PREVENTING PUPILLARY CAPTURE AFTER VITRECTOMY AND TRANSSCLERAL FIXATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS: Iridotomy Using a Vitrectomy Probe

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of concurrent iridotomy using a vitreous cutter probe on the prevention of pupillary capture in patients undergoing transscleral fixation of intraocular lens implantation.

METHODS

A total of 79 eyes from 79 patients, who underwent transscleral fixation of intraocular lens without preexisting vitreoretinal disorders and who were followed up for 6 months were included. Subjects were divided into a noniridotomy group (51 eyes) and an iridotomy group (28 eyes). After conventional 23-gauge vitrectomy and transscleral fixation of intraocular lens implantation in all patients, 28 patients underwent concurrent iridotomy intraoperatively. The patients were followed up to evaluate the incidence of surgery-related complications, including pupillary capture.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the preoperative demographic findings between the two groups (all P > 0.05). There was a significant difference in pupillary capture in 15 eyes (29.4%) of the noniridotomy group, compared with 1 eye (3.6%) of the iridotomy group (P = 0.007). There were no differences in postoperative best-corrected visual acuity between the two groups, and no iridotomy-related complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent iridotomy using a vitreous cutter probe is an easy, rapid, and effective procedure to prevent possible pupillary capture after combined vitrectomy and transscleral fixation of intraocular lens implantation.

A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy

Purpose. To evaluate surgical efficacy of in situ refixation technique for dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL). Methods. This was a single-center retrospective case series. 34 patients (34 eyes) who underwent sclera fixation for dislocated IOLs combined with vitrectomy were studied. Of 34 eyes, 17 eyes underwent IOL exchange and the other 17 eyes underwent in situ refixation. Results. Mean follow-up period was 6 months. Mean logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the groups 6 months after surgery (0.10 ± 0.03 in the IOL exchange group and 0.10 ± 0.05 in the refixation group; p = 0.065). Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was significantly lower in the refixation group (0.79 ± 0.41) than in the IOL exchange group (1.29 ± 0.46) (p = 0.004) at 3 months, which persisted to 6 months (1.13 ± 0.18 in the IOL exchange group and 0.74 ± 0.11 in the refixation group; p = 0.006). Postoperative complications occurred in 3 eyes in the IOL exchange group (17.6%) and 2 eyes in the refixation group (11.8%). However, all of the patients were well managed without additional surgery. Conclusion. The in situ refixation technique should be preferentially considered if surgery is indicated since it seemed to produce a sustained less SIA compared to IOL exchange.