Indocyanine green angiographic features of myopic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization as a prognostic factor after photodynamic therapy

Systemic Oxidative Stress Level as a Pathological and Prognostic Factor in Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization

Purpose

To investigate the association of systemic oxidative stress level with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) and its clinical outcomes.

Design

Retrospective case-control study.

Participants

This retrospective study included 52 eyes of 52 healthy participants (mean age: 62.5 years), 30 eyes of 30 patients (mean age: 59.6 years) with high myopia (HM) but without mCNV, and 23 eyes of 23 patients (mean age: 61.8 years) with HM and mCNV who received intravitreal anti-VEGF antibody injections (IVIs) using a pro re nata regimen during the 6-month follow-up after the first IVI.

Methods

Clinical findings, including oxidative stress parameters, such as diacron reactive oxygen metabolites (dROMs), biological antioxidant potential (BAP), and the BAP/dROM ratio (B/d ratio), were analyzed.

Main Outcome Measures

Clinical features and oxidative stress parameters.

Results

Both BAP and the B/d ratio were significantly lower in the HM/mCNV group than in the HM/no mCNV group (P = 0.002 and P = 0.012, respectively) and than in the control group (P = 0.001 and P = 0.026, respectively). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, axial length (odds ratio 1.878, P = 0.042) and the B/d ratio (odds ratio 0.470, P = 0.026) were significantly associated with mCNV. Dividing the patients into high and low B/d ratio groups (with a cutoff of 5.2) showed that subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) was lower (P = 0.002) and the number of IVI treatments was higher (P = 0.029) in the low B/d ratio group than in the high B/d ratio group. In multiple regression analyses, only the B/d ratio was significantly associated with SFCT (β = 0.684, P = 0.006).

Conclusions

The oxidative stress level in eyes with HM differed according to mCNV, SFCT, and the number of IVI treatments. Measuring oxidative stress parameters might be useful in eyes with HM both for assessing the risk of developing mCNV and determining disease activity.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Choroidal neovascularization in pathological myopia

Myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is one of the leading causes of visual impairment worldwide. The clinical and socioeconomic impact of myopic CNV in Asian countries is particularly significant due to rising trend in the prevalence and severity of pathological myopia. The exact pathogenesis of myopic CNV remains unclear and there is paucity of information with respect to incidence and risk factors for myopic CNV from prospective studies. Furthermore, there are no recognized measures that may prevent or delay the development of CNV in eyes with pathological myopia. Advances have been made in the diagnosis and characterization of myopic CNV over the years. Until recently, treatment modalities for myopic CNV were limited to thermal laser photocoagulation and photodynamic therapy with verteporfin, both these modalities primarily aim at prevention of further visual loss. In the last 5 years, inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have been used successfully and may improve vision to some extent. Nevertheless, the long-term safety and efficacy of anti-VEGF agents remains unknown. Furthermore, the risk of developing chorioretinal atrophy remains the key factor in determining the final visual outcome. This review article summarizes the current literature on myopic CNV, highlighting new evolving diagnostic and treatment modalities, prognostic factors influencing visual outcome, and areas of future research.

Combined photodynamic therapy and intravitreal triamcinolone injection for the treatment of choroidal neovascularisation secondary to pathological myopia: a pilot study

Intravitreous triamcinolone associated with PDT should preferably be used among elderly patients who usually show lower visual acuity and a poorer response to PDT, or among patients with recurrent or greater CNVs