Surgical experience of neglected lower cervical spine fracture in patient with ankylosing spondylitis

Treatment of lower cervical spine fracture with ankylosing spondylitis by simple long anterior cervical plate: a retrospective study of 17 cases

Objective

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), an autoimmune disease, often leads to lower cervical spine fractures, with the potential for severe spinal nerve damage even from low-energy injuries. The optimal treatment approach remains debated.

Methods

A retrospective study involved 17 AS patients with lower cervical spine fractures who received anterior cervical fixation. Most presented cervicothoracic or thoracolumbar kyphosis, with 11 exhibiting neurological deficits. Patient characteristics, clinical data, visual analog scale (VAS), complications, and nerve recovery were analyzed.

Results

No postoperative neurological deterioration occurred. All cases experienced complete fusion of fractures during the follow-up period. Preoperative VAS significantly decreased at 3 days and 3 months post-surgery. Of the 11 patients with preoperative neurological deficits, approximately 54.5% showed improvement post-surgery. No complications were reported, such as esophageal fistula, wound infection, or fixation failure.

Conclusion

Anterior internal fixation is a possible treatment for AS-related lower cervical fractures. This approach ensures satisfactory spinal stability and neurological recovery with proper cranial traction and external fixation post-surgery. Our findings demonstrate that this surgical method is safe and effective.

Can a Nomogram Predict Survival After Treatment for an Ankylosing Spondylitis Cervical Fracture in a Patient With Neurologic Impairment? A National, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Ankylosing spondylitis-related cervical spine fracture with neurologic impairment (ASCF-NI) is a rare but often lethal injury. Factors independently associated with survival after treatment remain poorly defined, and identifying patients who are likely to survive the injury remains challenging.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What factors are independently associated with survival after treatment among patients with ASCF-NI? (2) Can a nomogram be developed that is sufficiently simple for clinicians to use that can identify patients who are the most likely to survive after injury?

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted based on a multi-institutional group of patients admitted and treated at one of 29 tertiary hospitals in China between March 1, 2003, and July 31, 2019. A total of 363 patients with a mean age of 53 ± 12 years were eventually included, 343 of whom were male. According to the National Household Registration Management System, 17% (61 of 363) died within 5 years of injury. Patients were treated using nonsurgical treatment or surgery, including procedures using the anterior approach, posterior approach, or combined anterior and posterior approaches. Indications for surgery included three-column injury, unstable fracture displacement, neurologic impairment or continuous progress, and intervertebral disc incarceration. By contrast, patients generally received nonsurgical treatment when they had a relatively stable fracture or medical conditions that did not tolerate surgery. Demographic, clinical, and treatment data were collected. The primary study goal was to identify which factors are independently associated with death within 5 years of injury, and the secondary goal was the development of a clinically applicable nomogram. We developed a multivariable Cox hazards regression model, and independent risk factors were defined by backward stepwise selection with the Akaike information criterion. We used these factors to create a nomogram using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

After controlling for potentially confounding variables, we found the following factors were independently associated with a lower likelihood of survival after injury: lower fracture site, more-severe peri-injury complications, poorer American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale, and treatment methods. We found that a C5 to C7 or T1 fracture (ref: C1 to C4 and 5; hazard ratio 1.7 [95% confidence interval 0.9 to 3.5]; p = 0.12), moderate peri-injury complications (ref: absence of or mild complications; HR 6.0 [95% CI 2.3 to 16.0]; p < 0.001), severe peri-injury complications (ref: absence of or mild complications; HR 30.0 [95% CI 11.5 to 78.3]; p < 0.001), ASIA Grade A (ref: ASIA Grade D; HR 2.8 [95% CI 1.1 to 7.0]; p = 0.03), anterior approach (ref: nonsurgical treatment; HR 0.5 [95% CI 0.2 to 1.0]; p = 0.04), posterior approach (ref: nonsurgical treatment; HR 0.4 [95% CI 0.2 to 0.8]; p = 0.006), and combined anterior and posterior approach (ref: nonsurgical treatment; HR 0.4 [95% CI 0.2 to 0.9]; p = 0.02) were associated with survival. Based on these factors, a nomogram was developed to predict the survival of patients with ASCF-NI after treatment. Tests revealed that the developed nomogram had good performance (C statistic of 0.91).

CONCLUSION

The nomogram developed in this study will allow us to classify patients with different mortality risk levels into groups. This, coupled with the factors we identified, was independently associated with survival, and can be used to guide more appropriate treatment and care strategies for patients with ASCF-NI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Classification and Treatment for Cervical Spine Fracture with Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Clinical Nomogram Prediction Study

Objective

Through the follow-up analysis of cervical spine fracture cases with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), a treatment-oriented fracture classification method is introduced to evaluate the clinical efficacy guided by this classification method.

Method

A retrospective analysis was performed on 128 AS patients who underwent comprehensive treatment in the Spine Surgery Department of Qingdao University Hospital from January 2009 to May 2018. Statistics of patient demographic data, distribution of different fractures corresponding to surgical methods, 3-year follow-up outcomes, and summary of objective fracture classification methods were analyzed. A prospective 5-year follow-up study of 90 patients with AS cervical spine fractures from June 2015 to August 2020 was also included. Statistical differences on the distribution of factors such as case information, cervical spine sagittal sequence parameters, and fracture classification were assessed. Correlations between surgical information, American Spinal Injuries Association grade (ASIA), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores (mJOA), and other factors were analyzed to establish a nomogram predictive model for curative effect outcomes. Overall, three major types and the four subtypes of AS cervical spine fractures were evaluated based on the clinical efficacy of the classification and the selection of surgical treatment methods.

Result

The most common type of fracture was type II (30 cases, 33.33%), most of the subtypes were A (37 cases), followed by B (36 cases) and C (17 cases). Twenty-four of 28 patients with type I underwent anterior surgery, and 47 of 62 patients with type II and III underwent posterior surgery. The average follow-up time was 25.76 ± 11.80 months. The results of predicting clinical variables are different but include factors such as fracture type and subtype, type of operation, and age. The predictor variables include the above-mentioned similar variables, but survival is more affected by the fracture type of the patient.

Conclusion

This predictive model based on follow-up information delineation points out the impact of ankylosing spondylitis cervical spine fracture classification on surgical selection and clinical efficacy.

Clinical Features and Treatment Outcomes of Acute Multiple Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Fractures : A Comparison of Continuous and Noncontinuous Fractures

Objective

The treatment of multiple thoracolumbar spine fractures according to fracture continuity has rarely been reported. Herein we evaluate the clinical features and outcomes of multiple thoracolumbar fractures depending on continuous or noncontinuous status.

Methods

From January 2010 to January 2016, 48 patients with acute thoracic and lumbar multiple fractures who underwent posterior fusion surgery were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups (group A : continuous; group B : noncontinuous). We investigated the causes of the injuries, the locations of the injuries, the range of fusion levels, and the functional outcomes based on the patients’ general characteristics.

Results

A total of 48 patients were enrolled (group A : 25 patients; group B : 23 patients). Both groups had similar pre-surgical clinical and radiologic features. The fusion level included three segments (group A : 4; group B : 5) or four segments (group A : 19; group B : 5). Group B required more instrumented segments than did group A. Group A scored 23.5 and group B scored 33.4 on the Korean Oswestry Disability Index (KODI) at the time of last follow-up. In both groups, longer fusion was associated with worse KODI score.

Conclusion

In this study, due to the assumption of similar initial clinical and radiologic features in both group, the mechanism of multiple fractures is presumed to be the same between continuous and noncontinuous fractures. The noncontinuous fracture group had worse KODI scores in long-term follow-up, thought to be due to long fusion level. Therefore, we recommend minimizing the number of segments that are fused in multiple thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures when decompression is not necessary.

Single anterior approach for cervical spine fractures at C5-T1 complicating ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcomes of anterior approach for cervical spine fractures at C5-T1 in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and study the problems encountered in diagnosis and treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten patients with AS (all males; mean age 43.7±9.4 years) underwent anterior surgeries to treat fractures at C5-T1. Skull tractions were performed on patients with fracture dislocation preoperatively. After operation, all the patients wore a cervical collar for 3 months. Plain radiographs at follow-up were reviewed. If bone fusion could not be confirmed on plain radiograph, CT scan was employed. The pre- and postoperative neurological statuses were evaluated according to the Frankel grading system. Problems encountered in diagnosis and treatments were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 41.2±22.7months. After operation, the displacements of fractures were significantly reduced(P<0.05). Bone fusions were observed in 9 patients at final follow-up. Frankel grades improved by 1.0±0.7 grade (P>0.05). Posterior complications occurred in four patients, including implants failure (n=1), subsidence of cage (n=1), hoarse voice (n=1) and pneumonias (n=2). The patient with implants failure required revision surgery and anterior-posterior fixation. Patient with subsidence of the titanium cage achieved bone fusion with prolonged cervical collar immobilization.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis and treatment of cervical spine fractures at C5-T1 in AS patients are challenging, with high risk of neurological compromise and postoperative complications. The single anterior approach followed by postoperative immobilization with a cervical collar can yield acceptable results if the cases are properly selected.

Multiple noncontiguous spinal fractures and occipitocervical dislocation in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis treated with a hybrid open and percutaneous spinal fixation technique: a case report

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal fractures occur with a greater frequency in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. Treatment of these fractures is complicated because of a higher incidence of medical comorbidities, higher rate of neurologic deficits, and higher risk of neurologic deterioration.

PURPOSE

To report a case report of a novel, combined open and percutaneous surgical techniques used for the treatment of multiple noncontiguous spinal fractures in a patient with AS.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

We describe the surgical treatment and the outcome of a patient with AS that sustained an occipitocervical dislocation and two noncontiguous three-column extension injuries using a hybrid technique with open occipital to T3 fusion and percutaneous T5-L1 instrumentation at a tertiary care facility.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A 77-year-old man with multiple comorbidities and newly diagnosed AS.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Two-year clinical and radiographic outcome of a patient treated surgically for multiple spine injuries in the setting of an ankylosed spine.

METHODS

The patient was treated with a hybrid approach using both open fusion and percutaneous instrumentation techniques.

RESULTS

At 2 years postoperatively, the patient had recovered ambulatory ability and had a good clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a unique case of noncontiguous spinal trauma in a medically complex patient with AS treated with a hybrid open and percutaneous technique to minimize surgical insult and blood loss, with a good clinical and radiographic outcome 2 years postoperatively.

Robotic-assisted device in posterior spinal fusion for a high risk thoraculombar fracture in ankylosing spondylitis

Fractures in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are often difficult to treat and surgical treatment may be fraught with complications. We describe the use of a robotic-assisted device in the surgical treatment of an unstable L1 fracture in an elderly patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and AS. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged after 3 days. The use of a robotic-assisted device in spine surgery is particularly indicated in difficult high risk cases.

Diagnosing and managing spinal injury in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

BACKGROUND

Individuals with ankylosing spondylitis are at an increased risk of vertebral fractures. These are often unstable, leading to primary and secondary neurological injury and conferring high levels of morbidity and mortality. Fractures in these patients can occur after minimal trauma and are easily missed, with potentially disastrous consequences.

OBJECTIVES

To educate health professionals who may be involved in the initial assessment and management of ankylosing spondylitis patients with possible spinal injuries, despite not being spinal specialists.

CASE REPORTS

We present three cases from our own hospital, which illustrate the pitfalls associated with traumatic spinal injury in ankylosing spondylitis. Case 1 shows why delayed presentation of spinal injury is common, as well as demonstrating the need for multiple imaging modalities in some patients. Case 2 is an example of primary neurological injury in this patient group, and case 3 highlights the risk of secondary neurological injury, as well as the effect of multiple comorbidities on patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important that staff in the Emergency Department have an understanding of the extreme caution that is needed in the management of possible spinal injuries in patients with or suspected of having ankylosing spondylitis.