The effect of atropine in preventing catheter-related pain and discomfort in patients undergoing transurethral resection due to bladder tumor; prospective randomized, controlled study

Determination of the 90% Effective Dose of Dexmedetomidine for Treating Postoperative Catheter‑related Bladder Discomfort During Recovery: An Open-label, Single-group Study

PURPOSE

Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) is an unpleasant experience for patients during postoperative recovery. Dexmedetomidine is an effective therapy for CRBD; however, little is known about dexmedetomidine administration for treating CRBD during recovery. This study was conducted to determine the 90% effective dose (ED90) of dexmedetomidine to provide adequate treatment for CRBD during recovery.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-blind dose-finding study.

METHODS

This open-label, single-group trial included severe postoperative CRBD patients aged 18 to 80 years and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status class I or II in the postanesthesia care unit. All patients were assigned to receive intravenous dexmedetomidine. The dose of dexmedetomidine was determined using the modified Dixon's up-and-down method. The first patient was treated with 0.4 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine. An increment or decrement of 0.05 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine was used based on the response of the previous patient. A successful treatment was defined as the transition from severe CRBD to mild CRBD. Probit regression was applied to calculate the ED90 of dexmedetomidine.

FINDINGS

A total of 29 patients were recruited, of whom 14 patients (48.3%) underwent successful treatment. The ED90 of dexmedetomidine required for successfully treating postoperative CRBD was 0.55 mcg/kg (95% confidence interval: 0.49-1.54 mcg/kg).

CONCLUSIONS

The ED90 of dexmedetomidine for the successful treatment of severe postoperative CRBD during recovery is 0.55 mcg/kg.

The rise and fall of mandrake in medicine

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Mandrake (Mandragora sp.) is one of the most famous medicinal plants. It has been in continuous medical use throughout written history and is still in use today in popular medicine.

AIM OF THE STUDY

Mandrake derived drugs once played an important role in medicine and in magical practices. Today, the role of mandrake in popular medicine is marginal. However, natural products present in mandrake such as atropine and scopolamine, as well as their semi synthetic derivatives continue to hold and important role in medicine. Here we aim to trace the development of historical rationales and scientific events that led to the abandonment of mandrake as a medicine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We review the medicinal uses of mandrake drugs since antiquity in an attempt to pinpoint use patterns that were popular in certain periods of time and others that are more general. We compare the uses from the native territories to those from regions where the plant got introduced and use literature reporting mandrake's chemistry and pharmacology in order to explain the diachronic changes of use patterns.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

We found information about 88 different medicinal uses for mandrake, grouped into 39 conditions. According to the number of different medicinal uses, the most versatile period was the medieval (37), followed by the Renaissance (31), the classical (27), and the modern period (21). Considering the higher number of textual sources and use-records collected for the Renaissance period, the decrease of versatility in comparison to the medieval period appears robust. This seems to indicate a more consolidated use pattern, that might be conditioned by the reproduction of classic textual sources as well as by a less experimental approach and reduced popularity of mandrake in medicine. The introduction of the volatile anaesthetics with more reliable narcotic effects set the seal on using mandrake in surgery but opened the way for atropine being used as a prophylactic and antidote during surgical interventions.

Effects of Anticholinergic Drugs on Visual Acuity of Patients with Tracheal Intubation under General Anesthesia

Background. General anesthesia (GA) is the core means of surgical intervention, mainly used for analgesia and anxiety relief. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the laboratory and clinical research results during induction of GA. Penehyclidine hydrochloride (PHCD) combined with atropine sulfate (Atr) has the potential to induce GA. However, the role of PHCD combined with Atr during tracheal intubation under GA remains unclear. Objective. The research is aimed at exploring the effects of preoperative PHCD or Atr on adverse reactions (ARs) in patients during tracheal intubation under general anesthesia (GA). Methods. This study retrospectively enrolled 473 patients who underwent surgery under GA induction and divided them into a research group ( $n=234$ ) and a control group ( $n=239$ ) according to preoperative use of PHCD (with or without). Both groups of patients were given Atr postoperatively and nursing intervention. Anesthesia-related indexes, ARs, and hemodynamics were observed and compared between the two groups. Results. There were no significant differences in anesthesia-related indexes and hemodynamics between the research group and the control group. The incidence of blurred vision and diplopia in the research group was higher than that in the control group. Conclusion. Preoperative PHCD combined with postoperative Atr should be avoided in clinical practice, or Atr rather than PHCD should be used preoperatively, so as to reduce the occurrence of blurred vision, diplopia, and other ARs.

Different interventions for preventing postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) is a common complication of intraoperative urinary catheterization. Various studies have evaluated the efficacy of different interventions in postoperative CRBD. The present review was performed to assess the efficacy of these interventions.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of different drugs for the prevention of postoperative CRBD. This review evaluated the incidence and severity of CRBD after different interventions at 0, 1, 2, and 6 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies including 31 different drugs were analyzed. Eleven drugs were investigated in more than two RCTs, of which dexmedetomidine, gabapentin, tolterodine, tramadol, ketamine, nefopam, oxybutynin, pregabalin, and pudendal nerve block (PNB) generally showed significantly higher efficacy than controls postoperatively. Solifenacin only showed significant efficacy compared with the control at 0 h, and intravenous lidocaine only showed significant efficacy compared with the control at 6 h. There were insufficient trials to draw conclusions regarding atropine, butylscopolamine, chlorpheniramine, clonidine, darifenacin, diphenhydramine, glycopyrrolate, intravesical bupivacaine, ketamine-haloperidol, pethidine-haloperidol, ketorolac, lidocaine-prilocaine cream, magnesium, hyoscine n-butyl bromide, oxycodone, paracetamol, parecoxib, trospium, resiniferatoxin, or amikacin. However, all but pethidine-haloperidol and chlorpheniramine showed some efficacy at various time points compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

This review suggests that dexmedetomidine, gabapentin, tolterodine, tramadol, ketamine, nefopam, oxybutynin, pregabalin, and PNB are effective in preventing postoperative CRBD. Considering the efficacy and adverse effects of all drugs, dexmedetomidine and gabapentin were ranked best.

The efficacy and safety of antimuscarinics for the prevention or treatment of catheter-related bladder discomfort: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antimuscarinics for the prevention or treatment of catheter related bladder discomfort (CRBD).

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (from 1987 to July 2021) were used to search randomized controlled trials. The PRISMA checklists were followed. RevMan5.4.0 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven studies involving 1165 patients were involved in the analysis. The study reported that the incidence of CRBD observed in the antimuscarinics group was significantly lower than that of the control group at 0-, 1-, 2-, and 6-h after drug therapy (P = 0.001, P < 0.0001, P = 0.0005, and P = 0.001, respectively). For side effects, there were not statistical differences between the antimuscarinics group and the control group, mainly including dry mouth (risk ratio (RR) = 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.95 to 1.80, P = 0.09), postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.55 to 1.90, P = 0.87), facial flushing (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.43 to 2.61, P = 0.90), and blurred vision (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.35 to 2.58, P = 0.91). Besides, rescue analgesics were required less in the antimuscarinics group than in the control group (RR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.80, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the control group, the antimuscarinics group had a significant improvement on CRBD, the patients were well tolerated and the use rate of rescue analgesics was low.

A randomised-controlled, prospective study on the effect of dorsal penile nerve block after TURP on catheter-related bladder discomfort and pain

PURPOSE

In the present study, the impact of penile nerve block (PNB) on postoperative pain and Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort (CRBD) in the transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) patients were evaluated.

METHODS

Participants of the present study were selected from patients who performed TURP under spinal anaesthesia for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) between January 2018 and July 2020. The present study was planned as a single-centre, randomised-controlled prospective study in which the patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 was administered Control (n:40), and Group 2 ultrasonography(USG) guided PNB (n:40). The patients were included in the Groups, respectively. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were questioned and recorded in order to evaluate the postoperative pain complaints of the patients after the operation. In addition, in order to evaluate the CRBD, VAS scores were questioned and recorded as 0th, 0-1th hour, 1st-2nd hour, 2nd-4th hour, 4th-8th hour, 8th-12th hour, and 12th-24th hour. In addition, postoperative pain and need for analgesic drug were recorded. Tramadol was given to patients with moderate to severe CRBD. The findings were compared between the Groups.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference demographic and per-operative data between Group 1 and Group 2. The CRBD and pain-related VAS scores were significantly higher in Group 1 between the 0 and 8th hours. There was no difference between VAS scores in the postoperative 8-24th hours. In total 24 hours, Group 2's need for tramadol was significantly less than Group 1. On examining the factors affecting CRBD in the multivariate analysis, age, body mass index(BMI), prostate volume, operation time do not affect CRBD statistically, and only PNB reduces CRBD (P: .029). While less drug-related complications were observed in Group 2, no serious complications related to PNB were observed.

CONCLUSION

Penile nerve block is an effective method for the decrease pain and CRBD after urological surgery. It will also reduce the need for analgesics, and provide painless patients in the postoperative period.