Improving the Toric Intraocular Lens Calculation by Considering Posterior Corneal Astigmatism and Surgically-induced Corneal Astigmatism

Relation between change of effective lens position and toric IOL rotation after toric IOL implantation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between change of effective lens position (ELP) and toric intraocular lens (IOL) rotation in patients with increasing postoperative refractive astigmatism after successful toric IOL implantation.

METHODS

The subjects include 61 people (61 eyes) with increasing residual astigmatism >0.5 D 3 months after successful toric IOL implantation. Clinical measurements included preoperative, 1-week, and 1-, 2-, and 3-month postoperative visual acuity; refraction; keratometer; anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism; ELP by Scheimpflug camera imaging; and IOL axis by slit-lamp biomicroscopic photograph with pupil dilation.

RESULTS

Residual astigmatism in postoperative month 3 (0.81 ± 0.50 D) is higher than that at postoperative week 1 (0.41 ± 0.38 D; p < 0.05). ELP decreased by 264.44 ± 163.25 μm, and the IOL rotated by 2.91 ± 1.44 degrees from week 1 to month 3 (p < 0.05). The ELP change had a positive correlation with IOL rotation (R2 = 0.383; p = 0.006), and the postoperative refractive astigmatic change had a positive correlation with ELP change (R2 = 0.272; p = 0.027) and IOL rotation (R2 = 0.272; p = 0.0001) from week 1 to month 3.

CONCLUSION

ELP change can influence toric IOL rotation and increase residual astigmatism after toric IOL implantation.

The impact of posterior corneal astigmatism on the surgical planning of toric multifocal intraocular lens implantation

Purpose

To investigate the influence of posterior corneal astigmatism on the prediction accuracy of toric multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) calculation.

Methods

The keratometric astigmatism measured by Lenstar LS 900 (KCAL), keratometric astigmatism (KCAP) and total corneal astigmatism (TCA) measured by Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR) were documented and analyzed accordingly. Three deduction models using different parameters were compared. Model 1: KCAL ​+ ​keratometric corneal surgically induced astigmatism (KCSIA, 0.30 D @ 50°); Model 2: KCAP ​+ ​KCSIA); Model 3: TCA ​+ ​total CSIA (TCSIA, 0.23 D @ 50°). The prediction errors of each model as the difference vector between the actual and the intended residual astigmatism were compared.

Results

Seventy-six eyes implanted with toric multifocal IOLs were included in this study. The vector differences of the actual KCSIA and TCSIA were statistically significant in the total sample and against-the-rule (ATR) subgroup (both P ​< ​0.05). Model 1 deduced the smallest mean values of prediction error, while that of Model 3 were smaller than that of Model 2, both in the total sample and the ATR subgroups (all P ​< ​0.05). Meanwhile, in the total sample and ATR subgroups, the centroid vector magnitudes of Model 3 were smaller than that of Model 1 (0.31 ​± ​0.76 D and 0.39 ​± ​0.76 D).

Conclusions

The calculation of toric multifocal IOL should be individualized especially in the ATR eyes for the impact of PCA on the estimation of the preoperative corneal astigmatism and the CSIA.

The Impact of Posterior Corneal Astigmatism on Surgically Induced Astigmatism in Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the changes in posterior corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery and provide a theoretical basis to accurately evaluate the total corneal astigmatism (TA) to be corrected before toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients (89 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification combined with toric IOL implantation (AcrySof IQ Toric SN6AT2-T9) at Shanxi Eye Hospital between January 2017 and September 2018 were enrolled. Surgically induced astigmatism of the posterior cornea (SIAPA) was analysed using vector analysis during pentacam examination.

RESULTS

The vector variances of keratometric astigmatism (KA), TA, and posterior corneal astigmatism (PA) preoperatively and postoperatively in the "with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism" group and "overall patient" group were statistically significant (P < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed between surgically induced KA (SIAKA) and surgically induced astigmatism of the total cornea (SIATA) for all patients, including those with WTR astigmatism. For all patients, SIAKA was less than SIATA by 0.05 ± 0.21 D, and for patients with WTR astigmatism, SIAKA was less than SIATA by 0.09 ± 0.22 D. For patients in the "against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism" group, there were no statistically significant differences between SIAKA and SIATA, although SIAKA was greater than SIATA by 0.03 ± 0.18 D. When PA ≤0.4 D or KA ≤2.0 D, SIAPA can be ignored. However, when PA >0.4 D or KA >2.0 D, ignoring SIAPA caused by cataract surgery incision will cause SIAKA in patients with WTR astigmatism to underestimate SIATA, while SIAKA in patients with ATR astigmatism will cause an overestimation of SIATA.

CONCLUSION

SIA on the posterior corneal astigmatism may have a significant role on more precise planning of toric IOL implantation, especially in cases with higher preoperative anterior or posterior corneal astigmatism.

Efficacy of the Image-Guided Alignment System for a Four-Haptic Hydrophobic Monofocal Toric Intraocular Lens

OBJECTIVE

To compare the difference in performance between the image-guided alignment system and the manual-marking method in the four-haptic hydrophobic monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOL).

METHODS

Medical records of patients who underwent cataract surgery with a four-haptic hydrophobic monofocal toric IOL implantation between May 2020 and April 2021 and with 3-month visit data available were investigated. Toric IOL misalignment, residual astigmatism, and mean prediction errors between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

This study included 49 eyes of 44 patients (women: 68%; mean age: 67.2±7.0 [range: 47-82] years). Twenty-nine eyes of 26 patients were treated with toric IOL implantation using the image-guided system and 20 eyes of 18 patients were treated using the manual-marking method. No statistical differences were observed regarding the baseline characteristics of the two groups. Three months after the surgery, the misalignment of the toric IOL was significantly lower in the image-guided group (2.18°±0.65°, range: 1.26°-3.95°) than in the manual; marking group (4.72°±0.74°, range: 3.44°-6.21°; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

In comparison to the manual-marking method, the image-guided system reduced the misalignment of a four-haptic hydrophobic monofocal toric IOL.

Clinical Outcomes of Steep-Axis One-Handed Phacoemulsification under the Guidance of a Verion Image-Guided System

Purpose

To compare the efficiency and safety of steep-axis one-handed phacoemulsification with steep-axis two-handed phacoemulsification.

Patients and Methods

Patients with cataracts underwent steep-axis one-handed (steep-axis one-handed group) or steep-axis two-handed (steep-axis two-handed group) phacoemulsification with a 2.4 mm clear corneal incision (CCI) under the guidance of the Verion Image-Guided System. Intraoperative phacoparameters, such as visual acuity, surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), total corneal astigmatism (TCA), angle of error (AE), corneal volume (CV), and corneal endothelial cells, were compared.

Results

There were no significant differences in the intraoperative phacoparameters between the two groups. The visual outcomes were significantly better in the steep-axis one-handed group than in the two-handed group at 1 week postoperatively (all p < 0.05) but not at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. TCAs were significantly decreased in both groups at 1 and 3 months postoperatively (all p < 0.05). There were no significant differences at any follow-up points in both groups (all p < 0.001). At 3 months postoperatively, the SIA was 0.95 ± 0.44 D in the steep-axis one-handed group and 1.01 ± 0.50 D in the steep-axis two-handed group; there was no significant difference between the groups. The AE was 39.45 ± 26.53° in the steep-axis one-handed group and 49.75° ± 26.23° in the steep-axis two-handed group, which were significantly different (p=0.005). Endothelial cell loss was significantly lower in the steep-axis one-handed group than that in the steep-axis two-handed group at all follow-up points (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Both the steep-axis one-handed and the steep-axis two-handed techniques could significantly decrease TCA. Compared with the steep-axis two-handed technique, the steep-axis one-handed technique has the advantage of decreasing the AE and reducing trauma to the cornea in soft-to-moderate nuclei.