Jiang Y, Shen Y, Wang L, Chen X, Tang J, Liu L, Ma T, Ju L, Chen Y, Ge Z, Zhou X, Wang X. Effect of vault on predicting postoperative refractive error for posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens based on a machine learning model.
J Cataract Refract Surg 2024;
50:319-327. [PMID:
37938020 DOI:
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001356]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE
To investigate how vault and other biometric variations affect postoperative refractive error of implantable collamer lenses (ICLs) by integrating artificial intelligence and modified vergence formula.
SETTING
Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
DESIGN
Artificial intelligence and big data-based prediction model.
METHODS
2845 eyes that underwent uneventful spherical ICL or toric ICL implantation and with manifest refraction results 1 month postoperatively were included. 1 eye of each patient was randomly included. Random forest was used to calculate the postoperative sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent by inputting variable ocular parameters. The influence of predicted vault and modified Holladay formula on predicting postoperative refractive error was analyzed. Subgroup analysis of ideal vault (0.25 to 0.75 mm) and extreme vault (<0.25 mm or >0.75 mm) was performed.
RESULTS
In the test set of both ICLs, all the random forest-based models significantly improved the accuracy of predicting postoperative sphere compared with the Online Calculation & Ordering System calculator ( P < .001). For ideal vault, the combination of modified Holladay formula in spherical ICL exhibited highest accuracy ( R = 0.606). For extreme vault, the combination of predicted vault in spherical ICL enhanced R values ( R = 0.864). The combination of predicted vault and modified Holladay formula was most optimal for toric ICL in all ranges of vault (ideal vault: R = 0.516, extreme vault: R = 0.334).
CONCLUSIONS
The random forest-based calculator, considering vault and variable ocular parameters, illustrated superiority over the existing calculator on the study datasets. Choosing an appropriate lens size to control the vault within the ideal range was helpful to avoid refractive surprises.
Collapse