Added Value of Bone Suppression Image in the Detection of Subtle Lung Lesions on Chest Radiographs with Regard to Reader's Expertise

CheSS: Chest X-Ray Pre-trained Model via Self-supervised Contrastive Learning

Training deep learning models on medical images heavily depends on experts' expensive and laborious manual labels. In addition, these images, labels, and even models themselves are not widely publicly accessible and suffer from various kinds of bias and imbalances. In this paper, chest X-ray pre-trained model via self-supervised contrastive learning (CheSS) was proposed to learn models with various representations in chest radiographs (CXRs). Our contribution is a publicly accessible pretrained model trained with a 4.8-M CXR dataset using self-supervised learning with a contrastive learning and its validation with various kinds of downstream tasks including classification on the 6-class diseases in internal dataset, diseases classification in CheXpert, bone suppression, and nodule generation. When compared to a scratch model, on the 6-class classification test dataset, we achieved 28.5% increase in accuracy. On the CheXpert dataset, we achieved 1.3% increase in mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve on the full dataset and 11.4% increase only using 1% data in stress test manner. On bone suppression with perceptual loss, we achieved improvement in peak signal to noise ratio from 34.99 to 37.77, structural similarity index measure from 0.976 to 0.977, and root-square-mean error from 4.410 to 3.301 when compared to ImageNet pretrained model. Finally, on nodule generation, we achieved improvement in Fréchet inception distance from 24.06 to 17.07. Our study showed the decent transferability of CheSS weights. CheSS weights can help researchers overcome data imbalance, data shortage, and inaccessibility of medical image datasets. CheSS weight is available at https://github.com/mi2rl/CheSS .

Bone suppression on pediatric chest radiographs via a deep learning-based cascade model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Bone suppression images (BSIs) of chest radiographs (CXRs) have been proven to improve diagnosis of pulmonary diseases. To acquire BSIs, dual-energy subtraction (DES) or a deep-learning-based model trained with DES-based BSIs have been used. However, neither technique could be applied to pediatric patients owing to the harmful effects of DES. In this study, we developed a novel method for bone suppression in pediatric CXRs.

METHODS

First, a model using digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) of adults, which were used to generate pseudo-CXRs from computed tomography images, was developed by training a 2-channel contrastive-unpaired-image-translation network. Second, this model was applied to 129 pediatric DRRs to generate the paired training data of pseudo-pediatric CXRs. Finally, by training a U-Net with these paired data, a bone suppression model for pediatric CXRs was developed.

RESULTS

The evaluation metrics were peak signal to noise ratio, root mean absolute error and structural similarity index measure at soft-tissue and bone region of the lung. In addition, an expert radiologist scored the effectiveness of BSIs on a scale of 1-5. The obtained result of 3.31 ± 0.48 indicates that the BSIs show homogeneous bone removal despite subtle residual bone shadow.

CONCLUSION

Our method shows that the pixel intensity at soft-tissue regions was preserved, and bones were well subtracted; this can be useful for detecting early pulmonary disease in pediatric CXRs.

Bone Suppression on Chest Radiographs for Pulmonary Nodule Detection: Comparison between a Generative Adversarial Network and Dual-Energy Subtraction

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of bone suppression imaging using deep learning (BSp-DL) based on a generative adversarial network (GAN) and bone subtraction imaging using a dual energy technique (BSt-DE) on radiologists' performance for pulmonary nodule detection on chest radiographs (CXRs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 111 adults, including 49 patients with 83 pulmonary nodules, who underwent both CXR using the dual energy technique and chest CT, were enrolled. Using CT as a reference, two independent radiologists evaluated CXR images for the presence or absence of pulmonary nodules in three reading sessions (standard CXR, BSt-DE CXR, and BSp-DL CXR). Person-wise and nodule-wise performances were assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) and alternative free-response ROC (AFROC) curve analyses, respectively. Subgroup analyses based on nodule size, location, and the presence of overlapping bones were performed.

RESULTS

BSt-DE with an area under the AFROC curve (AUAFROC) of 0.996 and 0.976 for readers 1 and 2, respectively, and BSp-DL with AUAFROC of 0.981 and 0.958, respectively, showed better nodule-wise performance than standard CXR (AUAFROC of 0.907 and 0.808, respectively; p ≤ 0.005). In the person-wise analysis, BSp-DL with an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.984 and 0.931 for readers 1 and 2, respectively, showed better performance than standard CXR (AUROC of 0.915 and 0.798, respectively; p ≤ 0.011) and comparable performance to BSt-DE (AUROC of 0.988 and 0.974; p ≥ 0.064). BSt-DE and BSp-DL were superior to standard CXR for detecting nodules overlapping with bones (p < 0.017) or in the upper/middle lung zone (p < 0.017). BSt-DE was superior (p < 0.017) to BSp-DL in detecting peripheral and sub-centimeter nodules.

CONCLUSION

BSp-DL (GAN-based bone suppression) showed comparable performance to BSt-DE and can improve radiologists' performance in detecting pulmonary nodules on CXRs. Nevertheless, for better delineation of small and peripheral nodules, further technical improvements are required.

Value of bone suppression software in chest radiographs for improving image quality and reducing radiation dose

OBJECTIVES

To compare image quality and radiation dose between dual-energy subtraction (DES)-based bone suppression images (D-BSIs) and software-based bone suppression images (S-BSIs).

METHODS

Chest radiographs (CXRs) of forty adult patients were obtained with the two X-ray devices, one with DES and one with bone suppression software. Three image quality metrics (relative mean absolute error (RMAE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index (SSIM)) between original CXR and BSI for each of D-BSI and S-SBI groups were calculated for each bone and soft tissue areas. Two readers rated the visual image quality for original CXR and BSI for each of D-BSI and S-SBI groups. The dose area product (DAP) values were recorded. Paired t test was used to compare the image quality and DAP values between D-BSI and S-BSI groups.

RESULTS

In bone areas, S-BSIs had better SSIM values than D-BSI (94.57 vs. 87.77) but worse RMAE and PSNR values (0.50 vs. 0.20; 20.93 vs. 34.37) (all p < 0.001). In soft tissue areas, S-BSIs had better SSIM values than D-BSI (97.56 vs. 91.42) but similar RMAE and PSNR values (0.29 vs. 0.27; 31.35 vs. 29.87) (all p < 0.001). Both readers gave S-BSIs significantly higher image quality scores than D-BSI (p < 0.001). The mean DAP in software-related images (0.98 dGy·cm²) was significantly lower than that in the DES-related images (1.48 dGy·cm²) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Bone suppression software significantly improved the image quality of bone suppression images with a relatively lower radiation dose, compared with dual-energy subtraction technique.

KEY POINTS

• Bone suppression software preserves structure similarity of soft tissues better than dual-energy subtraction technique in bone suppression images. • Bone suppression software achieves superior image quality for lung lesions than dual-energy subtraction technique in bone suppression images. • Bone suppression software can decrease the radiation dose over the hardware-based image processing technique.