Comparison of Long-term Surgical Outcomes of Two-muscle Surgery in Basic-type Intermittent Exotropia: Bilateral versus Unilateral

How to Better Treat Patients with Intermittent Exotropia: A Review of Surgical Treatment of Intermittent Exotropia

Intermittent exotropia (X(T)) is the most common form of strabismus, especially in Asians. Treatment of X(T) includes occlusion, overminus lens, and surgery, of which, surgery is the mainstay of treatment. Commonly performed surgical procedures for X(T) are bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession or unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection; however, it is unclear which of the two surgeries is more effective. The purpose of this review is to provide an insight on the surgical treatment of X(T). Randomized controlled trials, comparative observational studies, and case series with a large number of patients as well as a long follow-up period of over a year were included.

Analysis of the Changes and Possible Reasons in Aberrations before and after Surgery in Patients with Concomitant Exotropia

Objective. The objective is to observe the changes in aberrations before and after surgery in patients with common horizontal strabismus and to analyze the possible reasons for the changes. Methods. Forty eyes of 40 cases with concomitant exotropia who underwent strabismus correction at the Ophthalmology Department of Nantong University Hospital from October 2020 to July 2021 were included in this study, all of whom underwent unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with a medial rectus resection in the same eye. Aberration parameters were measured 1 day before surgery and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. Differences in the indicators at each time period were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) of repeated measures data for a single factor, and data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 statistical application software. Results. 5 mm pupil diameter: the preoperative and postoperative RMS of total aberration showed statistically significant difference ( $P<0.01$ ). Postoperation test (Bonferroni method) and preoperative comparison at each period after surgery showed statistically significant differences between 6 months after surgery ( $P=0.002$ ) and preoperative comparison. The preoperative and postoperative comparison of RMS in LOAs was statistically significant ( $P<0.01$ ); postoperative test (Bonferroni method) and preoperative comparison showed that there were statistically significant differences between 1 week ( $P=0.033$ ) and 6 months ( $P=0.002$ ) after operation. The difference of RMS of defocus before and after operation was statistically significant ( $P<0.01$ ); postoperation test (Bonferroni method) and preoperative comparison showed that there was statistically significant difference between 6 months after operation ( $P=0.007$ ) and preoperative comparison. There was statistically significant difference in preoperative and postoperative RMS of HOAs ( $P=0.013$ ). Postoperative test (Bonferroni method) and preoperative comparison showed that there was statistically significant difference 6 months after surgery ( $P=0.03$ ). The RMS of secondary astigmatism showed a statistically significant difference before and after operation ( $P=0.001$ ), and the postoperation test (Bonferroni method) showed a statistically significant difference 6 months after operation ( $P=0.002$ ). In 5 mm pupil diameter, the preoperative and postoperative RMS of total aberration showed statistically significant difference ( $P<0.01$ ), postoperative test (Bonferroni method) was used to compare each period after surgery with that before surgery, and there were statistically significant differences between 1 week after surgery ( $P=0.034$ ), 3 months after surgery ( $P=0.033$ ), and 6 months after surgery ( $P=0.003$ ). The preoperative and postoperative comparison of RMS in LOAs was statistically significant ( $P<0.01$ ), postoperative test (Bonferroni method) was used to compare each period after surgery with that before surgery, and there were statistically significant differences between 1 week after surgery ( $P=0.04$ ), 3 months after surgery ( $P=0.034$ ), and 6 months after surgery ( $P=0.004$ ). The difference of RMS of defocus before and after surgery was statistically significant ( $P=0.002$ ), and the comparison between postoperation test (Bonferroni method) and preoperation showed that the difference was statistically significant 6 months after surgery ( $P=0.027$ ). The RMS of astigmatism showed statistically significant difference before and after operation ( $P=0.002$ ), and the postoperation test (Bonferroni method) showed statistically significant difference between 6 months after operation ( $P=0.009$ ) and before operation. Conclusion. We found that horizontal rectus surgery had a transient effect on LOAs and almost no effect on HOAs. Long-term follow-up is recommended after strabismus surgery to observe eye position and binocular visual function. Because of the high prevalence of strabismus in adolescents, long-term observation of the eye axis and aberration is recommended.

Contrast Agent and Molecular Imaging Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Effect of Intelligent Image Sensor Combined with Visual Training in the Treatment of Children with Intermittent Exotropia in China

At present, the main treatment for strabismus is still surgical treatment, but there is no unified standard for the evaluation of the timing of surgery. This study mainly explores the clinical effects of using meta-analysis of intelligent image sensors combined with visual training to treat children with intermittent exotropia. Cochrane systematic reviews collect, evaluate, and synthesize an increasing number of original clinical research results to obtain the comprehensive effect of relevant interventions, so as to provide real and reliable evidence for health decision-making and clinical practice. It uses scientific, clear, and reproducible research methods to reduce the influence of biased factors, so it is different from traditional reviews. Cochrane systematic reviews are especially suitable for certain interventions when the pros and cons of interventions are difficult to determine based on the results of a single clinical study or when there are large differences in the clinical application process. Poor quality systematic reviews can mislead policymakers and clinicians. In the meta-analysis, the Cochrane systematic evaluation method of evidence-based medicine was used to comprehensively search the published literature research on the treatment of intermittent exotropia with vision training. Using the Cochrane system evaluation method, computer search of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, manual retrieval of relevant conference documents, and inclusion of all clinical trial documents of visual training in children with intermittent exotropia was conducted. Patients with intermittent exotropia were selected, simultaneous vision, fusion function, and far stereo vision with the same vision machine were measured, and near stereo vision with a stereo vision chart was measured. The number of simultaneous vision, fusion function, and distance and near stereo vision "with" and "without" cases were recorded for all patients, and the relationship with age of onset, type of strabismus, degree of strabismus, and degree of control was counted. Among them, 91 patients who underwent strabismus correction surgery were followed up for at least 6 months with correct eye position. The presence or absence of simultaneous vision, fusion function, far stereo vision, and near stereo vision were recorded and compared with preoperative. The number of recovery and nonrecovery cases was recorded, and the relationship between the age of operation, the type of strabismus, the degree of strabismus, and the degree of control was counted. It was statistically analyzed by SPSS22.0. The results of the meta-analysis showed that in terms of the effective rate of fundus lesions, the visual training group was better than the nontraining group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: (1.25, 1.40), P < 0.0001). This study provides guidance for the early rehabilitation of children with intermittent exotropia.

Efficacy of bilateral lateral rectus recession versus unilateral recession and resection for basic-type intermittent exotropia: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLR) versus unilateral recession and resection (RR) for the treatment of patients with basic-type intermittent exotropia (IXT).

METHODS

We systematically searched the EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases for relevant studies published before April 2020 with no language restrictions. Related studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included. The primary outcomes were success rate and mean postoperative deviation. Odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

From 1243 screened articles, a total of 10 studies involving 967 patients were included in the analysis. No differences were observed in success rates between the BLR and RR groups at 1-day to 1-week postoperatively (OR: 0.9, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.53, p = 0.69), or at 6-month postoperatively (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.59 to 2.11, p = 0.74), or at the last follow-up visit (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.34, p = 0.34). The unsatisfactory effects (the overcorrection and undercorrection rates) between the two groups were comparable. In addition, there were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative deviation at 1-day to 1-week postoperatively (MD: 0.03, 95% CI: -1.32 to 1.27, p = 0.97), or at 6-month postoperatively (MD: 1.42, 95% CI: -0.43 to 3.27, p = 0.13) or at the last follow-up visit (MD: 0.29, 95% CI: -1.39 to 1.97, p = 0.74).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provides evidence that both the BLR and RR procedures have similar efficacy for the treatment of basic-type IXT.

Long-term Motor and Sensory Outcomes After Unilateral Lateral Rectus Recession-Medial Rectus Resection for Basic Intermittent Exotropia

PURPOSE

To report long-term motor and sensory outcomes after unilateral lateral rectus recession-medial rectus resection for basic intermittent exotropia.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who had undergone unilateral lateral rectus recession-medial rectus resection for basic intermittent exotropia and were observed postoperatively for a minimum of 10 years were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients were included (mean age: 6.07 ± 2.96 years; range: 3 to 17 years). The mean postoperative follow-up was 13.28 ± 3.27 years (range: 10 to 23 years). Overall, 19 patients (46%) had surgical success at their most recent follow-up visit. Age at onset of strabismus, age at surgery, strabismus duration, preoperative size of near and distance deviation, presence of stereopsis, and initial postoperative overcorrection did not predict motor outcome after surgery. Twenty-five patients (74%) achieved stereopsis. None of the 4 patients without binocular single vision preoperatively achieved stereopsis, compared to 3 of 7 patients (43%) with peripheral binocular single vision (P = .02). Five of 7 patients (71%) with a preoperative stereoacuity of 120 to 240 seconds of arc improved to 60 seconds of arc. Age at surgery did not predict stereopsis. Patients with a strabismus duration of 5 years or less achieved a better stereopsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer than half of the patients with basic intermittent exotropia achieved a successful long-term surgical outcome. Age at surgery, strabismus duration, preoperative stereopsis, and an initial postoperative overcorrection did not predict motor outcome. A pre-operative absence of binocular single vision indicated a poor prognosis for stereopsis. A shorter duration of strabismus predicted a better stereopsis after surgery. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2020;57(5):326-332.].

Do the primary surgical options for basic-type exotropia cause differences in distance-near discrepancy of recurrent exotropia after surgery?

Purpose

Most ophthalmologists appear to have no distinct preference between unilateral recess-resect (R&R) and bilateral lateral rectus (BLR) recessions to treat basic-type exotropia. This study aimed to determine whether differences in distance-near discrepancy and resultant exotropia types of recurrent exotropia following surgery for primary basic-type exotropia exist between the two surgical options.

Methods

Ninety-three patients with recurrent exotropia following BLR recessions for basic-type exotropia (BLR group) and 95 following R&R for basic-type exotropia (R&R group) were included in this retrospective study. The exotropia types in recurrent exotropia were classified into three types according to distance-near discrepancy: basic, divergence-excess, and convergence-insufficiency. The BLR and R&R groups were compared.

Results

After surgery for basic-type exotropia, the type composition changed differently in each group (p < 0.001). The basic-type of primary exotropia was more often maintained in recurrent exotropia in the R&R group than in the BLR group. The incidence of postoperative convergence-insufficiency type exotropia in the BLR group was 28.0% and 8.4% in the R&R group (p = 0.001). Postoperative near stereopsis and fusion control grade of distance deviation did not differ between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Convergence-insufficiency type recurrent exotropia occurred more frequently after BLR recessions than after R&R for basic-type exotropia. The high rate of secondary convergence-insufficiency type exotropia after BLR recessions should be considered when clinicians select a surgical option to treat exotropia.