Successful treatment of severe sympathetically maintained pain following anterior spine surgery

Efficacy of the lumbar sympathetic ganglion block in lower limb pain and its application prospects during the perioperative period

The sympathetic nervous system is involved in the physiological pathogenesis of many different types of chronic pain. Sympathetic blocks can interrupt the reflex control system by intercepting the noxious afferent fibers accompanying autonomic nerves, resulting in changes in peripheral or central sensory processing. A lumbar sympathetic ganglion block (LSGB), as a treatment method, refers to the injection of nerve blockers into the corresponding lumbar sympathetic nerve segments, usually requiring imaging assistance (CT, X-ray, ultrasound) to guide. At present, LSGB has been widely used in the clinical treatment of lower limb pain, such as neuropathic pain, lower limb ischemic pain, and so on. Its mechanism of action may be through inhibiting sympathetic nerve activity and dilating blood vessels, thereby alleviating pain and inhibiting stress response. However, there are few reports of LSGB during the perioperative period, especially in postoperative pain and gastrointestinal function. Therefore, by studying the literature about LSGB-related studies, this article reviews the anatomy of the lumbar sympathetic nerve (LSN), with its clinical application and possible mechanism. We reviewed the analgesic effect of LSGB in patients with lower limb pain and postoperative pain and the potential application prospects in the recovery of gastrointestinal function, finally providing a reference for its clinical application.

Evaluation of the Clinical Effect of Color Doppler Ultrasound-Guided Stellate Ganglion Block Combined with Drugs in the Treatment of Cervical Headache

In order to evaluate the clinical effect of color Doppler ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block combined with drugs in the treatment of cervical headache, a total of 80 patients, who were diagnosed as cervical headache at the hospital designated by this study from December 2017 to December 2018, were selected as study subjects, and were divided into 2 groups of control group and observation group according to random number table method with 40 cases in each group. The control group was treated only with drugs: 0.3 mg gabapentin orally taken 3 times a day, 0.3 mg tizanidine hydrochloride orally taken 3 times a day, and 0.2 mg celecoxib orally taken 3 times a day for a total of 4 continuous weeks; the observation group was treated with ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block based on the scheme of control group. The degree of patients’ pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS), which was divided into 0–10 points; the clinical efficacy evaluation was divided into three levels: markedly effective, effective and ineffective. The results showed that the total effective rate of patients’ treatments in observation group was 92.50%, which was significantly higher than that of 72.50% in the control group with statistically significant difference (P < 0.05); there was no statistical difference of patients’ average VAS score between the two groups before the treatment (P > 0.05), while the average VAS score of patients in the observation group after treatment (3.58±1.46) was significantly lower than that in the control group (5.37±1.58) with statistically significant difference (P < 0.05); and there were no serious adverse reactions in both groups. Therefore, it is believed that color Doppler ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block combined with oral gabapentin, tizanidine hydrochloride, and celecoxib is effective in treating cervical headache. The study results of this paper provides a certain reference for further evaluations of the clinical effect of color Doppler ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block combined with drugs in the treatment of cervical headache.

The lumbar autonomic nerves in males: a few anatomical insights into anterior lumbar interbody fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar autonomic nerve injury is an underappreciated complication of anterior lumbar spinal surgery. A detailed description of lumbar autonomic nerve anatomy would be helpful for surgeons to minimize the risk of this complication.

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the anatomical characteristics of lumbar autonomic nerves and provide a better understanding of these nerves for anterior lumbar spinal surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A dissection-based study of 10 embalmed male cadavers.

METHODS

The lumbar autonomic nerves from 10 embalmed male cadavers were dissected in this study. The position of the lumbar sympathetic trunks was recorded. Distance between the initial sites of the lumbar splanchnic nerves (LSNs) and the corresponding lumbar vertebral inferior endplate, distance between the ipsilateral and adjacent LSNs, angles formed by the LSNs and the vertical axis were measured. This study has been supported by grants from Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (CN) (Grant No. 2017B020210010) without potential conflict of interest-associated biases in the text of the paper.

RESULTS

In this study, a total of 72 LSNs were identified in the 10 human cadavers. On average, the investigation found that the initial sites of the first, second, third, and fourth LSNs were 9 mm distal, 5 mm distal, 9 mm proximal, and 9 mm distal to the inferior endplates of the L1, L2, L3, and L4 vertebrae, respectively, with variations from 6 to 11 mm for each nerve among specimens. There was no significant difference in the angle between each lumbar splanchnic nerve and the vertical axis (H=2.461, p=.482), with an angle of approximately 50°±6°. The distance between the first and the second LSNs, the second and the third LSNs, or the third and the fourth LSNs were 24±6 mm, 22±8 mm, and 55±11 mm, respectively. The bilateral lumbar sympathetic trunks (N=57, 95%) were more likely to be located in the first third of the sagittal plane at the level of the L2/3, L3/4, and L4/5 intervertebral discs.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found the same number and parallel courses of LSNs on each side, and on both the left and right side, the distance between the third and the fourth LSNs was much larger than the distance between the other two adjacent LSNs. The initial sites of 80.6% (n=58) of LSNs were superior to the inferior endplate of the L3 vertebra. Improved knowledge of lumbar autonomic nerve anatomy may be of great significance in reducing complications and improving surgical safety.

Relation of lumbar sympathetic chain to the open corridor of retroperitoneal oblique approach to lumbar spine: an MRI study

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal oblique approach to lumbar spine used surgical corridor between psoas muscle and aorta for exposure to anterior part of lumbar spine. Lumbar sympathetic chain (LSC) runs in the corridor to make it a structure at risk of injury.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does LSC relationship with surgical corridor for minimally invasive retroperitoneal anterolateral oblique approach change in different intervertebral disc level?

METHODS

Left LSC was identified in axial magnetic resonance imaging images at L2-3, L3-4 and L4-5 intervertebral disc levels of 144 patients. Distances between LSC and left psoas muscle and aorta were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 62.3 years. LSC was identifiable in 90.9% of levels. Distance between LSC and psoas muscle at L2-3, L3-4 and L4-5 was 4.0 mm, 4.7 mm and 5.2 mm. Statistical difference was found between L2-3 and L4-5 level (p = 0.006). Distance between LSC and aorta at each level was 12.4 mm, 12.3 mm and 10.6 mm without statistical difference. In non-scoliosis group distance between LSC and psoas muscle at each level was 3.1 mm, 3.3 mm and 4.0 mm. Statistical difference was found between L2-3 and L4-5 level (p = 0.012) and between L3-4 and L4-5 level (p = 0.041). Distance between LSC and aorta at each level was 11.9 mm, 11.4 mm and 10.2 mm. Statistical difference was found between L2-3 and L4-5 disc level (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

LSC moves away from psoas muscle and becomes closer to aorta in L4-5 disc level. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

The effect of interscalene block on ipsilateral shoulder pain and pulmonary function in patients undergoing lung lobectomy: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative ipsilateral shoulder pain occurs in 37% to 68% of patients undergoing a thoracotomy. We examined whether interscalene brachial plexus block using a lower concentration of local anesthetic would reduce the incidence of post-thoracotomy ipsilateral shoulder pain with assessment of pulmonary function in patients who underwent a lung lobectomy.

METHODS

Forty-four patients who underwent a lung lobectomy were randomly assigned to either the control or the interscalene block group. Single-shot interscalene block on the surgical site side was performed using ropivacaine 0.25% 10 mL including dexamethasone 5 mg under ultrasound guidance in the interscalene block group. Lobectomy and continuous paravertebral block were performed under general anesthesia. The presence of ipsilateral shoulder pain and postoperative adverse events were assessed. Pulmonary function tests were performed preoperatively, the day after surgery, and the day after removing the chest tube.

RESULTS

The incidence of ipsilateral shoulder pain was significantly lower in the interscalene block group than in the control group (54.5% vs 14.3%, P = .006) with an overall incidence of 34.9%. Postoperative adverse events were similar between the groups, with no patients presenting symptoms of respiratory difficulty. Significant reductions in pulmonary function were observed in all patients after lobectomy; however, no significant difference in any of the pulmonary function test variables was observed postoperatively between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Interscalene block using 10 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine including dexamethasone 5 mg reduced the incidence of post-thoracotomy ipsilateral shoulder pain and did not result in additional impairment of pulmonary function.

Percutaneous Cervical Sympathetic Block for Pain Control after Internal Carotid Artery Dissection. A Report of Two Cases

BACKGROUND

Medical treatment of cranio-cervical pain can be suboptimal in patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection. We report the use of cervical sympathetic block for treatment of pain in two patients with ICA dissection.

CASE REPORTS

A 58-year-old man and a 43-year-old woman presented with severe cranio-cervical pain associated with left and right ICA dissection confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and cerebral angiography. Due to suboptimal control of pain with medical treatment, cervical sympathetic block was performed under fluoroscopic guidance using 20 ml of bupivacaine injected lateral to the posterior aspect of sixth vertebral body in both patients. On self-reported pain scale, the 58-year-old man reported improvement in pain intensity from 8/10 pain to 0/10 within 1 h of blockade. The patient remained relatively pain free for the 24-h post blockade. Mild recurrence of pain was noted on Day 2. The 43-year-old woman reported improvement in pain intensity from 6/10 pain to 0/10 within 1 h of blockade. The patient remained pain free for five days with recurrence to previous intensity.

CONCLUSION

Cervical sympathetic blockade in patients with ICA dissection may be an effective option in the event of suboptimal pain control with medical treatment; however, the technique may be limited due to relatively short duration of action.