-threatening nature of these injuries, standard Advanced Trauma Life Support^® (ATLS) protocol must be used in the trauma setting as part of the initial management of these patients. The key to diagnosis is a good physical exam coupled with high level of suspicion. Radicular neurological deficits commonly are present in spondylopelvic dissociation (L5's roots) and should be documented for future evaluations. Radiographic views and CT-scan is preferred for the diagnosis.

BIOMECHANICS AND CLASSIFICATION

The authors briefly describe the anatomy and biomechanics of the pelvis, and present the main classifications used to define this rare lesion.

TREATMENT

Discussion about setting the boundaries of surgical stabilization, if there is still a role for conservative treatment, the importance of the initial treatment and the timing of intervention. Decompression is mandatory in the presence of canal compromise and progressive neurological deficit, regardless of biomechanical criteria for surgery. Kyphotic deformity occurs at the site of sacral transverse fracture and also reduces anteroposterior pelvis diameter. The technique of reduction and posterior surgical stabilization is emphasized. If residual kyphosis remains after bilateral lumbopelvic fixation by shifting of the lower sacral segment, we use S2 and/or S3 screws connected to transitional rods to additional reduction. An illustrated case is shown.

COMPLICATIONS

The infection of the wound and the failure of the implants are the most frequent complications of this surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Posterior stabilization is widely recognized as crucial in the treatment of pelvic disruptions. The concept of circumferential restoration of pelvic ring by bilateral lumbopelvic fixation and anterior fixation seems to be a nice option to increase stabilization and avoid bone misalignment.

A Rare Case of Isolated Lower Segment Transverse Sacral Fracture in a 12-Year-Old Girl and Its Management by Fixation with K-Wire

BACKGROUND

Isolated lower segment sacral fracture is very rare. To the best of our knowledge, there is only one case report of S4 stable fracture that was treated conservatively.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Here, we report a 12-year-old girl who sustained an isolated S5 fracture with anterior displacement of S5 and coccyx on S4. The patient initially was managed conservatively 1 month and 25 days. On the failure of this treatment procedure, the patient was treated surgically by partial coccygectomy with S4-S5 fixation after reduction by 2 K-wires.

CONCLUSIONS

Sacral fracture is difficult to diagnose, especially when the patient has multiple injuries. This is because the emergency doctor may not perform a neurologic examination of the perineum and may miss its diagnosis. Another reason for its misdiagnosis is that the routine anteroposterior plain X-ray may not detect it. Trauma patients with sacrococcygeal pain and tenderness should raise concerns about sacral fracture, and a lateral plain X-ray and/or computed tomography of the sacrococcygeal spine should be performed. Neurologic deficit is rare in lower sacral segment fracture; hence, a trial of conservative management (same as for coccygeal fracture) should be tried first. If the patient does not respond and there is displacement, surgical intervention can be used, because it has a very good response from the patient. In the presence of a neurological deficit, however, surgical intervention should be attempted as soon as possible.

Growing rod technique for the treatment of the traumatic spinopelvic dissociation: a technical trick

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Traumatic spinopelvic dissociation, sometimes referred to as U-shaped sacral fracture, is a very rare high-energy trauma. The surgical management of spinopelvic dissociation includes decompression, reduction, and fixation.

PURPOSE

We report a novel surgical technique for the treatment of spinopelvic dissociation that uses growing rods and a pedicle screw system, which is often used to treat patients with early onset scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN

This case report used a technical report of spinopelvic dissociation surgery using spinopelvic fixation and the growing rod technique.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One case was used as the patient sample.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Radiographic outcomes, including plain X-ray, three-dimensional computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging scan were the outcome measures.

METHODS

The radiographic outcomes were compared preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the 1-year follow-up with bony union.

RESULTS

Growing techniques improved traumatic sacral angulation, displacement, and canal encroachment, and provided sufficient structural support.

CONCLUSION

The growing rod technique for spinopelvic dissociation under intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring could be a useful alternative surgical option, especially in patients without neurologic deficit.

Osteosynthesis in sacral fracture and lumbosacral dislocation

Sacral fracture and lumbosacral hinge trauma are rare but serious lesions. Neurologic disorder is frequently associated, and nerve release may be required, with reduction and stabilization of the fracture. Management requires knowing the fracture lines and reduction maneuvers and the fixation techniques that may need to be associated. Three classifications allow these fractures to be well understood: the Roy-Camille classification identifies high transverse fractures and their displacement; the Denis classification identifies vertical fracture line location within the sacrum, which correlates with neurologic risk; and the Tile classification analyzes pelvic ring trauma when associated with the sacral fracture. Treatment, when surgical, requires careful patient positioning, sometimes on an orthopedic table. Reduction maneuvers are founded on the fracture classification. Isolated U-shaped fracture of the sacrum is to be distinguished from sacral fracture associated with pelvic ring lesion. Osteosynthesis may be lumbopelvic or restricted to the pelvic ring (sacroiliac or iliosacral). Open osteosynthesis allows reduction to be finalized by intraoperative maneuvers on the implant, while closed osteosynthesis requires perfect preoperative reduction. Complications are frequent and neurologic recovery is uncertain. Fatigue and osteoporotic fractures show little displacement and are good indications for cementoplasty, either isolated or associated to iliosacral screwing. In lumbosacral hinge trauma, and dislocation in particular, reduction surgery with fixation (usually 360°) is indicated. The present study details the analysis and classification of these fractures, the technical pitfalls of reduction and fixation, and treatment indications.

[Sacral fracture with spino-pelvic dissociation: a literature review]

The term, sacral fracture with traumatic spino-pelvic dissociation, is applied to those fractures of the sacrum in which there are both transverse and sagittal fracture lines in the sacrum, leading to a mechanical dissociation of the spine and the proximal fragment of the sacrum from the remaining sacrum and the pelvis. It is a quite rare pathological condition, and probably underdiagnosed. As it usually results from a high energy multiple trauma, an early diagnosis and treatment are mandatory for a better functional prognosis. We present a literature review of this relatively unknown injury.

Fixation techniques for complex traumatic transverse sacral fractures: a systematic review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and describe reconstruction methods for the treatment of transverse sacral fracture (TSF) and to evaluate outcomes based on treatment interventions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A variety of surgical interventions for stabilization of TSFs exist, yet the optimal management remains unclear. Although there are many individual case reports and series describing techniques to stabilize TSF, prior reviews fail to provide a comprehensive summary of current and past surgical techniques and their individual outcomes.

METHODS

Our systematic review searched the PubMed database using keywords identifying sacral fractures with a transverse component, requiring internal fixation for stabilization as well as a review of bibliographies and archives from meeting proceedings.

RESULTS

Our search located 417 publications for abstract review, of which 27 (109 patients) with TSF were included. Average follow-up was 22 months (range, 0-82 mo). Thirty-eight patients (34%) underwent spinopelvic fixation (SPF), 53 (49%) underwent posterior pelvic ring fixation (PPRF), and 18 (17%) underwent both. PPRF included iliosacral screws (37 patients), transiliac screws (11 patients), transiliac screws with plating (3 patients), posterior plating (1 patient), and transiliac bar (1 patient). Additional injuries causing lumbosacral instability were seen in 8 patients (42%) who underwent SPF, 2 patients (18%) treated with PPRF, and 5 patients (45%) who were treated with both SPF and PPRF. Of those who presented with a neurological deficit, 5 patients (45%) with SPF, 9 (39%) with PPRF, and 3 (30%) with SPF and PPRF experienced full neurological recovery. Five patients (45%) with SPF, 7 (30%) with PPRF, and 5 (50%) with both regained partial neurological function. One patient (9%) with SPF, 7 (30%) with PPRF, and 2 (20%) with both experienced no neurological recovery.

CONCLUSION

PPRF seems to be effective for stabilization of TSF. However, in the setting of further injuries causing additional lumbosacral instability, SPF should be used to ensure effective stabilization.

Management of traumatic spinopelvic dissociations: review of the literature

PURPOSE

Spinopelvic dissociation is a rare high-energy injury pattern in adults associated with high morbidity and an increased rate of neurological deficits. The purpose of this article is the conception of fracture type-associated treatment recommendations.

METHODS

This article is based on our own experience with spinopelvic dissociations and a review of the current literature.

RESULTS

Bilateral vertical plus an optional transverse fracture component configures spinopelvic dissociations as "U"- or "H"-shaped, with the result of a spinopelvic dissociation. "Y"-, "T"- or "II"-shaped fractures do not necessarily belong to this entity but can be subsumed to this entity in a wider sense. The surgical treatment of these injuries remains challenging. Initial haemodynamic stabilisation represents the main goal of primary care until definitive treatment can be performed. Anatomical reduction is demanding and even more complex in fracture areas with large comminution. Surgical treatment options depend on the fracture type, including transsacral screws, sacral banding and spinopelvic fixation, plus combinations of these procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinopelvic dissociations remain highly complex injuries. "U"- and "H"-shaped fractures usually require triangular fixation, whereas "II"-, "Y"- and "T"-shaped fractures might be sufficiently stabilised with transsacral screws.

Traumatic spinopelvic dissociation or U-shaped sacral fracture: a review of the literature

Traumatic spinopelvic dissociation is a rare high-energy injury pattern, characterised by a transverse sacral fracture in conjunction with bilateral sacral fracture-dislocations. It has a high incidence of neurological complications. The true nature of the injury is easily missed and diagnosis is delayed because it commonly presents in patients with severe associated injuries. In the absence of diagnosis and treatment, it can lead to progressive deformity and chronic pain. Early realignment and fixation of the unstable lumbopelvic junction, with adjunctive decompression of compromised lumbosacral roots, are currently thought to provide the best possible environment for early mobilisation of the polytraumatised patient. Plain pelvic radiographs (anteroposterior, inlet, and outlet), lateral sacral radiograph, CT scan and reconstruction are essential to provide optimal imaging and understanding of the fracture pattern. There is no single treatment paradigm and various surgical strategies have been described in the literature. Lumbopelvic fixation or triangular osteosynthesis has recently been recommended by several authors to restore stability at the lumbosacral junction. This article presents a review of the incidence, clinical evaluation, treatment methods and outcomes of this injury pattern.

Surgical management of U-shaped sacral fractures: a systematic review of current treatment strategies

PURPOSE

U-shaped sacral fractures usually result from axial loading of the spine with simultaneous sacral pivoting due to a horizontal fracture which leads to a highly unstable spino-pelvic dissociation. Due to the rarity of these fractures, there is lack of an agreed treatment strategy.

METHODS

A thorough literature search was carried out to identify current treatment concepts. The studies were analysed for mechanism of injury, diagnostic imaging, associated injuries, type of surgery, follow-up times, complications, neurological, clinical and radiological outcome.

RESULTS

Sixty-three cases were found in 12 articles. No Class I, II or III evidence was found in the literature. The most common mechanism of injury was a fall or jump from height. Pre-operative neurological deficit was noted in 50 (94.3%) out of 53 cases (not available in 10 patients). The most used surgical options were spino-pelvic fixation with or without decompression and ilio-sacral screws. Post-operative complications occurred in 24 (38.1%) patients. Average follow-up time was 18.6 months (range 2-34 months). Full neurological recovery was noted in 20 cases, partial recovery in 14 and 9 patients had no neurological recovery (5 patients were lost in follow-up). Fracture healing was mentioned in 7 articles with only 1 case of fracture reduction loss.

CONCLUSION

From the current available data, an evidence based treatment strategy regarding outcome, neurological recovery or fracture healing could not be identified. Limited access and minimal-invasive surgery focussing on sacral reduction and restoration seems to offer comparable results to large spino-pelvic constructs with fewer complications and should be considered as the method of choice. If the fracture is highly unstable and displaced, spino-pelvic fixation might offer better stability.

A mid-term follow-up result of spinopelvic fixation using iliac screws for lumbosacral fusion

OBJECTIVE

Iliac screw fixation has been used to prevent premature loosening of sacral fixation and to provide more rigid fixation of the sacropelvic unit. We describe our technique for iliac screw placement and review our experience with this technique.

METHODS

Thirteen consecutive patients who underwent spinopelvic fixation using iliac screws were enrolled. The indications for spinopelvic fixation included long segment fusions for spinal deformity and post-operative flat-back syndrome, symptomatic pseudoarthrosis of previous lumbosacral fusions, high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis, lumbosacral tumors, and sacral fractures. Radiographic outcomes were assessed using plain radiographs, and computed tomographic scans. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and questionnaire about buttock pain.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 33 months (range, 13-54 months). Radiographic fusion across the lumbosacral junction was obtained in all 13 patients. The average pre- and post-operative ODI scores were 40.0 and 17.5, respectively. The questionnaire for buttock pain revealed the following: 9 patients (69%) perceived improvement; 3 patients (23%) reported no change; and 1 patient (7.6%) had aggravation of pain. Two patients complained of prominence of the iliac hardware. The complications included one violation of the greater sciatic notch and one deep wound infection.

CONCLUSION

Iliac screw fixation is a safe and valuable technique that provides added structural support to S1 screws in long-segment spinal fusions. Iliac screw fixation is an extensive surgical procedure with potential complications, but high success rates can be achieved when it is performed systematically and in appropriately selected patients.