Hemoglobin A1c Levels Are Slightly but Significantly Lower in Normoglycemic Subjects With the Hemoglobin E Phenotype

False hemoglobin A1c value as a result of compound heterozygotes of hemoglobin E and hemoglobin New York

The presence of hemoglobin (Hb) variants might interfere with some glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c ) measurements. There have been a few reports of compound Hb variants affecting HbA_1c testing. Here, we report a case of the coinheritance of two Hb variants in the β-globin gene. High-performance liquid chromatography with the Hb program showed a high HbA₂ level. Similarly, an E-window peak was separated on the high-performance liquid chromatography with a glycated Hb program. However, capillary electrophoresis showed two abnormal peaks and no HbA peak. Sanger sequencing confirmed the presence of Hb New York and HbE. This is the first report of a compound heterozygote for HbE and Hb New York. The double heterozygote caused erroneous results for HbA_1c on high-performance liquid chromatography and enzyme assay.

Misleading HbA1c Measurement in Diabetic Patients with Hemoglobin Variants

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is widely used for the monitoring and management of diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of hemoglobin (Hb) variants on the measurement of HbA1c.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HbA1c levels of 845 blood samples obtained from diabetic patients with various hemoglobin types were measured using a turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay and capillary electrophoresis.

RESULTS

Of 845 patients with diabetes, 65.7% (555/845) have the normal hemoglobin type (A2A) and 34.3% (290/845) have various abnormal hemoglobin types, including heterozygous HbE 30.2% (255/845), homozygous HbE 1.9 % (16/845), Hb Constant Spring (CS) trait 1.4% (12/845), CSEA Bart's 0.2% (2/845), and beta-thalassemia trait 0.6% (5/845). In most of the patients with diabetes, HbA1c levels determined by two different methods, inhibition immunoassay and capillary electrophoresis, gave strong positive correlation (R = 0.901, P < 0.001), except for those with homozygous HbE (N = 16) and CSEA Bart's (N = 2). In all 18 patients with homozygous HbE and CSEA Bart's, the HbA1c was undetectable by capillary electrophoresis, meaning that their estimated average glucose was undeterminable, although their HbA1c levels could be measured using an inhibition immunoassay. The discrepancy of HbA1c results obtained from two different methods is noted in patients without HbA.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated the erroneous nature of HbA1c measurement in patients with hemoglobin variants, especially in those without HbA expression. Therefore, in the population with a high prevalence of hemoglobinopathies, hemoglobin typing should be considered as basic information prior to HbA1c measurement.

Prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus using fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c levels among individuals with impaired fasting plasma glucose: a cross-sectional study in Thailand

OBJECTIVES

About 11%-30% of individuals with impaired fasting plasma glucose (IFG) have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), diagnosed by the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (75 g OGTT). This study investigated (1) the prevalence and cut-off levels for fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in IFG individuals that most effectively predict the presence of T2DM diagnosed by a 75 g OGTT; (2) the predictors associated with T2DM; and (3) the pathophysiological characteristics of patients with IFG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-centre, cross-sectional study was conducted in a primary care setting. A standard 75 g OGTT was performed on 123 subjects with IFG. Their beta-cell function and insulin resistance were calculated through plasma glucose and insulin levels monitored during the 75 g OGTT.

RESULTS

In the IFG subjects, the prevalence of T2DM using the 2-hour postload plasma glucose (2hPG) criterion was 28.5%. Pre-diabetes and normal glucose metabolism were found in 48.7% and 22.8%, respectively, by 75 g OGTT. An HbA1c level ≥6.0% or FPG ≥5.9 mmol/L were the optimal cut-off thresholds for the prediction of the presence of T2DM. HbA1c had a sensitivity of 76.7% and specificity of 55.7% (95% CI 57.7% to 90.1% and 95% CI 43.3% to 67.6%, respectively), while FPG had a sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 23.9% (95% CI 69.7% to 95.2% and 95% CI 15.4% to 34.1%, respectively). The presence of metabolic syndrome, a higher HbA1c and higher FPG levels were associated with the risk of T2DM in the Thai IFG population.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost one-third of the people with IFG had T2DM diagnosed by the 2hPG criterion. HbA1c was more effective than FPG in predicting the presence of T2DM in the IFG subjects. IFG individuals with HbA1c≥6.0% or FPG≥5.9 mmol/L should be advised to undergo a 75 g OGTT to detect T2DM earlier than otherwise.