Prognostic evaluation of nodal diffuse large B cell lymphoma by immunohistochemical profiles with emphasis on CD138 expression as a poor prognostic factor

Molecular Subtypes, Apoptosis and Proliferation Status in Indonesian Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Cases

Objective:

The diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has two major molecular subtypes, germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) and non-GCB. These have differing behavior which affects overall patient survival. However, immunohistochemistry based molecular subtyping of Indonesian DLBCLs has been limited. This was the focus of the present study, with a focus of attention on the apoptotic index (AI) and the proliferation index (PI) of the two molecular subtypes.

Materials and Methods:

During the study period of 3.5 years, a total of 98 cases of DLBCL were identified. Molecular subtypes and PI were determined by immunohistochemistry and TUNEL method was used to determine the AI.

Result:

GCB accounted for 31 cases (31.6%) and non-GCB the remainder (68.4%). Gender showed a slight male predominance (54 cases, 55.1%), with a higher incidence in the extra-nodal region (57 cases, 58.2%). The AI and PI were significantly higher in GCB (p<0.001 in the Mann-Whitney test) and a Spearman correlation coefficient test showed that PI was positively correlated with AI (r=0.673, p<0.001).

Conclusion:

The findings indicate that the non-GCB subtype is more common than GCB in Indonesian DLBCL. GCB features significantly higher PI and AI, which themselves appear linked.

Prognostic Significance of in situ Phenotypic Marker Expression in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphomas

Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are the most common lymphoid malignancies, and encompass all malignant lymphomas characterized by large neoplastic cells and B-cell derivation. In the last decade, DLBCL has been subjected to intense clinical, phenotypic and molecular studies, and were found to represent a heterogeneous group of tumors. These studies suggested new disease subtypes and variants with distinct clinical characteristics, morphologies, immunophenotypes, genotypes or gene expression profiles, associated with distinct prognoses or unique sensitivities to particular therapy regimens. Unfortunately, the reliability and reproducibility of the molecular results remains unclear due to contradictory reports in the literature resulting from small sample sizes, referral and selection biases, and variable methodologies and cut-off levels used to determine positivity. Here, we review phenotypic studies on the prognostic significance of protein expression profiles in DLBCL and reconsider our own retrospective data on 301 primary DLBCL cases obtained on a previously validated tissue microarray in light of powerful statistical methods of determining optimal cut-off values of phenotypic factors for prediction of outcome.

Expression IRF/MUM1>25% Predictor to Three-year Survival of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma in the Immunochemotherapy Era

INTRODUCTION

Non Hodgkin lymphoma-Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBC) is composed of more varieties of one disease. Analysis and understanding of a wide range of characteristics of the disease, which include: clinical, immunohistochemical, cytogenetic and molecular characteristics may improve treatment results.

AIM

achieving the estimated three-year survival and influence of IRF/MUM1 expression to three-year survival.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A study was retrospective-prospective, patients were followed for seven years a period of dine. The study included 60 patients de novo DLBCL. Age was 18-72 years old, the average age 45 years, male 31 (51,7%) and female 29 (48.3%). Median follow-up was 47 months (3-91 months). To determine differentiation immunophenotype antibodies those were used anti-CD20, anti-CD10, anti-Bcl-6, IRF-4/MUM1, CD 138.

RESULTS

Included the GCB type was 65%. Impact prognostic index IPI>2 GBC vs non GBC p=0,038 X2. Statistically significant difference was confirmed compared to the IPI> 2 to 3 year OS p<0,0005 X2. Significantly longer three-year survival was provided in the group GCB 36 (92,3%) vs. non GCB 8 (38,1%) p=0,003 X2. Clinical and immunohistochemical factors showed a significant impact to three-year survival by univariate: LDH p=0,005, MUM1 p=0,003, while CD10 p=0,069 was confirmed on the level of borderline impact. Using multivariate analysis, expression MUM1 has the greatest impact p<0.0005 OR=0.083 (95% CI 0.23-0.303) on the disease outcome - three-year survival.

CONCLUSION

expression MUM1 >25% has the greatest impact on the disease outcome - three-year survival.

Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for canine CD138 (syndecan-1) for nuclear medicine preclinical trials on spontaneous tumours

We isolated 11 antibodies specific for canine CD138 (cCD138) to validate the interest of CD138 antigen targeting in dogs with spontaneous mammary carcinoma. The affinity of the monoclonal antibodies in the nanomolar range is suitable for immunohistochemistry and nuclear medicine applications. Four distinct epitopes were recognized on cCD138 by this panel of antibodies. CD138 expression in canine healthy tissues is comparable to that reported in humans. CD138 is frequently expressed in canine mammary carcinomas corresponding to the human triple negative breast cancer subtype, with cytoplasmic and membranous expression. In canine diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, CD138 expression is associated with the 'non-germinal center' phenotype corresponding to the most aggressive subtype in humans. This homology of CD138 expression between dogs and humans confirms the relevance of tumour-bearing dogs as spontaneous models for nuclear medicine applications, especially for the evaluation of new tumour targeting strategies for diagnosis by phenotypic imaging and radio-immunotherapy.

Molecular and clinical profiles of syndecan-1 in solid and hematological cancer for prognosis and precision medicine

Syndecan-1 (SDC1, CD138) is a key cell surface adhesion molecule essential for maintaining cell morphology and interaction with the surrounding microenvironment. Deregulation of SDC1 contributes to cancer progression by promoting cell proliferation, metastasis, invasion and angiogenesis, and is associated with relapse through chemoresistance. SDC1 expression level is also associated with responses to chemotherapy and with prognosis in multiple solid and hematological cancers, including multiple myeloma and Hodgkin lymphoma. At the tissue level, the expression levels of SDC1 and the released extracellular domain of SDC1 correlate with tumor malignancy, phenotype, and metastatic potential for both solid and hematological tumors in a tissue-specific manner. The SDC1 expression profile varies among cancer types, but the differential expression signatures between normal and cancer cells in epithelial and stromal compartments are directly associated with aggressiveness of tumors and patient's clinical outcome and survival. Therefore, relevant biomarkers of SDC signaling may be useful for selecting patients that would most likely respond to a particular therapy at the time of diagnosis or perhaps for predicting relapse. In addition, the reciprocal expression signature of SDC between tumor epithelial and stromal compartments may have synergistic value for patient selection and the prediction of clinical outcome.

Determination of frequency of epstein-barr virus in non- Hodgkin lymphomas Using EBV latent membrane protein 1 (EBV-LMP1) immunohistochemical staining

BACKGROUND

The presence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma can be identified by immunohistochemistry for detection of EBV latent membrane protein (LMP). The role of EBV as an etiologic agent in the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma has been supported by detection of high levels of latent membrane protein 1 (LMP-1) expression in tumors. However, no study has been conducted in a Pakistani population up till now to determine the frequency of Epstein-Barr virus positivity. The objective of our study was to determine a value for non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients using EBV LMP-1 immunostaining in our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was carried out at the Department of Histopathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), Pakistan from December 2011 to December 2012. It was a cross sectional study. A total of 71 patients who were diagnosed with various subtypes of NHL after histological and EBV LMP-1 immunohistochemical evaluation were studied. Sampling technique was non-probability purposive. Statistical analysis was achieved using SPSS version 17.0. Mean and SD were calculated for quantitative variables like patient age. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for qualitative variables like subgroup of NHL, results outcome of IHC for EBV and gender distribution.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 53.6 ± 16 years (Mean ± SD). A total of 50 (70.4%) were male and 21 (29.6%) were female. Some 9 (12.7%) out of 71 cases were positive for EBV-LMP-1 immunostaining, 2 (22.2%) follicular lymphoma cases, 1 (11.1%) case of T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma, 4 (44.4%) cases of diffuse large B cell lymphomas, 1 (11.1%) mantle cell lymphoma and 1 (11.1%) angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma case.

CONCLUSION

In our study, frequency of EBV in NHL is 12.7% and is mostly seen in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. This requires further evaluation to find out whether this positivity is due to co-infection or has a role in pathogenesis.

Differences in the cytogenetic alteration profiles of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma among Chinese and American patients

To study the similarities and differences of cytogenetic alterations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) between Asian and Caucasian patients, we compared the cytogenetic profiles of Chinese and American DLBCL cases by analyzing conventional karyotypes and select fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) findings. We used interphase FISH analyses to determine the incidence of the t(14;18) and BCL6 and MYC rearrangements. Immunohistochemical analysis was used to categorize the lymphomas into the germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) or non-GCB-DLBCL subtypes, according to the Hans algorithm. Our data suggested that Chinese patients had cytogenetic profiles for GCB-DLBCL that differed from those of their American counterparts; specifically, the Chinese GCB patients exhibited greater frequencies of BCL6 rearrangements and gains of 1q and 11q but lower incidence of the t(14;18). Non-GCB-DLBCL in both the Chinese and American patients was characterized by recurrent gains of 3/3q and 18/18q. The incidences of both BCL6 rearrangement and t(14;18) were similar in Chinese and American non-GCB-DLBCL cases.

Evaluation of BCL-6, CD10, CD138 and MUM-1 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: CD138 is a marker of poor prognosis

The diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) encompasses two major groups of tumors with uneven survival outcomes--germinal center B-cell (GCB) and non-germinal center B-cell (non-GCB). In the present study, we investigated the expression of GCB markers (BCL-6 and CD10) and non-GCB markers (CD138 and MUM-1) in an effort to evaluate their prognostic value. Paraffin-embedded tumor biopsies of 46 Jordanian DLBCL patients were analyzed, retrospectively, by immunohistochemistry to investigate the expression of BCL-6, CD10, CD138 and MUM-1. In addition, survival curves were calculated with reference to marker expression, age, sex and nodal involvement. Positive expression of BCL-6, CD10, CD138 and MUM-1 was shown in 78%, 61%, 39% and 91% of the cases, respectively, that of BCL-6 being associated with better overall survival (p = 0.02), whereas positive CD138 was linked with poor overall survival (p = 0.01). The expression of CD10 and MUM-1 had no impact on the overall survival. Among the clinical characteristics studied, diagnosis at an early age, nodal involvement and maleness were associated with a higher overall survival for DLBCL patients. Our results underline the importance of BCL-6 as a marker of better prognosis and CD138 as a marker of poor prognosis for DLBCL patients.

Prognostic sub-grouping of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas into germinal centre and post germinal centre groups by immunohistochemistry after 6 cycles of chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) can be divided into germinal centre (GC-DLBCL) and post germinal centre (post GC-DLBCL) groups by applying immunohistochemical antibodies. As these subgroups respond differently to chemotherapy, it is possible at diagnosis to select a poor prognostic subgroup for aggressive treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequencies of GC-DLBCL and post GC-DLBCL in patients by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the clinical response after six cycles of chemotherapy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In this descriptive study conducted in AFIP and CMH, Rawalpindi and NORI, Islamabad, from September 2010 to September 2011, a total of 75 pretreatment cases of DLBCL diagnosed during the study period were included. Cases were segregated in to GC-DLBCL and post GC-DLBCL groups according to results of immunohistochemistry markers CD10, BCL6 and MUM1. Immediate clinical response was assessed after 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Response was divided into complete response, partial response, stable disease or relapse or progression.

RESULTS

The mean age was 54.2 ± 15. Males were 53 (70.7%). Forty (53.3%) cases comprised the GC-DLBCL group; 25(62.5%) of them showed a complete response. Most patients of the post GC-DLBCL 19(54%) showed relapse/progression. Results of immediate clinical response in both prognostic subgroups were significant (p<0.05). Results regarding positivity with immunohistochemical antibodies CD10 (p 0.011), BCL6 (p 0.013) and MUM1 (p 0.000) regarding immediate clinical response were also significant.

CONCLUSION

GC-DLBCL group shows better response to CHOP chemotherapy regimen. Immunohistochemistry should be used to further classify DLBCL as this can enable us to select aggressive group for aggressive treatment. This manuscript is important because the study is the first to becarried out exclusively in Pakistan or our part of the world.

Antithetic roles of proteoglycans in cancer

Proteoglycans (PGs), a family of complex post-translationally sculptured macromolecules, are fundamental regulators of most normal and aberrant cellular functions. The unparalleled structural-functional diversity of PGs endows them with the ability to serve as critical mediators of the tumor cells' interaction with the host microenvironment, while directly contributing to the organization and dynamic remodeling of this milieu. Despite their indisputable importance during embryonic development and in the adult organism, and their frequent dysregulation in tumor lesions, their precise involvement in tumorigenesis awaits a more decisive demonstration. Particularly challenging is to ascertain to what extent selected PGs may catalyze tumor progression and to what extent they may inhibit it, implying antithetic functions of individual PGs. Integrated efforts are needed to consolidate the routine use of PGs in the clinical monitoring of cancer patients and to broaden the exploitation of these macromolecules as therapeutic targets. Several PGs have the required attributes to be contemplated as effective antigens for immunotherapeutic approaches, while the tangible results obtained in recent clinical trials targeting the NG2/CSPG4 transmembrane PG urge further development of PG-based cancer treatment modalities.

Prognostic value of immunohistochemical biomarkers at different cut-off values in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP chemotherapy

Many predictive models have been proposed for better stratification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Hans' algorithm has been widely used as standard to sub-classify DLBCL into germinal center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB origins. However, there have been disagreements in the literature regarding its prognostic significance. Here, we retrospectively analyzed Hans' algorithm and the individual immunohistochemical biomarkers at different cut-off values (5%, 30%, 50% or 75%) in 94 Korean patients with DLBCL treated with combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone. No significant differences were observed between the GCB (18 patients, 19.1%) and non-GCB (76, 80.9%) groups. Among individual biomarkers, CD10 negativity (cut point: 30%) and bcl-6 positivity (cut point: 5%) were independent good prognostic markers in progression-free survival (PFS), whereas bcl-6 (cut point: 5%) positivity was an independent good prognostic marker in overall survival irrelevant of international prognostic index. The present study showed the lack of predictability of Hans' algorithm in DLBCL patients, and that CD10, Bcl-6 may have diverse prognostic significance at different cut-off values. Our results suggest that the proposed cut-off value may not be applied universally, and that the optimal cut-off value may need to be optimized for individual laboratory.

Prognostic immunophenotypic biomarker studies in diffuse large B cell lymphoma with special emphasis on rational determination of cut-off scores

A number of biomarkers, particularly proteins that contribute to prognosis in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), have been identified. However, translation into accepted standards to predict survival has not yet been accomplished, primarily due to contradictory reports in the literature resulting from, among other factors, arbitrary methodologies used to set cut-off values for determining positivity. Some of these problems might be resolved by application of rational statistical methods for determination of cut-off scores. Herein, we critically address issues on in situ phenotypic prognostic tumor-related biomarkers in DLBCL with a particular and practical emphasis on tools for cut-off level determination, especially receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Moreover, we candidly illustrate the application of these tools for efficient disease-specific survival prognostication on a tissue microarray collective of 240 primary DLBCL using the common prognostic biomarkers Bcl-2, Bcl-6, CD10, FOXP1, MUM1, and Cyclin E. Comparison of the results relative to disease-specific survival unequivocally showed the superior discriminatory power of the cut-off levels calculated by receiver operating curves and the Youden's index, compared to arbitrary cut-off values from the literature, advocating fundamental application of rational methods for determination of clinically relevant prognostic biomarkers' cut-off scores.

Prognostic evaluation of immunohistochemical profiles in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a Chinese study

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has been classified into different prognostic subgroups using immunohistochemistry in Western populations. However, the applicability in Chinese patients of these subgroups was unclear. We collected 116 specimens and performed immunohistochemical staining for CD10, BCL-6, MUM1, CD138, and CD5, and the results were classified into subgroups according to 3 different algorithms. We then analyzed the subgroups' correlation to patient survival. Expression of CD10 and BCL-6 predicted favorable 5-year OS (70 and 62.5%, respectively) and PFS (64.3 and 61.5%, respectively) rates. In contrast, the expression of MUM1 predicted unfavorable 5-year OS (23.1%) and PFS (17.9%) rates and was also independent of other markers. All algorithms led to useful subclassifications. Using Hans' algorithm based on CD10, BCL-6, and MUM1, the non-germinal center (GC) subgroup (66.4%) had worse 5-year OS (29.8%) and PFS (26.7%) rates than did the GC subgroup. Likewise, using Muris' algorithm based on CD10 and MUM1, fewer non-GC cases (27%) showed poorer OS (20.3%) and PFS (16.2%) rates than did GC cases, an effect that was independent of both the International Prognostic Index, a clinical indicator, and treatment. It identified a subgroup with a high-risk of death and seemed to be applicable in our series. In conclusion, these algorithms can be used effectively in Chinese patients with DLBCL.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Chinese patients: immunophenotypic and cytogenetic analyses of 124 cases

In diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), BCL2 expression usually correlates with the t(14;18) (q32;q21) in germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtype and with gain/amplification of chromosome 18q21 in the activated B cell-like subtype. Studies have suggested that the GCB subtype is less common in Chinese than in Western populations. We studied 124 Chinese DLBCL cases using immunohistochemical, conventional cytogenetics, and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. A cohort of 114 well-characterized DLBCL cases from Western populations was also analyzed for comparison. Lower incidences of the GCB subtype (P = .0001) and the t(14;18) translocation (P = .0001) were present in Chinese cases. However, BCL2 overexpression was more frequent in Chinese compared with Western cases (P = .0054). BCL2 expression was associated with gain of chromosome 18/18q in the Chinese and Western cohorts. More interestingly, BCL2 expression was associated with gain of chromosome 3/3q in Chinese DLBCL cases, whereas this association was less significant in Western cases.

The prognostic value of immunohistochemical subtyping in Chinese patients with de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma undergoing CHOP or R-CHOP treatment

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease with recognised variability in molecular aetiology and clinical outcome. Though the use of agents such as rituximab significantly improves outcome, intrinsic genetic and morphological factors greatly affect the response to treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of immunohistochemical subtyping and the International Prognostic Index (IPI) for predicting treatment outcome in Chinese DLBCL patients. We followed 108 cases of DLBCL and performed prognostic analyses based on molecular subtyping of the disease through immunostaining of tissue samples. The use of rituximab conferred a clinical benefit to DLBCL patients regardless of disease subtype. Importantly, this treatment regimen also improved outcomes in patients with the non-germinal centre B-cell-like (GCB) DLBCL subtype, frequently associated with poorer prognosis. Our results suggest that IPI was the best tool for the prediction of treatment outcome in our patient cohort, regardless of treatment regimen. Furthermore, the use of rituximab alongside classical chemotherapy regimens can improve the outcomes for DLBCL patients who exhibit both GCB and non-GCB subtypes of the disease.

Prognostic impact of C-REL expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with a germinal center B-cell (GCB) phenotype is believed to confer a better prognosis than DLBCL with an activated B-cell (ABC) phenotype. Previous studies have suggested that nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation plays an important role in the ABC subtype of DLBCL, whereas c-REL amplification is associated with the GCB subtype. Using immunohistochemical techniques, we examined 68 newly diagnosed de novo DLBCL cases (median follow-up 44 months, range 1 to 142 months) for the expression of c-REL, BCL-6, CD10, and MUM1/IRF4. Forty-four (65%) cases demonstrated positive c-REL nuclear expression. In this cohort of patients, the GCB phenotype was associated with a better overall survival (OS) than the non-GCB phenotype (Kaplan–Meier survival (KMS) analysis, p = 0.016, Breslow–Gehan–Wilcoxon test). In general, c-REL nuclear expression did not correlate with GCB vs. non-GCB phenotype, International Prognostic Index score, or OS. However, cases with a GCB phenotype and negative nuclear c-REL demonstrated better OS than cases with a GCB phenotype and positive nuclear c-REL (KMS analysis, p = 0.045, Breslow–Gehan–Wilcoxon test), whereas in cases with non-GCB phenotype, the expression of c-REL did not significantly impact the prognosis. These results suggest that c-REL nuclear expression may be a prognostic factor in DLBCL and it may improve patient risk stratification in combination with GCB/non-GCB phenotyping.

Prognostic subgroup distribution in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the upper aerodigestive tract

AIMS

To stratify upper aerodigestive tract (UAT) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) into prognostic subgroups by immunohistochemical staining (IHC) method, and to evaluate the association rate of UAT DLBCL with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).

METHODS

Using a panel of antibodies to CD10, Bcl-6, MUM1 and CD138, consecutive cases of primary UAT DLBCL were stratified into subgroups of germinal centre B-cell-like (GCB) and non-GCB, phenotype profile patterns A, B and C, as proposed by Hans et al. and Chang et al., respectively. EBER in situ hybridisation technique was applied for the detection of EBV in the tumours.

RESULTS

In this series of 32 cases of UAT DLBCL, 34% (11/32) were GCB, and 66% (21/32) were non-GCB types; 59% (19/32) had combined patterns A and B, and 41% (13/32) had pattern C. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in the occurrence of these prognostic subgroups in the UAT when compared with series of de novo DLBCL from all sites. There was also no site difference in phenotype protein expressions, with the exception of MUM1. EBER in situ hybridisation stain demonstrated only one EBV infected case.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognostic subgroup distribution of UAT DLBCL is similar to de novo DLBCL from all sites, and EBV association is very infrequent.

Prognostic Significance of in situ Phenotypic Marker Expression in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphomas

Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are the most common lymphoid malignancies, and encompass all malignant lymphomas characterized by large neoplastic cells and B-cell derivation. In the last decade, DLBCL has been subjected to intense clinical, phenotypic and molecular studies, and were found to represent a heterogeneous group of tumors. These studies suggested new disease subtypes and variants with distinct clinical characteristics, morphologies, immunophenotypes, genotypes or gene expression profiles, associated with distinct prognoses or unique sensitivities to particular therapy regimens. Unfortunately, the reliability and reproducibility of the molecular results remains unclear due to contradictory reports in the literature resulting from small sample sizes, referral and selection biases, and variable methodologies and cut-off levels used to determine positivity. Here, we review phenotypic studies on the prognostic significance of protein expression profiles in DLBCL and reconsider our own retrospective data on 301 primary DLBCL cases obtained on a previously validated tissue microarray in light of powerful statistical methods of determining optimal cut-off values of phenotypic factors for prediction of outcome.

Profiling of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry: identification of prognostic subgroups

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a frequent lymphoma subtype with a heterogeneous behavior and a variable response to conventional chemotherapy. This clinical diversity is believed to reflect differences in the molecular pathways leading to lymphomagenesis. In this study, we have analyzed pretreatment, diagnostic samples from 108 DLBCL by immunohistology for expression of four markers linked to germinal center B-cells (CD10, Bcl-6), postgerminal center B-cells (MUM1) and apoptosis (Bcl-2). The results indicate that both CD10 and Bcl-6 are favorable prognostic indicators, in contrast to Bcl-2, which is an adverse parameter. Furthermore, using two algorithms for distinction between low- and high-risk patients proposed by Hans et al. (Blood, 2004; 103:275) and Muris et al. (Journal of Pathology, 2006; 208:714), it is shown that both are useful for predicting outcome in DLBCL. However, in this report, the algorithm of Hans et al. was superior to that of Muris et al. These findings confirm and extend other studies and indicate that different prognostic subgroups of DLBCL can be distinguished by simple immunohistological investigations for a limited number of markers. Whether these groups are also relevant for individual treatment decisions will be important to investigate in prospective studies.

The GCB subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is less frequent in Asian countries

Patients with the germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a significantly better survival rate than those with non-GCB DLBCL. Several studies have examined the proportions of GCB and non-GCB subtypes in large series of DLBCL patients, but it remains unclear if these proportions are the same in different countries. We performed an immunohistochemical analysis of the numbers of GCB and non-GCB subtypes in a large number of patients with DLBCL in Japan and compared the results with literature data for other countries. We found that 71 of 248 patients (29%) had the GCB phenotype and 177 patients (71%) had the non-GCB subtype of DLBCL among our patient population. Assessment of data collected from other studies showed that 31% of DLBCL patients (102/330) have the GCB subtype in Asian countries, but 50% (206/416) express GCB phenotypes in Western countries; based on these data, the occurrence of the GCB subtype of DLBCL was significantly less in Asian countries (p<0.001). Since patients with the GCB phenotype of DLBCL have better survival, future studies of DLBCL should recognize the difference in the proportions of GCB and non-GCB subtypes of DLBCL between Asian and Western populations.