A case of myasthenia gravis proven by ultrastructural study

A review of the histopathological findings in myasthenia gravis: Clues to the pathogenesis of treatment-resistance in extraocular muscles

In myasthenia gravis autoantibodies target components of the neuromuscular junction causing variable degrees of weakness. In most cases, autoantibodies trigger complement-mediated endplate damage and extraocular muscles may be most susceptible. A proportion of MG cases develop treatment-resistant ophthalmoplegia. We reviewed publications spanning 65 years reporting the histopathological findings in the muscles and extraocular muscles of myasthenic patients to determine whether pathological changes in extraocular muscles differ from non-ocular muscles. As extraocular muscles represent a unique muscle allotype we also compared their histopathology in myasthenia to those in strabismus. We found that in myasthenia gravis, the non-ocular muscles frequently demonstrate neurogenic changes regardless of myasthenic serotype. Mitochondrial stress/damage was also frequent in myasthenic muscles and possibly more evident in muscle-specific kinase antibody-positive MG. Although myasthenia-associated paralysed extraocular muscles demonstrated prominent fibro-fatty replacement and mitochondrial alterations, these features appeared commonly in paralysed extraocular muscles of any cause. We postulate that extraocular muscles may be more susceptible than limb muscles to poor contractility as a consequence of myasthenia, resulting in a cascade of atrophy signaling pathways and altered mitochondrial homeostasis which contribute to the tipping point in developing treatment-resistant myasthenic ophthalmoplegia. Early strategies to improve force generation in extraocular muscles are critical.

Lack of motor recovery after prolonged denervation of the neuromuscular junction is not due to regenerative failure

Motor axons in peripheral nerves have the capacity to regenerate after injury. However, full functional motor recovery rarely occurs clinically, and this depends on the nature and location of the injury. Recent preclinical findings suggest that there may be a time after nerve injury where, while regrowth to the muscle successfully occurs, there is nevertheless a failure to re-establish motor function, suggesting a possible critical period for synapse reformation. We have now examined the temporal and anatomical determinants for the re-establishment of motor function after prolonged neuromuscular junction (NMJ) denervation in rats and mice. Using both sciatic transection-resuture and multiple nerve crush models in rats and mice to produce prolonged delays in reinnervation, we show that regenerating fibres reach motor endplates and anatomically fully reform the NMJ even after extended periods of denervation. However, in spite of this remarkably successful anatomical regeneration, after 1 month of denervation there is a consistent failure to re-establish functional recovery, as assessed by behavioural and electrophysiological assays. We conclude that this represents a failure in re-establishment of synaptic function, and the possible mechanisms responsible are discussed, as are their clinical implications.