The role of cyclosporine and mycophenolate in an orthotopic porcine-to-rat corneal xenotransplantation

Comparison of Graft Survival Between Full-Thickness and Lamellar Pig-to-Monkey Corneal Xenotransplantation from the Same Genetically Engineered Pig Model with Minimal Immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

The graft survival rate of full-thickness corneal xenotransplantation (XTP) with minimal immunosuppression in genetically engineered pigs is unknown, whereas lamellar corneal XTP shows satisfactory results. We compared graft survival between full-thickness and lamellar transplantations in the same genetically engineered pig.

METHODS

Six pig-to-monkey corneal transplantations were performed on 3 transgenic pigs. Two corneas harvested from 1 pig were transplanted into 2 monkeys using full-thickness and lamellar corneal xenotransplantation. The transgenic donor pigs used were α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout + membrane cofactor protein (GTKO+CD46) in one recipient and GTKO+CD46+ thrombomodulin (TBM) in the other.

RESULTS

The graft survival time for GTKO+CD46 XTP was 28 days. With the addition of TBM, the survival differences between lamellar and full-thickness XTP were 98 days versus 14 days and >463 days (ongoing) versus 21 days, respectively. An excessive number of inflammatory cells was observed in failed grafts, but none were in the recipient's stromal bed.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike full-thickness corneal XTP, lamellar xenocorneal transplantation does not exhibit surgical complications, such as retrocorneal membrane or anterior synechia. The graft survival of lamellar XTP in this study was not as good as in our previous experiments, although the survival period was superior to that of full-thickness XTP. The difference in graft survival based on transgenic type is not definitive. Further studies using transgenic pigs and minimal immunosuppression need to focus on improving graft survival of lamellar XTP and using a larger sample size to determine the potential of full-thickness corneal XTP.

Corneal xenotransplantation: Where are we standing?

The search for alternatives to allotransplants is driven by the shortage of corneal donors and is demanding because of the limitations of the alternatives. Indeed, current progress in genetically engineered (GE) pigs, the introduction of gene-editing technology by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9, and advanced immunosuppressants have made xenotransplantation a possible option for a human trial. Porcine corneal xenotransplantation is considered applicable because the eye is regarded as an immune-privileged site. Furthermore, recent non-human primate studies have shown long-term survival of porcine xenotransplants in keratoplasty. Herein, corneal immune privilege is briefly introduced, and xenogeneic reactions are compared with allogeneic reactions in corneal transplantation. This review describes the current knowledge on special issues of xenotransplantation, xenogeneic rejection mechanisms, current immunosuppressive regimens of corneal xenotransplantation, preclinical efficacy and safety data of corneal xenotransplantation, and updates of the regulatory framework to conduct a clinical trial on corneal xenotransplantation. We also discuss barriers that might prevent xenotransplantation from becoming common practice, such as ethical dilemmas, public concerns on xenotransplantation, and the possible risk of xenozoonosis. Given that the legal definition of decellularized porcine cornea (DPC) lies somewhere between a medical device and a xenotransplant, the preclinical efficacy and clinical trial data using DPC are included. The review finally provides perspectives on the current standpoint of corneal xenotransplantation in the fields of regenerative medicine.

Processing porcine cornea for biomedical applications

To investigate the propriety of decellularized porcine corneas as a source of lamellar corneal xenografts, we treated porcine corneas with (1) freezing, (2) three freezing-thawing, (3) hypertonic saline, (4) hyperosmolar glycerol, (5) trypsin/sodium dodecyl sulfate/Dispase, and (6) DNase/RNase. After processing, we examined the cells and collagen structures of the decellularized corneas using hematoxylin-eosin staining, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay, and transmission electron microscopy. Cell viability was also assessed via organ culture. In addition, the outcomes of porcine anterior lamellar corneal xenografting were evaluated in rabbits. Graft integration and corneal thickness were assessed using anterior optical coherence tomography, and the corneas were histologically examined sequentially after transplantation. We found that porcine corneas treated with hypertonic saline-based decellularization had little immunogenicity with intact collagen structures. The porcine corneal xenografts decellularized with the hypertonic saline-based method were well integrated into the adjacent host tissues and remained clear in rabbit eyes for more than 6 months.

Rat allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells did not prolong the survival of corneal xenograft in a pig-to-rat model

OBJECTIVE

Recent reports have demonstrated that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can modulate/suppress immunologic responses through interactions with different immune cells. We performed this study in order to investigate the immunomodulatory effects of MSCs in corneal xenotransplantation.

ANIMALS STUDIED

Pig and rat.

PROCEDURES

We orthotopically transplanted pig corneas into rats and topically applied allogeneic rat MSCs to the corneas for 2 h immediately after transplantation. Graft survival was clinically assessed using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and the median survival time (MST) was calculated. The rejected grafts were histologically examined using antibodies against CD4, CD8, CD161, and CD68. The expression of IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-gamma was also evaluated in the rejected grafts using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

The survival of corneal xenografts was not significantly prolonged by MSC application (MST 10.5 days) compared with the controls (MST 9.67 days) (P = 0.4189). Histologically, the rejected grafts in both groups were massively infiltrated with neutrophils and macrophages. Some CD8+ T cells and rare NK cells were found in the rejected grafts. The levels of IL-6 and IL-10 were significantly increased in the rejected grafts from MSC-treated rats compared with the grafts from MSC-untreated rats. However, the levels of IL-2 and IFN-gamma were not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical application of allogeneic rat MSCs was ineffective in prolonging corneal xenograft survival in a pig-to-rat model.

Histological differences in full-thickness vs. lamellar corneal pig-to-rabbit xenotransplantation

To evaluate the differences in graft survival and histopathological characteristics between full-thickness and lamellar orthotopic corneal xenotransplantation in a pig-to-rabbit model, we orthotopically transplanted a full-thickness or the anterior half of a pig's cornea onto the OD of 16 rabbits. As a result, the median survival were 16.83 and 29.07 days for the full-thickness and lamellar xenografts, respectively (P = 0.0005). Histologically, the full-thickness corneal xenografts had massive infiltration by eosinophils, whereas the lamellar xenografts showed predominantly mononuclear infiltrates (P < 0.05). Given these preliminary findings, lamellar corneal xenografts in rabbits survived longer than the full-thickness xenografts and each type of graft demonstrated different rejection mechanisms.

Suppression of lymphocyte proliferation and regulation of dendritic cell phenotype by soluble mediators from rat lacrimal epithelial cells

Lacrimal epithelial cells appear to constitutively secrete autoantigens to their underling stroma. The present experiments address the hypothesis that they also secrete soluble factors that regulate immune responses. Epithelial cells, spleen cells and lymphocytes were obtained from rabbits or rats and cultured in various configurations. Monocytes from rat bone marrow were matured to dendritic cells (DC) ex vivo. Proliferation was measured by [3H]-thymidine incorporation; surface MHC Class II and CD86 using flow cytometry; and mRNA relative abundances using real time RT-PCR. Microporous culture inserts containing rat lacrimal cells inhibited proliferation of rabbit lymphocytes co-cultured with autologous lacrimal cells and of rat lymphocytes co-cultured with TNF-alpha-stimulated DC. They inhibited CD86 and MHC Class II surface expression by maturating DC and reversed surface expression of CD86 but not MHC Class II by partially matured DC. Subsequent exposure of partially matured DC to mediators from rat lacrimal cells reversed the ability to stimulate lymphocyte proliferation. TGF-beta(1) and IL-10 mRNAs increased somewhat when rat lacrimal cells were isolated but decreased markedly in rabbit lacrimal cells. Antibodies to TGF-beta prevented soluble factors from rat lacrimal cells from inhibiting proliferation of rabbit lymphocytes co-cultured with rabbit lacrimal cells, but recombinant TGF-beta alone did not mimic the soluble factors. IL-10 immunopositivity was detected in epithelial cells of interlobular ducts and occasional interstitial cells in rabbit lacrimal gland. Rat lacrimal epithelial cells secrete TGF-beta and other factors that synergize to suppress lymphocyte proliferation and regulate DC maturation. Interlobular duct epithelial cells in rabbit lacrimal glands may express similar functions.