Accuracy and Safety in Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spines : Comparison Study between Conventional C-Arm Fluoroscopy and Navigation Coupled with O-Arm® Guided Methods

Deep Learning-Based Localization and Orientation Estimation of Pedicle Screws in Spinal Fusion Surgery

Objective

This study investigated the application of a deep learning-based object detection model for accurate localization and orientation estimation of spinal fixation surgical instruments during surgery.

Methods

We employed the You Only Look Once (YOLO) object detection framework with oriented bounding boxes (OBBs) to address the challenge of non-axis-aligned instruments in surgical scenes. The initial dataset of 100 images was created using brochure and website images from 11 manufacturers of commercially available pedicle screws used in spinal fusion surgeries, and data augmentation was used to expand 300 images. The model was trained, validated, and tested using 70%, 20%, and 10% of the images of lumbar pedicle screws, with the training process running for 100 epochs.

Results

The model testing results showed that it could detect the locations of the pedicle screws in the surgical scene as well as their direction angles through the OBBs. The F1 score of the model was 0.86 (precision: 1.00, recall: 0.80) at each confidence level and mAP50. The high precision suggests that the model effectively identifies true positive instrument detections, although the recall indicates a slight limitation in capturing all instruments present. This approach offers advantages over traditional object detection in bounding boxes for tasks where object orientation is crucial, and our findings suggest the potential of YOLOv8 OBB models in real-world surgical applications such as instrument tracking and surgical navigation.

Conclusion

Future work will explore incorporating additional data and the potential of hyperparameter optimization to improve overall model performance.

Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Injury: Evidence-Based Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Traumatic thoracolumbar spine injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Targeted for non-spine specialist trauma surgeons, this systematic scoping review aimed to examine literature for up-to-date evidence on presentation, management, and outcomes of thoracolumbar spine injuries in adult trauma patients.

METHODS

This review was reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. We searched four bibliographic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included experimental, observational, and evidence-synthesis articles evaluating patients with thoracic, lumbar, or thoracolumbar spine injury, published in English between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2021. Studies which focused on animals, cadavers, cohorts with N <30, and pediatric cohorts (age <18 years old), as well as case studies, abstracts, and commentaries were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 2501 studies were screened, of which 326 unique studies were fully text reviewed and twelve aspects of injury management were identified and discussed: injury patterns, determination of injury status and imaging options, considerations in management, and patient quality of life. We found: (1) imaging is a necessary diagnostic tool, (2) no consensus exists for preferred injury characterization scoring systems, (3) operative management should be considered for unstable fractures, decompression, and deformity, and (4) certain patients experience significant burden following injury.

DISCUSSION

In this systematic scoping review, we present the most up-to-date information regarding the management of traumatic thoracolumbar spine injuries. This allows non-specialist trauma surgeons to become more familiar with thoracolumbar spine injuries in trauma patients and provides a framework for their management.

Midpoint of C7 Lateral Mass Serves as an Accurate Reference Point for the Placement of T1 Pedicle Screws: An Anatomic Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Free-hand placement of T1 pedicle screws can often be challenging. A reliable free-hand technique for placement of T1 pedicle screws can overcome some of the difficulties associated with poor fluoroscopy in this region. The purpose of this study was to propose a novel anatomic landmark for accurate identification of the T1 entry point using the midpoint of the C7 lateral mass as a reference point. Our hypothesis is that the midpoint of the C7 lateral mass is within 1-2 mm of the center of the T1 pedicle.

METHODS

Using 3-dimensional reconstruction software, the pedicle of T1 and the lateral mass of C7 were isolated to assess the location of the T1 pedicle relative to the C7 lateral mass. Specifically, the distance between the center of the T1 pedicle and the center of the C7 lateral mass was measured on 40 computed tomography scans. Furthermore, a clinical validation of this technique was performed by assessing the postoperative computed tomography scans of 53 patients undergoing cervicothoracic instrumentation. The Gertzbein and Robbins classification system was used to grade the accuracy of T1 pedicle screw placements in all patients using this technique.

RESULTS

The average horizontal deviation + SD from centers of the T1 pedicle and the C7 lateral mass was 0.398 mm ± 0.953 mm. The T1 pedicle on average was slightly medial to the center of the C7 lateral mass. A total of 98.1% of T1 pedicle screws placed in vivo using the free-hand technique were of Grade A.

CONCLUSION

In this article, we demonstrate that the center of the C7 lateral mass overlays the T1 pedicle and the optimal entry point is immediately below the midpoint of the C7 lateral mass. This approach provides a practical and accurate landmark in posterior cervicothoracic spine procedures that reduce the need for additional radiation exposure or increased operative time with image-guided techniques.

Assessing intraoperative pedicle screw placement accuracy using biplanar radiographs compared to three-dimensional imaging

To date, biplanar imaging (2D) has been the method of choice for pedicle screw (PS) positioning and verified for the anteroposterior view and (spinal midline) M-line method. In recent years, the use of intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) imaging has become available with the Gertzbein-Robbins system (GRS) to assess PS breach and positioning confirmation. The aim is to determine if 2D imaging is sufficient to assess PS position in comparison to advanced 3D imaging.Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 204 consecutive adult patients who underwent posterior thoracic and lumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative spinal surgery by a single surgeon (2019-2022).Of the 204 patients, 187 (91.6%) had intraoperative images available for analysis. A total of 1044 PS implants were used; 922 (88.3%) were robotically placed. Postoperative CT scans were verified with M-line/GRS findings. Among 103 patients (50.5%) with a total of 362 screws, (34.7%) had postoperative CT, intraoperative 3D scan, and intraoperative 2D scan for analysis. Postoperative CT findings were consistent with all GRS findings, validating that 3D imaging was accurate. Screws (1%) were falsely verified by the M-line as 3D imaging confirmed false negative or positive findings.In our series, intraoperative 3D scan was as accurate as postoperative CT scan in assessing PS breach. A significant number of PS may be falsely read as accurate on 2D imaging, that is in fact inaccurate when assessed on 3D imaging. An intraoperative post-instrumentation 3D scan may be preferable to prevent postoperative recognition of a falsely verified screw on biplanar imaging.

A Single-Center Experience of Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery in Korea : Analysis of Screw Accuracy, Potential Risk Factor of Screw Malposition and Learning Curve

OBJECTIVE

Recently, robotic-assisted spine surgery (RASS) has been considered a minimally invasive and relatively accurate method. In total, 495 robotic-assisted pedicle screw fixation (RAPSF) procedures were attempted on 100 patients during a 14-month period. The current study aimed to analyze the accuracy, potential risk factors, and learning curve of RAPSF.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated the position of RAPSF using the Gertzbein and Robbins scale (GRS). The accuracy was analyzed using the ratio of the clinically acceptable group (GRS grades A and B), the dissatisfying group (GRS grades C, D, and E), and the Surgical Evaluation Assistant program. The RAPSF was divided into the no-breached group (GRS grade A) and breached group (GRS grades B, C, D, and E), and the potential risk factors of RAPSF were evaluated. The learning curve was analyzed by changes in robot-used time per screw and the occurrence tendency of breached and failed screws according to case accumulation.

RESULTS

The clinically acceptable group in RAPSF was 98.12%. In the analysis using the Surgical Evaluation Assistant program, the tip offset was 2.37±1.89 mm, the tail offset was 3.09±1.90 mm, and the angular offset was 3.72°±2.72°. In the analysis of potential risk factors, the difference in screw fixation level (p=0.009) and segmental distance between the tracker and the instrumented level (p=0.001) between the no-breached and breached group were statistically significant, but not for the other factors. The mean difference between the no-breach and breach groups was statistically significant in terms of pedicle width (p<0.001) and tail offset (p=0.042). In the learning curve analysis, the occurrence of breached and failed screws and the robot-used time per screw screws showed a significant decreasing trend.

CONCLUSION

In the current study, RAPSF was highly accurate and the specific potential risk factors were not identified. However, pedicle width was presumed to be related to breached screw. Meanwhile, the robot-used time per screw and the incidence of breached and failed screws decreased with the learning curve.

Learning curve across 2000 thoracolumbar pedicle screw placements using O-arm navigation: technical difficulties and their solutions

INTRODUCTION

Instrumentation using the intraoperative O-arm navigation technique appears safer than its predecessor techniques. However, only a handful of surgeons often used navigation during spinal surgeries. Too many operative glitches and unreliable navigation accuracy were the important reasons cited even by experienced surgeons for not using spinal navigation. We have studied the accuracy of pedicle screw placement during the learning curve and beyond it. We have also discussed in detail the intricacies of the technique and solutions to the difficulties encountered using spinal navigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 2000 thoracolumbar pedicle screws have been placed in the 324 spine surgeries meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria included in this retrospective study. We have divided 2000 pedicle screw placements into consecutive groups of 200 each. We have compared these groups for the accuracy of screw placement with the surgeon's experience.

RESULTS

The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using the "in-versus-out" grading system in group 1 was 85.5% which significantly increased in group 2 to 93.5% (p-value: 0.0099), and thereafter, there was a nonsignificant increase in subsequent groups with the graph achieving the shape of a plateau.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should learn the correct principles of the technique of O-arm navigation to prevent the loss of accuracy and place pedicle screws with high accuracy. There is a learning curve of around 30-35 surgeries or 200 pedicle screw placements to acclimatize with the technique of O-arm navigation and learn its principles.

Robotics and navigation in spine surgery: A narrative review

Introduction

In recent decades, there has been a rising trend of spinal surgical interventional techniques, especially Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (MIS), to improve the quality of life in an effective and safe manner. However, MIS techniques tend to be difficult to adapt and are associated with an increased risk of radiation exposure. This led to the development of 'computer-assisted surgery' in 1983, which integrated CT images into spinal procedures evolving into the present day robotic-assisted spine surgery. The authors aim to review the development of spine surgeries and provide an overview of the benefits offered. It includes all the comparative studies available to date.

Methods

The manuscript has been prepared as per "SANRA-a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles". The authors searched Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus using the terms "(((((Robotics) OR (Navigation)) OR (computer assisted)) OR (3D navigation)) OR (Freehand)) OR (O-Arm)) AND (spine surgery)" and 68 articles were included for analysis excluding review articles, meta-analyses, or systematic literature.

Results

The authors noted that 49 out of 68 studies showed increased precision of pedicle screw insertion, 10 out of 19 studies show decreased radiation exposure, 13 studies noted decreased operative time, 4 out of 8 studies showed reduced hospital stay and significant reduction in rates of infections, neurological deficits, the need for revision surgeries, and rates of radiological ASD, with computer-assisted techniques.

Conclusion

Computer-assisted surgeries have better accuracy of pedicle screw insertion, decreased blood loss and operative time, reduced radiation exposure, improved functional outcomes, and lesser complications.

Assessment of Navigated Pedicle Screws From Intraoperative Imaging: A Prospective Study of Accuracy and Agreement

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative (IO) image guidance surgery using 3-dimensional fluoroscopic navigation methods, such as the O-arm system, has improved the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in instrumented spine surgery. IO and postoperative (PO) validation of the implant's correct position from radiological images is a decisive step to ensure patient safety and avoidance of complications related to implant misplacement. In this prospective single-center study, the authors investigated the accuracy and agreement of assessment of pedicle screws from IO O-arm images in comparison to PO computed tomography images. This study aimed to determine whether final evaluation of pedicle screws can safely be conducted from IO images that supersedes the PO computed tomography control.

METHODS

A prospective single-center study was carried out at the Spine Unit in the Department of Orthopedics at Umeå University Hospital between 2019 and 2021. All patients enrolled in the study underwent instrumented thoracolumbar spine surgery using navigation. Imaging data were obtained from IO and PO examinations. Four reviewers-2 attending senior spine surgeons, 1 final year resident in orthopedics, and 1 attending neuroradiologist-classified pedicle screws using the Gertzbein and Robbins classification system. Agreement and accuracy of the reviewers were studied to evaluate the assessment of pedicle screws from IO and PO images.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients (422 screws) were included in the study. There was high accuracy among surgeons both on IO and PO images (0.96-0.97, 95% CI [0.94-0.99] and 0.97, 95% CI [0.94-0.99], respectively), and the overall agreement between all raters was 92% to 98% (95% CI [0.90, 1.00]). The discrepancy in assessment between optimal (Group 1) and suboptimal (Group 2) screws between IO and PO images was as low as 1% to 1.7%, which indicates that very few suboptimal screws are missed in the assessment of IO images.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of navigated pedicle screws using IO images is safe and reliable and may replace the need for further assessment using PO imaging.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Real-Time Navigation with Guide Template for Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Device: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Objective

This study aims to explore the real-time navigation with guide template using an augmented reality head-mounted device (ARHMD) for pedicle screw placement.

Methods

The spatial coordinate relationships between augmented reality images and real objects were established through the custom-made guide template, and the registration and tracking were completed using an ARHMD. The feasibility and accuracy of this method were verified by pedicle screw placement in 2 lumbar models. According to the Gertzbein-Robbins grading scale, the accuracy of pedicle screw placement was assessed. The navigation errors were estimated by measuring the deviation values of entry point and trajectory angle.

Results

A total of 20 pedicle K-wires were placed into L1-L5 in 2 lumbar models, which were successfully completed, with an average time of 11.5 min per model and 69 s per screw. The overall K-wires placement accuracy was 100% (20 screws). The navigation error was 2.77 ± 0.82 mm for the deviation value of entry point, and 3.03° ± 0.94° for the deviation value of trajectory angle.

Conclusions

The application of an ARHMD combined with guide template for pedicle screw placement is a promising navigation approach.

Technological Advances in Spine Surgery: Navigation, Robotics, and Augmented Reality

Accurate screw placement is critical to avoid vascular or neurologic complications during spine surgery and to maximize fixation for fusion and deformity correction. Computer-assisted navigation, robotic-guided spine surgery, and augmented reality surgical navigation are currently available technologies that have been developed to improve screw placement accuracy. The advent of multiple generations of new technologies within the past 3 decades has presented surgeons with a diverse array of choices when it comes to pedicle screw placement. Considerations for patient safety and optimal outcomes must be paramount when selecting a technology.

Marker Screw Utilization for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MS-MIS TLIF): Promises and Advantages

Background and Objective: Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) has been investigated and shown excellent short- and long-term outcomes. In this paper, we describe a new MIS-TLIF technique and pedicle screw insertion using a marker screw as a guidance method. Moreover, we report perioperative, postoperative, and patient-related outcomes. In addition, this paper outlines major differences in radiation exposure, cost effectiveness and accuracy of Marker Screw Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MS-MIS TLIF) compared to other techniques. We report our technique to share our knowledge and experience with the aim of achieving a better MIS-TLIF that would help both surgeons and patients. Materials and Methods: A prospective case series was conducted between October 2018 and February 2021. Patients undergoing MS-MIS TLIF with marker screws were consecutively included. The surgery did not exceed two levels. The patients’ medical records were reviewed, and the included patients were asked to complete two outcome-questionnaires before surgery and at the six-month visit. The surgical technique is described in this paper. Results: A total of 37 patients were recruited. The mean age was 57.35 ± 12.8 years, and more than half of the patients were females. The most common indications for surgery were degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis, with the typical level at L4–5. The operative time was 3.02 ± 0.83 h, while the estimated blood loss was 127.7 ± 71.1 mL. The average time for ambulation and hospitalization was 1 ± 1.1 and 2.84 ± 1.4 days, respectively. The patients described significant improvement in both questionnaires. No screw-related complications or screw revisions were needed up to two years of follow-up. Conclusions: The use of marker screws for pedicle screw placement through a minimally invasive fashion is shown to be a promising technique that can overcome many drawbacks, including cost, operative time, and radiation exposure. Performing MS-MIS TLIF can achieve a 360- degree fusion compared to percutaneous MIS-TLIF.

Alternative Uses of O-Arm and Stealth Navigation Technology Over 10 Years: The University of Colorado Experience

Intraoperative computed tomography scanning with O-arm and use of Stealth navigation can improve surgical outcomes in a variety of orthopedic subspecialties. In spine surgery, the accuracy, precision, and safety of pedicle screw and interbody implant placement has improved. This technology is now routinely used in percutaneous pedicle screw placement and minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion. Other applications include, but are not limited to, isthmic pars defect repair, lumbosacral pseudoarticulation resection in Bertolotti's syndrome, radiofrequency ablation, and en bloc tumor resection. Intraoperative navigation has numerous applications, and use of this technology should continue to evolve as the technology advances. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(2):e89-e97.].

Spine surgery in a state-of-the-art hybrid operating room: an experience of 1745 implanted pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar spine

Hybrid-operating rooms (hybrid-OR) combine high-resolution 2D images and 3D-scans with the possibility of 3D-navigation and allow minimal invasive pedicle screw placement even in the upper thoracic spine. The disadvantage of high cost and increased radiation needs to be compensated with high accuracy and safety. The hybrid operating room consists of a floor-based flat-panel robotic C-arm with 3D-scan capability (Artis Zeego, Siemens; Germany) combined with navigation (BrainLAB Curve, BrainLAB; Germany). Through a minimally invasive incision, a Jamshidi needle was advanced through the pedicle and a K-wire was placed. If 2D image quality did not allow safe placement 3D-navigation was used to place the K-wire. Position was controlled through a 3D-Scan and corrected if necessary before screw placement. Postoperative CTs evaluated screw perforation grade with grade I when completely within the pedicle, II < 2 mm, III 2-4 mm, and IV > 4 mm outside the pedicle. Overall, 354 screws were placed in T1-T6, 746 in the lower thoracic spine T7-T12 and 645 in the L1-L5. Navigation was mainly used in upper thoracic spine cases (31 of 57). In 63 out of 326 cases K-wire was corrected after the 3D-Scan. Overall, 99.1% of the screws showed perforation less than 2 mm. Mean radiation was 13.3 ± 11.7 mSv and significantly higher in the upper thoracic spine and in navigated procedures. Despite higher costs and radiation, the hybrid-OR allows highest accuracy and therefore patient safety in minimal invasive pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Reoperation for Misplaced Pedicle Screws: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate reoperation of misplaced pedicle screws (MPSs) after posterior spinal fusion (PSF), focusing on neurological complications.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The management strategy for MPSs and the clinical results after reoperation are poorly defined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects were 10,754 patients (73,777 pedicle screws) who underwent PSF at 11 hospitals over 15 years. The total number of reoperations for MPS and patient clinical data were obtained from medical records at each hospital.

RESULTS

The rate of reoperation for screw misplacement per screw was 0.17%. A total of 69 patients (mean age, 67.4±16.5 yr) underwent reoperation because of 82 MPS. Reasons for reoperation were neurological symptoms (58 patients), contact with vessels (5), suboptimal bone purchase (4), and misplacement recognized during operation (2). Neurological symptoms were the major reason for reoperation in cervical (5/5 screws, 100%) and lumbo-sacral (60/67 screws, 89.6%) regions. Contact with vessels was the major reason for reoperation in the thoracic spine (6/10 screws, 60.0%). We further evaluated 60 MPSs in the lumbo-sacrum necessitating reoperation because of neurological symptoms. The majority of MPSs necessitating reoperation were placed in the lower lumbar spine (43/60 screws, 71.7%). The mean pedicle breach tended to be larger in the incomplete recovery group than in the complete recovery group (6.8±2.4 vs . 5.9±2.2 mm, P =0.146), and the cutoff value resulting in incomplete resolution was 5.0 mm. Multivariate analysis revealed that medial-caudal breaches ( vs . medial breach, odds ratio: 25.8, 95% confidence interval: 2.58-258, P =0.0057) and sensory and motor disturbances ( vs . sensory only, odds ratio: 8.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-56.6, P =0.026) were significant factors for incomplete resolution of neurological symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

After reoperation, 70.1% of the patients achieved complete resolution of neurological symptoms. Factors associated with residual neurological symptoms included sensory and motor disturbance, medial-caudal breach, and larger pedicle breach (>5 mm).

A real-time 3D electromagnetic navigation system for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in traumatic thoraco-lumbar fractures: implications for efficiency, fluoroscopic time, and accuracy compared with those of conventional fluoroscopic guidance

PURPOSE

Navigation is becoming more useful in percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF). The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency, fluoroscopic time, accuracy, and clinical outcomes of PPSF with a novel electromagnetic navigation (EMN) system for thoraco-lumbar (TL) fractures with those of PPSF with conventional C-arm fluoroscopic (CF) guidance.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted. A total of 162 screws were implanted in 29 patients with the assistance of the EMN system (EMN group), and 220 screws were inserted in 40 patients by using CF guidance (CF group). The duration of surgery, placement time per screw, fluoroscopic time per screw, accuracy of pedicle screw placement, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The duration of surgery and placement time per screw in the EMN group were significantly lower than those in the CF group (P < 0.05). The fluoroscopic time per screw in the CF group was significantly longer than that in the EMN group (P < 0.05). The learning curve of PPSF in the EMN group was steeper than that in the CF group. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the EMN group was more precise than that in the CF group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores in the EMN group were significantly lower than those in the CF group at one-week postoperatively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with PPSF by using conventional fluoroscopic guidance, PPSF with the aid of the EMN system can increase the efficiency and accuracy of pedicle screw placement and reduce the fluoroscopic time.

Deep learning-based X-ray inpainting for improving spinal 2D-3D registration

BACKGROUND

Two-dimensional (2D)-3D registration is challenging in the presence of implant projections on intraoperative images, which can limit the registration capture range. Here, we investigate the use of deep-learning-based inpainting for removing implant projections from the X-rays to improve the registration performance.

METHODS

We trained deep-learning-based inpainting models that can fill in the implant projections on X-rays. Clinical datasets were collected to evaluate the inpainting based on six image similarity measures. The effect of X-ray inpainting on capture range of 2D-3D registration was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The X-ray inpainting significantly improved the similarity between the inpainted images and the ground truth. When applying inpainting before the 2D-3D registration process, we demonstrated significant recovery of the capture range by up to 85%.

CONCLUSION

Applying deep-learning-based inpainting on X-ray images masked by implants can markedly improve the capture range of the associated 2D-3D registration task.

Use of Intraoperative Computed Tomography Improves Outcome of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To provide data about surgical workflow, accuracy, complications, radiation exposure, and learning curve effect in patients who underwent minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with navigation coupled with mobile intraoperative computed tomography.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of data from consecutive patients who underwent single- or double-level MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at a single institution; mobile intraoperative computed tomography combined with a navigation system was used as the sole intraoperative imaging method to place pedicular screws; decompression and interbody fusion were performed through a 22-mm tubular retractor. Clinical data, perioperative complications, accuracy of pedicular screw placement, and radiation exposure were analyzed. A learning curve effect on surgical time and accuracy was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 408 screws in 100 patients were analyzed. In all cases, spinal navigation allowed for identification of pedicular trajectories and greatly facilitated nerve root decompression through the MIS approach. Overall accuracy according to Heary classification was 95.3%. Nineteen screws (4.7%) presented a minor lateral breach (<2 mm), not clinically significant. Surgical time, blood loss, and patient radiation exposure compared favorably with reported values from other series using three-dimensional navigation. A learning curve effect on surgical time, but not on screw accuracy, was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion can now be performed without any radiation exposure to the surgeon and operating room staff, with almost absolute accuracy during screw positioning and tubular decompression. A learning curve effect on surgical time, but not on overall screw accuracy, may be expected.

Neurological events due to pedicle screw malpositioning with lateral fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion

OBJECTIVE

The risk of novel postoperative neurological events due to pedicle screw malpositioning in lumbar fusion surgery is minimized by using one of the several image-guided techniques for pedicle screw insertion. These techniques for guided screw insertion range from intraoperative fluoroscopy to intraoperative navigation. A practical technique consists of anatomical identification of the screw entry point followed by lateral fluoroscopy used for guidance during insertion of the screw. This technique is available in most clinics and is less expensive than intraoperative navigation. However, the safety of lateral fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement with regard to novel postoperative neurological events due to screw malposition has been addressed only rarely in the literature. In this study the authors aimed to determine the rate of novel postoperative neurological events due to intraoperative and postoperatively established screw malpositioning during lateral fluoroscopy-assisted screw insertion.

METHODS

Included patients underwent lateral fluoroscopy-assisted lumbosacral screw insertion between January 2012 and August 2017. The occurrence of novel postoperative neurological events was analyzed from patient files. In case of an event, surgical reports were screened for the occurrence of intraoperative screw malposition. Furthermore, postoperative CT scans were analyzed to identify and describe possible screw malposition.

RESULTS

In total, 246 patients with 1079 screws were included. Novel postoperative neurological events were present in 36 patients (14.6%). In 8 of these 36 patients (3.25% of the total study population), the neurological events could be directly attributed to screw malposition. Screw malpositioning was caused either by problematic screw insertion with immediate screw correction (4 patients) or by malpositioned screws for which the malposition was established postoperatively using CT scans (4 patients). Three patients with screw malposition underwent revision surgery without subsequent symptom relief.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral fluoroscopy-assisted lumbosacral screw placement results in low rates of novel postoperative neurological events caused by screw malposition. In the majority of patients suffering from novel postoperative neurological events, these events could not be attributed to screw malpositioning, but rather were due to postoperative neurapraxia of peripheral nerves, neuropathy, or intraoperative traction of nerve roots.

Mazor X Stealth Robotic Technology: A Technical Note

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive techniques in spine surgery have continued to advance as robotic technology has evolved over several generations. Although traditional techniques for placing pedicle screws are still widespread in practice, newer technology has increased the reliability of accurately placing instrumentation with smaller incisions and subsequent decreased length of stay. Additionally, advancements in planning software have improved the ability to align posterior instrumentation to assist with rod placement on multilevel constructs.

METHODS

This paper describes the surgical techniques and operative workflow for placing pedicle screws with the latest robotic technology. The robotic platform, registration, surgical planning, and placement of instrumentation are discussed in detail. Advantages of the Mazor X Stealth Edition compared with the previous generation robot include obviating the need for K wires and eliminating the need for a percutaneous pin, as navigation is integrated into the robot.

RESULTS

Our use of this new technology has been encouraging. Using the techniques described in this paper, the first 90 pedicle screws placed with the Mazor X Stealth Edition robot yielded 100% grade A accuracy on the Gertzbein-Robbins scale confirmed on immediate postoperative CT. There were no complications experienced in any case.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, this robotic technology has the potential to improve patient outcomes and is associated with advanced surgical planning compared with more traditional techniques.

Technologic Evolution of Navigation and Robotics in Spine Surgery: A Historical Perspective

Spine surgery is continuously evolving. The synergy between medical imaging and advances in computation has allowed for stereotactic neuronavigation and its integration with robotic technology to assist in spine surgery. The discovery of x-rays in 1895, the development of image intensifiers in 1940, and then advancements in computational science and integration have allowed for the development of computed tomography. In combination with the advancements of stereotaxy in the late 1980s, and manipulation of volumetric and special data for 3-dimensional reconstruction in 1998, computed tomography has revolutionized neuronavigational systems. Integrating all these technologies, robotics in spine surgery was introduced in 2004. Since then, it has become a safe modality that can reproducibly place accurate pedicle screws. Robotics may have the added benefits of improving the surgical workflow and optimizing surgeon ergonomics. Growing at a rapid rate, the second-generation spinal robotics have overcome preliminary limitations and errors. However, comparatively, robotics in spine surgery remains in its infancy. By leveraging technologic advancements in medical imaging, computation, and stereotactic navigation, robotics in spine surgery will continue to mature and expand in utility.

Pedicle Screw Insertion: Is O-Arm-Based Navigation Superior to the Conventional Freehand Technique? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although O-arm-based navigation (ON) has been considered a better choice than the conventional freehand (FH) technique for spine surgery, clinical evidence showing the accuracy of ON compared with the FH technique is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion under ON compared with the FH technique.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and CNKI online databases were searched up to January 2020. Because only a few randomized controlled trials were anticipated, prospective and retrospective comparative studies were also evaluated to compare the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion between ON and FH. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 16.0. The primary outcomes extracted from articles that met the selection criteria were expressed as odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval. A χ² test and I² statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 20 reviews were included in this meta-analysis without identifying additional studies from the references of published articles. These reviews included 1422 patients and 9982 screws. ON was used to insert 4797 pedicle screws and 5185 pedicle screws were inserted using the conventional FH technique with C-arm assistance. The meta-analysis showed that ON is significantly more accurate than FH pedicle screw insertion (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-3.16; I² = 43.4%; P = 0.021). I² indicates that the studies have a moderate statistical heterogeneity; subgroup analysis decreased heterogeneity significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional methods, navigation provides greater accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws, accelerates the insertion, and reduces the complications associated with screw insertion. However, it may increase exposure time to radiation, which may harm the patient's or surgeon's health.

Prospective Evaluation of the Time Required for Insertion of 380 Lumbar and Sacral Pedicle Screws Using Navigation with an Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Imaging System

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the time required for various parts of the procedure to insert lumbar and sacral pedicle screws using navigation with an intraoperative, 3-dimensional imaging system. Comparison of these timings was carried out for different surgical indications.

Methods

This was a single-surgeon prospective cohort study of 69 consecutive patients (between August 2013 and June 2018) who underwent insertion of 380 pedicle screws into the lumbar and sacral vertebrae. Surgical indications, average time required for surgical exposure and attachment of the reference frame, average time required until completion of the first pedicle screw insertion, and average time required for insertion of a single pedicle screw were evaluated.

Results

The average time required from skin incision to reference frame attachment was 28.3 ± 20.4 (mean ± SD) minutes, and the average time required from reference frame attachment to completion of first pedicle screw insertion was 22.3 ± 9.6 minutes. The average time required for insertion of a single pedicle screw was 7.8 ± 2.7 minutes. When surgical indications were compared, the average time required for insertion of a single pedicle screw was 7.7 ± 2.6 minutes in surgery for spondylosis-related stenosis, 8.1 ± 2.8 minutes for degenerative scoliosis, and 8.2 ± 3.6 minutes for metastatic tumor (P = .89). There were no significant changes in these timings over consecutive 6-month periods.

Conclusions

There is no significant learning curve and no significant difference in navigation setup and pedicle screw insertion timings with intraoperative 3-dimensional navigation systems for surgeries of different pathologies and levels of surgery.

Level of Evidence

2.

O-arm navigation versus C-arm guidance for pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

O-arm and C-arm are commonly used in spine surgery to guide pedicle screw placement. However, concerning the accuracy and efficiency of them, no systematical review and meta-analyses are available to help surgeons make comparisons.

PURPOSES

This study aims to investigate the accuracy and efficiency of O-arm-navigated versus C-arm-guided pedicle screw placement in thoracic and lumbar spine surgery. It would help surgeons choose the optimal technique for pedicle screw placement.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analyses were performed after searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify all studies that assessed the accuracy and efficiency of navigation coupled with O-arm and conventional C-arm fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

Eight studies were finally recruited in this systematic review, all of which reported pedicle screw placement outcomes related to accuracy or efficiency in both C-arm and O-arm groups. Five studies showed higher screw insertion accuracy in the O-arm group, while one study showed no significant difference. And the pooled results also indicated that the incidence of screw misplacement in the C-arm groups is higher. Moreover, the pooled results from five studies indicated no significant difference in insertion time between C-arm and O-arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Navigation coupled with O-arm imaging displayed a lower efficiency outcome in pedicle screw placement compared to conventional C-arm fluoroscopy. However, in terms of accuracy, O-arm navigation had significant advantages in accuracy over conventional C-arm fluoroscopy.

Evolving Navigation, Robotics, and Augmented Reality in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Innovative technology and techniques have revolutionized minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) within the past decade. The introduction of navigation and image-guided surgery has greatly affected spinal surgery and will continue to make surgery safer and more efficient. Eventually, it is conceivable that fluoroscopy will be completely replaced with image guidance. These advancements, among others such as robotics and virtual and augmented reality technology, will continue to drive the value of 3-dimensional navigation in MIS. In this review, we cover pertinent features of navigation in MIS and explore their evolution over time. Moreover, we aim to discuss the key features germane to surgical advancement, including technique and technology development, accuracy, overall health care costs, operating room time efficiency, and radiation exposure.

3D-Customized Guiding Template for Posterior Fixation in Complex Atlantoaxial Instability-Preliminary Experiences of National Cheng Kung University Hospital

Objective  Atlantoaxial fixation is technically demanding and challenging, especially in cases with anatomical abnormality. The purpose of this study is to report the effectiveness of the three-dimensional (3D)-customized guiding template for placement of C1 and C2 screws in cases with abnormalities. Method  Two patients with anatomical abnormality and one without were included. The preoperative computed tomography (CT) image was analyzed using our software. The entry point, trajectory, and depth of the screws were designed based on these images. Templates with screw guiding cylinders and cervical spine model were created. In operation, guiding templates were applied directly to the laminae. Drilling, tapping, and screwing were performed through the cylinders. To evaluate the accuracy, deviation of the screw axis from the preplanned trajectory was measured on postoperative CT. A classification system was taking to evaluate the pedicle screw insertion. Results  In complex cases, one of C2 screws has grade 2 deviation, and two has grade 1. There was no deviation in screws of C1. All patients achieved symptoms free after 6 months follow-up. Conclusion  Although 3D-printed template for atlantoaxial fixation still has limitation in complex cases, it has been proved usefulness and makes the most difficult and dangerous spinal posterior fixation easy to achieve.

Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion for unilateral open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a side-by-side comparison of percutaneous and conventional open techniques in the same patients

Background

The aim of the study was to compare the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) insertion (P-side) with that of conventional open screw insertion (O-side) during unilateral open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the same patients. We also sought to determine the incidence of pedicle screw misplacement and to identify relevant risk factors.

Methods

The study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for 766 pedicle screws placed in 181 consecutive patients who underwent a unilateral open-TLIF procedure in the lumbosacral spine. Our minimally invasive TLIF was performed by unilateral open freehand insertion of pedicle screws for decompression on one side and PPS on the opposite side. Using this approach, we were able to compare the accuracy of PPS insertion with that of conventional open screw insertion in the same patients. There were 383 PPSs and 383 screws inserted by the open method. The accuracy of screw placement was evaluated on reconstructed computed tomography images obtained postoperatively, and screw misplacement was classified. Potential risk factors for screw misplacement were investigated in three-level mixed-effects logistic regression analysis.

Results

Thirty-four screws (8.9%) were misplaced on the P-side and 37 (9.5%) were misplaced on the O-side; the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.803). Subclassification analysis revealed minor perforation of 28 screws (7.3%) on the P-side and 32 (8.4%) on the O-side, moderate perforation of 5 screws (1.3%) on the P-side and 4 (1.0%) on the O-side, and severe perforation of 1 screw (0.3%) on each side. Three-level mixed-effects logistic regression analysis identified body mass index as a significant risk factor for screw misplacement on the P-side (odds ratio 1.194, 95% confidence interval 1.066–1.338).

Conclusions

Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion was not significantly different between PPS insertion and conventional open screw insertion in the same patients. Body mass index had a significant influence on the risk of screw misplacement in PPS insertion.

Augmented reality navigation with intraoperative 3D imaging vs fluoroscopy-assisted free-hand surgery for spine fixation surgery: a matched-control study comparing accuracy

This study aimed to compare screw placement accuracy and clinical aspects between Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation (ARSN) and free-hand (FH) technique. Twenty patients underwent spine surgery with screw placement using ARSN and were matched retrospectively to a cohort of 20 FH technique cases for comparison. All ARSN and FH cases were performed by the same surgeon. Matching was based on clinical diagnosis and similar proportions of screws placed in the thoracic and lumbosacral vertebrae in both groups. Accuracy of screw placement was assessed on postoperative scans according to the Gertzbein scale and grades 0 and 1 were considered accurate. Procedure time, blood loss and length of hospital stay, were collected as secondary endpoints. A total of 262 and 288 screws were assessed in the ARSN and FH groups, respectively. The share of clinically accurate screws was significantly higher in the ARSN vs FH group (93.9% vs 89.6%, p < 0.05). The proportion of screws placed without a cortical breach was twice as high in the ARSN group compared to the FH group (63.4% vs 30.6%, p < 0.0001). No statistical difference was observed for the secondary endpoints between both groups. This matched-control study demonstrated that ARSN provided higher screw placement accuracy compared to free-hand.

Accuracy and Safety in Screw Placement in the High Cervical Spine: Retrospective Analysis of O-arm-based Navigation-assisted C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screws

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of present study was to evaluate accuracy, efficiency, and safety of intraoperative O-arm-based navigation system for the placement of C1 lateral mass screw (C1LMS) and C2 pedicle screws (C2PSs) in high cervical spine operations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

High screw misplacement rates, various pedicle morphometry and vertebral body size variations have led to a search of image-guided systems to improve the surgical accuracy of screw insertion in high cervical spine. The use of O-arm has been proposed for more accurate and efficient spinal instrumentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2009 and August 2016, a total of 48 patients with atlantoaxial instability were surgically treated using the image-guidance system. To reconstruct atlantoaxial instability, we have been using Harm's technique of C1LMS and C2PS fixations. A frameless, stereotactic O-arm-based image-guidance system was used for correct screw placement. Postoperative computed tomographic scan with multiplanar reconstructions were used to determine the accuracy of the screw placement.

RESULTS

A total of 182 screws, including 90 C1LMS and 92 C2PSs were inserted using image-guidance system. In total, 4.4% (4/90) of C1LMS and 7.6% (10/92) of C2PS had cortex violation over 2 mm and considered as "significant." Among the significant cortex violations, "unexpected breech" was 3.3% of all the screws inserted. Two (2.1%) screws inserted had perforated the vertebral artery canal and iatrogenic vertebral artery stenosis was proved with postoperative computed tomography angiography. When divided into time periods, 60% of significant breech occurred during the beginning stage, 40% during adaptation stage and none during expert stage.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the authors demonstrated that use of image-guidance system seems to be beneficial for high cervical instrumentation which requires much experience and steep learning curves. However, incidence of cortex violation does not disappear completely due to the close proximity to spinal canal and surrounding vessels.

Mini-open sacroiliac joint fusion with direct bone grafting and minimally invasive fixation using intraoperative navigation

Background

Describe a novel technique for sacroiliac arthrodesis using intraoperative navigation, direct bone grafting, and minimally invasive implants. Report on the outcomes of the first cohort of these patients.

Methods

Institutional review board (IRB) approved, single center, two surgeon, retrospective study.

Results

All patients were 18 years or older, primary sacroiliac fusions, and underwent novel technique described. Fifty patients underwent 57 surgeries. Twelve male/38 female patients. All received three sacroiliac implants. Average blood loss 42.8 mL. Average length of stay 1.9 nights. Average follow-up 13.96±13 months. Statistically significant improvements in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores (<0.001) for all time periods 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months compared to preop. Other outcomes scores [Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Denver Sacroiliac Joint Questionnaire (DSIJQ)] also showed a general trend for clinical improvement at all postoperative time periods. Of 2/57 (3.5%) complications were identified. No patients required surgical revision within the study window.

Conclusions

Limited open sacroiliac arthrodesis using minimally invasive implants, intraoperative navigation, and direct open bone grafting is safe and demonstrates clinical benefit, similar to other techniques for minimally invasive sacroiliac arthrodesis. There is potential for improved long-term outcomes from increased union rates.

Keywords

Sacroiliac dysfunction; minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion; open sacroiliac fusion; navigation.

Three-dimensional fluoroscopic navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws in L4-L5-S1 fixation: single-centre experience of pedicular accuracy and S1 cortical fixation of 810 screws

Background

Three-dimensional (3D) navigation techniques can theoretically provide higher accuracy rates and increased safety for pedicle screw (PS) placement than traditional fluoroscopy (FL) guided methods. In this study, we compare the pedicular accuracy of 3D isocentric fluoroscopic navigation (3DFL) versus FL guidance in PS L4-L5-S1 fixation and evaluate the differential cortical purchase and safety of fixation of the S1 PS.

Methods

This is a single-centre retrospective study of 810 PSs placed in open L4-L5-S1 fixation between 2012 and 2017 in 39 patients using standard FL and in 96 patients under 3DFL. Pedicular screw accuracy was determined by postoperative computed tomography (CT) and graded on a 4-tiered classification system according to Gertzbein and Robbins. In addition, sacral screws were evaluated depending on the degree of cortical fixation: monocortical, bicortical or tricortical, and the degree of safety with respect to retroperitoneal structures.

Results

Grade 0 perfect pedicular screw placement was 95% for 3DFL screws compared to 85% for screws placed under fluoroscopy (P<0.05). The number of grade 0 versus grade 1 and higher (breached screws) was statistically significant (P<0.05). Higher S1 cortical screw accuracy [77% versus 51% (P<0.05)] for bi- and tricortical fixation and a lower percentage of "at risk" PSs (P<0.05) were achieved with placement under 3DFL versus FL.

Conclusions

3DFL enhances the accuracy and safety of PS placement in L4-L5-S1 fixation, reducing the rate of misplaced screws and improving S1 cortical fixation.

Contribution of Dynamic Surgical Guidance to the Accurate Placement of Pedicle Screws in Deformity Surgery: A Retrospective Case Series

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the contribution of a dynamic surgical guidance (DSG) probe in the accurate placement of thoracic and lumbar pedicle screws (PSs) in patients with spinal deformity.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 98 patients (104 procedures) with various spinal deformities, who had received posterior instrumentation with PSs inserted using either DSG or the conventional free-hand (FH) technique. A total of 882 PSs were inserted using DSG (DSG group) and 603 using the FH technique (FH group). The DSG probe was preferably chosen for large osteosyntheses and severe deformities. Two neurosurgeons, unaware of the surgical groups, reviewed all the intraoperative computed tomography scans and assessed all the PS placements.

RESULTS

Of the PSs used, 95.4% in the DSG group and 92.2% in the FH group were correctly placed (P = 0.0136). The difference in screw placement accuracy was greater at the thoracic level (DSG group, 92.5%; vs. FH group, 87.0%; P = 0.0310) than at the lumbar level (DSG group, 98.0%; vs. FH group, 95.4%; P = 0.0385). Severe (>4 mm) lateral breaches occurred in 24 cases (4.0%) in the FH group but in only 5 (0.6%) in the DSG group (P < 0.0001). No severe medial breach was observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite having more patients with severe deformities in the DSG group, PS insertion was significantly more accurate with DSG. This technique also reduced the severe unacceptable lateral misplacement rate (>4 mm) and, consequently, the incidence of intraoperative screw revisions even in patients with severe deformities.

Accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screws for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures compared with open technique

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the accuracy of screw placement between open pedicle screw fixation and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (MIS) for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures (TSF).

METHODS

forty-nine patients with acute TSF who were treated with transpedicular screw fixation from January 2013 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into Open and MIS groups. Laminectomy was performed in either group if needed. The accuracy of the screw placement, the evolution of the Cobb sagittal angle postoperatively and at 12-month follow-up and the neurological status were recorded. AO type of fracture and TLICS score were also recorded.

RESULTS

Mean age was 42 years old. Mean TLICS score was 6.29 and 5.96 for open and MIS groups respectively. Twenty-five MIS and 24 open surgeries were performed, and 350 (175 in each group) screws were inserted (7.14 per patient). Twenty-four and 13 screws were considered "out" in the open and MIS groups respectively (Odds ratio 1.98. 0.97-4,03 P=0.056). The Cobb sagittal angle went from 13.3º to 4.5º and from 14.9º to 8.2º in the Open and MIS groups respectively (both P<0.0001). Loss of correction at 12-month follow-up was 3.2º and 4.2º for the open and MIS groups, respectively. No neurological worsening was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of acute thoracolumbar fractures, the MIS technique seems to achieve similar results to the open technique in relation to neurological improvement and deformity correction, while placing the screws more accurately.

Time Demand and Radiation Dose in 3D-Fluoroscopy-based Navigation-assisted 3D-Fluoroscopy-controlled Pedicle Screw Instrumentations

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective single-center cohort study to record additional time requirements and radiation dose in navigation-assisted O-arm-controlled pedicle screw (PS) instrumentations.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate amount of extra-time and radiation dose for navigation-assisted PS instrumentations of the thoracolumbosacral spine using O-arm 3D-real-time-navigation (O3DN) compared to non-navigated spinal procedures (NNSPs) with a single C-arm and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan for controlling PS positions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

3D-navigation is reported to enhance PS insertion accuracy. But time-consuming navigational steps and considerable additional radiation doses seem to limit this modern technique's attraction. A detailed analysis of additional time demand and extra-radiation dose in 3D-navigated spine surgery is not provided in literature, yet.

METHODS

From February 2011 through July 2015, 306 consecutive posterior instrumentations were performed in vertebral levels T10-S1 using O3DN for PS insertion. The duration of procedure-specific navigational steps of the overall collective (I) and the last cohort of 50 consecutive O3DN-surgeries (II) was compared to the average duration of analogous surgical steps in 100 consecutive NNSP using a single C-arm. 3D-radiation dose (dose-length-product, DLP) of navigational and postinstrumentation O-arm scans in group I and II was compared to the average DLP of 100 diagnostic lumbar CT scans.

RESULTS

The average presurgical time from patient positioning on the operating table to skin incision was 46.2 ± 10.1 minutes (O3DN, I) and 40.6 ± 9.8 minutes (O3DN, II) versus 30.6 ± 8.3 minutes (NNSP) (P < 0.001, each). Intraoperative interruptions for scanning and data processing took 3.0 ± 0.6 minutes. DLPs averaged 865.1 ± 360.8 mGycm (O3DN, I) and 562.1 ± 352.6 mGycm (O3DN, II) compared to 575.5 ± 316.5 mGycm in diagnostic lumbar CT scans (P < 0.001 (I), P ≈ 0.81 [II]).

CONCLUSION

After procedural experience, navigated surgeries can be performed with an additional time demand of 13.0 minutes compared to NNSP, and with a total DLP below that of a diagnostic lumbar CT scan (P ≈ 0.81).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Pedicle Screw Insertion Accuracy Using O-Arm, Robotic Guidance, or Freehand Technique: A Comparative Study

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective radiological study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion using O-Arm navigation, robotic assistance, or a freehand fluoroscopic technique.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screw insertion using either "O-Arm" navigation or robotic devices is gaining popularity. Although several studies are available evaluating each of those techniques separately, no direct comparison has been attempted.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients undergoing implantation of 569 lumbar and thoracic screws were divided into three groups. Eleven patients (64 screws) had screws inserted using robotic assistance, 25 patients (191 screws) using the O-arm, while 48 patients (314 screws) had screws inserted using lateral fluoroscopy in a freehand technique. A single experienced spine surgeon assisted by a spinal fellow performed all procedures. Screw placement accuracy was assessed by two independent observers on postoperative computed tomography (CTs) according to the A to D Rampersaud criteria.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was noted between the three groups. About 70.4% of screws in the freehand group, 69.6% in the O arm group, and 78.8% in the robotic group were placed completely within the pedicle margins (grade A) (P > 0.05). About 6.4% of screws were considered misplaced (grades C&D) in the freehand group, 4.2% in the O-arm group, and 4.7% in the robotic group (P > 0.05). The spinal fellow inserted screws with the same accuracy as the senior surgeon (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The advent of new technologies does not appear to alter accuracy of screw placement in our setting. Under supervision, spinal fellows might perform equally well to experienced surgeons using new tools. The lack of difference in accuracy does not imply that the above-mentioned techniques have no added advantages. Other issues, such as surgeon/patient radiation, fiddle factor, teaching suitability, etc., outside the scope of our present study, need further assessment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

POSTEROLATERAL, POSTERIOR AND MI-TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION: A STUDY OF 212 CASES

ABSTRACT Objective: Degenerative disc disease is a common problem that could require surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes, complications and benefits associated with intersomatic fusions by the MI-TLIF, PLIF and PLF techniques. Methods: A total of 212 patients were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent the same pre- and postoperative clinical evaluations using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and SF-36. Follow-ups were performed for at least one year. Inpatient days, complications, blood loss and operative times were equally quantified. Results: Estimated blood loss for MI-TLIF was statistically lower compared to the amount of blood recovered by Cell Saver device on PLIF and PLF groups. Mean surgical time for MI-TLIF were not significantly different compared to PLIF and PLF groups. Inpatient days were significantly lower in the MI-TLIF group, with an average decrease of one day. Four complications were recorded in the PLIF group, 2 in the PLF group, and one in the MI-TLIF group. Analysis of the clinical parameters revealed post-operative improvements at all time points, with the most statistically significant differences occurring at the first six months. Better results were achieved with the MI-TLIF technique. Conclusions: Compared to more invasive techniques, MI-TLIF showed fewer complications, less blood loss and shorter hospitalization times. Longer operative times in this group can be explained by the greater technical complexity and incipient learning curves. Interbody fusion by PLIF, PLF and MI-TLIF provided good clinical outcomes, but faster recovery was obtained with less invasive techniques. Level of evidence: III; Type of study: Retrospective comparative case study.

Revision Rate of Misplaced Pedicle Screws of the Thoracolumbar Spine-Comparison of Three-Dimensional Fluoroscopy Navigation with Freehand Placement: A Systematic Analysis and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown higher accuracy rates of image-guided pedicle screw placement compared to freehand (FH) placement. However, data focusing on the impact of spinal navigation on the rate of revision surgeries caused by misplaced pedicle screws (PS) are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

This study is aimed at identifying the rate of revision surgeries for misplaced PS comparing three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy navigation (3DFL) with FH PS placement.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 2232 patients (mean age, 65.3 ± 13.5 years) with 13,703 implanted PS who underwent instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spine between 2007 and 2015. Group 1 received surgery with use of 3DFL (January 2011 to December 2015), group 2 received surgery in the FH technique (April 2007 to December 2015). Because the use of 3DFL was initiated in January 2011, the examined period for 3DFL-navigated surgeries is shorter. Patients routinely received postoperative computed tomography scans and/or intraoperative control 3D scans.

RESULTS

There was an overall rate of revision surgeries for malpositioned PS of 2.9%. In the 3DFL group, the rate of secondary revision surgeries was significantly lower with 1.35% (15/1112 patients) compared to 4.38% (49/1120 patients) in the FH group, respectively (odds ratio, 3.35; P < 0.01). Of all PS in the 3DFL group (30/7548 PS), 0.40% needed revision surgery (P < 0.01) compared to 1.14% in the FH group (70/6155 PS).

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to show that the use of 3DFL-navigated PS placement significantly reduces the rate of revision surgeries after posterior spinal instrumentation compared to freehand PS placement.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Multi-axis Intraoperative Angiography Unit for Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine

We analyzed clinical usefulness of the high resolution imaging system in a hybrid operation room (OR) for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A total of 17 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis between February 2014 and August 2016 were included. Multi-axis imaging system in a hybrid OR was used in 12 patients (hybrid OR group); the conventional C-arm fluoroscopy, in 5 patients (C-arm group). The time to confirm the first percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) angle (hybrid OR, 80 vs C-arm, 249 s; P = 0.0026) and the second to the last PPS angle (77 vs 90 s; P = 0.040) were shorter in the hybrid OR group. Placement accuracy was higher in the hybrid OR group (88.0 vs 59.1%; P = 0.010). Irradiation dose was significantly lower in the C-arm group (462 vs 102 mGy; P = 0.0013). This study suggested that the accuracy of PPS placement and time to confirm the PPS angle are the advantages in a hybrid OR.

Are computer numerical control (CNC)-manufactured patient-specific metal templates available for posterior thoracic pedicle screw insertion? Feasibility and accuracy evaluation

PURPOSE

Accurate and safe posterior thoracic pedicle insertion (PTPI) remains a challenge. Patient-specific drill templates (PDTs) created by rapid prototyping (RP) can assist in posterior thoracic pedicle insertion, but pose biocompatibility risks. The aims of this study were to develop alternative PDTs with computer numerical control (CNC) and assess their feasibility and accuracy in assisting PTPI.

METHODS

Preoperative CT images of 31 cadaveric thoracic vertebras were obtained and then the optimal pedicle screw trajectories were planned. The PDTs with optimal screw trajectories were randomly assigned to be designed and manufactured by CNC or RP in each vertebra. With the guide of the CNC- or RP-manufactured PDTs, the appropriate screws were inserted into the pedicles. Postoperative CT scans were performed to analyze any deviations at entry point and midpoint of the pedicles.

RESULTS

The CNC group was found to be significant manufacture-time-shortening, and cost-decreasing, when compared with the RP group (P < 0.01). The PDTs fitted the vertebral laminates well while all screws were being inserted into the pedicles. There were no significant differences in absolute deviations at entry point and midpoint of the pedicle on either axial or sagittal planes (P > 0.05). The screw positions were grade 0 in 90.3% and grade 1 in 9.7% of the cases in the CNC group and grade 0 in 93.5% and grade 1 in 6.5% of the cases in the RP group (P = 0.641).

CONCLUSION

CNC-manufactured PDTs are viable for assisting in PTPI with good feasibility and accuracy.

Precision and accuracy of consumer-grade motion tracking system for pedicle screw placement in pediatric spinal fusion surgery

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a 3-dimensional spinal deformity involving lateral curvature and axial rotation. Surgical intervention involves insertion of pedicle screws into the spine, requiring accuracies of 1mm and 5° in translation and rotation to prevent neural and vascular complications. While commercial CT-navigation is available, the significant cost, bulk and radiation dose hinders their use in AIS surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate a commercial-grade Optitrack Prime 13W motion capture cameras to determine if they can achieve adequate accuracy for screw insertion guidance in AIS. Static precision, camera and tracked rigid body configurations, translational and rotational accuracy were investigated. A 1-h camera warm-up time was required to achieve precisions of 0.13mm and 0.10°. A three-camera system configuration with cameras at equal height but staggered depth achieved the best accuracy. A triangular rigid body with 7.9mm markers had superior accuracy. The translational accuracy for motions up to 150mm was 0.25mm while rotational accuracy was 4.9° for rotations in two directions from 0° to 70°. Required translational and rotational accuracies were achieved using this motion capture system as well as being comparable to surgical-grade navigators.

Fluoroscopic Confirmation of Sacral Pedicle Screw Placement Utilizing Pelvic Inlet and Outlet Technique: Technical Note

Minimally invasive surgical techniques may decrease length of stay, operative duration and blood loss, and postoperative pain. Numerous technical challenges and concerns surround the placement of percutaneous pedicle screws at the lumbosacral level. Maximization of screw triangulation, bicortical purchase, and rostral bias toward the sacral promontory has been shown repeatedly to stabilize lumbosacral segment instrumentation and maximize pullout strength. Because of the unique anatomy, conventional anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographic views are relatively less reliable at determining screw depth and penetration of the sacral cortex. Percutaneous sacral pedicle fixation using AP and lateral 2-dimensional fluoroscopy is complicated by the variable contour of the sacral alae and promontory. The pelvic inlet view is ideal for visualization of the ventral screw extent and is obtained by directing 45-degree cephalad and 0-degree mediolateral, with adjustments aligning the patient's pelvic brim. The modified pelvic outlet view is obtained with the trajectory axis being directed 45-degree caudal from the AP plane. This aligns the pubic symphysis with the second sacral vertebrae providing visualization of the superior boundary of the S1-bony neural foramen and any inferior wall pedicle breaches. The authors describe this reliable fluoroscopic technique and their clinical experience with percutaneous S1-screw placement.

Differences between Manufacturers of Computed Tomography-Based Computer-Assisted Surgery Systems Do Exist: A Systematic Literature Review

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have shown that the accuracy of pedicle screw placement significantly improves with use of computed tomography (CT)-based navigation systems. Yet, there has been no systematic review directly comparing accuracy of pedicle screw placement between different CT-based navigation systems. The objective of this study is to review the results presented in the literature and compare CT-based navigation systems relative only to screw placement accuracy.

METHODS

Data sources included CENTRAL, Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies included were randomized clinical trials, case series, and case-control trials reporting the accuracy of pedicle screws placement using CT-based navigation. Two independent reviewers extracted the data from the selected studies that met our inclusion criteria. Publications were grouped based on the CT-based navigation system used for pedicle screw placement.

RESULTS

Of the 997 articles we screened, only 26 met all of our inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis, which showed a significant statistical difference (p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.23) in accuracy of pedicle screw placement between three different CT-based navigation systems. The mean (weighted) accuracy of pedicle screws placement based on the CT-based navigation system was found to be 97.20 ± 2.1% in StealthStation (Medtronic, United States) and 96.1 ± 3.9% in VectorVision (BrainLab, Germany).

CONCLUSION

This review summarizes results presented in the literature and compares screw placement accuracy using different CT-based navigation systems. Although certain factors such as the extent of the procedure and the experience and skills of the surgeon were not accounted for, the differences in accuracy demonstrated should be considered by spine surgeons and should be validated for effects on patients' outcome.

Comparison of intraoperative O-arm- and conventional fluoroscopy (C-arm)-assisted insertion of pedicle screws in the treatment of fracture of thoracic vertebrae

Purpose:

To introduce the intraoperative O-arm-assisted pedicle screw insertion without any navigation system in the treatment of thoracic vertebrae fracture and compare it to conventional fluoroscopy (C-arm)-assisted pedicle screw insertion technique.

Methods:

About 156 pedicle screws were inserted in 23 patients (C-arm group), and 208 pedicle screws were inserted in 30 patients (O-arm group). The postoperative computed tomography images were analyzed for pedicle violation based on Gertzbein classification. The total surgery time, the average time required for inserting a screw, the mean action times of adjusting guide probe and pedicle screw, and the hospitalization time were compared in both groups, respectively. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) was used for evaluating the health outcomes pre- and postoperatively.

Results:

There are the higher accuracy rate of satisfactory pedicle screw placement (grades 0 and 1) and the less incidence of medial perforation in the O-arm group compared to the C-arm group ( p < 0.05). The average time required for inserting a screw, the action times of adjusting the guide probe and pedicle screw, and the hospitalization time in the O-arm group are less than the respective ones in the C-arm group ( p < 0.05). There was no significant difference for the total surgery time between both groups. No further damage of the nerve function postoperatively is found according to the ASIA grade.

Conclusion:

The O-arm-assisted pedicle screw insertion without navigation we described provides higher accuracy of pedicle screw placement and better clinical efficacy compared to conventional fluoroscopy (C-arm) technique.

Reliability of the Planned Pedicle Screw Trajectory versus the Actual Pedicle Screw Trajectory using Intra-operative 3D CT and Image Guidance

BACKGROUND

Technological advances, including navigation, have been made to improve safety and accuracy of pedicle screw fixation. We evaluated the accuracy of the virtual screw placement (Stealth projection) compared to actual screw placement (intra-operative O-Arm) and examined for differences based on the distance from the reference frame.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data was conducted from January 2013 to September 2013. We evaluated thoracic and lumbosacral pedicle screws placed using intraoperative O-arm and Stealth navigation by obtaining virtual screw projections and intraoperative O-arm images after screw placement. The screw trajectory angle to the midsagittal line and superior endplate was compared in the axial and sagittal views, respectively. Percent error and paired t-test statistics were then performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients with 240 pedicle screws were analyzed. The mean angular difference between the virtual and actual image in all screws was 2.17° ± 2.20° on axial images and 2.16° ± 2.24° on sagittal images. There was excellent agreement between actual and virtual pedicle screw trajectories in the axial and sagittal plane with ICC = 0.99 (95%CI: 0.992-0.995) (p<0.001) and ICC= 0.81 (95%CI: 0.759-0.855) (p<0.001) respectively. When comparing thoracic and lumbar screws, there was a significant difference in the sagittal angulation between the two distributions. No statistical differences were found distance from the reference frame.

CONCLUSION

The virtual projection view is clinically accurate compared to the actual placement on intra-operative CT in both the axial and sagittal views. There is slight imprecision (~2°) in the axial and sagittal planes and a minor difference in the sagittal thoracic and lumbar angulation, although these did not affect clinical outcomes. In general, we find that pedicle screw placement using intraoperative cone beam CT and navigation to be accurate and reliable, and as such have made it a routine part of our spine practice. This study was approved by the University of Minnesota IRB (#1303E30544).