Reducing Irrational Beliefs and Pain Severity in Patients Suffering from Non-Cardiac Chest Pain (NCCP): A Comparison of Relaxation Training and Metaphor Therapy

The Role of Psychological Factors in Noncardiac Chest Pain of Esophageal Origin

Background/Aims

Noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) of esophageal origin is a challenging clinical problem of diverse etiology that affects more than 80 million Americans yearly. We assess the prevalence and impact of psychological disorders on NCCP of esophageal origin, describe possible mechanisms associated with this condition, and review psychological therapy options.

Methods

Online search using PubMed and Medline from January 1, 1966, to April 30, 2023.

Results

Psychological disorders have been reported in up to 79% of patients with NCCP of esophageal origin. Several psychological disturbances have been identified with this condition, including depression, anxiety, panic disorder, phobias, and obsessive-compulsive and somatoform disorders. It is unclear whether the psychological disorders trigger the chest pain or vice versa. Multiple psychological mechanisms have been linked to chest pain and may contribute to its pathogenesis and severity. These mechanisms include cardiophobia, poor coping strategies, negative social problem solving, stress and perceived control, hypervigilance to cardiopulmonary sensations, altered pain perception, and alexithymia. Psychological therapies for NCCP of esophageal origin include cognitive behavioral therapy, hypnotherapy, physical and relaxation training, breathing retraining, and alternative medicine. Among the therapeutic options, cognitive behavioral therapy has been shown to be an effective treatment for NCCP of esophageal origin.

Conclusion

This review raises awareness about the high prevalence of psychological disorders in NCCP of esophageal origin and highlights the need for clinical trials and trained therapists to address the management of this taxing clinical problem.

Languaging psychopathology: neurobiology and metaphor

Explanatory models of the mind inform our working assumptions about mental illness with direct implications for clinical practice. Neurobiological models assert that the mind can be understood in terms of genetics, chemistry, and neuronal circuits. Growing evidence suggests that clinical deployment of neurobiological models of illness may have unintended adverse effects on patient attitudes, public perception, provider empathy, and the effectiveness of psychiatric treatment. New approaches are needed to find a better language for describing (let alone explaining) the experience of mental illness. To address this gap, we draw upon interdisciplinary sources and semiotic theory to characterize the role of metaphor in the conceptualization and communication of psychopathology. We examine the metaphors recruited by contemporary neurobiological models and metaphor's role in facilitating descriptive clarity or evocative creativity, depending on intention and context. These multiple roles reveal the implications of metaphorical reasoning in clinical practice, including cognitive flexibility, personalized communication, and uncertainty tolerance. With this analysis, we propose a clinical approach that embraces the meta-process of ongoing novel metaphor generation and co-elaboration, or languaging metaphors of psychopathology. Our goal is to bring attention to the value of employing ever-evolving, shapeable metaphorical depictions of psychiatric illness: metaphors that enable a capacity for change in individuals and society, reduce stigma, and nurture recovery.

Comparing depression, anxiety, and quality of life in individuals with cardiac and non-cardiac chest pain

Background

Psychological factors are often overlooked as potential contributors to cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between depression, anxiety, and quality of life with chest pain origin.

Method

This cross-sectional study was performed from 2019 to 2020 and included participants from multiple medical centers across Shahrekord, Iran. Participants were recruited through advertisements in medical centers. Participants were divided into three groups: healthy control (n = 67), chest pain with cardiac origin (CCP) (n = 70), and chest pain with non-cardiac origin (NCCP) (n = 73). Data were collected using the Beck's Anxiety scale, Beck's Depression scale, and Short-Form Health Survey questionnaires. The chi-square, exact test, t-test, Kruskal-Wallis, and logistic regression models were used for statistical analysis. All analysis was performed using SPSS 26.

Results

The mean scores of depression and anxiety in the NCCP group (depression = 17.03 ± 11.93, anxiety = 17.18 ± 11.37) were significantly higher than those in the CCP (depression = 9.73 ± 5.76, anxiety = 8.77 ± 5.96) and healthy (depression = 7.00 ± 7.61, anxiety = 6.18 ± 7.63) groups (p < 0.05). The mean score of quality of life in the NCCP group (54.87 ± 12.66) was significantly lower than that in the CCP (76.31 ± 12.49) and healthy (80.94 ± 15.78) groups (p < 0.05). Patients with NCCP had higher odds of having depression (adjusted OR = 4.39, 95% CI: 1.25, 15.35) and lower odds for having mental quality of life scores than the CCP and health groups, respectively (adjusted OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.87, 0.94).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that collaboration between psychiatrists and other specialists may be necessary to improve patients' health conditions and quality of life.

Perspectives on the insidious nature of pain metaphor: we literally need to change our metaphors

Metaphorical language is used to convey one thing as representative or symbolic of something else. Metaphor is used in figurative language but is much more than a means of delivering "poetic imagination". A metaphor is a conceptual tool for categorising, organizing, thinking about, and ultimately shaping reality. Thus, metaphor underpins the way humans think. Our viewpoint is that metaphorical thought and communication contribute to "painogenicity", the tendency of socio-ecological environments (settings) to promote the persistence of pain. In this perspectives article, we explore the insidious nature of metaphor used in pain language and conceptual models of pain. We explain how metaphor shapes mental organisation to govern the way humans perceive, navigate and gain insight into the nature of the world, i.e., creating experience. We explain how people use metaphors to "project" their private sensations, feelings, and thoughts onto objects and events in the external world. This helps people to understand their pain and promotes sharing of pain experience with others, including health care professionals. We explore the insidious nature of "warmongering" and damage-based metaphors in daily parlance and demonstrate how this is detrimental to health and wellbeing. We explore how metaphors shape the development and communication of complex, abstract ideas, theories, and models and how scientific understanding of pain is metaphorical in nature. We argue that overly simplistic neuro-mechanistic metaphors of pain contribute to fallacies and misnomers and an unhealthy focus on biomedical research, in the hope of developing medical interventions that "prevent pain transmission [sic]". We advocate reconfiguring pain language towards constructive metaphors that foster a salutogenic view of pain, focusing on health and well-being. We advocate reconfiguring metaphors to align with contemporary pain science, to encourage acceptance of non-medicalised strategies to aid health and well-being. We explore the role of enactive metaphors to facilitate reconfiguration. We conclude that being cognisant of the pervasive nature of metaphors will assist progress toward a more coherent conceptual understanding of pain and the use of healthier pain language. We hope our article catalyses debate and reflection.

Those Who Perceive Their Disease as a Physiological or Psychological Risk Factor Experience More Anxiety at the Beginning of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

Background:

In a cardiac patient, anxiety is the result of the individual’s perception of the treatment and is characterized by inability to predict, control, or achieve the desired treatment outcomes.

Objectives:

This study was carried out to investigate the extent of clinical anxiety in patients who underwent a cardiac rehabilitation program with different attitudes toward the disease risk factors.

Patients and Methods:

The administrative data of this retrospective study were obtained from the database of the cardiac rehabilitation department of a hospital in Iran. The demographic and clinical information of 603 patients from April 2006 to April 2011 was collected using compiled forms of this database, the Beck anxiety inventory, and the structured clinical interview for axis I disorders. The univariate analysis of variance and the Bonferroni post-hoc analysis were used for data analysis.

Results:

After controlling for gender and educational level, we observed statistically significant differences in the modified means between the patients who considered the behavioral risk factors and those who considered the physiological risk factors (P = 0.012, MD = 5.03) and between the patients who regarded the behavioral risk factors and those who regarded the psychological risk factors (P = 0.0005, MD = 5.32) as the underlying cause of their cardiac condition, which means that the level of anxiety in the physiological and psychological groups was higher than that in the behavioral group.

Conclusions:

The anxiety of patients can be controlled through alteration in their attitudes toward the disease risk factors on the grounds that psychological or physiological factors per se do not trigger the occurrence of the disease, whereas behavioral risk factors, as the controlling agent, significantly influence its occurrence.

Non-Coronary Patients with Severe Chest Pain Show More Irrational Beliefs Compared to Patients with Mild Pain

Background

Despite providing insufficient medical evidence of the existence of a real cardiac condition, patients with non-coronary chest pain still interpret their pain incorrectly. The present study, therefore, sought to compare the irrational beliefs in non-coronary patients with mild chest pain against those with severe chest pain.

Methods

A cross-sectional design was used. The statistical population comprised non-coronary patients who presented to the Heart Emergency Center of Kermanshah city, Iran. Using a matching method, 96 participants were selected and studied in two groups of 48. The instruments used were the Comorbidity Index, Brief Pain Index, and the Jones Irrational Beliefs Test (short-form). The multivariate analysis of variance, chi-square test, and t-test were used for data analysis.

Results

Controlling for the effects of age and comorbid conditions, the severity of three types of irrational beliefs, including emotional irresponsibility (P<0.001), hopelessness changes (P<0.001), and problem avoiding (P=0.002) was higher among patients with severe chest pain (according to effect level). However, in terms of demand for approval, no difference was seen between the two groups (P=0.180).

Conclusion

Non-coronary patients with severe chest pain showed a greater number of irrational beliefs in comparison to patients with mild pain. Irrational beliefs are common mental occurrences in patients with non-coronary chest pain, and they should be attended to by health professionals, especially in severe non-coronary chest pain. Further investigation to determine the association between irrational beliefs and non-coronary chest pain is necessary.