Prognostic Factor Analysis for Management of Chronic Neck Pain: Can We Predict the Severity of Neck Pain with Lateral Cervical Curvature?

Quantitatively assessing the effect of cervical sagittal alignment on dynamic intervertebral kinematics by video-fluoroscopy technique

BACKGROUND

Cervical sagittal alignment is crucial for distributing the head load to lower cervical segments and maintaining normal cervical spine function, but its biomechanical effect on the cervical spine was not fully elucidated.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of cervical sagittal alignment on dynamic intervertebral kinematics.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Healthy participants without neck pain were recruited and divided into lordosis, straight and kyphosis groups according to the C2-C7 Cobb angle at the neutral position. The anti-directional and total joint motions were extracted across 10 epochs of dynamic cervical flexion and extension movements.

RESULTS

/findings: The overall anti-directional joint motion during flexion is larger in the kyphosis group when compared with the lordosis group (p = 0.021), while the range of flexion is smaller in the kyphosis group than that in the lordosis group (p = 0.017). The C2/C3 anti-directional joint motion during extension in the straight group is larger than that in the lordosis group (p = 0016). The range of extension in the kyphosis group (p < 0.001) and the straight group (p = 0.002) are larger than that in the lordosis group. The increased range of extension in the kyphosis and straight groups were mainly from the C3/C4, C4/C5, and C5/C6 joints(p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Changes in cervical sagittal alignment alter both the quality and quantity of the individual joint motions. More adjustments are required by the cervical joints to complete neck movements with the loss of lordosis. The lordotic curvature is a relatively effort-saving mode for the cervical spine from a biomechanical perspective.

Systemic Symptoms as Potential Predictors of Chronic Neck Pain on Initial Examination: Can Systemic Symptoms Act as a Predictor of Neck Pain?

BACKGROUND

Neck pain is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder that can cause other additional misalignments and other misalignment-induced chronic musculoskeletal diseases. Although numerous risk factors for chronic neck pain have been researched, systemic symptoms have not received the same level of investigation. The aim of this study was to analyze the link between subjective systemic symptoms and neck pain based on initial holistic interviews, with the objective of identifying potential predictive factors for neck pain.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients hospitalized due to acute neck pain between January 2018 and August 2021. Data collected included demographic information, treatment details, neck-pain characteristics, medical history, and co-occurring symptoms regardless of their known association with neck pain. Statistical analyses, including independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests, and correlation analyses, were performed.

RESULTS

With regard to the demographic characteristics, a significant positive correlation was observed between age and initial pain intensity (p < 0.01), while female sex was associated with changes in pain intensity (p < 0.05). Past medical conditions, including diabetes, hyperlipidemia, heart attacks, and psychological medical history, demonstrated a significant relationship with neck pain (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively). Hospitalization duration, cervical dizziness, limitations in the cervical range of motion (ROM), and widespread pain were significantly associated with neck pain (p < 0.05, p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively). Among the subjective systemic symptoms, only upper gastrointestinal (GI) disturbance displayed a significant association with neck pain (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified several potential predictors of neck pain-notably, upper GI disturbances-providing a new avenue to investigate the prognostic factors of neck pain. However, further study is needed to substantiate these findings and elucidate the precise nature of these associations.

Comparison of Cervical Sagittal Parameters among Patients with Neck Pain and Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have shown that cervical sagittal alignment is strongly associated with cervical deformity, myelopathy, and cervical adjacent-segmental disease, and these cervical sagittal parameters are correlated with health-related quality of life. However, less attention has been paid to cervical sagittal balance in various cervical disorders. This study aimed to compare cervical sagittal parameters between patients with nonspecific neck pain (NS-NP) and patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 236 patients from between January 2020 and October 2022. We divided them into three groups (NS-NP, CSR, and CSM) and collected general information and cervical sagittal parameters for these patients. The variation of parameters between the size of these parameters and gender differences was analyzed. Pearson's or Spearman's correlation was applied to analyze the association of cervical sagittal parameters of all patients between the three groups.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in age and sex among the three groups (p < 0.001), with the NS-NP group being the youngest and NS-NP being more common in women. The parameters of cervical sagittal position significantly differed among the three groups (p < 0.05). Pearson's or Spearman's correlation result showed that the C2-C7 Cobb angle was negatively associated with the C2-C7 sagittal vertical angle (SVA), and the C2-C7 Cobb angle and T1 slope (T1s) were negatively associated with the spino-cranial angle (SCA). There was a positive correlation between the C2-C7 Cobb angle and C7 slope (C7s), C2-C7 SVA and T1s, C2-C7 SVA and SCA, and C7s and T1s.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that between the three groups, patients with nonspecific neck pain had smaller SCA, and among patients with NS-NP, women had more significant SCA. The smaller anteroposterior diameter of the thorax in women might explain this difference.

Restoring cervical lordosis by cervical extension traction methods in the treatment of cervical spine disorders: a systematic review of controlled trials

[Purpose] To systematically review the literature on the use of cervical extension traction methods for increasing cervical lordosis in those with hypolordosis and cervical spine disorders. [Methods] Literature searches for controlled clinical trials were performed in Pubmed, PEDro, Cochrane, and ICL databases. Search terms included iterations related to the cervical spine, neck pain and disorders, and extension traction rehabilitation. [Results] Of 1,001 initially located articles, 9 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The trials demonstrated increases in radiographically measured lordosis of 12-18°, over 5-15 weeks, after 15-60 treatment sessions. Untreated controls/comparison groups not receiving extension traction showed no increase in cervical lordosis. Several trials demonstrated that both traction and comparison treatment groups experienced immediate pain relief. Traction treatment groups maintained their pain and disability improvements up to 1.5 years later. Comparative groups not receiving lordosis improvement experienced regression of symptoms towards pre-treatment values by 1 years' follow-up. [Conclusion] There are several high-quality controlled clinical trials substantiating that increasing cervical lordosis by extension traction as part of a spinal rehabilitation program reduces pain and disability and improves functional measures, and that these improvements are maintained long-term. Comparative groups who receive multimodal rehabilitation but not extension traction experience temporary relief that regresses after treatment cessation.

Demonstration of central conduction time and neuroplastic changes after cervical lordosis rehabilitation in asymptomatic subjects: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

A randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the effect of rehabilitation of the cervical sagittal configuration on sensorimotor integration and central conduction time in an asymptomatic population. Eighty (32 female) participants with radiographic cervical hypolordosis and anterior head translation posture were randomly assigned to either a control or an experimental group. The experimental group received the Denneroll cervical traction while the control group received a placebo treatment. Interventions were applied 3 × per week for 10 weeks. Outcome measures included radiographic measured anterior head translation distance, cervical lordosis (posterior bodies of C2–C7), central somatosensory conduction time (latency) (N13–N20), and amplitudes of potentials for spinal N13, brainstem P14, parietal N20 and P27, and frontal N30. Outcomes were obtained at: baseline, after 10 weeks of intervention, and at 3 months follow up. After 10 weeks and 3-months, between-group analyses revealed statistically significant differences between the groups for the following measured variables: lordosis C2–C7, anterior head translation, amplitudes of spinal N13, brainstem P14, parietal N20 and P27, frontal N30 potentials (P < 0.001), and conduction time N13–N20 (P = 0.004). Significant correlation between the sagittal alignment and measured variables were found (P < 0.005). These findings indicate restoration of cervical sagittal alignment has a direct influence on the central conduction time in an asymptomatic population.

Correlations and Age-Related Changes of Cervical Sagittal Parameters in Adults Without Symptoms of Cervical Spinal Disease

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the correlations and age-related changes of cervical sagittal parameters in adults without obvious cervical spinal disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical sagittal parameters play essential roles in the pathogenesis and therapy of cervical spinal diseases. However, few studies have investigated the correlations and age-related changes of cervical sagittal parameters.

METHODS

The enrolled participants were divided into three age groups and their cervical sagittal parameters were collected. Correlations and age-related changes of these parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

Significant differences in the C2-C7 angle, center of gravity of the head-C7 sagittal vertical axis (CGH-C7 SVA), C2-C7 SVA, neck tilt (NT), and thoracic inlet angle (TIA) were found among the three age groups. Pearson correlation analysis showed positive correlations between the C0-C2 angle and CGH-C7 SVA, C0-C2 angle and C2-C7 SVA, C2-C7 angle and T1 slope, C2-C7 angle and TIA, CGH-C7 SVA and C2-C7 SVA, C2-C7 SVA and T1 slope, T1 slope and TIA, and NT and TIA as well as negative correlations between the C0-C2 angle and C2-C7 angle, C2-C7 angle and CGH-C7 SVA, and C2-C7 angle and C2-C7 SVA. Paired t tests showed significant changes in the C2-C7 angle in groups I and II, and in the CGH-C7 SVA and C2-C7 SVA in all age groups with increasing age.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that cross correlations exist between different cervical sagittal parameters in adults without symptoms of cervical spinal disease, and the lower cervical curvature and SVA change obviously with increasing age.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Is Cervical Traction Effective in Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain Patients With Unsatisfactory NSAID Control? A Nomogram to Predict Effectiveness

OBJECTIVE

In this retrospective study, our objective was to establish a nomogram to predict the effectiveness of cervical traction in young and middle-aged chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNNP) patients with unsatisfactory nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) control. For CNNP patients with unsatisfactory NSAID control, the effectiveness of cervical traction varies. Neck muscle fat infiltration and clinical features may associate with the effectiveness.

METHODS

A total of 186 suitable patients were classified into a training data set (from August 2015 to July 2018, n = 118) and a validation data set (from August 2018 to June 2019, n = 68) with time sequence. All patients were included to receive magnetic resonance imaging scan to calculate posterior cervical fat and muscle features, then undergoing unified cervical traction in an outpatient clinic. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was used to select potentially relevant features to predict effectiveness possibility of cervical traction. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop the predicting model, presenting with a nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed based on its calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility.

RESULTS

Through the LASSO regression model, we identified 4 predictors including sex, good exercise compliance, the ratio of the cross-sectional area (CSA) between fat and muscle on C5 level (C5 fat CSA/muscle CSA), the ratio of CSA between fat and centrum on C5 level (C5 fat CSA/centrum muscle CSA). The nomogram provided good calibration and discrimination in the training cohort, showing an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.704 (95% CI, 0.608-0.799) and good concordance between the predicted and actual probabilities with Spiegelhalter's Z-test (P = 0.835). Discrimination of the model in the validation data set was acceptable, with AUC of 0.691 (95% CI, 0.564-0.817). Decision curve analysis revealed the nomogram to be clinically useful.

CONCLUSIONS

Male sex, good exercise compliance, lower C5 fat CSA/centrum CSA, and and lower C5 fat CSA/muscle CSA could be favorable features to predict the effectiveness of cervical traction in CNNP patients with unsatisfactory NSAID control.

Twenty-year Longitudinal Follow-up MRI Study of Asymptomatic Volunteers: The Impact of Cervical Alignment on Disk Degeneration

STUDY DESIGN

A 20-year longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term effect of sagittal alignment of the cervical spine on intervertebral disk degeneration in healthy asymptomatic subjects.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

This study continues a previous 10-year longitudinal study to determine whether sagittal alignment affects disk degeneration during normal aging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed 90 healthy subjects (30 men and 60 women) from among 497 volunteers who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and plain radiographs of the cervical spine between 1994 and 1996 (follow-up rate 18.1%). The mean age at the initial study was 35.5±13.4 years (11-65 y). We compared initial MRIs and follow-up MRIs, conducted at an average of 21.6 years after the initial study, for (1) decreased signal intensity of the intervertebral disks, (2) posterior disk protrusion, and (3) disk-space narrowing from C2-3 to C7-T1. Subjects were grouped by age at follow-up (under 40 vs. 40 y and older) and by a lordotic or nonlordotic cervical sagittal alignment at baseline. We assessed neck pain, stiff shoulders, and upper-arm numbness at follow-up, and examined associations between clinical symptoms and MRI parameters.

RESULTS

Progressive changes during the 20-year period included a decrease in disk signal intensity (84.4% of subjects), posterior disk protrusion (86.7%), and disk-space narrowing (17.8%). No significant association was observed between sagittal alignment and decreased disk signal intensity, posterior disk protrusion, or disk-space narrowing. Among subjects over the age of 40, progressive degenerative changes at C7-T1 were significantly more frequent in nonlordotic subjects (90.9%) compared with those with cervical lordosis (54.2%, P=0.032). The prevalence of clinical symptoms was similar in lordotic and nonlordotic subjects at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonlordotic cervical alignment was related to the progression of disk degeneration at C7-T1 but not other levels. Cervical alignment did not affect the development of clinical symptoms in healthy subjects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.