[Characterization of a Toxin A-Negative, Toxin B-Positive Variant Strain of Clostridium difficile.]

High Clostridium difficile Infection among HIV-Infected Children with Diarrhea in a Tertiary Hospital in Mwanza, Tanzania

Clostridium difficile causes a million of illnesses each year worldwide and can affect people of all ages. Limited data exist on the prevalence of C. difficile infections (CDI) among children below five years of age in developing countries. This study is aimed at determining the prevalence, associated factors, and outcome of the Clostridium difficile infection among children with diarrhea attending a tertiary hospital in Mwanza, Tanzania. Stool samples were collected and cultured anaerobically to isolate Clostridium difficile, followed by C. difficile toxin A and B assay and ribotyping. A total of 301 children with diarrhea were enrolled. A total of 22 (7.31%, 95% CI: 0.89-0.95) nonrepetitive stool samples were positive for Clostridium difficile. Eighteen (81%) of C. difficile isolates were toxigenic, and 16 (72.7%) had unknown ribotypes. Independent predictors of positive C. difficile were as follows: positive HIV status, hospital stay of more than four days, high stool leukocyte count, and watery stool. Clostridium difficile-positive children had significantly higher median duration of the diarrhea than those without C. difficile. Clinicians should consider C. difficile as a possible cause of diarrhea in children living in developing countries and institute appropriate management to prevent associated morbidities and mortalities. Furthermore, there is a need of joint effort to improve C. difficile diagnosis and surveillance in developing countries to establish the unknown epidemiology of CDI in these countries.

[Comparison of Two Enzyme Immunoassays for Clostridium difficile Toxin A.]

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile is one of the most important pathogens responsible for nosocomial diarrhea. The disease is mediated by two toxins, designated as A and B; therefore, identification of the toxins is important for diagnosis. However, culture or cytotoxin assay are not easily done because of tedious procedures. Instead, toxin A immunoassay is widely used. We evaluated two different enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for C. difficile toxin A and compared them with culture and PCR results.

METHODS

A total of 65 stool specimens were examined for toxin A using enzyme linked fluorescent immunoassay (ELFA, VIDAS CD II, Bio-Merieux, France) and enzyme linked immunosolvent assay (ELISA, C.DIFFICILE TOX A II, TECHLAB, USA ) and were also cultured for C. difficile using cycloserine cefoxitine fructose agar. We amplified toxin A and B genes using primers NK9-NK 11 and NK104-NK105, respectively, in 23 C. difficile isolates.

RESULTS

The concordance rate between ELFA and ELISA was 76.9%. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELFA and ELISA based on the culture and PCR results for toxin A gene were 84.6%/98.1% and 84.6%/67.3%. Positive and negative predictive values were 91%/96.2% in VIDAS and 78.0%/ 94.6% in TECHLAB. The positive rates of toxin B genes were 100%, 83.3% and 50% in toxin A positive, variant and negative strains, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivities of the ELFA and ELISA for toxin A were the same, but specificity and positive predictive value of the ELFA were higher than those of the ELISA. PCR or EIA method detecting both toxin A and toxin B is strongly recommended, because the variant strains (toxin A negative and toxin B positive) of C. difficile may be more prevalent than were anticipated in Korea.

Comparative analysis of an expanded Clostridium difficile reference strain collection reveals genetic diversity and evolution through six lineages

Clostridium difficile is an anaerobic bacillus that resides in the gut and has rapidly emerged as a leading cause of antibiotic associated diarrheal disease in humans. The genetic basis of the pathogenicity of C. difficile remains poorly understood. In this study we aimed at characterizing the genetic diversity of C. difficile strains by three different methods (PCR ribotyping, multilocus sequence typing and genetic markers) to improve the typing of C. difficile. Our study was performed on a reference collection (Leeds-Leiden/ECDC) of C. difficile PCR ribotype (RT) strains (n=70) expanded with six PCR RT strains highly related to the emerging PCR RTs 027 and 078. Besides PCR ribotyping we used multilocus sequence typing (MLST) using seven housekeeping genes (MLST 7HG) that has recently been developed for characterizing C. difficile isolates as well as analysis of unique genetic markers. Evolutionary relatedness of the sequences determined by MLST 7HG was analyzed in phylogenetic analysis. In total 56 MLST 7HG sequence types (STs) were identified, nine of which were new. Phylogeny reconstruction of the reference set of strains supplemented with the online available C. difficile MLST reference database, revealed six monophyletic lineages of closely related STs. ST-122 (PCR RT131) formed a well-separated branch in the tree and was thus designated as a novel lineage. Furthermore, we confirmed that several PCR RTs are highly related to the emerging PCR RTs 027 and 078 since these types display the same STs (ST-1 and ST-11, respectively). Based on the observed results, we conclude that MLST 7HG is a valuable method to study C. difficile phylogeny.

Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A/B genes by multiplex real-time PCR for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection

Toxigenic Clostridium difficile culture is considered to be the standard diagnostic method for the detection of C. difficile infection (CDI). Culture methods are time-consuming and although enzyme immunoassay is rapid and easy to use, it has low sensitivity. In the present study, the AdvanSure CD real-time (RT)-PCR kit (LG Life Sciences) was evaluated for its ability to detect C. difficile toxin A (tcdA) and B (tcdB) genes, simultaneously. A total of 127 fresh diarrhoeal stool specimens, submitted to the clinical microbiology laboratory for C. difficile culture, were tested. C. difficile toxins and toxin genes were detected with a VIDAS C. difficile A&B (VIDAS-CDAB) enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay (ELFA) and the AdvanSure RT-PCR kit, respectively, according to the manufacturers' instructions. Their performance was compared with a standard toxigenic culture method as a reference. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values using the AdvanSure RT-PCR kit were 100 %, 98.3 %, 84.6 % and 100 %, respectively, while those of the VIDAS-CDAB system were 63.6 %, 100 %, 100 % and 96.6 %, respectively. Four tcdA(+)/tcdB(+) strains of C. difficile were detected with the AdvanSure RT-PCR kit, which offers comparable sensitivity and specificity to the reference method with a turnaround time of ~3 hours.

[Comparison of two enzyme immunoassay for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B]

BACKGROUND

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) capable of detecting both toxin A and toxin B is strongly recommended for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile associated disease. Therefore, we evaluated two different EIAs for the detection of C. difficile toxin A/B.

METHODS

For a total of 228 stool specimens we performed bacteriologic cultures for C. difficile and examined for toxin A and toxin B using enzyme linked fluorescent immunoassay (ELFA; VIDAS CDAB, Bio-Merieux sa, France) and ELISA (C.DIFFICILE TOX A/B II, TECHLAB, USA). We also performed PCR assays for toxin A and B genes in 117 C. difficile isolates that grew from the stool cultures and compared the results with those obtained with the two different EIAs.

RESULTS

The concordance rate between ELFA and ELISA was 85.5% (195/228). Using the culture and PCR results as the standard, the sensitivity/specificity of the ELFA and ELISA were 65.0%/72.1% and 71.8%/70.3%, and for positive/negative predictive values were 78.4%/69.6% and 71.8%/70.3%, respectively (P value >0.05). No differences were observed between the results of ELFA and ELISA with toxin A(-) toxin B(+) strains of C. difficile.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of the ELISA was slightly higher than that of ELFA for toxin A and toxin B, but the specificity and positive predictive value of the ELFA were rather higher than those of the ELISA, although no statistical differences were observed. A bacteriologic culture and PCR assay for toxin genes are recommended in case the both EIAs are negative.

Increasing prevalence of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive isolates of Clostridium difficile in Korea: impact on laboratory diagnosis

Of 462 Korean Clostridium difficile isolates, 77.5% were toxin B positive but 21.4% were toxin A negative (A(-) B(+)). The binary toxin gene was detected in nine isolates. A higher fluoroquinolone resistance of A(-) B(+) strains may contribute to the increase of these strains. Toxin A detection alone may underdiagnose C. difficile-associated disease.

Emerging toxin A-B+ variant strain of Clostridium difficile responsible for pseudomembranous colitis at a tertiary care hospital in Korea

Sixty percent to 80% of Clostridium difficile isolates in Korea have been reported to be toxigenic. However, over 1 year, we encountered a high number of tcdA-tcB+ strains associated with pseudomembranous colitis (PMC). C. difficile was isolated from 224 of 471 specimens (47.6%) from 371 patients. A subset of the culture-positive specimens (n = 106), containing no duplicate cases, was randomly selected for tcdA and tcdB polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. PCR results showed that tcdA+tcdB+ and tcdA-tcdB+ strains accounted for 39.6% (42/106) and 50.9% (54/106), respectively. Endoscopy, performed on 55/106 patients, revealed 29 with PMC, 5 with colitis, 14 with other colon diseases, and 7 normal cases. Among the 29 PMC cases, 21 (72.4%) were associated with tcdA-tcdB+ strains (P = 0.0016). These results revealed the possible emergence of tcdA-tcdB+ C. difficile strains in Korea, and these variant strains could evoke a higher rate of PMC than tcdA+tcdB+ strains.