Long Time Efficacy and Safety of Microvascular Decompression Combined with Internal Neurolysis for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia

Treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression: How to select

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate individualized treatment strategies and clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD).

METHODS

One hundred forty-four patients with recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after MVD were retrospectively examined and grouped according to treatment. Surgical efficacy and pain recurrence were analyzed as outcomes.

RESULTS

Repeat craniotomy was performed in 31 patients (21.5 %), percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) in 67 (46.5 %), and radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) in 46 (32.0 %). Effectiveness did not differ among the three types of treatment (P = 0.052). The incidence of postoperative complications, including trigeminal nerve cardiac reflex, facial numbness, and mastication weakness, was lower in the craniotomy group than the PBC and RFT groups (P < 0.001). The 5-year pain recurrence rate was significantly higher than the 1-year rate in all groups. Although the 1-year pain recurrence rate did not differ among the groups, the 5-year rate was significantly lower in the repeat craniotomy group than the other groups (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after MVD should be treated based on imaging evaluation and general condition. Repeat craniotomy, PBC, and RFT are all effective. Incidence of postoperative complications and long-term pain recurrence-free survival are superior for repeat craniotomy.

A systematic review on the efficacy of adjunctive surgical strategies during microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia without intraoperative evidence of neurovascular conflict

Aim of the present study was to conduct a comprehensive review of surgical strategies that can be offered to patients with trigeminal neuralgia undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery and without intraoperative evidence of neurovascular conflict, with a high pre-operative suspicion of conflict lacking intraoperative confirmation, or individuals experiencing recurrence after previous treatment. This systematic review followed established guidelines (PRISMA) to identify and critically appraise relevant studies. The review question was formulated according to the PICO (P: patients; I: intervention; C: comparison; O: outcomes) framework as follows. For patients with trigeminal neuralgia (P) undergoing MVD surgery (I) without demonstrable preoperative neurovascular conflict, high suspicion of conflict but no intraoperative confirmation or recurrence after previous treatment (C), do additional surgical techniques (nerve combing, neurapraxia, arachnoid lysis) (O) improve pain relief outcomes (O)? The search of the literature yielded a total of 221 results. Duplicate records were then removed (n = [76]). A total of 143 papers was screened, and 117 records were excluded via title and abstract screening; 26 studies were found to be relevant to our research question and were assessed for eligibility. Upon full-text review, 17 articles were included in the review, describing the following techniques; (1) internal neurolysis (n = 6) (2) arachnoid lysis/adhesiolysis (n = 2) (3) neurapraxia (n = 3) (4) partial rhizotomy of the sensory root (n = 4) (5) pontine descending tractotomy (n = 2). The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions) assessment tool. While the described techniques hold promise, further research is warranted to establish standardized protocols, refine surgical approaches, and comprehensively evaluate long-term outcomes.

Microsurgical posterior fossa re-exploration for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after previous microvascular decompression: common grounds-scarring, deformation, and the "piston effect"

OBJECTIVE

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is a well-accepted treatment modality for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) with high initial success rates. The causes for recurrence of TN after previously successful MVD have not been fully clarified, and its treatment is still a matter of debate. Here, we present the surgical findings and the clinical outcome of patients with recurrent TN after MVD who underwent posterior fossa re-exploration.

METHODS

Microsurgical posterior fossa re-exploration was performed in 26 patients with recurrent TN (mean age 59.1 years) who underwent MVD over a period of 10 years. The trigeminal nerve was exposed, and possible factors for recurrent TN were identified. Arachnoid scars and Teflon granulomas were dissected meticulously without manipulating the trigeminal nerve. Outcome of posterior fossa re-exploration was graded according to the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity score. Follow-up was analyzed postoperatively at 3, 12, and 24 months and at the latest available time point for long-term outcome.

RESULTS

The mean duration of recurrent TN after the first MVD was 20 months. Pain relief was achieved in all patients with recurrent TN on the first postoperative day. Intraoperative findings were as follows: arachnoid scar tissue in 22/26 (84.6%) patients, arterial compression in 1/26 (3.8%), venous contact in 8/26 (30.8%), Teflon granuloma in 14/26 (53.8%), compression by an electrode in Meckel's cave used for treatment of neuropathic pain in 1/26 (3.8%), evidence of pulsations transmitted to the trigeminal nerve through the Teflon inserted previously/scar tissue ("piston effect") in 15/26 (57.7%), and combination of findings in 18/26 (69.2%). At long-term follow-up (mean 79.5 months; range, 29-184 months), 21/26 (80.8%) patients had favorable outcome (BNI I-IIIa). New hypaesthesia secondary to microsurgical posterior fossa re-exploration occurred in 5/26 (19.2%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior fossa re-exploration avoiding manipulation to the trigeminal nerve, such as pinching or combing, may be a useful treatment option for recurrent TN after previously successful MVD providing pain relief in the majority of patients with a low rate of new hypaesthesia.

Microvascular decompression: Diversified of imaging uses, advantages of treating trigeminal neuralgia and improvement after the application of endoscopic technology

Classical trigeminal neuralgia (CTN) is a unilateral and severe facial pain disease, which seriously affects the patient's quality of life. Microvascular decompression (MVD) is currently the most effective surgical method, and it is the only treatment for the etiology of CTN. Imaging for MVD has been increasingly used, and the advantages and disadvantages of endoscopy-assisted vascular decompression surgery have been controversially debated. In this review, we aimed to discuss the advantages of MVD in the treatment of patients with CTN, the importance of using imaging in disease management, and the improvements of vascular decompression surgery through the application and maturity of endoscopic techniques. Compared with other surgical methods, MVD has more prominent short- and long-term treatment effects. Its selection depends on the accurate discovery of neurovascular compression by preoperative imaging. Moreover, magnetic resonance imaging plays a diverse role in MVD, not only in identifying the responsible vessels but also in determining the prognosis and as a tool for scientific research. The use of endoscopic techniques provides improved visualization of the MVD and additional benefits for vascular decompression surgery.