Radio frequency ablation in the rabbit lung using wet electrodes: comparison of monopolar and dual bipolar electrode mode

"Edgeboost": A Novel Technique to Extend the Ablation Zone Lateral to a Two-Probe Bipolar Radiofrequency Device

BACKGROUND

The dual-electrode bipolar-RFA (B-RFA) is increasingly used to ablate large liver tumours (3-7 cm). However, the challenging aspect of B-RFA is the placement of the two electrodes around the tumour. Realignment often requires the electrodes to be extracted and reinserted.

AIM

The aim of this study is to examine "Edgeboost", a novel technique to increase the lateral ablation dimension without requiring any realignment of the electrodes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An egg-white model and an ex vivo calf liver model were used compare the standard bipolar mode ablation to Edgeboost-1 (reaching full impedance in bipolar mode initially, then cycling in unipolar mode between left and right probes) and Edgeboost-2 (similar to Edgeboost-1 but not reaching full impedance initially in bipolar mode in order to minimize charring and, thus, to increase total ablation time).

RESULTS

A significantly larger outer lateral ablation dimension to the probe was achieved with Edgeboost-1 compared to the standard method in the liver model (1.14 cm, SD: 0.16 vs. 0.44 cm, SD: 0.24, p = 0.04). Edgeboost-2 achieved the largest outer lateral ablation dimension of 1.75 cm (SD: 0.35). A similar association was seen in the egg model. Edgeboost-2 almost doubled the mass ablated with standard bipolar alone (mass ratio: 1:1.94 in egg white and 1:1.84 in liver).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the novel "Edgeboost" technique can increase the outer lateral ablation dimension without requiring the two inserted electrodes to be reinserted. This would be beneficial for interventionists who use the dual B-RFA.

Laparoscopic treatment of liver tumours using a two-needle probe bipolar radiofrequency ablation device

BACKGROUND

Many hepatobiliary centres are increasingly utilizing thermocoagulative devices such as bipolar-radiofrequency ablation (B-RFA). Compared with monopolar-radiofrequency ablation (M-RFA), B-RFA does not require grounding pads, thereby avoiding dermal burn injuries, and does not position probes directly into the tumour but rather on the perimeter. Additionally, B-RFA can precoagulate parenchyma to assist in hepatic resection. Herein, we report our early experience using B-RFA.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified 68 patients who underwent M-RFA or B-RFA between June 2004 and September 2010 in an academic centre. Peri-operative metrics were analysed.

RESULTS

M-RFA was used to treat 30 patients, whereas B-RFA was used for 17 patients. There were no differences in peri-operative metrics, survival or disease recurrence between M-RFA and B-RFA. Seventeen additional patients underwent B-RFA precoagulation during laparoscopic resection (segmentectomy in eleven patients and multi-segmental resection in six patients). Four patients with multifocal disease underwent procedures that combined B-RFA with resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The early experience utilizing B-RFA demonstrates equivalency to M-RFA with respect to peri-operative metrics and survival. Moreover, B-RFA can be utilized to precoagulate tissue during a planned resection, making it not only a useful tool for tumour therapy but also a useful adjunct during surgical resections.