1
|
Fan W, Zhou T, Li J, Sun Y, Gu Y. Freehand Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Fixation and Minimally Invasive Decompression for a Thoracic or Lumbar Vertebral Metastatic Tumor From Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Surg 2021; 8:723943. [PMID: 34926563 PMCID: PMC8671451 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.723943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To compare freehand minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation (freehand MIPS) combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), minimally invasive decompression, and partial tumor resection with open surgery for treatment of thoracic or lumbar vertebral metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with symptoms of neurologic compression, and evaluate its feasibility, efficacy, and safety. Methods: Forty-seven patients with 1-level HCC metastatic thoracolumbar tumor and neurologic symptoms were included between February 2015 and April 2017. Among them, 21 patients underwent freehand MIPS combined with PVP, minimally invasive decompression, and partial tumor resection (group 1), while 26 patients were treated with open surgery (group 2). Duration of operation, blood loss, times of fluoroscopy, incision length, and stay in hospital were compared between the two groups. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade, ambulatory status, and urinary continence were also recorded. The Cobb angle and central and anterior vertebral body height were measured on lateral radiographs before surgery and during follow-ups. Results: Patients in group 1 showed significantly less blood loss (195.5 ± 169.1 ml vs. 873.1 ± 317.9 ml, P = 0.000), shorter incision length (3.4 ± 0.3 vs. 13.6 ± 1.8 cm, P = 0.000), shorter median stay in hospital (4–8/6 vs. 8–17/12 days, P = 0.000), more median times of fluoroscopy (5–11/6 vs. 4–7/5 times, P = 0.000), and longer duration of operation (204.8 ± 12.1 vs. 171.0 ± 12.0 min, P = 0.000) than group 2. Though VAS significantly decreased after surgery in both groups, VAS of group 1 was significantly lower than that of group 2 immediately after surgery and during follow-ups (P < 0.05). Similar results were found in ODI. No differences in the neurological improvement and spinal stability were observed between the two groups. Conclusion: Freehand MIPS combined with PVP, minimally invasive decompression, and partial tumor resection is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive method for treating thoracolumbar metastatic tumors of HCC, with less blood loss, better pain relief, and shorter length of midline incision and stay in hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenshuai Fan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Tianyao Zhou
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinghuan Li
- Department of Hepatic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunfan Sun
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
| | - Yutong Gu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Flynn SC, Eli IM, Ghogawala Z, Yew AY. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spinal Metastasis: A Review. World Neurosurg 2021; 159:e32-e39. [PMID: 34861449 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have advanced the treatment of metastatic diseases to the spine. The objective of this review is to describe clinical outcomes, benefits, and complications of these techniques. METHODS All relevant clinical studies describing the role of MIS, computer-assisted navigation (CAN), robot-assisted (RA) procedures, and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) in the treatment of metastatic spine diseases were identified from PubMed, MEDLINE, and relevant article bibliographies. RESULTS For MIS articles, we filtered 1480 results and identified 26 studies. For CAN, we searched 464 articles to identify 18 articles for review. For RA, we searched 321 results to identify 7 studies for review. For LITT, we identified 21 articles for review. CONCLUSIONS MIS for the treatment of spine metastasis has significant potential benefits in reducing surgical site infections, hospital stay, and blood loss without compromising instrument accuracy or overall outcomes. Overall, MIS and its adjuncts have the potential to reduce the risks involved in the treatment of patients with metastatic disease to the spinal column without compromising the benefits of decompression and stabilization of the spine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott C Flynn
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ilyas M Eli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Zoher Ghogawala
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew Y Yew
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chi JE, Ho CY, Chiu PY, Kao FC, Tsai TT, Lai PL, Niu CC. Minimal invasive fixation following with radiotherapy for radiosensitive unstable metastatic spine. Biomed J 2021; 45:717-726. [PMID: 34450348 PMCID: PMC9486178 DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become a feasible option for patients with spinal metastasis, but the effectiveness of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) without decompression in patients with severe cord compression remains unknown. We compared PPSF without decompression with debulking surgery in patients with radiosensitive, unstable, metastatic thoracolumbar spinal cord compression. METHODS A retrospective study of surgically treated spinal metastasis and spinal cord compression patients was conducted between October 2014 and June 2019. Demographic and pre- and postoperative data were collected and compared between patients treated with minimally invasive percutaneous fixation and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (the PPSF group) and those treated with debulking surgery (the debulking group). RESULTS We included 50 patients in this study. The PPSF group had a significantly shorter operative time (143.56 ± 49.44 min vs. 181.47 ± 40.77 min; p < .01), significantly lower blood loss (116.67 ± 109.92 mL vs. 696.55 ± 519.43 mL; p < .01), and significantly shorter hospital stay (11.90 ± 9.69 vs. 25.35 ± 20.65; p <0.01) than did the debulking group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in age, sex, spinal instability neoplastic score, ESCC, Tomita scores, numeric rating scale scores, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale scores, survival rates, and complication rates. Postoperative neurologic function and decrease in pain were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION The PPSF group had a shorter operation time, shorter length of hospital stay, and less blood loss than did the debulking group. PPSF followed by EBRT is pain relieving, relatively safe and appropriate as palliative therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-En Chi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Section, Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Yee Ho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Section, Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ping-Yeh Chiu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Section, Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Cheng Kao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Section, Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Ting Tsai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Section, Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| | - Po-Liang Lai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Section, Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Chien Niu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Section, Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jung JM, Hyun SJ, Kim KJ. Surgical Impacts of Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer to the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. J Korean Med Sci 2021; 36:e52. [PMID: 33619918 PMCID: PMC7900527 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery for spinal metastasis is rapidly increasing in frequency with procedures ranging from laminectomy to spondylectomy combined with stabilization. This study investigated the effect of various surgical procedures for spinal metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS A single-center consecutive series of patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastasis of NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' characteristics, radiographic parameters, operative data, clinical outcomes, and complications were analyzed. Surgical outcomes were assessed according to pain and performance status before and after surgery. Overall survival (OS) rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was performed to detect factors independently associated with OS using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Twenty-one patients were treated with laminectomy, 24 with corpectomy, 13 with spondylectomy (piecemeal or total en bloc fashion), and all procedures were combined with stabilization. Back pain and performance status improved significantly after surgical treatment among the three groups. Revision surgery due to tumor progression at the index level or spinal metastasis at another level were four patients (19.0%) in the laminectomy group, six patients (25.0%) in the corpectomy group, and one patient (7.7%) in the spondylectomy group. A Charlson comorbidity index and the number of spinal metastasis negatively affected OS (hazard ratio [HR], 19.613 and 2.244). Postoperative chemotherapy, time to metastasis, spondylectomy, and corpectomy had favorable associations with OS (HR, 0.455, 0.487, 0.619, and 0.715, respectively). CONCLUSION Postoperative chemotherapy was the most critical factor in OS of patients with metastatic NSCLC to the spine. An extensive surgical procedure (corpectomy/spondylectomy) with stabilization also could be beneficial for limited patients with spinal metastasis of NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Myung Jung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Seung Jae Hyun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
| | - Ki Jeong Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Di Perna G, Cofano F, Mantovani C, Badellino S, Marengo N, Ajello M, Comite LM, Palmieri G, Tartara F, Zenga F, Ricardi U, Garbossa D. Separation surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: A qualitative review. J Bone Oncol 2020; 25:100320. [PMID: 33088700 PMCID: PMC7559860 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Separation surgery is a new concept for metastatic spinal cord compression treatment. Stereotactic radiosurgery increased local control, overcoming radio-resistance’s idea. The surgery goal shifted towards creating targets for radiations avoiding cord damages. Minimal invasive strategies could allow quick return to systemic therapies.
Introduction The new concept of separation surgery has changed the surgical paradigms for the treatment of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), shifting from aggressive cytoreductive surgery towards less invasive surgery with the aim to achieve circumferential separation of the spinal cord and create a safe target for high dose Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT), which turned out to be the real game-changer for disease’s local control. Discussion In this review a qualitative analysis of the English literature has been performed according to the rating of evidence, with the aim to underline the increasingly role of the concept of separation surgery in MESCC treatment. A review of the main steps in the evolution of both radiotherapy and surgery fields have been described, highlighting the important results deriving from their integration. Conclusion Compared with more aggressive surgical approaches, the concept of separation surgery together with the advancements of radiotherapy and the use of SBRT for the treatment of MESCC showed promising results in order to achieve a valuable local control while reducing surgical related morbidities and complications.
Collapse
Key Words
- CTV, Clinical tumor volume
- Carbon fiber/PEEK cement
- ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale
- ESCC, Epidural Spinal Cord Compression
- Epidural spinal cord compression
- GTV, Gross tumor volume
- KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status
- LC, Local Control
- LITT, Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy
- MAS, Minimal Access Spine
- MESCC, Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression
- MIS techniques
- MIS, Minimally Invasive Surgical
- NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- NSE, Neurologic Stability Epidural compression
- PEEK, Polyetheretherketone
- PLL, Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
- PMMA, Poly-Methyl-Methacrylate
- PRV, Spinal cord planning risk volume
- PTV, Planning target volume
- SBRT, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
- SINS, Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score
- SRS, Stereotactic Radiosurgery
- SS, Separation Surgery
- Separation surgery
- Spinal metastases
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy
- cEBRT, conventional External Beam Radiation Therapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Di Perna
- Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Fabio Cofano
- Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Spine Surgery, Humanitas Gradenigo, Turin, Italy
- Corresponding author at: Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Turin, Italy.
| | - Cristina Mantovani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Via Genova 3, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Serena Badellino
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Via Genova 3, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Nicola Marengo
- Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Ajello
- Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Ludovico Maria Comite
- Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Palmieri
- Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Fulvio Tartara
- Neurosurgery Unit, Istituto Clinico Città Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Zenga
- Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Via Genova 3, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Diego Garbossa
- Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|