Spinal cord stimulation for a patient with neuropathic pain related to congenital syringomyelia

Successful spinal cord stimulation using fast-acting sub-perception therapy for postoperative neuropathic pain of syringomyelia with Chiari malformation type 1: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Central neuropathic pain after foramen magnum decompression (FMD) for Chiari malformation type 1 (CM-1) with syringomyelia can be residual and refractory. Here we present a case of refractory central neuropathic pain after FMD in a CM-1 patient with syringomyelia who achieved improvements in pain following spinal cord stimulation (SCS) using fast-acting sub-perception therapy (FAST™).

CASE PRESENTATION

A 76-year-old woman presented with a history of several years of bilateral upper extremity and chest-back pain. CM-1 and syringomyelia were diagnosed. The pain proved drug resistant, so FMD was performed for pain relief. After FMD, magnetic resonance imaging showed shrinkage of the syrinx. Pain was relieved, but bilateral finger, upper arm and thoracic back pain flared-up 10 months later. Due to pharmacotherapy resistance, SCS was planned for the purpose of improving pain. A percutaneous trial of SCS showed no improvement of pain with conventional SCS alone or in combination with Contour™, but the combination of FAST™ and Contour™ did improve pain. Three years after FMD, percutaneous leads and an implantable pulse generator were implanted. The program was set to FAST™ and Contour™. After implantation, pain as assessed using the McGill Pain Questionnaire and visual analog scale was relieved even after reducing dosages of analgesic. No adverse events were encountered.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneously implanted SCS using FAST™ may be effective for refractory pain after FMD for CM-1 with syringomyelia.

Spinal cord stimulator for the treatment of central neuropathic pain secondary to cervical syringomyelia: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Central neuropathic pain (CNP) of the cervical and/or thoracic spinal cord has many etiologies, both natural and iatrogenic. Frequently, CNP is medically refractory and requires surgical treatment to modulate the perception of pain. Spinal cord stimulation is a modality commonly used in adults to treat this type of refractory pain; however, it is rarely used in the pediatric population.

OBSERVATIONS

The authors reported a case involving a common pediatric condition, Chiari malformation type I with syrinx, that led to a debilitating complex regional pain syndrome. The associated life-altering pain was successfully alleviated following placement of a spinal cord stimulator.

LESSONS

CNP, or the syndromic manifestations of the pain (complex regional pain syndrome), can alter an individual's life in dramatic ways. Spinal cord stimulator placement in carefully selected pediatric patients should be considered in these difficult pain treatment paradigms.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, acupuncture, and spinal cord stimulation on neuropathic, inflammatory and, non-inflammatory pain in rat models

Background

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), manual acupuncture (MA), and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) are used to treat a variety of pain conditions. These non-pharmacological treatments are often thought to work through similar mechanisms, and thus should have similar effects for different types of pain. However, it is unclear if each of these treatments work equally well on each type of pain condition. The purpose of this study was to compared the effects of TENS, MA, and SCS on neuropathic, inflammatory, and non-inflammatory pain models.

Methods

TENS 60 Hz, 200 μs, 90% motor threshold (MT), SCS was applied at 60 Hz, an intensity of 90% MT, and a 0.25 ms pulse width. MA was performed by inserting a stainless-steel needle to a depth of about 4-5 mm at the Sanyinjiao (SP6) and Zusanli (ST36) acupoints on a spared nerve injury (SNI), knee joint inflammation (3% carrageenan), and non-inflammatory muscle pain (intramuscular pH 4.0 injections) in rats. Mechanical withdrawal thresholds of the paw, muscle, and/or joint were assessed before and after induction of the pain model, and daily before and after treatment.

Results

The reduced withdrawal thresholds were significantly reversed by application of either TENS or SCS (P < 0.05). MA, on the other hand, increased the withdrawal threshold in animals with SNI and joint inflammation, but not chronic muscle pain.

Conclusions

TENS and SCS produce similar effects in neuropathic, inflammatory and non-inflammatory muscle pain models while MA is only effective in inflammatory and neuropathic pain models.