1
|
Girsa D, Kremenova K, Lukavsky J, Sukupova L, Malikova H. Comparison of dose length product and image quality of a biphasic whole-body polytrauma CT protocol with and without the automatic tube voltage selection. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2024. [PMID: 38445394 DOI: 10.5507/bp.2024.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS A significant source of man-made radiation is now linked to medical devices especially X-ray imaging based ones like CT scans which expose the body to cumulative ionizing radiation and thus attendant cancer risks. The aim of this study was to determine whether using a combination of Automatic Tube Current Modulation (ATCM) and Automatic Tube Voltage Selection (ATVS) during two-phase whole-body CT (2PWBCT) examinations would reduce the radiation dose while preserving the image quality. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a prospective, observational, single-centre study of 127 adult patients who had undergone the 2PWBCT polytraumatic protocol. All were examined on a Somatom Drive scanner (Siemens). The patients were divided into two groups: ATCM only (42 patients) and ATCM +ATVS (85 patients). Patients' arm positions during examination and the examination dose length product (DLP) values were recorded, as well the standard deviations (SD) of the density in reference areas on CT scans for the image quality assessment. The DLP values and image quality in the groups were compared using ANOVA. RESULTS Mean Total DLP (in mGy*cm): ATCM only: 3337 +/-797, ATCM+ATVS: 3402 +/-830; P=0.674. No effect of arm position (P=0.586). Mean density SD values in reference areas (in HU) in ATCM only: 49 +/-45, 15 +/-6, 9 +/-2, 12 +/-4, 10 +/-3, in ATCM+ATVS: 48 +/-45, 17 +/-6, 11 +/-3, 15 +/-6, 12 +/-4. SD values was higher in ATCM+ATVS group (P<0.001). CONCLUSION Combination of ATVS and ATCM in polytraumatic 2PWBCT leads to no significant radiation load reduction compared with ATCM only but does lead to a slight degradation of image quality. The radiation load is significantly reduced if the patient has their arms behind the head when scanning, regardless of the activation of ATVS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Girsa
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady; Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Karin Kremenova
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Lukavsky
- Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, 110 00 Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lucie Sukupova
- Director's Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Hana Malikova
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady; Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yoo J, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Joo I, Lee ES, Jeon SK, Jang S. Comparison of low kVp CT and dual-energy CT for the evaluation of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3217-3226. [PMID: 33713160 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02888-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare lesion conspicuity and image quality of arterial phase images obtained from low kVp (90-kVp) and dual-energy (DE) scans for the evaluation of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS This retrospective study included 229 patients with HCC who underwent either 90 kVp (n = 106) or DE scan (80- and 150-kVp with a tin filter) (n = 123) during the arterial phase. DE scans were reconstructed into a linearly blended image with a mixed ratio of 0.6 (60% 80kVp and 40% 150 kVp) and post-processed for 40 keV and 50 keV images. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of HCC to the liver and image noise was measured. Lesion conspicuity, liver parenchymal image quality, and overall image preference were assessed qualitatively by three independent radiologists. RESULTS DE 40 keV images had the highest CNR of HCC, and DE blended images had the lowest image noise among four image sets (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in mean volume CT dose index and dose-length product between DE and low kVp scan (ps > 0.05). For qualitative analyses, DE blended images had the highest scores for image quality and overall image preference (ps < 0.001). CONCLUSION At an equal radiation dose, DE 40 keV showed higher CNR of HCC and DE blended image showed higher image quality and image preference compared with low kVp CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeongin Yoo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Daehak-ro 101, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
| | - Jeong Hee Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ijin Joo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Sun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Kyung Jeon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Siwon Jang
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Choi MH, Lee YJ, Jung SE. A LESSON FROM AUTOMATIC TUBE VOLTAGE SELECTION: FEASIBILITY OF 100 kVp IN PORTAL VENOUS PHASE ABDOMINAL CT. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2020; 188:424-431. [PMID: 31998958 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncz302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the relationship between ATVS-recommended tube voltage and patient body habitus and to compare radiation dose and diagnostic performance between fixed 120-kVp and ATVS protocols in portal venous phase abdomen CT. METHODS A total of 907 portal venous phase abdominal CTs were evaluated. Radiation dose in the ATVS protocol was compared according to tube voltage (80, 100 or 120 kVp). Quantitative image analysis and diagnostic performance were compared between 81 pairs of CT using ATVS and fixed 120-kVp protocols. RESULTS Most CT examinations with ATVS were performed with 80 or 100 kVp. The average reduction rate of radiation dose in the ATVS protocol was 15.4%. There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance (p = 0.388) between ATVS and fixed 120-kVp protocols. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, ATVS frequently selected 80 or 100 kVp for portal venous phase abdominal CT without impairing the diagnostic performance, even with filtered back projection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moon Hyung Choi
- Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Catholic Smart Imaging Center, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radioogy, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Joon Lee
- Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Catholic Smart Imaging Center, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radioogy, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Eun Jung
- Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Catholic Smart Imaging Center, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radioogy, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jia Y, Zhai B, He T, Yu Y, Yu N, Duan H, Yang C, Zhang X. The Application of a New Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Dose Upper Abdominal CT. Acad Radiol 2019; 26:e275-e283. [PMID: 30660470 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Revised: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To compare upper abdominal computed tomography (CT) image quality of new model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) with low-contrast resolution preference (MBIRNR40), conventional MBIR (MBIRc), and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) at low dose with ASIR at routine-dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS Study included phantom and 60 patients who had initial and follow-up CT scans. For patients, the delay phase was acquired at routine-dose (noise index = 10 HU) for the initial scan and low dose (noise index = 20 HU) for the follow-up. The low-dose CT was reconstructed with 40% and 60% ASIR, MBIRc, and MBIRNR40, while routine-dose CT was reconstructed with 40% ASIR. CT value and noise measurements of the subcutaneous fat, back muscle, liver, and spleen parenchyma were compared using one-way ANOVA. Two radiologists used semiquantitative 7-scale (-3 to +3) to rate image quality and artifacts. RESULTS The phantom study revealed superior low-contrast resolution with MBIRNR40. For patient scans, the CT dose index for the low-dose CT was 3.00 ± 1.32 mGy, 75% lower than the 11.90 ± 4.75 mGy for the routine-dose CT. Image noise for the low-dose MBIRNR40 images was significantly lower than the low-dose MBIRc and ASIR images, and routine-dose ASIR images (p < 0.05). Subjective ratings showed higher image quality for low-dose MBIRNR40, with lower noise, better low-contrast resolution for abdominal structures, and finer lesion contours than those of low-dose MBIRc and ASIR images, and routine-dose ASIR images (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION MBIRNR40 with low-contrast resolution preference provides significantly lower noise and better image quality than MBIRc and ASIR in low-dose abdominal CT; significantly better objective and subjective image quality than the routine-dose ASIR with 75% dose reduction.
Collapse
|
5
|
Euler A, Solomon J, FitzGerald PF, Samei E, Nelson RC. Can Realistic Liver Tissue Surrogates Accurately Quantify the Impact of Reduced-kV Imaging on Attenuation and Contrast of Parenchyma and Lesions? Acad Radiol 2019; 26:640-650. [PMID: 30269958 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Revised: 07/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To assess if a liquid tissue surrogate for the liver (LTSL) can emulate contrast-enhanced liver parenchyma and lesions and quantify the impact of reduced-kV imaging as a function of lesion contrast, phase of enhancement, and phantom size. MATERIALS AND METHODS First, CT attenuation of LTSL- and water-iodine solutions were measured as a function of iodine concentration and tube potential. For each solution, the iodine concentration was determined to emulate liver parenchyma at 120 kV. CT attenuation for both solutions was predicted for different tube potentials and compared to published patient data. Second, liver parenchyma in late arterial phase (LA: +92 HU at 120 kV) and portal venous phase (PV: +112 HU at 120 kV) was emulated using LTSL-iodine and a two-size phantom. Fourteen setups of hyper- and hypoattenuating lesions (lesion-to-parenchyma contrast (CLP) = -50 to +50HU) were created. Each combination of CLP, phase, and size was imaged at 80, 100, 120, and 140 kV at constant radiation dose. CT attenuation, CLP, and lesion-to-parenchyma contrast-to-noise ratio (CNRLP) were assessed and compared to a theoretical model. RESULTS LTSL-iodine more accurately emulated the CT attenuation of liver parenchyma across different tube potentials compared to water-iodine solutions. The theoretical model was confirmed by the empirical measurements using LTSL-iodine solutions: attenuation, CLP, and CNRLP increased when the tube potential decreased (p < 0.001). This trend was independent of lesion contrast, phase, and size. The absolute improvement in CLP and CNRLP, however, was inversely related to the magnitude of CLP at 140kV. CONCLUSION LTSL accurately emulated the energy-dependent CT attenuation characteristics of contrast-enhanced liver parenchyma and lesions. The relative improvement in CLP and CNRLP by applying reduced-kV imaging was independent of lesion contrast, phase, and size while the absolute improvement decreased for low-contrast lesions.
Collapse
|
6
|
Potentials of the Potential: The “Lower, Slower, and Brighter” Mantra. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15:998-999. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
7
|
Sub-millisievert CT colonography: effect of knowledge-based iterative reconstruction on the detection of colonic polyps. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:5258-5266. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5545-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
8
|
Euler A, Obmann MM, Szucs-Farkas Z, Mileto A, Zaehringer C, Falkowski AL, Winkel DJ, Marin D, Stieltjes B, Krauss B, Schindera ST. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between split-filter dual-energy images and single-energy images in single-source abdominal CT. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:3405-3412. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5338-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2017] [Revised: 01/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
9
|
Qurashi A, Rainford L, Ajlan A, Khashoggi K, Ashkar L, Al-Raddadi M, Al-Ghamdi M, Al-Thobaiti M, Foley S. Optimal abdominal CT protocol for obese patients. Radiography (Lond) 2017; 24:e1-e12. [PMID: 29306386 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2017.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Revised: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 08/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study investigated the impact of different protocols on radiation dose and image quality for obese patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations. METHODS Five abdominal/pelvis CT protocols employed across three scanners from a single manufacturer in a single centre used a variety of parameters (kV: 100/120, reference mAs: 150/190/218/250/300, image reconstruction: filtered back projection (FBP)/iterative (IR)). The routine protocol employed 300 reference mAs and 120 kV. Data sets resulting from obese patient examinations (n = 42) were assessed for image quality using visual grading analysis by three experienced radiologists. Objective assessment (noise, signal/contrast-noise ratios) and radiation dose was compared to determine optimal protocols for prospective testing on a further sample of patients (n = 47) for scanners using FBP and IR techniques. RESULTS Compared to the routine protocol, mean radiation dose was reduced by 60% when using 100 kV and SAFIRE technique strength 3 (p = 0.001). Reduction of up to 30% in radiation dose was noted for the FBP protocol: 120 kV and 190 reference mAs (p = 0.008). Subjective and objective image quality for both protocols were comparable to that of the routine protocol (p > 0.05). An overall improvement in image quality with increasing strength of SAFIRE was noted. Upon clinical implementation of the optimal dose protocols, local radiology consensus deemed image quality to be acceptable for the participating obese patient cohort. CONCLUSION Radiation dose for obese patients can be optimised whilst maintaining image quality. Where iterative reconstruction is available relatively low kV and quality reference mAs are also viable for imaging obese patients at 30-60% lower radiation doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Qurashi
- Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland; Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
| | - L Rainford
- Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland
| | - A Ajlan
- King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - K Khashoggi
- King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - L Ashkar
- King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - M Al-Ghamdi
- King Abdulaziz Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - S Foley
- Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Davis AT, Palmer AL, Nisbet A. Can CT scan protocols used for radiotherapy treatment planning be adjusted to optimize image quality and patient dose? A systematic review. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20160406. [PMID: 28452568 PMCID: PMC5603945 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Revised: 03/16/2017] [Accepted: 04/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
This article reviews publications related to the use of CT scans for radiotherapy treatment planning, specifically the impact of scan protocol changes on CT number and treatment planning dosimetry and on CT image quality. A search on PubMed and EMBASE and a subsequent review of references yielded 53 relevant articles. CT scan parameters significantly affect image quality. Some will also affect Hounsfield unit (HU) values, though this is not comprehensively reported on. Changes in tube kilovoltage and, on some scanners, field of view and reconstruction algorithms have been found to produce notable HU changes. The degree of HU change which can be tolerated without changing planning dose by >1% depends on the body region and size, planning algorithms, treatment beam energy and type of plan. A change in soft-tissue HU value has a greater impact than changes in HU for bone and air. The use of anthropomorphic phantoms is recommended when assessing HU changes. There is limited published work on CT scan protocol optimization in radiotherapy. Publications suggest that HU tolerances of ±20 HU for soft tissue and of ±50 HU for the lung and bone would restrict dose changes in the treatment plan to <1%. Literature related to the use of CT images in radiotherapy planning has been reviewed to establish the acceptable level of HU change and the impact on image quality of scan protocol adjustment. Conclusions have been presented and further work identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne T Davis
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Department of Medical Physics, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Antony L Palmer
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Department of Medical Physics, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Andrew Nisbet
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Department of Medical Physics, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
McAllister F, Montiel MF, Uberoi GS, Uberoi AS, Maitra A, Bhutani MS. Current Status and Future Directions for Screening Patients at High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2017; 13:268-275. [PMID: 28656024 PMCID: PMC5479340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
It is well known that pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has a high mortality rate. Despite progress in understanding the biology and genetic basis of this disease, life expectancy has changed minimally in the last 50 years. This article highlights the importance of screening patients at high risk for developing pancreatic cancer and reviews current methods as well as methods in development for pancreatic cancer early detection and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florencia McAllister
- Dr McAllister is an assistant professor and Dr Montiel is a research investigator in the Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention; Dr Guneesh S. Uberoi and Dr Angad S. Uberoi are research interns and Dr Bhutani is a professor in the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition; and Dr Maitra is a professor in the Department of Pathology at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas
| | - Maria F Montiel
- Dr McAllister is an assistant professor and Dr Montiel is a research investigator in the Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention; Dr Guneesh S. Uberoi and Dr Angad S. Uberoi are research interns and Dr Bhutani is a professor in the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition; and Dr Maitra is a professor in the Department of Pathology at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas
| | - Guneesh S Uberoi
- Dr McAllister is an assistant professor and Dr Montiel is a research investigator in the Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention; Dr Guneesh S. Uberoi and Dr Angad S. Uberoi are research interns and Dr Bhutani is a professor in the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition; and Dr Maitra is a professor in the Department of Pathology at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas
| | - Angad S Uberoi
- Dr McAllister is an assistant professor and Dr Montiel is a research investigator in the Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention; Dr Guneesh S. Uberoi and Dr Angad S. Uberoi are research interns and Dr Bhutani is a professor in the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition; and Dr Maitra is a professor in the Department of Pathology at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas
| | - Anirban Maitra
- Dr McAllister is an assistant professor and Dr Montiel is a research investigator in the Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention; Dr Guneesh S. Uberoi and Dr Angad S. Uberoi are research interns and Dr Bhutani is a professor in the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition; and Dr Maitra is a professor in the Department of Pathology at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Dr McAllister is an assistant professor and Dr Montiel is a research investigator in the Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention; Dr Guneesh S. Uberoi and Dr Angad S. Uberoi are research interns and Dr Bhutani is a professor in the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition; and Dr Maitra is a professor in the Department of Pathology at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Impact of model-based iterative reconstruction on low-contrast lesion detection and image quality in abdominal CT: a 12-reader-based comparative phantom study with filtered back projection at different tube voltages. Eur Radiol 2017; 27:5252-5259. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4825-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2016] [Revised: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|