The efficacy of the combined procedure in involutional entropion surgery: a comparative study

Evaluation of outcomes of lower eyelid entropion and ectropion surgical repair

<b><br>Introduction:</b> The imbalance of external and internal forces acting on the lower eyelid can result in entropion and ectropion, both of which cause ocular irritation and loss of proper eye protection. Potential complications of untreated cases include recurrent inflammation of the conjunctiva and cornea, conjunctival neovascularization, corneal abrasion or perforation, and ultimately even loss of vision. Although various surgical techniques are used to address this problem, their long-term outcome and effectiveness are still under discussion. </br> <b><br>Aim:</b> To evaluate outcomes of surgery for entropion and ectropion, including a modified Wheeler's method for entropion correction.</br> <b><br>Methods:</b> A non-comparative study (prospective and retrospective groups) included 100 patients operated on in two university hospitals' plastic surgery departments for lower eyelid entropion or ectropion, following formal ethics approval. The prospective group included 50 patients assessed preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The retrospective group was comprised of 50 patients (2012-2018), whose preoperative documentation and clinical examinations were analyzed. The main outcome measures were change between pre- and postoperative patient-reported symptoms (VAS scale), ectropion/entropion grading scale (EGS/EnGS), quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF), and occurrence of complications.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> The differences in the severity of all symptoms before and after surgery evaluated with the VAS scale were statistically significant in both groups (p <0.05). We observed 6 recurrences (12%) in the prospective group and 9 (18%) in the retrospective group, with minor complications. Very good functional and esthetic postoperative results were confirmed in 70% (79) of the whole group and in 13 patients (81.3%) treated with the modified Wheeler's method. In the prospective group, the Mann- Whitney U test for dependent variables revealed significant improvement in the somatic, psychological, and environmental domains, with no significant change in the social relationships domain.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> The results following entropion/ectropion surgery prove the effectiveness of the methods used. Complementing them with the modified Wheeler's method brought an increase in the number of very good outcomes. Surgery of lower eyelid malposition contributed to reduced symptoms and improved quality of life. The rates of postoperative sequelae were low.</br>.

Outcomes of combined procedures compared to various single techniques for involutional entropion

BACKGROUND

To describe the outcomes of triangular tarsectomy and limited orbicularis myectomy with lower eyelid retractor plication compared to an everting sutures (ES) technique or lateral tarsal strip (LTS) procedure for the correction of lower eyelid involutional entropion.

METHODS

A nonrandomized clinical study was carried out at two tertiary eye hospitals between January 2016 and December 2019. Patients in Group A underwent triangular tarsectomy and limited orbicularis myectomy with lower eyelid retractor plication. Group B had ES, and Group C underwent a LTS procedure. All participants were operated by one surgeon and underwent 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients in whom 84 eyelids were affected by lower eyelid involutional entropion were included in the study. The success rate was higher in Group A compared to Group B and Group C (100% vs. 86.7% vs. 95.8%; P < 0.05). Recurrence at a 1-year follow-up was noted in only four (13.3%) eyelids in Group B and one (4.2%) in Group C. However, patient's in Group C experienced a higher frequency of minimal postoperative complications, including short-term pain (100%), tenderness on the lateral canthal area (100%), tightness of the eyelid (91.7%), and ecchymosis (54.2%) compared to Group A. Patients of Group B experienced minimal or no postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Triangular tarsectomy and limited orbicularis myectomy with eyelid retractor plication may be considered the standard procedure for correcting lower eyelid involutional entropion with no recurrence compared to LTS technique or minimally invasive and cost-effective ES procedure.

A novel surgical correction technique of involutional entropion by combined triangular tarsectomy, orbicularis muscle tightening and inferior retractor plication

PURPOSE

Describing a novel collective technique for treatment of involutional entropion of the lower eyelids in patients aged 55 years old or more.

METHODS

A prospective comparative study included 56 patients (69 eyelids), recruited from the outpatient clinic of Tanta University Eye Hospital, presented with involutional lower eyelid entropion either primary or secondary. They were divided into: 1- Group A 42 eyelids with excessive horizontal lid laxity (pinch test > 8.0 mm), who underwent Combined tarsectomy of a triangle with base down and horizontal tightening of orbicularis muscle. 2- Group B: 27 eyelids with excessive horizontal lid laxity (pinch test < 8.0 mm) who underwent vertical tightening of orbicularis muscle. Follow up of the patients up to 12 month and satisfaction recording were done.

RESULTS

The mean age of Group A was 60.08 ± 8.38 and of Group B was 55.10 ± 7.40. An overall high success rate (91.07%) and a low recurrence rate (8.92%) with a high post-operative satisfaction, both functionally and cosmetically (96.42%), were reported.

CONCLUSION

Combined procedures with addressing the horizontal tightening was associated with a higher success rate and a lower recurrence rate.

Anterior versus posterior retractor reinsertion with a lateral tarsal strip for involutional entropion repair: A multicentric experience

PURPOSE

The aim was the comparison of two different approaches to re-insert the inferior eyelid retractors within addition to lateral tarsal strip at lower eyelid involutional entropion (LEIE) surgical correction.

METHOD

This multicentric retrospective case series involved 233 consecutive patients (195 eyelids) who underwent LEIE repair. All the lids had a lateral tarsal strip (LTS) in addition to the reinsertion of retractors onto the tarsal plate via the anterior approach (group 1) or the posterior approach (group 2). The desired normal position of the eyelids at 6-month follow-up was considered 'surgical successes, while entropion recurrence and overcorrection (ectropion) were considered 'surgical failures'.

RESULTS

One-hundred ninety-one (82%) surgeries were included in group 1 and 42 (18%) in group 2. The success rate was 92.1% (176 lids) in group 1 and 85.7% (36 lids) in group 2 (p = 0.188). The recurrence rate was statistically higher for group 2 (14.3%) than for group 1 (3.7%) (p = 0.016). Overcorrection only described in group 1 (3.1%). Both groups had a similar complication rate (p = 0.268), with trichiasis being the most frequent (14, 6%). Ten eyelids (47.6%) from the 21 overall failures were satisfactorily reoperated, and the remaining ones were treated conservatively.

CONCLUSION

The anterior or posterior approach to reinsert lower eyelid retractors to tarsal plate in addition to LTS to correct LEIE can provide a similar outcome. However, the anterior approach achieves a slightly higher success rate with fewer recurrences but with a higher overcorrection rate.

The role of the lateral tarsal strip procedure in modern ophthalmic plastic surgery-A review

Introduction

The lateral tarsal strip is one of the basic surgical techniques in ophthalmic plastic surgery. It is used in many indications, predominantly in ectropion repair. Even though there are alternatives, it is probably one of the most popular techniques in ophthalmic plastic surgery. The lateral tarsal strip is also part of bigger surgical procedures (such as midface lifting, entropion surgery, reconstruction surgery, or a part of some surgical approaches to the orbit). The aim of this review is to assess the most common ways of usage of the lateral tarsal strip, to cover its alternatives, and to discuss the future of this technique.

Methods

We have search PubMed and Web of Science and went through articles about lateral tarsal strip. We have also searched for other techniques that used the lateral tarsal strip and included these articles in our review. We have analyzed the major articles and made a review about the topic.

Results

As a natural part of many advanced surgical techniques and as a major surgical technique for lower eyelid ectropion repair, the lateral tarsal strip remains an important part of modern ophthalmic plastic surgery.

Comparison of the two techniques for involutional lower eyelid entropion: A retrospective study

Evaluation of the surgical outcome and the patient satisfaction between the modified Wies technique and the Jones retractor plication technique for involutional lower eyelid entropion without horizontal eyelid laxity. Patients who underwent the modified Wies technique (group 1) and the Jones retractor plication technique (group 2) for correction of involutional lower eyelid entropion without horizontal eyelid laxity between January 2014 and January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with horizontal eyelid laxity; cicatricial, congenital or iatrogenic entropion; and less than 6 months of follow-up time were excluded. The main outcome measures were the recurrence rate, correct anatomical position of the eyelid, symptom relief, and postoperative complications for both groups. 37 patients (41 eyes) in Group 1 and 34 patients (34 eyes) in Group 2 were enrolled in the study. Mean age ± SD was 75.6 ± 8.5 years in Group 1 and 73.4 ± 7.9 years in Group 2 (p:0.255). The mean follow-up time (range) was 24.3 (6-80) months in group 1 and 25.3 (6-78) months in group 2 (p:0.818). Two patients in Group 1 and seven patients in Group 2 had a recurrence during the follow-up period (p:0.07). Based on the results of the study, it seems that the modified Wies technique may be a good alternative in suitable patients, as it has satisfactory surgical results.

LATERAL TARSAL STRIP TECHNIQUE IN CORRECTION OF EYELID ECTROPION AND ENTROPION

BACKGROUND

Ectropion and entropion are eyelid malpositions associated with a number of unpleasant symptoms. One of several surgical methods that can correct these problems is referred to as the lateral tarsal strip technique. In this paper, we evaluate the postoperative results and quality of this technique. We also examine the complications associated with this surgical method.

METHODS

The study took place from April 2018 to April 2020 at the Military University Hospital in Prague. The operation was performed by two surgeons. The study included 43 eyes of 33 patients (17 women and 16 men), average age was 79 years. Before the operation, 23 eyes were affected by ectropion and 20 eyes affected by entropion, 35 of the 43 were cases of involutional origin. The study does not include patients who underwent other surgical techniques.

RESULTS

There were no perioperative or postoperative complications in the entropion surgery group. Successful correction was achieved, and adverse symptoms disappeared in 91.3% of cases. Correct position of the eyelid was not achieved in two cases. For patients with ectropion, surgical correction was successful in 95% of cases. Ectropion persisted after surgery only in one patient.

CONCLUSION

  The lateral tarsal strip technique is a safe, reliable and highly effective surgical technique. Correction of eyelid malposition was achieved in more than 90% of cases. The vast majority of patients were satisfied and reported relief from preoperative symptoms.

A 2-step Procedure for Entropion Treatment: Eyelid Splitting and Full-thickness Everting Sutures

Background:

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the 2-step procedure used for treating entropion patients: (1) performing a grey line split incision and recessing the anterior lamella; (2) using full-thickness everting sutures of the eyelid to enhance the rotating effect.

Methods:

In total, 31 eyelids of 21 patients were reviewed (male–female ratio = 11:10), with each patient having either upper or lower, or both eyelid entropion due to various causes. All patients underwent the two-step procedure by eyelid splitting and full-thickness everting sutures at the Bundang Cha Hospital from August 2014 until July 2018.

Results:

The mean follow-up duration was 24.3 months (range, 14–107 months). The causes of entropion included involutional entropion (15 eyelids), congenital entropion (10 eyelids), and cicatrical entropion (6 eyelids). Surgery was re-performed on 16 eyelids due to recurrences from previous electrolysis or surgical correction of entropion such as capsulopalpebral fascia repair, full-thickness rotating suture, or folliculectomy. The two-step procedure was performed on all 31 eyelids, and 9 eyelids received additional excision of skin. After the 2-step procedure, patients showed improvement in symptoms, and all were satisfied with the contour of their eyelids. During the follow-up period, there were no recurrences or complications.

Conclusion:

A two-step procedure involving eyelid splitting and full-thickness everting sutures is an effective surgical method to treat entropion due to various causes, when compared with other conventional methods.

Modified everting sutures combined with reattachment to the inferior tarsal plate for involutional lower eyelid entropion: A new technique

Background

This study evaluated the outcomes of a new modified Wies technique for patients with involutional lower eyelid entropion without horizontal eyelid laxity.

Methods

This case series retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with entropion who underwent surgery between January 2014 and March 2019 by the same experienced surgeon. Horizontal eyelid laxity, lower eyelid retractor function, and orbicularis muscle overriding were recorded before and after surgery. The recurrence rate and complications were also evaluated. This technique consisted of modified everting sutures combined with reattachment of the lower eyelid retractors to the inferior tarsal plate.

Results

This new technique was performed on 28 eyes in 25 patients (mean age, 71.0±8.0 years; range, 56–87 years). Nine patients (36%) were women and 16 (64%) were men. Lower lid entropion was present in the right eye in 14 patients (56%), the left eye in eight patients (32%), and both eyes in three patients (12%). The mean follow-up period was 27.3±12.4 months (range, 6–60 months). No intraoperative complications were observed. All patients’ symptoms were alleviated. One patient (3.6%) had recurrence after 2 years (success rate, 96.4%). The remaining 27 eyes maintained a satisfactory and comfortable eyelid position. No patients had problems with scarring.

Conclusions

The approach described herein proved to be safe and feasible in eyes with involutional lower eyelid entropion without horizontal eyelid laxity. These advantages of this procedure include the lack of a conjunctival scar, punctal eversion, and lateral canthal angle deformation. A low recurrence rate and a long interval to recurrence were also observed.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Everting Sutures with a Lateral Tarsal Strip for Involutional Lower Eyelid Entropion

INTRODUCTION

To compare the anatomical and functional outcome and changes in the quality of life (QoL) over time of the lateral tarsal strip (LTS) versus the Quickert everting sutures (ES) for the repair of primary involutional lower eyelid entropion.

METHODS

Forty-five patients (54 eyes) with primary involutional lower eyelid entropion were recruited in a prospective randomized clinical trial over 3-year period. Twenty-six eyes were randomized to the LTS technique and 28 to the ES procedure. Primary outcome was the anatomical correction of the eyelid at the final assessment in 1 year. Secondary outcomes were function and symptoms assessment with a QoL questionnaire at 6 months. Fisher's exact test was used for the statistical analysis of success rate and gender study and Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression analysis were used for age study. The Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for the analysis of the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25).

RESULTS

At the 6-month follow-up, 25 eyes (96.2%) of the LTS group and 20 (71.4%) of the ES group had favorable outcome (P = 0.025). There were one and eight eyes, respectively, with early recurrence. At the final 12-month evaluation, 23 eyes (88.5%) in the LTS group and 16 eyes (57.1%) in the ES group were successful. Three (11.5%) and 12 (42.9%) eyes respectively showed postoperative recurrence. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.015) for the primary outcome, whereas age and gender did not influence success. The NEI VFQ-25 showed statistically significant subjective improvement from baseline in most categories of the QoL. No significant difference between the two procedures was detected at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the LTS procedure has a superior surgical success rate and reduction of symptoms compared with the ES for the repair of involutional lower eyelid entropion. Both procedures showed similar improvement of the postoperative QoL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Clinical Trials Registry Platform identifier: ACTRN12616000620426.

A comparison of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures and the Quickert procedure for involutional entropion

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To provide evidence of statistically significant difference in the surgical outcome of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures (LTS + ES) versus the Quickert procedure (QP) in the treatment of involutional entropion.

METHODS

In a prospective randomized comparative trial, 66 eyelids of 52 patients with primary involutional lower eyelid entropion were recruited. Thirty-six eyelids were randomized to QP, and 30 eyelids were randomized to LTS + ES. Surgery was performed by a single surgeon. Postoperative follow-up was scheduled after 2 weeks, 8 and 14 months. Successful surgery was defined as a normal eyelid position at rest and inability to induce entropion on forced eyelid closure at or before the 14-month follow-up visit.

RESULTS

A total of 66 eyelids of 52 patients were enrolled in the study. Three patients did not complete follow-up (1 did not attend the 8 months follow-up visit; 2 did not attend 14 months follow-up visit). Of the 63 patients, a single eyelid [success probability 0.97; confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1] in the QP group and two treated eyelids [success probability of 0.93; CI: 0.85-1] in the LTS + ES group had a recurrence of a lower eyelid entropion after 14 months. There was no statistically significant difference in surgical failure between the LTS + ES versus QP (Log-rank test: p = 0.46).

CONCLUSION

These data provide strong evidence that success rates at 14 months are similar in patients treated with either techniques (LTS + ES versus QP).

Surgical correction of involutional lower lid entropion with lateral canthal eyelid block excision and imbrication of the capsulopalpebral ligament using non-buried non-resorbable imbricating sutures versus buried resorbable imbricating sutures

PURPOSE

To compare the results of surgical correction of involutional lower eyelid entropion using either buried resorbable imbricating sutures or non-buried non-resorbable sutures that were removed after five to seven days.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a two-surgeon series. Analysis of the charts of patients surgically treated for involutional lower eyelid entropion between January 2011 and December 2014 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Recurrence rate, postoperative complications.

RESULTS

We included 281 eyelids of 240 patients. Of these, 89 eyelids had been treated with buried resorbable imbricating sutures (surgeon WvdB) and 192 with non-buried non-resorbable sutures (surgeon DP). Of the 281 eyelids, 77 eyelids had undergone previous entropion surgery. In the buried resorbable suture group (group R), the mean follow-up was 30 months (range 12 to 61 months) versus 39 months (range 14 to 60 months) in the non-buried non-resorbable group (group NR) (p = 0.07). With a follow-up of up to 18 months, the recurrence rate was 2.2% in group R and 4.2% in group NR (p = 0.73). With a similar follow-up, the recurrence rate was 3.9% after primary surgery versus 2.6% in recurrent cases (p = 0.73). Minor postoperative complications and side-effects were seen in 5.3% (15/281).

CONCLUSION

We found no difference in the recurrence rate between the use of buried resorbable imbricating sutures and non-buried non-resorbable sutures and between primary versus recurrent cases. We conclude that we can safely use buried resorbable imbricating sutures in involutional entropion. It yields comparable results and omits the need for suture removal.

Combined pentagonal resection and inferior retractor plication in involutional entropion

Background

To describe the effectiveness of combined pentagonal resection and inferior retractor plication (PR + IRP) based on the Hill’s procedure for the treatment of primary involutional lower eyelid entropion in the Chinese population.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of 52 eyelids of 46 patients who underwent PR + IRP for treatment of involutional entropion between May 2009 and May 2017. Patient demographics, presence of pre-operative laxity, post-operative outcome and presence of complications were all recorded from electronic patient records.

Results

A total of 52 eyelids of 46 patients received PR + IRP. None had recurrence of entropion, 1 (2.1%) had residual entropion, 2 eyelids (4.4%) had lower eyelid notching, 1 eyelid (2.2%) had infection and 1 eyelid (2.2%) had overcorrection. The overall success rate was 90.4%.

Conclusion

Combined PR + IRP is an effective surgical procedure for primary involutional entropion with low recurrence rate. However, it may carry risk of eyelid notching post-operatively.

Lower eyelid entropion repair with retractor mobilization and insertion onto the anterior surface of the tarsal plate

PURPOSE

To evaluate a modified surgical technique for the correction of lower eyelid involutional entropion in terms of recurrence rate and relief of symptoms.

METHOD

A prospective series of 67 consecutive eyelids in 55 patients who underwent lower eyelid entropion repair using a modified surgical approach not previously published in the literature to the authors' knowledge. The surgical technique, via a skin crease incision, involves disinsertion of the lower eyelid retractors from the tarsus and conjunctiva and suturing the retractors onto the anterior surface of the tarsal plate. Standard excision of redundant lower lid skin and orbicularis muscle was also performed as well as lateral canthal tendon repair. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon (B. A. O'donnell). This study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

RESULTS

There were 67 eyelids with a minimum of 12 months follow-up: of these only 1 patient (1%) required revision surgery (average follow-up 24 months). Four other eyelids had persistent or recurrent irritation (6%) not suggestive of, or secondary to, recurrence. Seven eyelids (10%) had undergone previous operative repair with no further recurrence following their most recent surgery.

CONCLUSION

Disinsertion and reattachment of the retractors to the anterior tarsal plate in lower eyelid entropion repair is an effective surgical technique to improve lower eyelid stability. Although minimum follow-up is 12 months and average follow-up 24 months, longer follow-up would further evaluate this technique.

Entropion and ectropion repair: a snapshot of surgical practice in the United Kingdom

We aim to provide a snapshot of the current surgical practice for correction of entropion and ectropion, the two most common oculoplastic procedures carried out in the UK, by surveying 135 consultant oculoplastic surgeons via the tool Survey Monkey. Forty-seven (35%) consultants responded. For entropion, 44% of surgeons opted for lateral tarsal strip (LTS) + everting sutures (ES). Other first-line choices included LTS + transcutaneous retractor plication (21%), Quickert's procedure (14%), ES (7%), and Wies procedure (5%). Important patient-related factors to consider were horizontal lid laxity and retractor dehiscence. Regarding ectropion, LTS was most commonly practiced (35%), followed by LTS + transconjunctival retractor plication (28%), wedge excision (16%), and lateral canthoplasty (5%). The patient-related factors guiding choice were horizontal lid laxity, lateral canthal tendon laxity, and punctal position under traction. Responses found a wide range of preferred surgical techniques in practice. The factors guiding surgical choice were personal audit results (92% stated important/very important), familiarity with the technique (92%), and the technique being favoured by previous trainers (76%), suggesting current practice led by expert opinion, possibly due to a lack of evidence-based literature. This highlights the variety of core oculoplastic surgical techniques practiced and underlines the need for robust trials to guide surgical choice.