Clinical significance of lymph node dissection in patients with muscle-invasive upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy

Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephro-Ureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Review

Although lymphonodal dissection is well-accepted for muscle-invasive bladder cancer management, its role is still debated during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The aim of this study was to summarize the current knowledge concerning the indication, anatomical template, prognostic, and therapeutic roles of lymph node dissection (LND) performed at the time of RNU. Quality control markers, such as the number of lymph nodes (LN) removed, lymph node density, and safety of the different surgical approaches, were assessed. We performed a narrative review using the PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. We identified and analyzed articles based on the practice and the role of lymph node dissection for non-metastatic UTUC. There are no clear guidelines regarding the indication of LND for UTUC, but aggressive tumors may beneficiate from lymphadenectomy since lymph node invasion is a clear independent poor prognostic factor, allowing for adjuvant treatments. It seems that an extended lymphadenectomy may provide therapeutic advantages as a higher number of nodes removed may be related to the removal of undetected LNs micrometastases and a subsequent improvement in recurrence rate and cancer-specific survival. Clear anatomical templates are thus needed based on the location and the laterality of the primary tumor.

Role of lymph node dissection at the time of open or minimally invasive nephroureterectomy

Unlike urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, there is no guideline-based consensus on whether a lymph node dissection (LND) should be performed at the time of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Variable lymphatic drainage based on primary tumor location, lack of prospective trials, and difficulties in developing a risk-adapted approach to LND for UTUC are all challenges to the development of an established approach. The UTUC literature consists of an evidence pool that has historically been limited to single-institution series with heterogenous inclusion criteria for LND and variable LND templates. Areas of controversy exist regarding migration to the great vessel LN beds for mid and distal tumors. A lack of template standardization limits the interpretation of studies relative to one another and a lack of uniformity in reporting templates may lead to inaccuracies in the estimation of lymph node metastasis landing sites. Most clinicians agree that there is a staging benefit to LND for UTUC. Although the data is somewhat heterogenous, it demonstrates a prognostic and staging benefit to LND in higher stages of UTUC. Unlike the staging benefits provided by LND for UTUC, the therapeutic benefits are not as clearly established. Several studies have evaluated differences in cancer-specific survival (CSS) and demonstrated LND to be an independent predictor of CSS when compared to patients not undergoing LND. However, this finding is not consistent across all studies and the literature is again limited by inclusion heterogeneity and inconsistent or lack or template-based resections. LND for UTUC at the time of RNU is a safe and feasible procedure that seems to especially benefit patients with muscle-invasive or locally advanced disease. Prospective, randomized studies with strict inclusion criteria and defined anatomic templates are needed to definitely characterize the role of LND for UTUC.

The role of lymphadenectomy at the time of radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

The role of lymphadenectomy (LND) at the time of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is controversial. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend performing a template-based LND for high-risk primary tumors while the European guidelines state that it is not feasible to determine indication or extent of LND at the time of surgery for UTUC. Herein, we review the anatomic rationale for template-based LND, examine when a LND should be considered, and discuss the impact of LND on staging and survival outcomes.

Lymph node dissection for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review

Objective

To perform a systematic review, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, investigating the role of lymph node dissection (LND) during nephroureterectomy (NU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); focussing on survival and complication outcomes.

Methods

A comprehensive systematic search was completed using a combination of Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords related to UTUC and LND on multiple databases. Meta-analyses were performed when outcomes were reported under the same definition in two or more studies. Where meta-analysis was not possible, outcomes were reviewed in a narrative manner.

Results

A total of 21 studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 11 cohort studies in the quantitative analysis. Our review did not detect significant improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–1.92), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.54–1.46) and overall survival (OS) (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.93–1.30). However, when focussing on studies only including patients with pT2/pT3 UTUC, not performing LND significantly worsened RFS (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.72–4.66). Reports of removing more than eight lymph nodes may also provide prognostic benefits in pN0 patients. The performance of LND was not associated with a higher rate of postoperative complications (risk ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.00–1.13).

Conclusion

Overall, LND did not provide additional benefit in RFS, CSS and OS. However, there was a potential benefit in RFS in patients with muscle-invasive and advanced UTUC. LND was also not associated with increased risks of postoperative complications.

Abbreviations: CIS: carcinoma in situ; CSS: cancer-specific survival; HR: hazard ratio; LND: lymph node dissection; NU: nephroureterectomy; OS: overall survival; PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; RFS: recurrence-free survival; RoB, risk of bias; RR: risk ratio; (UT)UC: (upper tract) urothelial carcinoma

Lymph node dissection during nephroureterectomy: Establishing the existing evidence based on a review of the literature

Abstract Objective: To determine the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in the treatment of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma (UTTCC), as the role of LND along with nephroureterectomy in treating UTTCC is unclear and several retrospective studies have been published on this topic with conflicting results.

Methods: The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), the Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database (CENTRAL), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, and individual urological journals, were searched for all studies investigating the role of LND in the treatment of UTTCC. Of the studies identified, those that met inclusion criteria were included in this review.

Results: In all, 27 studies were included in this review, with 9303 patients who underwent LND. No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Tumours were located in the renal pelvis in 62% of patients, in the ureter in 35.5%, and multifocal in 2.3%. In total: 77.1% were LN-negative and 22.9% had LN metastasis. For all patients undergoing LND, the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 27–65.4% and 32.3–95%, respectively. For patients who underwent a LND in accordance with a standardised anatomical template, the 5-year RFS and CSS rates were 84.3–93% and 83.5–94%, respectively.

Conclusion: LND may provide a survival benefit in patients undergoing nephroureterectomy for UTTCC, particularly if following a standardised anatomical template and in those patients with muscle-invasive disease; however, a prospective RCT is required to confirm this.

Abbreviations: CSS: cancer-specific survival; LN(D): lymph node (dissection); MeSH: Medical Subject Headings; OS: overall survival; pT: pathological T stage; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RFS: recurrence-free survival; UTTCC: upper tract TCC

Lymphadenectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

Background: The role of lymphonodal dissection during surgery for a tumor of the urinary tract remains controversial. Objective: To analyze anatomical bases of lymphonodal dissection in tumors of the upper urinary tract and analyze its impact on survival, recurrence, and staging. Acquisition of data: A web-based search for scientific articles using Medline/Pubmed was carried out to identify and analyze articles on the practice and the role of lymphonodal dissection in this indication. Data Synthesis: The lymphatic drainage of the upper urinary tract has rarely been studied and is poorly understood. The lymphonodal metastatic extension is the most common extension in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Lymphnode invasion is a clear independent poor prognostic factor. Therefore, it seems legitimate to offer an extended lymphonodal dissection to patients undergoing surgery to cure these tumors. When lymphnodes dissection respects clear anatomical principles based on the location of the primary tumor and its extension, it improves both survival and recurrence rates. This result could be secondary to the treatment of subclinical metastatic disease. Conclusion: An extended lymphadenectomy during surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma following strict anatomical pattern improves staging with a highly probable therapeutic benefit.

Contemporary role of lymph node dissection at the time of radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE

To review the contemporary data on the role of lymph node dissection (LND) at the time of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

METHODS

A computerized bibliographic search using the following protocol ("Nephroureterectomy") AND ("Lymphadenectomy" OR "Lymph node" OR "Lymphatic") was performed in MEDLINE to identify all original and review articles that addressed the role of LND for UTUC.

RESULTS

Regional lymph node (LN) boundaries of UTUC have been recently investigated in mapping studies to propose anatomic templates of LND according to the laterality and location of primary tumor. Although these anatomic templates remained poorly described, most reports supported the staging benefit of LND that allowed for risk stratification of patients with (pN+) or without (pN0) LN metastases from those who did not undergo such a procedure (pNx). In addition, the therapeutic benefit of LND at the time of RNU was supported by better oncological outcomes obtained after complete LND when compared to incomplete or no LND, especially in the group of patients with advanced disease. The number of LNs removed was also correlated with both, more accurate staging and greater cancer-specific survival after LND, whose feasibility and safety have been validated in prospective studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite mostly based on data with level of evidence 3, our comprehensive review of the literature supports the staging and therapeutic benefits of LND at the time of RNU for UTUC, which are particularly significant for patients with muscle-invasive or locally advanced disease.

Long-term oncologic outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer at a single institution

The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience using radical cystectomy to treat patients with bladder cancer and to describe the associations between pathologic features and clinical outcomes. All 701 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer were evaluated. The patient population consisted of 623 men and 78 women. The overall 5 and 10 yr recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 61.8% and 57.7%, respectively, and the 5 and 10 yr cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 70.8% and 65.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that factors significantly predictive of RFS and CSS included extravesical extension (P = 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.001), and lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001 and P = 0.007). The 5 and 10 yr RFS rates for patients with lymph node metastasis were 25.6% and 20.8%, respectively, and the 5 and 10 yr CSS rates were 38.6% and 30.9%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved RFS (P = 0.002) and CSS (P = 0.001) in patients with lymph node metastasis. Radical cystectomy provides good survival results in patients with invasive bladder cancer. Pathologic features significantly associated with prognosis include extravesical extension, node metastasis, and lymphovascular invasion. Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with advanced stage disease.

Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) robot-assisted nephroureterectomy: comparison with conventional multiport technique in the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the peri-operative, pathological and oncological outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (LESS-RALNU) with those of multiport robot-asssisted nephroureterectomy (M-RALNU).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 38 patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma underwent LESS-RALNU (n = 17) or M-RALNU (n = 21) by a single surgeon at a tertiary institution. Data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database.

RESULTS

Patients' demographics and tumour characteristics were similar between the M-RALNU and LESS-RALNU groups. The mean follow-up was 48.4 months for M-RALNU and 30.9 months for LESS-RALNU (P = 0). The mean operating time, estimated blood loss and length of hospitalization for M-RALNU and LESS-RALNU were 251 min, 192 mL, 6.5 days and 247 min, 376 mL and 5.4 days, respectively (P > 0.05). Overall, there were no significant differences in complication rates, although three patients in the LESS-RALNU group required blood transfusion, whereas no patient in the M-RALNU group did (P = 0.081). The proportion of patients with bladder recurrence, local recurrence and distant metastases was similar between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival and overall survival rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the oncological and peri-operative outcomes of patients who underwent LESS-RALNU compared well with those who underwent M-RALNU and with series of other surgical approaches, LESS-RALNU might result in greater intra-operative blood loss. We suggest careful selection of patient for this technique.

The contemporary role of lymph node dissection during nephroureterectomy in the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: the Canadian experience

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between lymph node dissection (LND) and survival among patients undergoing nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UTUC).

METHODS

This study includes 1029 patients from 10 Canadian institutions who underwent nephroureterectomy between 1990 and 2010. Disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared for patients with a node-negative LND (N0), node-positive LND (N+), or no LND (Nx) using Kaplan-Meyer analysis and Cox regression analysis. The association between survival and number of positive nodes, number of nodes removed, and ratio of positive nodes to nodes removed was also investigated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 19.8 months (interquartile range = 7.2-53.8). LND was performed in 276 (26.8%) patients, and 77 (27.9%) had N+ disease. Patients with N+ disease had significantly shorter OS, DSS, and RFS compared with N0 and Nx patients(P < .01). No differences were identified between N0 and Nx patients in any survival categories (P > .05). A ratio of positive nodes to nodes removed ≥ 20% had a per annum hazard ratio of 2.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-4.65) for OS, 2.70 (95% CI = 1.25-5.83) for DSS, and 1.94 (95% CI = 1.13-3.32) for RFS. The number of positive nodes and the number of nodes removed were not associated with survival in any survival category (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

LND during nephroureterectomy provides more accurate staging and prediction of survival; however, it remains uncertain whether LND independently improves survival in patients with UTUC.