Delirium and extrapyramidal symptoms due to a lithium-olanzapine combination therapy: a case report

The Syndrome of Irreversible Lithium-Effectuated Neurotoxicity: A Scoping Review

The Syndrome of Irreversible Lithium-Effectuated Neurotoxicity (SILENT) is a rare but concerning neurological complication resulting from lithium intoxication. Despite being reported since the 1960s, SILENT remains poorly understood and previous reviews on this topic commonly have been narrative. We therefore conducted a scoping review to assess the nature and scope of the research literature on the long-term neurological sequelae of lithium toxicity and determine the current knowledge of SILENT. A comprehensive and systematic literature search, using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases (from inception to July 2023), was conducted for English and Dutch articles, assessing the long-term neurological sequelae of lithium intoxication. Key information concerning clinical manifestations, risk factors, therapeutic approaches, or preventive measurements was extracted. We reviewed 91 articles, extracting information from 117 cases of SILENT. The prevailing outcome observed was persistent cerebellar dysfunction (77% of cases), often in combination with other sequelae. Other common sequelae included cognitive problems, parkinsonism, choreoathetosis, tardive dyskinesia, and peripheral neuropathy. The most common (61.4%) acute neurological symptom in the development of SILENT is an altered level of consciousness ranging from confusion to comatose states. Cerebellar sequelae were mentioned in 77% of cases as most common persistent sequelae. Antipsychotic use was mentioned in 59% of cases and fever was reported in 37.6% of cases. Scientific knowledge about this phenomenon has not advanced much since its initial reports in the 1960s and 1970s. While the use of lithium has become much more stringent than it had been in years past, and the occurrence of SILENT is rather exceptional, raising awareness about SILENT nevertheless remains crucial to avoid deleterious neurological consequences. Comprehensive, high-quality research in a systematic and standardized manner is therefore urgently needed to better understand this phenomenon.

One Patient, Three Providers: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Managing Common Neuropsychiatric Cases

BACKGROUND

Neuropsychiatric cases require a multidisciplinary approach for effective management. This paper presented case-based discussions on migraine, dementia, epilepsy, mood disorders, neuralgia, and psychosis from the perspectives of a family physician, neurologist, and psychiatrist. The goal was to highlight the importance of collaboration between healthcare providers in managing these complex cases.

METHODS

The paper was based on the proceedings of the Mediterranean Neuropsychiatry Symposium, where experts from family medicine, neurology, and psychiatry came together for comprehensive case-based discussions. The CARE framework (Case Report, Appraisal, Research, and Education) was developed to guide reporting and evaluation of case reports in clinical practice.

RESULTS

Six cases were presented and discussed, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in managing neuropsychiatric cases. The cases included chronic migraine with medication overuse, memory dysfunction with language and behavioral problems, refractory epileptic seizures with subjective sensory symptoms, bipolar affective disorder with normal pressure hydrocephalus, postherpetic neuralgia in a case with bipolar affective disorder, and psychosis with recurrent attacks with the abuse of several substances.

CONCLUSION

A biopsychosocial multidisciplinary approach is essential for managing neuropsychiatric cases effectively on behalf of the patients and public health of the country. The CARE framework can guide the reporting and evaluation of case reports in clinical practice, ensuring that patients receive comprehensive and effective care. Healthcare providers should collaborate to provide the best possible care for patients with complex and multifaceted needs.

Safety of Off-Label Pharmacological Treatment in Pediatric Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Global Perspective From an Observational Study at an Italian Third Level Children’s Hospital

Background: The acquisition of proper and relevant pediatric clinical data is essential to ensure tolerable and effective pediatric drug therapies. In the field of pharmacological treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, the lack of sufficient high quality scientific evidence for pediatric age results in the frequent need to prescribe off-label drugs. With the aim of improving knowledge about safety profile of off-label drug prescription in children and adolescent with neurological and/or psychiatric disorders, we realized a multidisciplinary pharmacovigilance study.

Materials and methods: An observational retrospective study was conducted to assess the safety of off-label pharmacological therapies in patients aged 0–18 years, admitted to the Neuropsychiatry Unit of the Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” between January 2016 and December 2018. Prescription patterns and adverse drug reactions were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team.

Results: Overall, 230 patients were enrolled, 48% boys (N = 111), 52% girls (N = 119), average age of 10 years, and a total of 534 prescriptions was analyzed. 54.5% (N = 125) of patients had epilepsy, 37.5% (N = 86) suffered from psychiatric disorders, 8% (N = 19) had other neurological disorders. The prevalence of off-label prescriptions was 32% and 50% of the study population received at least one off-label drug. A total of 106 ADRs was detected: 57% of ADRs were due to drug-drug interactions, 30% were due to off-label prescriptions, 10% were due to overdose and 3% were due to improper use. No significant association between emerged ADRs and off label prescriptions was found (Fisher’s exact two-tailed test, p = 1.000). There was significant association between increasing number of administrated drugs and risk of ADRs (OR 1.99; IC95% 1.58–2.5; p = 0.000). Psychiatric disorders were associated with at least three times higher risk to be treated with an off-label drug (OR 3.30; IC95% 2.26–4.83; p = 0.000).

Conclusions: This study shows that off-label prescribing in neuropsychiatric disorders does not pose a greater risk of ADRs than on-label prescribing and highlights unmet clinical needs in pediatric neuropsychopharmacology. The multidisciplinary approach can provide important contributions to improve therapeutic path of these already complex pathologies by careful monitoring of therapeutic appropriateness and drug interactions.

Drug Interactions with Lithium: An Update

Lithium has been used for the management of psychiatric illnesses for over 50 years and it continues to be regarded as a first-line agent for the treatment and prevention of bipolar disorder. Lithium possesses a narrow therapeutic index and comparatively minor alterations in plasma concentrations can have significant clinical sequelae. Several drug classes have been implicated in the development of lithium toxicity over the years, including diuretics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory compounds, but much of the anecdotal and experimental evidence supporting these interactions is dated, and many newer medications and medication classes have been introduced during the intervening years. This review is intended to provide an update on the accumulated evidence documenting potential interactions with lithium, with a focus on pharmacokinetic insights gained within the last two decades. The clinical relevance and ramifications of these interactions are discussed.

[Informed Consent and the Approval by Ethics Committees of Studies Involving the Use of Atypical Antipsychotics in the Management of Delirium]

INTRODUCTION

Delirium is an acute alteration of consciousness and cognition. Atypical antipsychotics (AA) have recently become a main part of its treatment. Studies in this population generate a series of ethical dilemmas concerning the voluntary participation of patients and their state of vulnerability since their mental faculties are, by definition, compromised.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether studies with AA for the treatment of delirium obtained an approval by an ethics committee on human research (ECHR), if an informed consent (IC) was obtained, whether the IC was verbal or written, and who gave the approval to participate.

METHOD

Systematic review of Medline for studies of delirium where quetiapine and olanzapine were the main treatment, assessing the existence of an ECHR approval and implementation of an IC.

RESULTS

11 studies were identified (6 of quetiapine and 5 of olanzapine). 5 had an ECHR approval.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies examining the treatment of delirium with quetiapine or olanzapine were not subject to approval by an ECHR and most of them did not obtain an IC from the patient's legal guardian. It is essential that future studies of antipsychotics and other drugs for the treatment of delirium have the protocol approved by an ECHR and a written IC signed by the patient's legal representative, since by definition delirium is a condition that compromises superior mental processes.

Delirium associated with olanzapine therapy in an elderly male with bipolar affective disorder

Atypical antipsychotic medications are commonly used to treat symptoms of delirium. Olanzapine has been successfully used in the treatment of delirium. However, there have been few case reports of delirium associated with olanzapine. We hereby report a case of delirium associated with olanzapine therapy. Possible risk factors and underlying pathogenesis is discussed.