Diagnosing Lung Nodules on Oncologic MR/PET Imaging: Comparison of Fast T1-Weighted Sequences and Influence of Image Acquisition in Inspiration and Expiration Breath-Hold

Use of "Diagnostic Yield" in Imaging Research Reports: Results from Articles Published in Two General Radiology Journals

OBJECTIVE

"Diagnostic yield," also referred to as the detection rate, is a parameter positioned between diagnostic accuracy and diagnosis-related patient outcomes in research studies that assess diagnostic tests. Unfamiliarity with the term may lead to incorrect usage and delivery of information. Herein, we evaluate the level of proper use of the term "diagnostic yield" and its related parameters in articles published in Radiology and Korean Journal of Radiology (KJR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Potentially relevant articles published since 2012 in these journals were identified using MEDLINE and PubMed Central databases. The initial search yielded 239 articles. We evaluated whether the correct definition and study setting of "diagnostic yield" or "detection rate" were used and whether the articles also reported companion parameters for false-positive results. We calculated the proportion of articles that correctly used these parameters and evaluated whether the proportion increased with time (2012-2016 vs. 2017-2022).

RESULTS

Among 39 eligible articles (19 from Radiology and 20 from KJR), 17 (43.6%; 11 from Radiology and 6 from KJR) correctly defined "diagnostic yield" or "detection rate." The remaining 22 articles used "diagnostic yield" or "detection rate" with incorrect meanings such as "diagnostic performance" or "sensitivity." The proportion of correctly used diagnostic terms was higher in the studies published in Radiology than in those published in KJR (57.9% vs. 30.0%). The proportion improved with time in Radiology (33.3% vs. 80.0%), whereas no improvement was observed in KJR over time (33.3% vs. 27.3%). The proportion of studies reporting companion parameters was similar between journals (72.7% vs. 66.7%), and no considerable improvement was observed over time.

CONCLUSION

Overall, a minority of articles accurately used "diagnostic yield" or "detection rate." Incorrect usage of the terms was more frequent without improvement over time in KJR than in Radiology. Therefore, improvements are required in the use and reporting of these parameters.

Detection of lung lesions in breath-hold VIBE and free-breathing Spiral VIBE MRI compared to CT

BACKGROUND

Detection of pulmonary nodules in MRI requires fast imaging strategies without respiratory motion impairment, such as single-breath-hold Cartesian VIBE. As patients with pulmonary diseases have limited breath-hold capacities, this study investigates the clinical feasibility of non-Cartesian Spiral VIBE under free-breathing compared to CT as the gold standard.

METHODS

Prospective analysis of 27 oncological patients examined in PET/CT and PET/MR. A novel motion-robust 3D ultrashort-echo-time (UTE) MR sequence was evaluated in comparison with CT and conventional breath-hold MR. CT scans were performed under breath-hold in end-expiratory and end-inspiratory position (CT ex, CT in). MR data was acquired with non-contrast-enhanced breath-hold Cartesian VIBE followed by a free-breathing 3D UTE Spiral VIBE. Impact of respiratory motion on pulmonary evaluation was investigated by two readers in Cartesian VIBE, followed by UTE Spiral VIBE and CT ex and the reference standard of CT in. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated, and visual image quality assessed.

RESULTS

Higher detection rate and sensitivity of pulmonary nodules in free-breathing UTE Spiral VIBE in comparison with breath-hold Cartesian VIBE were found for lesions > 10 mm (UTE Spiral VIBE/VIBE/CT ex): 93%/54%/100%; Lesions 5-10 mm: 67%/25%/ 92%; Lesions < 5 mm: 11%/11%/78%. Lobe-based analysis revealed sensitivities and specificities of 64%/96%/41% and 96%/93%/100% for UTE Spiral VIBE/VIBE/CT ex.

CONCLUSION

Free-breathing UTE Spiral VIBE indicates higher sensitivity for detection of pulmonary nodules than breath-hold Cartesian VIBE and is a promising but time-consuming approach. However, sensitivity and specificity of inspiratory CT remain superior in comparison and should be preferred for detection of pulmonary lesions.

PET/MRI assessment of lung nodules in primary abdominal malignancies: sensitivity and outcome analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate PET/MR lung nodule detection compared to PET/CT or CT, to determine growth of nodules missed by PET/MR, and to investigate the impact of missed nodules on clinical management in primary abdominal malignancies.

METHODS

This retrospective IRB-approved study included [18F]-FDG PET/MR in 126 patients. All had standard of care chest imaging (SCI) with diagnostic chest CT or PET/CT within 6 weeks of PET/MR that served as standard of reference. Two radiologists assessed lung nodules (size, location, consistency, position, and [18F]-FDG avidity) on SCI and PET/MR. A side-by-side analysis of nodules on SCI and PET/MR was performed. The nodules missed on PET/MR were assessed on follow-up SCI to ascertain their growth (≥ 2 mm); their impact on management was also investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 505 nodules (mean 4 mm, range 1-23 mm) were detected by SCI in 89/126 patients (66M:60F, mean age 60 years). PET/MR detected 61 nodules for a sensitivity of 28.1% for patient and 12.1% for nodule, with higher sensitivity for > 7 mm nodules (< 30% and > 70% respectively, p < 0.05). 75/337 (22.3%) of the nodules missed on PET/MR (follow-up mean 736 days) demonstrated growth. In patients positive for nodules at SCI and negative at PET/MR, missed nodules did not influence patients' management.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitivity of lung nodule detection on PET/MR is affected by nodule size and is lower than SCI. 22.3% of missed nodules increased on follow-up likely representing metastases. Although this did not impact clinical management in study group with primary abdominal malignancy, largely composed of extra-thoracic advanced stage cancers, with possible different implications in patients without extra-thoracic spread.

Current Applications for Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Pulmonary Disease

Purpose of Review

The main goal of the article is to familiarize the reader with commonly and uncommonly used nuclear medicine procedures that can significantly contribute to improved patient care. The article presents examples of specific modality utilization in the chest including assessment of lung ventilation and perfusion, imaging options for broad range of infectious and inflammatory processes, and selected aspects of oncologic imaging. In addition, rapidly developing new techniques utilizing molecular imaging are discussed.

Recent Findings

The article describes nuclear medicine imaging modalities including gamma camera, SPECT, PET, and hybrid imaging (SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MR) in the context of established and emerging clinical applications. Areas of potential future development in nuclear medicine are discussed with emphasis on molecular imaging and implementation of new targeted tracers used in diagnostics and therapeutics (theranostics).

Summary

Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging provide many unique and novel options for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary diseases. This article reviews current applications for nuclear medicine and molecular imaging and selected future applications for radiopharmaceuticals and targeted molecular imaging techniques.

Lung visualisation on PET/MRI: implementing a protocol with a short echo-time and low flip-angle volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence

AIM

To assess the diagnostic performance in detecting lung lesions of a short echo-time (TE) and low flip-angle (FA) volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequence included in the integrated positron-emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Thirty-seven oncological patients who underwent computed tomography (CT) and PET/MRI, including both a dedicated short TE, low FA VIBE (modified VIBE) and a standard VIBE of the lung, were enrolled. Modified VIBE images were reviewed retrospectively and independently by three raters, to detect pulmonary nodules, parenchymal consolidation, and bands. Three other groups examined standard VIBE, PET, and CT images. MRI and PET findings were compared to CT using Krippendorff's alpha using patient-based and a lesion-based analysis. Krippendorff's alpha was calculated to assess the interobserver agreement among the three raters of the modified VIBE.

RESULTS

In the patient-based analysis (positivity ≥1 lesion), the comparison of modified VIBE with CT showed an alpha of 0.54 for nodules <6 mm (versus 0.41 for standard VIBE and 0.09 for PET) and an alpha of 0.88 for nodules ≥6 mm (versus 0.74 for standard VIBE and 0.42 for PET). On a lesion-based analysis (presence/absence of each lesion), modified VIBE compared to CT showed an alpha of0.58 for nodules <6 mm (versus 0.44 for standard VIBE and 0.09 for PET) and an alpha of 0.90 for nodules ≥6 mm (versus 0.79 for standard VIBE and 0.50 for PET). The alpha value for the interobserver agreement was 0.90 for nodules <6 mm, 0.91 for nodules ≥6 mm, 1.00 for consolidations, and 0.95 for bands in the patient-based analysis and 0.89, 0.93, 1.00, and 0.95 in the lesion-based analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified VIBE proved to be reproducible, showed better accuracy than standard VIBE and PET, and very good concordance with CT in assessing lung nodules ≥6 mm, whereas the agreement was less satisfactory for smaller nodules.

The Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Gynecological Malignancies

Accurate oncological staging for early detection is of utmost importance in patient care and increasing the overall patient survival outcome. Hybrid imaging in the form of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography has been successfully implemented in oncological imaging and, where available, has been used consistently in patients with gynecologic malignancies. The implementation of PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables high-quality assessment of gynecological malignancies by combining the diagnostic advantages of metabolic information of PET along with the high-resolution anatomical and functional information from the MRI to provide precise information about staging, recurrence, and metastases. This article will review the various applications of PET/MRI in gynecological cancer.

Towards fast whole-body PET/MR: Investigation of PET image quality versus reduced PET acquisition times

Purpose

The trend towards faster acquisition protocols in whole-body positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) arises the question of whether short PET data acquisition protocols in a whole-body multi-station context allow for reduced PET acquisition times while providing adequate PET image quality and accurate quantification parameters. The study goal is to investigate how reducing PET acquisition times affects PET image quality and quantification in whole-body PET/MR in patients with oncologic findings.

Methods

Fifty-one patients with different oncologic findings underwent a clinical whole-body 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MR examination. PET data was reconstructed with 4, 3, 2, and 1 min/bed time intervals for each patient to simulate the effect of reduced PET acquisition times. The 4-minute PET reconstructions served as reference standard. All whole-body PET data sets were analyzed regarding image quality, lesion detectability, PET quantification and standardized uptake values.

Results

A total of 91 lesions were detected in the 4-minute PET reconstructions. The same number of congruent lesions was also noticed in the 3 and 2 minutes-per-bed (mpb) reconstructed images. A total of 2 lesions in 2 patients was not detected in the 1 minute PET data reconstructions due to poor image quality. Image noise in the blood pool increased from 22.2% (4 mpb) to 42.1% (1 mpb). Signal-to-noise ratio declined with shorter timeframes from 13.1 (4 mpb) to 9.3 (1 mpb). SUV_mean and SUV_max showed no significant changes between 4 and 1 mpb reconstructed timeframes.

Conclusions

Reconstruction of PET data with different time intervals has shown that 2 minutes acquisition time per bed position instead of 4 minutes is sufficient to provide accurate lesion detection and adequate image quality in a clinical setting, despite the trends to lower image quality with shorter PET acquisition times. This provides latitude for potential reduction of PET acquisition times in fast PET/MR whole-body examinations.

SEOM-SERAM-SEMNIM guidelines on the use of functional and molecular imaging techniques in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Imaging in oncology is an essential tool for patient management but its potential is being profoundly underutilized. Each of the techniques used in the diagnostic process also conveys functional information that can be relevant in treatment decision making. New imaging algorithms and techniques enhance our knowledge about the phenotype of the tumor and its potential response to different therapies. Functional imaging can be defined as the one that provides information beyond the purely morphological data, and include all the techniques that make it possible to measure specific physiological functions of the tumor, whereas molecular imaging would include techniques that allow us to measure metabolic changes. Functional and molecular techniques included in this document are based on multi-detector computed tomography (CT), 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and hybrid equipments, integrating PET with CT (PET/CT) or MRI (PET-MRI). Lung cancer is one of the most frequent and deadly tumors although survival is increasing thanks to advances in diagnostic methods and new treatments. This increased survival poises challenges in terms of proper follow-up and definitions of response and progression, as exemplified by immune therapy-related pseudoprogression. In this consensus document, the use of functional and molecular imaging techniques will be addressed to exploit their current potential and explore future applications in the diagnosis, evaluation of response and detection of recurrence of advanced NSCLC.

SEOM-SERAM-SEMNIM guidelines on the use of functional and molecular imaging techniques in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Imaging in oncology is an essential tool for patient management but its potential is being profoundly underutilized. Each of the techniques used in the diagnostic process also conveys functional information that can be relevant in treatment decision-making. New imaging algorithms and techniques enhance our knowledge about the phenotype of the tumor and its potential response to different therapies. Functional imaging can be defined as the one that provides information beyond the purely morphological data, and include all the techniques that make it possible to measure specific physiological functions of the tumor, whereas molecular imaging would include techniques that allow us to measure metabolic changes. Functional and molecular techniques included in this document are based on multi-detector computed tomography (CT), 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and hybrid equipments, integrating PET with CT (PET/CT) or MRI (PET-MRI). Lung cancer is one of the most frequent and deadly tumors although survival is increasing thanks to advances in diagnostic methods and new treatments. This increased survival poises challenges in terms of proper follow-up and definitions of response and progression, as exemplified by immune therapy-related pseudoprogression. In this consensus document, the use of functional and molecular imaging techniques will be addressed to exploit their current potential and explore future applications in the diagnosis, evaluation of response and detection of recurrence of advanced NSCLC.