Laparotomy versus Laparoscopic Placement of Distal Catheter in Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Procedure

Techniques to Reduce the Rate of Infection in Surgeries for Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunting in Adults

OBJECTIVE

Cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement is associated with high rates of infection. Multiple standardized protocols, particularly in pediatric populations, have been proposed to mitigate this infection rate. We sought to determine the effectiveness of a standardized shunt infection protocol in a large adult population.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of adults presenting for primary cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement from 2012 to 2022. The primary outcome of interest was shunt infection. The primary exposure of interest was implementation of the shunt protocol (began October 2015). Secondary exposures of interest included use and type of perioperative antibiotics and total operating room time.

RESULTS

In total, 820 patients were included, 140 before protocol implementation and 680 after protocol implementation. The overall number of infections over the study period was 15 (1.8% infection rate), with 8 infections preprotocol (5.7%) and 7 infections during the protocol period (1.0%). The infection protocol was associated with a decreased infection rate (odds rato [OR] 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.58, P = 0.002). Total operating room time (OR 1.38 per 30-minute increase, 95% CI 1.05-1.81, P = 0.021) was associated with increased infection rate. Patients who received antibiotics with primarily gram-positive coverage (cefazolin or equivalent) did not have significantly different odds of shunt infection as patients who received broad-spectrum coverage (OR 2.10, 95% CI 0.56-7.88, P = 0.274).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of an evidence-based perioperative shunt infection protocol is an effective method to decrease shunt infections. Broad-spectrum perioperative antibiotics may not have greater efficacy than gram-positive only coverage, but more research is required.

Outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement with or without laparoscopic assistance: An analysis of the national inpatient sample

Background

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) can be placed solely by a neurosurgeon often via an open-laparotomy approach, or laparoscopically as a collaborative effort between a neurosurgeon and a general surgeon. Prior studies have shown conflicting results when examining outcomes regarding infection, revision rate, hospital charges, length of stay, and mortality between the open mini-laparotomy and the laparoscopic approaches.

Objective

The current study uses the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to compare outcomes of open mini-laparotomy vs. laparoscopic collaborative approach in VPS placement.

Methods

We performed a retrospective database study of the NIS from October 2015-December 2017 utilizing International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision coding to identify all cases of VPS placement. All analyses accounted for the sampling design of the NIS.

Results

A total of 6580 cases (4969 with open mini-laparotomy approach and 1611 with laparoscopic collaborative approach) met inclusion criteria. Hospital charges, infection rates, and revision rates were similar between approaches. There were no significant differences in length of stay, mortality, or complication rates between the two approaches.

Conclusion

The collaborative, laparoscopic approach to VPS placement has similar outcomes and is non-inferior to the traditional open mini-laparotomy approach.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement: A Non-inferiority Study

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) insertion into the abdominal cavity had been done for decades via an open approach. Recently, the laparoscopic insertion of the peritoneal portion of the shunt has become an option. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes between these two approaches. We performed a single institution retrospective review of 104 consecutive adult patients between 2015 and 2017. Patients had peritoneal catheters placed either via an open approach by the neurosurgical team, or laparoscopically by general surgeons. Patient demographics and outcomes were compared using a non-inferiority analysis. Independent variables in the analysis included patient age, gender, race, BMI, surgery performed, previous VPS placement, previous abdominal procedures, and VPS indication, while dependent variables included length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), occurrence of shunt failure, and postoperative complications. Cohort analysis included 62 open and 42 laparoscopic cases with similar baseline characteristics. In terms of patient outcomes, EBL and hospital stay duration were shown to be non-inferior in the open group as compared to the laparoscopic group. We could not prove non-inferiority based on risk for overall or distal shunt failure. Neurosurgeons may reasonably continue to place peritoneal shunt catheters using a "traditional" method.

Two-point fixation enhanced the outcome of laparoscopy-assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunt in adult patients with hydrocephalus: a retrospective study

Objective

In patients with hydrocephalus, laparoscopy significantly improved ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) outcomes. However, abdominal complications still occur, which require revision surgeries. In this study, we aimed to examine whether laparoscopy-assisted VPS with two-point fixation (LAVPS-TPF) has better outcomes than those of VPS (open-VPS) and laparoscopy-assisted VPS with no fixation (LAVPS-NF).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 105 open-VPS, 40 LAVPS-NF, and 49 LAVPS-TPF cases from 2015 to 2020. Data including body mass index, etiology, abdominal surgery history, Glasgow coma scale (GCS), operation time, in-hospital days, shunt failure, complications, and modified Rankin scores were analyzed, as well as subgroups of patients with history of abdominal surgery, GCS scores, and revision surgeries.

Results

The LAVPS-TPF group demonstrated decreased shunt failure rates at 12 months (2.04%) compared to those of the open-VPS group (14.29%, P = 0.020) and reduced abdominal shunt-related complications (P = 0.004 vs. open-VPS and LAVPS-NF) and shunt revisions. In the LAVPS-TPF group with abdominal history (n = 51), 12-month shunt failure rates (P = 0.020 vs. open-VS), repair frequency (P = 0.020 vs. open-VS), and abdominal complications (P = 0.003 and 0.006 vs. open-VS and LAVPS-NF) were reduced. In the LAVPS-TPF group with GCS scores of 13-15 (n = 152), shunt failure rates at 12 months, abdominal complications, and revision frequency were decreased (P < 0.05 vs. other groups). Compared to the LAVPS-NF group, neurological complications were also reduced (P = 0.001). Among revision surgeries (n = 28), fixed shunts resulted in improved shunt survival rates at 12 months, reduced abdominal complications, and secondary revisions (P < 0.05). Moreover, a more optimal recovery without neurological sequelae was achieved by shunt fixation than that by LAVPS-NF (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

LAVPS-TPF significantly improved shunt survival rates at 12 months and reduced the incidence of abdominal shunt-related complications compared to open-VPS and LAVPS-NF, especially in patients with history of abdominal surgery, higher GCS scores, and revision surgeries. However, further studies are required to confirm these benefits.

Open versus laparoscopic ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) surgery is the traditional method for treating hydrocephalus, remaining one of the most regularly used procedures in pediatric neurosurgery. The reported revision rate of VPS can reach up to 80% and significantly reduces the quality of life in the affected children and has a high socioeconomic burden. Traditionally, distal VPS placement has been achieved open via a small laparotomy. However, in adults several studies have shown a lower rate of distal dysfunction using laparoscopic insertion. As the data in children are scarce, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare open and laparoscopic VPS placement in children regarding complications.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases were searched using a systematic search strategy to identify studies comparing open and laparoscopic VPS placement up to July 2022. Two independent researchers assessed the studies for inclusion and quality. Primary outcome measure was distal revision rate. A fixed effects model was used if low heterogeneity (I2 < 50%) was present, otherwise a random effects model was applied.

RESULTS

Out of 115 screened studies we included 8 studies in our qualitative assessment and three of them in our quantitative meta-analysis. All studies were retrospective cohort studies with 590 analyzed children, of which 231 children (39.2%) received laparoscopic, and 359 children (60.8%) open shunt placement. Similar distal revision rates were observed between the laparoscopic and open group (3.75% vs. 4.3%, RR 1.16, [ 95% CI 0.48 to 2.79], I2 = 50%, z = 0.32, p = 0.74). There was no significant difference in postoperative infection rate between the two groups (laparoscopic 5.6% vs. open 7.5%, RR 0.99, (95% CI [0.53 to 1.85]), I2=0%, z = -0.03, p= 0.97). The meta-analysis showed a significantly shorter surgery time in the laparoscopic group (49.22 (±21.46) vs. 64.13 (±8.99) minutes, SMD-3.6, [95% CI -6.9 to -0.28], I2=99%m z= -2.12, p= 0.03) compared to open distal VPS placement.

CONCLUSION

Few studies are available comparing open and laparoscopic shunt placement in children. Our meta-analysis showed no difference in distal revision rate between laparoscopic and open shunt insertion; however, laparoscopic placement was associated with a significantly shorter surgery time. Further prospective trials are needed to assess possible superiority of one of the techniques.

Transvaginal Migration of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts in Children: Review of Literature

Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt placement is the most commonly performed procedure for the treatment of hydrocephalus. The complication of migration of the distal ventriculo-peritoneal shunt is one of the many complications that occur after ventriculo-peritoneal shunt placement. The migration of the ventriculo-peritoneal shunt through the vagina is infrequently reported in children. The aim of this review is to help all the providers caring for children with ventriculo-peritoneal shunts to identify issues early when encountered with this complication and thus limit morbidity and mortality. We reviewed all cases of migration of ventriculo-peritoneal shunt through the vagina in children less than 18 years of age that were published in the literature using PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. A total of 11 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review among the 93 articles obtained with title and abstract screening. Previous non-shunt-related abdominal operations and shunt revisions are consistent risk factors in all cases. We did not recognize specific approaches to catheter placement or management that could have prevented this complication. Ventriculitis necessitating shunt removal and therapies requiring additional procedures and prolonged hospitalization are the major consequences identified. Awareness of this unusual complication is very important among health care providers such as emergency care health providers who are likely to be the first to encounter these children on initial presentation.

An Indigenous Method of Securing Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Tube in Peritoneal Cavity

Introduction Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) is the most common procedure used for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion in hydrocephalus. Over the years, many technical, procedural, and instrument-related advancements have taken place which have reduced the associated complication rates. Shunt block is a very common complication irrespective of the shunt system used. The abdominal end of the shunt tube gets blocked usually due to plugging of omentum onto the shunt catheter. We describe a technique of catheter fixation and placement under vision coupled with omentopexy done laparoscopically to prevent this complication.

Materials and Methods This technique was used in 23 patients (11 female, 12 male; range 16–73 years) afflicted with hydrocephalus from June 2016 and December 2019 after obtaining an informed consent, and the outcomes were noted in terms of shunt patency, complications, if any, and the need for revision.

Results The median operation time was 90 minutes (range 35–160 minutes). All shunt catheters were still functional after a mean follow-up of 16.5 months (range 1–34 months) and none required revision.

Conclusion Laparoscopic placement of shunt tube along with omental folding is a safe and effective technique for salvaging the abdominal end of VPS and may be helpful in reducing shunt blockage.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Versus Mini-Open Laparotomy for Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement in the Medicare Population

BACKGROUND

Placement of the distal shunt catheter into the peritoneum during ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) surgery can be done with either laparoscopic assistance or laparotomy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes in laparoscopic-assisted vs laparotomy for placement of VPS in the Medicare population.

METHODS

Patients undergoing VPS placement, between 2004 and 2014, were identified by International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes in the Medicare database. Demographic data including age, sex, comorbidities, and indications were collected. Six- and twelve-month complication rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1966 (3.2%) patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted VPS and 60 030 (96.8%) patients underwent nonlaparoscopic-assisted VPS placement. Compared with traditional open VPS placement, the laparoscopic approach was associated with decreased odds of distal revision at 6- and 12-mo postoperatively (6 mo: odds ratio [OR] = 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.74; 12 mo: OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.94). At 6- and 12-mo postoperatively, multivariable regression analysis demonstrated increased odds of distal revision in patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 Kg/M2, history of open abdominal surgery, and history of laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Additionally, history of prior abdominal surgery and BMI > 30 Kg/M2 were significantly associated with increase odds of shunt infection at 6 and 12-mo, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In the largest retrospective analysis to date, patients with a history of abdominal surgery and obesity were found to be at increased risk of infection and distal revision after VPS placement. However, the laparoscopic approach for abdominal placement of the distal catheter was associated with reduced rates of distal revision in this population, suggesting an avenue for reducing complications in well-selected patients.

Peritoneal insertion of shunts in children: comparison between trocar and laparoscopically guided insertion

PURPOSE

Ventriculo-peritoneal shunts are commonly used for treating hydrocephalus for all age groups. There are 3 main methods for shunt placement into the peritoneum: mini laparotomy, laparoscopically guided, or percutaneously with a trocar. There is limited literature comparing between these techniques in the pediatric population, and specifically-the trocar has not been compared with laparoscopy. The goal of this study is to compare trocar and laparoscopy use, with respect to safety and potential need for future shunt revisions.

METHODS

Data was retrospectively collected from 2 centers for children (< 18 years old) who underwent a primary insertion of a CSF shunt to the peritoneum, and had no prior abdominal surgery or significant abdominal disease. One center used a trocar, and the other laparoscopic guidance. Demographics, surgical time, and shunt complications were analyzed. Primary endpoint was distal shunt malfunction, either technique-related or non-technique-related.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-seven children (220 trocar, 37 laparoscopy) were included. The groups were similar with regard to age at surgery and etiology of hydrocephalus. Trocar use was associated with a slightly higher, although statistically insignificant, rate of technique-related distal complications (4.1% vs 0, p = 0.37). Following propensity score matching, there was no statistically significant difference in any shunt complication between both groups. Trocar use was associated with shorter surgery, and less surgical personnel.

CONCLUSIONS

In primary shunt surgery in children, abdominal placement of the catheter using a trocar or laparoscopic guidance is safe, and associated with a low distal malfunction rate, with no statistically significant differences between both techniques.

Laparoscopic insertion of ventriculoperitoneal shunts in pediatric patients - A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPSs) are the mainstay of treatment of hydrocephalus but have frequent complications including shunt failure and infection. There has been no comparison of laparoscopic versus open primary VPS insertion in children. We hypothesized that laparoscopic VP shunt insertion may improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

A prospectively-maintained, externally-validated database of pediatric patients who underwent VPS insertion at a single center between 2012 and 2016 was reviewed. Outcomes including subsequent revisions, shunt infections, operative time, and hospital stay between open and laparoscopic groups were compared.

RESULTS

210 patients underwent VPS insertion - 41 laparoscopically and 169 open. Operative time was longer for laparoscopic insertions. There was no difference in shunt infections, complications or length of stay. There was no difference between overall revisions or in confirmed peritoneal obstructions in the laparoscopic (12%) versus open VPS insertions (5%), p = 0.13.

CONCLUSIONS

This first cohort analysis of laparoscopic versus open VPS insertion in pediatric patients indicates no difference in confirmed peritoneal obstructions. With increasing use of laparoscopic placement in some centers, it remains important to elucidate if there is a subset of pediatric patients who might benefit from this technique; possible candidates may be those who are overweight/obese or have had previous intra-abdominal surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III - Retrospective cohort study.

Novel type of peritoneocentesis trocar-assisted distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement with supervision via a one-port laparoscope

Ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS) are the primary treatment for hydrocephalus and are associated with a high risk of complications, specifically in patients who are obese or have abdominal adhesions or shunt revisions. The present study describes the use of a novel type of peritoneal catheter peritoneocentesis trocar insertion with the assistance of a one-port laparoscope. A total of 36 patients with hydrocephalus underwent this novel type of peritoneocentesis trocar-assisted VPS. The distal shunt catheter was placed into the right subdiaphragmatic space and the catheter was traversed through a single hole drilled through the liver falciform ligament. The duration of the laparoscopic surgery ranged from 6–18 min (mean 10.4±1.6 min). No shunt-related infections or catheter malfunctions or injuries to the intra-abdominal organs occurred. The total abdominal incision length was 1.0 cm (0.5+0.5 cm). No laparoscopy-related complications were observed during follow-up assessments. The novel approach used in the current study is very easy to perform, and this method may significantly reduce the risk of malfunction complications. The presented method also has the advantages of reduced trauma and a simpler surgery. The current study indicated that this simple, minimally invasive procedure was beneficial for patients with hydrocephalus, specifically in cases of patients with obesity, peritoneal adhesions or shunt revisions.

Distal shunt revision: a simple method to avoid repeat laparotomy

Hydrocephalus is usually treated by placement of a ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunt. Distal VP shunt failure is a common complication of this procedure, especially in the paediatric population. Distal shunt revisions are often made more technically difficult by challenging abdominal anatomy. In this technical note, we describe a simple technique utilizing tenting sutures and the previous shunt tract for placement of the distal abdominal catheter accurately into the peritoneal space during distal shunt revision.

Laparoscopy versus mini-laparotomy peritoneal catheter insertion of ventriculoperitoneal shunts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt treatment is the main treatment method for hydrocephalus. The traditional operative approach for peritoneal catheter insertion is mini-laparotomy. In recent years, laparoscopy-assisted insertion has become increasingly popular. It seems likely that use of an endoscope could lower the incidence of shunt malfunction. However, there is no consensus about the benefits of laparoscopy-assisted peritoneal catheter insertion.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library databases. A manual search for reference lists was conducted. The protocol was prepared according to the interventional systematic reviews of the Cochrane Handbook, and the article was written on the basis of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines.

RESULTS

Eleven observational trials and 2 randomized controlled trials were included. Seven operation-related outcome measures were analyzed, and 3 of these showed no difference between operative techniques. The results of the meta-analysis are as follows: in the laparoscopy group, the rate of distal shunt failure was lower (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.25–0.67; p = 0.0003), the absolute effect is 7.11% for distal shunt failure, the number needed to treat is 14 (95% CI 8–23), operative time was shorter (mean difference [MD], −12.84; 95% CI −20.68 to −5.00; p = 0.001), and blood loss was less (MD −9.93, 95% CI −17.56 to −2.31; p = 0.01). In addition, a borderline statistically significant difference tending to laparoscopic technique was observed in terms of hospital stay (MD −1.77, 95% CI −3.67 to 0.13; p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

To some extent, a laparoscopic insertion technique could yield a better prognosis, mainly because it is associated with a lower distal failure rate and shorter operative time, which would be clinically relevant.

Antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters for prevention of infections in patients with hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECT The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters (antimicrobial catheters) in reducing the risk of infection in patients undergoing CSF shunting or ventricular drainage. METHODS The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched. Catheter implantation was classified as either shunting (mainly ventriculoperitoneal shunting) or ventricular drainage (mainly external [EVD]). Studies evaluating antibioticimpregnated catheters (AICs), silver-coated catheters (SCCs), and hydrogel-coated catheters (HCCs) were included. A random effects model meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS Thirty-six studies (7 randomized and 29 nonrandomized, 16,796 procedures) were included. The majority of data derive from studies on the effectiveness of AICs, followed by studies on the effectiveness of SCCs. Statistical heterogeneity was observed in several analyses. Antimicrobial shunt catheters (AICs, SCCs) were associated with lower risk for CSF catheter-associated infections than conventional catheters (CCs) (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.35-0.56). Fewer infections developed in the patients treated with antimicrobial catheters regardless of randomization, number of participating centers, funding, shunting or ventricular drainage, definition of infections, de novo implantation, and rate of infections in the study. There was no difference regarding gram-positive bacteria, all staphylococci, coagulase-negative streptococci, and Staphylococcus aureus, when analyzed separately. On the contrary, the risk for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, RR 2.64, 95% CI 1.26-5.51), nonstaphylococcal (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.22-2.52), and gram-negative bacterial (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.33-3.43) infections increased with antimicrobial shunt catheters. CONCLUSIONS Based on data mainly from nonrandomized studies, AICs and SCCs reduce the risk for infection in patients undergoing CSF shunting. Future studies should evaluate the higher risk for MRSA and gram-negative infections. Additional trials are needed to investigate the comparative effectiveness of the different types of antimicrobial catheters.

Use of a new type of trocar for the surgical treatment of hydrocephalus: a simple and effective technique

This study compared the use of a new type of peritoneocentesis trocar with conventional laparotomy for the placement of the distal catheter in the treatment of hydrocephalus with ventriculoperitoneal shunt. A total of 376 patients with hydrocephalus were recruited to the study and were assigned randomly to undergo insertion of the distal catheter by conventional laparotomy (n = 195) or using the new peritoneal trocar (n = 181). The time taken for the surgical procedure and the complication rate over the following 1-year period were compared between the two groups. The mean length of the procedure to place the distal catheter was significantly shorter in the trocar group compared with the laparotomy group. Infection and obstruction rates were significantly higher in the laparotomy group than in the trocar group. In conclusion, the use of the new trocar was associated with lower rates of surgically induced trauma and complications compared with conventional laparotomy.