Ultrasonographic features of benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast

Benign Adenomyoepithelioma of the Breast: Imaging Characteristics

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the radiological and clinical characteristics of benign adenomyoepitheliomas of the breast.

Materials and Methods

Over the last 20 years, 120 patients were histologically diagnosed with breast adenomyoepithelioma (AME) at our institution. We excluded 43 patients who were incidentally diagnosed during mastectomy for breast cancer, 28 who underwent percutaneous biopsy without further excision, and 8 who had biopsy-confirmed benign AME and were found to have another pathology after complete excision. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records and radiological findings of the remaining 41 patients with histologically diagnosed benign breast AMEs after complete excision.

Results

All 41 patients underwent US; 38 underwent mammography (MG) and US; and 18 underwent MG, US, and MRI. MG detected 38 cases with a round or oval shape (56%), and mass (89%), were non-circumscribed (62%), hyperdense (53%), and without microcalcifications (95%). Breast US revealed suspicious masses (98%) with a non-circumscribed margin (66%), hypoechogenicity (43%), and intratumoral vascularity (63%). All lesions on breast MRI showed suspicious masses (100%) with ill-defined margins (61%), and 84% showed wash-out kinetics. Benign AMEs showed suspicious features of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 or 5 in 83%-95% of the MG, US, and MRI. Sixteen of the 41 cases were misdiagnosed on the initial core needle biopsy and two were diagnosed as malignancy.

Conclusion

Benign breast AME often shows suspicious radiological features mimicking a malignant mass on MG, US, and MRI. Differentiating benign AME from other pathologies might be difficult on core needle biopsy, and complete excision is needed for a correct diagnosis.

Breast adenomyoepithelioma from a radiologic perspective

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast (AB) is an uncommon tumor that is characterized by the biphasic proliferation of epithelial and myoepithelial cells. The radiologic findings for AB have been scantly reported. This paper aims to analyze the characteristic findings for AB on ultrasonography (US) and mammography. This retrospective descriptive study used the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) to analyze the US and mammography findings for histologically confirmed AB in patients attended at our institution between 2007 and 2019. We identified a total of 13 AB in 13 women. All patients underwent US. On US, 12 lesions were seen as oval nodules, and the remaining lesion was irregular-shaped; 8 lesions had circumscribed margins, 3 had angled margins, and 2 had microlobulated margins. Regarding the echo pattern, 8 lesions were hypoechoic and 5 were complex (solid-cystic). On color Doppler, 11 lesions were vascularized nodules and 2 were avascular nodules. In conclusion, we present the imaging characteristics for a series of cases of AB. It is unlikely that this lesion can be suspected solely on the basis of the imaging findings; nevertheless, it is important for radiologists to be familiar with AB to carry out a good radiopathologic correlation.

Breast adenomyoepithelioma from a radiologic perspective

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast (AB) is an uncommon tumor that is characterized by the biphasic proliferation of epithelial and myoepithelial cells. The radiologic findings for AB have been scantly reported. This paper aims to analyze the characteristic findings for AB on ultrasonography (US) and mammography. This retrospective descriptive study used the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) to analyze the US and mammography findings for histologically confirmed AB in patients attended at our institution between 2007 and 2019. We identified a total of 13 AB in 13 women. All patients underwent US. On US, 12 lesions were seen as oval nodules, and the remaining lesion was irregular-shaped; 8 lesions had circumscribed margins, 3 had angled margins, and 2 had microlobulated margins. Regarding the echo pattern, 8 lesions were hypoechoic and 5 were complex (solid-cystic). On color Doppler, 11 lesions were vascularized nodules and 2 were avascular nodules. In conclusion, we present the imaging characteristics for a series of cases of AB. It is unlikely that this lesion can be suspected solely on the basis of the imaging findings; nevertheless, it is important for radiologists to be familiar with AB to carry out a good radiopathologic correlation.

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast with prominent cystic changes: a case report

BACKGROUND

Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) of the breast is a rare subtype of breast tumor. Most of AMEs reported are solid, however, cystic or prominent cystic changes are extremely rare.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 51-year-old woman presented a lump in the upper outer quadrant of right breast, and it was accompanied by continuous breast pain and bilateral axillary itching for more than 2 months. There were no other symptoms found. Preoperative mammography and ultrasound examination were performed. Mammography showed a noncalcified lobulated mass, and it was considered to be a benign cyst with septum on ultrasound, but ductal carcinoma of breast, adenoid cystic carcinoma could not be excluded. At first, AME was not considered preoperatively, because the imaging features of this rare tumor may vary widely, which may result in an incorrect diagnosis. But eventually, AME was diagnosed by postoperative pathology and immunohistochemistry.

CONCLUSION

We herein present a rare case of breast AME with prominent cystic changes. AME has no-specific imaging features, but the benign or malignant nature of the lesion might be suspected on imaging.

Benign adenomyoepitelioma of the breast: Presentation of two rare cases and review of literature

•

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast is a rare benign breast neoplasm.

•

The rarity of this histological type of benign breast tumor and the finding of two cases in a short period makes this case report unique.

•

Although benign, adenomyoepithelioma has a potential for local recurrence; therefore, wide excision is recommended.

Introduction

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast is a rare benign breast neoplasm with a particular behaviour.

Presentation of cases

We report two cases of adenomyoepithelioma of the breast in two old female patients, diagnosed over a period of 5 years. The clinical presentation, the radiological and the histopathologic findings are discussed.

Discussion

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast is characterized by the proliferation of both epithelial and myoepithelial cells belonging to the breast lobules and ducts. The imaging features are not pathognomonic and FNAB is usually not diagnostic. The morphologic appearance of this tumor varies, and it has to be considered in the differential diagnosis with other breast tumors. Although benign, adenomyoepithelioma has a potential for local recurrence, and malignant transformation is possible; therefore, wide excision is recommended to lower the recurrence rate.

Conclusion

The rarity of this histological type and the finding of two cases in a relatively short period makes this case report unique.

Rapid Local Recurrence of Breast Myoepithelial Carcinoma Arising in Adenomyoepithelioma: A Case Report

Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) is a rare breast neoplasm composed of both epithelial and myoepithelial cells with biphasic proliferation. Although most AMEs are benign, malignant transformation of either or both cellular components may occur. This report describes an unusual rapid local tumor recurrence a month after excision of the myoepithelial carcinoma arising in an AME. Ultrasound and MRI showed small recurrent masses in the superficial part of a hematoma. This report suggests the benefit of immediate postoperative breast imaging in patients with malignant AME with potential for local recurrence, such as those with narrow resection margins or high mitotic activity.

Challenges in management of male breast adenomioepithelioma with malignant behavior: Case report

RATIONALE

Male adenomyoepithelioma of the breast with malignant features is a rare tumor with only one previous case reported in the literature over 25 years ago.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report the case of a 63-year-old man admitted to our Oncology Institute with a painless tumor mass of 6 cm in the left breast with no additional regional lymph nodes. Ultrasound revealed a complex cystic tumor mass of 60 mm in the left breast, with both anechoic (cystic) and echogenic (solid) components, with ill-defined margin.

DIAGNOSES

Extemporaneous assessment showed a solid (invasive) papillary intracystic carcinoma. Definitive pathology examination revealed the presence of a breast malignant adenomyoepithelioma.

INTERVENTIONS

Based on the extemporaneous assessment, wide tumor excision was performed. The tumor board decided to continue treatment with adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

OUTCOMES

After 6 years of follow-up, the patient is cancer-free. No chronic side effects were noted.

LESSONS

Because this pathology is extremely rare, no guidelines are available for its therapeutic approach. All decisions regarding patient management should be made by a multi-disciplinary team and can only be based on clinical experience and the few cases reported in female patients.

A Case of Adenomyoepithelioma of the Breast Showing Strong Uptake of 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose on a Positron Emission Tomography

An adenomyoepithelioma of the breast is a rare tumor characterized by biphasic proliferation of both epithelial and myoepithelial cells. This tumor is generally considered as a benign neoplasm, and there are few reports describing the imaging features of this tumor through ¹⁸ F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Here, we report a case of an adenomyoepithelioma that showed strong uptake of FDG on PET similar to that observed with a malignant tumor. A 73-year-old woman presented to our hospital with a 3.5-cm, mobile, and elastic hard tumor in the upper area of the left breast. Although the findings of mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging suggested that the tumor was malignant, it was diagnosed as an adenomyoepithelioma by core needle biopsy. An invasive ductal carcinoma, 0.5-cm in size, was detected in the medial upper area of the ipsilateral breast during an examination. Although FDG-PET demonstrated no lymph node or distant metastases from the invasive ductal carcinoma, strong uptake of FDG was detected in the adenomyoepithelioma. Breast conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy for the invasive ductal carcinoma together with resection of the adenomyoepithelioma was performed. A diagnosis of adenomyoepithelioma was confirmed through histologic examination of the resected specimen. This case indicates that some adenomyoepitheliomas may show a strong uptake of FDG on PET, which resembles a malignant tumor.

The mammography and MRI manifestations of adenomyoepithelioma of the breast

AIM

To investigate mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) manifestations of benign and malignant adenomyoepithelioma (AME), in order to improve our understanding of this disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen patients (11 cases of benign AME and two cases of malignant AME) were included. All patients underwent preoperative mammography, and four underwent preoperative MRI examinations.

RESULTS

Mammography revealed that 11 cases showed round, lobulate, or oval masses. One case was accompanied by calcification with blurred edges; the remaining 10 cases showed masses with clear or shaded borders. One case exhibited structurally distorted lesions, and another showed focal opacities. Among the four patients who also underwent preoperative MRI examinations, signals in the three benign cases were clearly enhanced homogeneously, and the dynamic enhancement curves were progressive. The one case of malignant AME showed an irregularly shaped mass with spiculate margins on the MRI images. The signals were homogeneously enhanced, and the dynamic enhancement curve was of the washout type.

CONCLUSION

AME usually exhibited oval or round masses with smooth edges and no calcification, and, in a portion of the cases, structurally distorted lesions or focal opacities. On different MRI sequences, AME usually showed homogeneous signal. The apparent diffusion coefficient value of malignant AME is relatively low.

Imaging features of benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the imaging features of benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast with a focus on sonographic (US) appearances.

METHODS

Ten benign adenomyoepitheliomas in 9 patients were included in this study. Mammographic and US findings were analyzed retrospectively by 2 radiologists according to the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon. The BI-RADS final assessment category was also recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 8 lesions for which mammography was available, 4 lesions presented with abnormal findings. Two lesions presented with an indistinct, irregular, isodense mass and a circumscribed, oval, isodense mass. The other 2 lesions presented with areas of focal asymmetry and asymmetry, respectively. On US, all of 10 lesions presented as a mass. The masses measured 0.5-1.2 cm (mean, 0.8 cm), were irregular (n = 8) or oval (n = 2) with microlobulated (n = 5), indistinct (n = 3), or angular (n = 2) margins. They were all hypoechoic, had non parallel orientation in 6 cases, and increased peripheral vascularity in 7 cases. The BI-RADS final assessment category was 4B in 6, and 4A in 4.

CONCLUSIONS

Mammographic findings of benign adenomyoepithelioma were nonspecific. An irregular, non parallel orientation, microlobulated or indistinct margin, hypoechogenicity, and increased peripheral vascularity were the most frequent US features.

Adenomyoepithelioma with ductal carcinoma in situ: a case report and review of the literature

Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) with microglandular adenosis-like growth pattern and superimposed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was identified in a 55-year-old female after biopsy of an atypical lesion identified through routine breast screening. A literature review reveals that this association has rarely been described.