Atypical Appearance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Its Mimickers: How to Solve Challenging Cases Using Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging

ACG Clinical Guideline: Focal Liver Lesions

Focal liver lesions (FLLs) have become an increasingly common finding on abdominal imaging, especially asymptomatic and incidental liver lesions. Gastroenterologists and hepatologists often see these patients in consultation and make recommendations for management of multiple types of liver lesions, including hepatocellular adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, hemangioma, and hepatic cystic lesions including polycystic liver disease. Malignancy is important to consider in the differential diagnosis of FLLs, and healthcare providers must be familiar with the diagnosis and management of FLLs. This American College of Gastroenterology practice guideline uses the best evidence available to make diagnosis and management recommendations for the most common FLLs.

Imaged periductal infiltration: Diagnostic and prognostic role in intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma

Purpose

This study examines periductal infiltration in intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC), focusing on its importance for differentiating hepatic tumors and its influence on post-surgical survival in IMCC patients.

Methods

Eighty-three consecutive patients with IMCC (n = 43) and liver cancer whose preoperative images showed intrahepatic bile duct dilatation adjacent to the tumor for differential diagnosis from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [n = 21], metastatic liver cancer (MLC) [n = 16] and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) [n = 3] were enrolled. CT and MRI findings of simple bile duct compression, imaged periductal infiltration, and imaged intrabiliary growth adjacent to the main tumor were reviewed. Clinicopathological and imaging features were compared in each group. The sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio were calculated for each imaging finding of IMCC versus the other tumor groups. Overall survival was compared between cases of IMCC with and without imaged periductal infiltration.

Results

Simple bile duct compression and imaged intrabiliary growth were more frequently observed in HCC than in the others (p < 0.0001 and 0.040, respectively). Imaged periductal infiltration was observed more often in histopathologically confirmed large-duct type IMCC than in the small-duct type IMCC (p = 0.034). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that only imaged periductal infiltration (odds ratio, 50.67) was independently correlated with IMCC. Patients with IMCC who had imaged periductal infiltration experienced a poorer prognosis than those without imaged periductal infiltration (p = 0.0034).

Conclusion

Imaged periductal infiltration may serve as a significant marker for differentiating IMCC from other liver cancers. It may also have the potential to predict post-surgical outcomes in patients with IMCC.

A Modified Targetoid Feature Emphasizing Thin-Rim APHE to Improve the Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS for Malignant Hepatic Tumors

Objective

To identify imaging features that help distinguish between HCCs and non-HCC malignancies assigned to LI-RADS M (LR-M) and evaluate the diagnostic performance of a LI-RADS with targetoid criteria using thin-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE).

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included 381 patients (387 observations) at high-risk for HCC who underwent enhanced-MRI before surgery. Three radiologists reviewed images for LI-RADS categorization of hepatic observations. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to determine reliable features to differentiate between HCC and non-HCC malignancies among the LR-M lesions. The thin-rim (<30%) APHE was defined based on the thickest thickness of rim APHE compared with the tumor radius, and a modified LI-RADS emphasizing thin-rim APHE as a specific feature of LR-M was established. We compared the diagnostic performance of modified LR-M and LI-RADS 5 (LR-5) with the conventional one.

Results

Thin-rim APHE and targetoid diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were found as independent predictive factors of non-HCC malignancies, while enhancing capsule, thick-rim APHE and peripheral washout were noted as independent variables significantly associated with HCC of LR-M (P<0.05). The noticeable diagnostic performance of thin-rim APHE in distinguishing non-HCC malignancies from HCCs using the ROC curve. Emphasizing thin-rim APHE on targetoid features, the modified LR-M revealed significantly superior specificity and accuracy (89.4% vs 81.1%, P=0.004; and 87.9% vs 82.2%, P=0.027, respectively) while maintaining high sensitivity (82.2% vs 86.0%; P=0.529) compared with the LR-M. Meanwhile, the modified LR-5 achieved greater sensitivity and accuracy (88.6% vs 79.7%, P=0.004; and 85.8% vs 80.1%, P=0.036, respectively) for diagnosing HCC, without compromising specificity (78.3% vs.81.1%; P=0.608) compared with the LR-5.

Conclusion

Thin-rim APHE may be the specific imaging feature for differentiating non-HCC malignancies from HCCs within LR-M. The modified targetoid criteria emphasizing thin-rim APHE can improve the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS for hepatic malignancies.

Based on Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl DTPA-Enhanced MRI: Diagnostic Performance of the Category-Modified LR-5 Criteria in Patients At Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Introduction: We aimed to modify the LR-5 strategy to improve the diagnostic sensitivity for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients while maintaining specificity. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 412 patients with 445 liver observations who underwent preoperative gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA (GD-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI followed by surgical procedures or biopsies. All observations were classified according to LI-RADS v2018, and the classifications were adjusted by modifying major features (MF)(substituting threshold growth with a more HCC-specific ancillary features (AF): presence of blood products within the mass, arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) was interpreted with hypointensity on precontrast imaging- isointensity in arterial phase (AP) and extending washout to transitional phase (TP)(2 min)). The specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were assessed to compare LR-5 (definitely HCC) diagnostic efficacy between LI-RADS version 2018 and modified LI-RADS. Results: Apart from nonenhancing "capsule", the interreader agreement of MFs and HCC-specific AFs between the two readers reached substantial or excellent ranges (κ values ranging from 0.631 to 0.911). According to LI-5 v2018, the specificity, sensitivity and PPV of HCC were 90.74%, 82.35%, and 98.17%, respectively. Based on a more HCC-specific AF, signal intensity in AP and TP (2 min), the sensitivity of the three modified strategies were 86.19%, 93.09%, 96.67% (P < .05)), while maintaining high specificity and PPV rates at 88.89% and 98.25% (P > .05) Conclusion: Further investigation into the efficacy of threshold growth as a MF is warranted. By utilizing GD-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, enhancing the sensitivity of the modified LR-5 category may be achieved without compromising specificity and PPV in diagnosing HCC among high-risk patients.

The Clinical Value of Multimodal Ultrasound for the Differential Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Other Liver Tumors in Relation to Histopathology

Recent advances in the field of ultrasonography offer promising tools for the evaluation of liver tumors. We aim to assess the value of multimodal ultrasound in differentiating hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) from other liver lesions. We prospectively included 66 patients with 72 liver tumors. The histological analysis was the reference standard for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions, and partially for benign tumors. All liver lesions were assessed by multiparametric ultrasound: standard ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), the point shear wave elastography (pSWE) using shear wave measurement (SWM) method and real-time tissue elastography (RTE). To diagnose HCCs, CEUS achieved a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value (PPV) of 69.05%, 92.86%, 78.57% and 93.55%, respectively. The mean shear-wave velocity (Vs) value in HCCs was 1.59 ± 0.29 m/s, which was lower than non-HCC malignancies (p < 0.05). Using a cut-off value of 1.58 m/s, SWM achieved a sensitivity of 54.76%, and 82.35% specificity, for differentiating HCCs from other malignant lesions. The combination of SWM and CEUS showed higher sensitivity (79.55%) compared with each technique alone, while maintaining a high specificity (89.29%). In RTE, most HCCs (61.53%) had a mosaic pattern with dominant blue areas corresponding to type "c" elasticity. Elasticity type "c" was 70.59% predictive for HCCs. In conclusion, combining B-mode ultrasound, CEUS, pSWE and RTE can provide complementary diagnostic information and potentially decrease the requirements for other imaging modalities.

Differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from atypical hepatocellular carcinoma using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging combined with serum markers in at-risk patients with hepatitis B virus

Background

The precise differentiation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) from atypical hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is vital for treatment strategy and prognostic prediction. In clinical practice, nearly 40% of HCCs demonstrate atypical manifestations, particularly HCCs with rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), which is challenging to differentiate from mass-forming ICC. Thus, we aimed to develop a diagnostic regimen of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with serum tumor markers in differentiating mass-forming ICC from atypical HCC in at-risk patients with the hepatitis B virus (HBV).

Methods

This study enrolled 129 patients with pathologically proven mass-forming ICCs (n=53) and atypical HCCs (n=76) who had undergone preoperative Gd-EOB-DTPA contrast-enhanced MRI. The clinical data and imaging findings were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors for differentiating mass-forming ICCs from atypical HCCs. The diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and DeLong test was used to compare the areas under curves of all independent predictors.

Results

Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed normal alpha fetoprotein (AFP), elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level, elevated carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) level, central hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), central hypointensity on T2WI, and targetoid sign on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) and targetoid restriction on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were more likely to be significant predictors favoring mass-forming ICCs (all P values <0.05). In contrast, multifocal hyperintensity on T2WI and capsule sign were more frequently seen in patients with atypical HCC (all P values <0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed normal AFP, elevated CA19-9 level, targetoid sign on HBP, and targetoid restriction on DWI (all P=0.001) were independent predictors for differentiating mass-forming ICCs from atypical HCCs; DeLong test showed that the area under curve (AUC) increased to 0.949 when the above predictors were combined (all P values <0.05), and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the combined independent predictors were 88.7%, 93.4%, and 91.5%, respectively.

Conclusions

A diagnostic regimen integrating tumor markers (AFP, CA19-9) and imaging biomarkers (targetoid restriction on DWI and/or targetoid sign on HBP) using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI could help to differentiate mass-forming ICCs from atypical HCCs and achieve high diagnostic performance of mass-forming ICCs in at-risk patients with the HBV.

Keywords

Mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (mass-forming ICC); atypical hepatocellular carcinoma (atypical HCC); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA); hepatobiliary phase (HBP).

Multimodality imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are the two most common primary malignant tumors of the liver. The similarities and variations in imaging characteristics that may aid in distinguishing between these two primary tumors will be discussed and outlined in this review. Knowledge of imaging techniques that are currently available would assist in the differentiation between these primary malignancies.

Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A State-of-the-Art Review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains not only a cause of a considerable part of oncologic mortality, but also a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for healthcare systems worldwide. Early detection of the disease and consequential adequate therapy are imperative to increase patients' quality of life and survival. Imaging plays, therefore, a crucial role in the surveillance of patients at risk, the detection and diagnosis of HCC nodules, as well as in the follow-up post-treatment. The unique imaging characteristics of HCC lesions, deriving mainly from the assessment of their vascularity on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) or contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), allow for a more accurate, noninvasive diagnosis and staging. The role of imaging in the management of HCC has further expanded beyond the plain confirmation of a suspected diagnosis due to the introduction of ultrasound and hepatobiliary MRI contrast agents, which allow for the detection of hepatocarcinogenesis even at an early stage. Moreover, the recent technological advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology contribute an important tool for the diagnostic prediction, prognosis and evaluation of treatment response in the clinical course of the disease. This review presents current imaging modalities and their central role in the management of patients at risk and with HCC.

Clinical care in hepatocellular carcinoma: A mixed methods assessment of experiences and challenges of oncology professionals

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare providers (HCPs) may face numerous dilemmas in optimally screening, diagnosing, and treating patients with, and/or at risk for, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to achieve a greater understanding of the challenges in HCC care which in turn could delineate HCP educational opportunities within this oncologic sub-specialty.

METHODS

A mixed-methods approach was used to identify practice gaps and clinical barriers experienced by US-based medical oncologists, hepatologists, oncology physician assistants, oncology nurse practitioners, and interventional radiologists involved in HCC care. The qualitative (semi-structured interview) and quantitative (survey) data collection approaches were deployed sequentially with findings subsequently triangulated.

RESULTS

A total of 214 HCPs participated in this study. Analysis revealed challenges related to screening and diagnosing HCC, specifically in applying appropriate screening guidelines, and the optimal use and decisions related to diagnostic imaging and biopsy. Issues related to treatment selection included the application of existing HCC guidelines in treatment decision-making, weighing risk/benefit ratios of various antineoplastics regimens (i.e., tyrosine kinase inhibitors-TKIs, immunotherapy agents, chemotherapy), sequencing therapies, potential toxicity management, and optimally educating patients about their HCC.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the educational needs of those involved in HCC care and provide a starting point for clinicians to both reflect on their practice and identify opportunities to enhance communication within the HCC team and between provider and patient. There is an opportunity to optimize continuing professional development interventions that address the identified gaps in clinical practice specifically related to teamwork and interdisciplinary communication.

Preoperative differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma with peripheral rim-like enhancement from intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma on contrast-enhanced MRI

Purpose

The present study aimed to determine the reliable imaging features to distinguish atypical hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with peripheral rim-like enhancement from intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

A total of 168 patients (130 male, 57.10 ± 10.53 years) pathological confirmed HCC or IMCC who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI between July 2019 and February 2022 were retrospectively included. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine independent differential factors for distinguishing HCC from IMCC, and the model was established. Bootstrap resampling 1000 times was used to verify the model, which was visualized by nomograms. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated based on discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.

Results

Radiological capsule (OR 0.024, 95% CI: 0.006, 0.095, P<0.001), heterogeneous signal intensity (SI) on T1WI (OR 0.009, 95%CI: 0.001,0.056, P<0.001) were independent differential factors for predicting HCC over IMCC. A lobulated contour (OR 11.732, 95%CI: 2.928,47.007, P = 0.001), target sign on DP (OR 14.269, 95%CI: 2.849,82.106, P = 0.007), bile duct dilatation (OR 12.856, 95%CI: 2.013, P = 0.001) were independent differential factors for predicting IMCCs over HCCs. The independent differential factors constituted a model to distinguish atypical HCCs and IMCCs. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, and specificity values of the model were 0.964(0.940,0.987), 0.88, and 0.906, indicating that the model had an excellent differential diagnostic performance. The decision curve analysis (DCA) curve showed that the model obtained a better net clinical benefit.

Conclusion

The present study identified reliable imaging features for distinguishing atypical HCCs with peripheral rim-like enhancement from IMCCs on contrast-enhanced MRI. Our findings may help radiologists provide clinicians with more accurate preoperative imaging diagnoses to select appropriate treatment options.

The clinicopathological and prognostic factors of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 10-year tertiary center experience in Egypt

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major health problem despite the emergence of several preventive and therapeutic modalities. HCC has heterogeneous and wide morpho-molecular patterns, resulting in unique clinical and prognostic criteria. Therefore, we aimed to study the clinical and pathological criteria of HCC to update the morpho-molecular classifications and provide a guide to the diagnosis of this disease.

METHODS

Five hundred thirty pathologically analyzed HCC cases were included in this study. The clinical and survival data of these cases were collected.

RESULTS

Hepatitis C virus is still the dominant cause of HCC in Egypt. Post-direct-acting antiviral agent HCC showed an aggressive course compared to interferon-related HCC. Old age, male gender, elevated alpha-fetoprotein level, tumor size, and background liver were important prognostic parameters. Special HCC variants have characteristic clinical, laboratory, radiological, prognostic, and survival data. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes rather than neutrophil-rich HCC have an excellent prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

HCC is a heterogenous tumor with diverse clinical, pathological, and prognostic parameters. Incorporating the clinicopathological profile per specific subtype is essential in the treatment decision of patients with HCC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This was a retrospective study that included 530 HCC cases eligible for analysis. The cases were obtained from the archives of the Pathology Department, during the period between January 2010 and December 2019. Clinical and survival data were collected from the patients' medical records after approval by the institutional review board (IRB No. 246/2021) of Liver National Institute, Menoufia University. The research followed the guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05047146).

Giant Hepatic Regenerative Nodule in a Patient With Hepatitis B Virus-related Cirrhosis

Hepatic regenerative nodules are reactive hepatocellular proliferations that develop in response to liver injury. Giant hepatic regenerative nodules of 10 cm or more are extremely rare and have only been reported in patients with biliary atresia or Alagille syndrome. A 50-year-old man presented with a pathologically confirmed giant 11.3×9.4×11.2 cm hepatic regenerative nodule and hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis. Imaging of intrahepatic nodule included mild hyperenhancement in the portal phase of contrast-enhanced CT and the hepatobiliary phase in the gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI scan, as well as the portal vein crossing through sign in the setting of liver cirrhosis. This case highlights the imaging characteristics of giant hepatic regenerative nodules in hepatitis cirrhosis.

Current Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Simple Summary

The role of imaging in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has significantly evolved and expanded beyond the plain radiological confirmation of the tumor based on the typical appearance in a multiphase contrast-enhanced CT or MRI examination. The introduction of hepatobiliary contrast agents has enabled the diagnosis of hepatocarcinogenesis at earlier stages, while the application of ultrasound contrast agents has drastically upgraded the role of ultrasound in the diagnostic algorithms. Newer quantitative techniques assessing blood perfusion on CT and MRI not only allow earlier diagnosis and confident differentiation from other lesions, but they also provide biomarkers for the evaluation of treatment response. As distinct HCC subtypes are identified, their correlation with specific imaging features holds great promise for estimating tumor aggressiveness and prognosis. This review presents the current role of imaging and underlines its critical role in the successful management of patients with HCC.

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer related death worldwide. Radiology has traditionally played a central role in HCC management, ranging from screening of high-risk patients to non-invasive diagnosis, as well as the evaluation of treatment response and post-treatment follow-up. From liver ultrasonography with or without contrast to dynamic multiple phased CT and dynamic MRI with diffusion protocols, great progress has been achieved in the last decade. Throughout the last few years, pathological, biological, genetic, and immune-chemical analyses have revealed several tumoral subtypes with diverse biological behavior, highlighting the need for the re-evaluation of established radiological methods. Considering these changes, novel methods that provide functional and quantitative parameters in addition to morphological information are increasingly incorporated into modern diagnostic protocols for HCC. In this way, differential diagnosis became even more challenging throughout the last few years. Use of liver specific contrast agents, as well as CT/MRI perfusion techniques, seem to not only allow earlier detection and more accurate characterization of HCC lesions, but also make it possible to predict response to treatment and survival. Nevertheless, several limitations and technical considerations still exist. This review will describe and discuss all these imaging modalities and their advances in the imaging of HCC lesions in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic livers. Sensitivity and specificity rates, method limitations, and technical considerations will be discussed.

MRI features of histologic subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histologic, genetic, and molecular biologic classification

HCC is a heterogeneous group of tumors in terms of histology, genetic aberration, and protein expression. Advancements in imaging techniques have allowed imaging diagnosis to become a critical part of managing HCC in the clinical setting, even without pathologic diagnosis. With the identification of many HCC subtypes, there is increasing correlative evidence between imaging phenotypes and histologic, molecular, and genetic characteristics of various HCC subtypes. In this review, current knowledge of histologic heterogeneity of HCC correlated to features on gadolinium-enhanced dynamic liver MRI will be discussed. In addition, HCC subtype classification according to transcriptomic profiles will be outlined with descriptions of histologic, genetic, and molecular characteristics of some relatively well-established morphologic subtypes, namely the low proliferation class (steatohepatitic HCC and CTNNB1-mutated HCC) and the high proliferation class (macrotrabecular-massive HCC (MTM-HCC), scirrhous HCC, and CK19-positive HCC). Characteristics of sarcomatoid HCC and fibrolamellar HCC will also be discussed. Further research on radiological characteristics of HCC subtypes may ultimately enable non-invasive diagnosis and serve as a biomarker in predicting prognosis, molecular characteristics, and therapeutic response. In the era of precision medicine, a multidisciplinary effort to develop an integrated radiologic and clinical diagnostic system of various HCC subtypes is necessary. KEY POINTS: • HCC is a heterogeneous group of tumors in terms of histology, genetic aberration, and protein expression, which can be divided into many subtypes according to transcriptome profiles. • There is increasing evidence of a correlation between imaging phenotypes and histologic, genetic, and molecular biologic characteristics of various HCC subtypes. • Imaging characteristics may ultimately enable non-invasive diagnosis and subtype characterization, serving as a biomarker for predicting prognosis, molecular characteristics, and therapeutic response.

Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 for Primary Liver Cancer in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis on Enhanced MRI

Purpose

The study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from primary liver cancer in patients with liver cirrhosis based on the updated 2019 WHO classification.

Materials and Methods

From 2016 to 2021, 300 patients with surgically confirmed primary liver cancer (PLC) and liver cirrhosis based on the updated 2019 WHO classification were eligible for this retrospective study (100 cases in each of three groups including HCC, ICC, and cHCC-CCA). Two radiologists were blinded to the final diagnosis and independently assigned an LI-RADS category to each liver nodule. The diagnostic performances of the LR-5 category (definitely HCC), and the LR-M category (probably or definitely malignant, but not specific for HCC) were calculated in overall and small observations (<20 mm). Comparisons between groups of categorical variables were performed by one-way analysis of variance and the Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test.

Results

The mean age of 300 patients (226 men and 74 women) was 57.40 ± 11.05 years. The sensitivity and specificity of the LR-5 category for differentiating HCCs from other primary liver cancers were 81% (81 of 100) and 82% (164 of 200), respectively. The LR-M category had a sensitivity of 63% (126 of 200) for diagnosing non-HCCs (ICCs and cHCC-CCAs), with a specificity of 90% (90 of 100). The LR-5 category had a sensitivity of 82.5% (33 of 40) for diagnosing HCCs in small observations (<20 mm) with a specificity of 76.6% (59 of 77). On the contrary, LR-M demonstrated slightly higher specificity (93.8%) and sensitivity (73.8%) for diagnosing non-HCCs with tumor size <20 mm.

Conclusion

The LR-5 category as well as the LR-M category of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 can effectively distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma from other primary hepatic malignancies in patients with liver cirrhosis, especially for small observations (<20 mm).

Morphomolecular Classification Update on Hepatocellular Adenoma, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs), hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs) are a highly heterogeneous group of liver tumors with diverse pathomolecular features and prognoses. High-throughput gene sequencing techniques have allowed discovery of distinct genetic and molecular underpinnings of these tumors and identified distinct subtypes that demonstrate varied clinicobiologic behaviors, imaging findings, and complications. The combination of histopathologic findings and molecular profiling form the basis for the morphomolecular classification of liver tumors. Distinct HCA subtypes with characteristic imaging findings and complications include HNF1A-inactivated, inflammatory, β-catenin-activated, β-catenin-activated inflammatory, and sonic hedgehog HCAs. HCCs can be grouped into proliferative and nonproliferative subtypes. Proliferative HCCs include macrotrabecular-massive, TP53-mutated, scirrhous, clear cell, fibrolamellar, and sarcomatoid HCCs and combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma. Steatohepatitic and β-catenin-mutated HCCs constitute the nonproliferative subtypes. iCCAs are classified as small-duct and large-duct types on the basis of the level of bile duct involvement, with significant differences in pathogenesis, molecular signatures, imaging findings, and biologic behaviors. Cross-sectional imaging modalities, including multiphase CT and multiparametric MRI, play an essential role in diagnosis, staging, treatment response assessment, and surveillance. Select imaging phenotypes can be correlated with genetic abnormalities, and identification of surrogate imaging markers may help avoid genetic testing. Improved understanding of morphomolecular features of liver tumors has opened new areas of research in the targeted therapeutics and management guidelines. The purpose of this article is to review imaging findings of select morphomolecular subtypes of HCAs, HCCs, and iCCAs and discuss therapeutic and prognostic implications. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Atypical Manifestation of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Hepatic Malignancy Mimicking Lesions

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed noninvasively on multiphasic CT and MRI based on its distinctive imaging findings. These features include arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout on portal or delayed phase images. However, radiologists face significant diagnostic challenges because some HCCs exhibit atypical imaging characteristics. In addition to many HCC-mimicking lesions, such as arterioportal shunts, combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and hemangioma present a challenge for radiologists in actual clinical practice. The ability to distinguish HCCs from mimickers on initial imaging examinations is crucial for appropriate management and treatment decisions. Therefore, this pictorial review presents the imaging findings of atypical HCCs and HCCs mimicking malignant and benign lesions and discusses important clues that may help narrow down the differential diagnosis.

Subtype Classification of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Using Liver MR Imaging Features and Its Prognostic Value

INTRODUCTION

Small-duct (SD) and large-duct (LD) subtypes of cholangiocarcinoma have been investigated for their prognostic factors. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in differentiating SD and LD types of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and its prognostic value in predicting survival outcomes.

METHODS

One hundred forty patients with surgically confirmed iCCAs (93 SD type and 47 LD type) who had available preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR images were retrospectively included. MRI features suggestive of the LD type over the SD type were analyzed using multivariate logistic analyses. Postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for 107 patients with available survival data were compared according to MRI features.

RESULTS

MRI features suggestive of the LD type included infiltrative contour (odds ratio [OR] 14.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5-81.7, p = 0.003), diffuse biliary dilatation (OR 9.7, 95% CI: 1.2-76.9, p = 0.032), no arterial phase hyperenhancement (OR 17.8, 95% CI: 2.7-118.6, p = 0.003), and vascular invasion (OR 4.5, 95% CI: 1.3-15.4, p = 0.018). When two or more features were combined, sensitivity was 59.6% (28/47), and specificity was 95.7% (89/93) in discriminating the LD type. RFS/OS was significantly shorter in patients with two or more MRI features, compared to those with none or one (310 days vs. 529 days, p = 0.011/964 days vs. 2,023 days, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative liver MRI may help predict the pathological subtype of iCCAs as either the SD type or LD type, allowing preoperative identification of patients with poorer survival outcomes.

Imaging mimickers of cholangiocarcinoma: a pictorial review

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primary hepatobiliary malignancy and presents as three separate morphological subtypes; namely mass-forming, periductal-infiltrating, and intraductal-growing patterns. Each of these subtypes have distinct imaging characteristics, as well as a variety of benign and malignant mimics, making accurate diagnosis of CCA on imaging challenging. Whilst histopathological examination is required to arrive at a definitive diagnosis, it is still important for radiologists to be cognizant of these entities and provide reasonable differential diagnoses, as these potentially have a large impact on patient management. This pictorial essay illustrates the three morphological subtypes of CCA, as well as some important mimics for each subtype, that are encountered in clinical practice.

Variant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Subtypes According to the 2019 WHO Classification: An Imaging-Focused Review

The 2019 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumors estimates that up to 35% of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) can be classified as one of eight subtypes defined by molecular characteristics: steatohepatitic, clear cell, macrotrabecular massive, scirrhous, chromophobe, fibrolamellar, neutrophil-rich, and lymphocyte-rich HCC. Due to their distinct cellular and architectural characteristics, these subtypes may not display the classic MRI features of HCC of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) and washout appearance, creating challenges in noninvasively diagnosing such lesions as HCC. Moreover, certain subtypes with atypical imaging features have a worse prognosis than other HCCs. A range of distinguishing imaging features may help raise suspicion that a liver lesion represents one of these HCC subtypes. In this review, we describe the MRI features that have been reported in association with various HCC subtypes according to the 2019 WHO classification, with attention to current understanding of these subtypes' pathologic and molecular bases and relevance to clinical practice. Imaging findings that differentiate the subtypes from benign liver lesions and non-HCC malignancies are highlighted. Familiarity with these subtypes and their imaging features may allow the radiologist to suggest their presence, though histologic analysis remains needed to establish the diagnosis.

Extracellular vesicles as a new hope for diagnosis and therapeutic intervention for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer with a high mortality rate. Early diagnosis and treatment before tumor progression into an advanced stage is ideal. The current diagnosis of HCC is mainly based on imaging modalities such as ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. These methods have some limitations including diagnosis in the case of very small tumors with atypical imaging patterns. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanosized vesicles which have been shown to act as an important vector for cell-to-cell communication. In the past decade, EVs have been investigated with regard to their roles in HCC formation. Since these EVs contain biomolecular cargo such as nucleic acid, lipids, and proteins, it has been proposed that they could be a potential source of tumor biomarkers and a vector for therapeutic cargo. In this review, reports on the roles of HCC-derived EVs in tumorigenesis, and clinical investigations using circulating EVs as a biomarker for HCC and their potential diagnostic roles have been comprehensively summarized and discussed. In addition, findings from in vitro and in vivo reports investigating the potential roles of EVs as therapeutic interventions are also presented. These findings regarding the potential benefits of EVs will encourage further investigations and may allow us to devise novel strategies using EVs in the early diagnosis as well as for treatment of HCC in the future.

HCC: role of pre- and post-treatment tumor biology in driving adverse outcomes and rare responses to therapy

Liver cancer is the fastest-growing cause of cancer deaths in the United States and is a complex disease. The response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to treatment can be variable. Predicting response to determine the most effective therapy is an active area of research. Our understanding of underlying factors which drive response to therapy is continually increasing. As more therapies for the treatment of this disease evolve, it is crucial to identify and match the ideal therapy for a particular tumor and patient. The potential predicative imaging features of tumor behavior, while of research interest, have not been validated for clinical use and do not currently inform treatment planning. If further validated though, prognostic features may be used in the future to personalize treatment plans according to individual patients and tumors. Unexpected post-treatment responses such as potential tumor biology changes and abscopal effect which are important to be aware of. This review is intended for radiologists who routinely interpret post treatment HCC imaging and is designed to increase their cognizance about how HCC tumor biology drives response to therapy and explore rare responses to therapy.

Differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in high-risk patients matched to MR field strength: diagnostic performance of LI-RADS version 2018

PURPOSE

To eliminate the effects of field strength in determining the diagnostic performance of the LI-RADS version 2018 (LI-RADS v2018) in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC primary liver malignancy in high-risk patients.

METHODS

Patients who were pathologically confirmed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) or combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with HCC were matched to the iCCA or cHCC-CCA patients on age, tumor size, MR scanner, and number of tumors. Two readers independently evaluated the lesions according to LI-RADS v2018. Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS v2018 in differentiating HCC from non-HCC primary liver malignancy were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients with 204 lesions (102 HCCs, 78 iCCAs, and 24 cHCC-CCAs) were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 or LR-TIV (definitely due to HCC) in diagnosing HCC were 68.63% and 85.29%, respectively. LR-M or LR-TIV (may be due to non-HCC malignancy) had a sensitivity of 72.55% and a specificity of 86.27% in diagnosing non-HCC malignancy. The sensitivity of LR-M or LR-TIV (may be due to non-HCC malignancy) for iCCA and cHCC-CCA was 82.05% and 41.67%, respectively. Nearly half (11/24, 45.83%) of cHCC-CCAs were categorized as LR-5. Three tesla MR showed higher sensitivity than 1.5 T in diagnosing HCC (80.00% vs 57.69%, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

When the effect of field strength was eliminated, LI-RADS v2018 demonstrated high specificity but suboptimal sensitivity in distinguishing HCC from non-HCC primary liver carcinomas. Most iCCAs were categorized as LR-M or LR-TIV (may be due to non-HCC malignancy). However, nearly half of cHCC-CCAs were assigned as LR-5.

Diagnosis of LI-RADS M lesions on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI: identifying cholangiocarcinoma-containing tumor with serum markers and imaging features

OBJECTIVES

The LI-RADS M (LR-M) category describes hepatic lesions probably or definitely malignant, but not specific for hepatocellular carcinoma in at-risk patients. Differentiation among LR-M entities, particularly detecting cholangiocarcinoma-containing tumors (M-CCs), is essential for treatment and prognosis. Thus, we aimed to develop diagnostic models on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI comprising serum tumor markers and LI-RADS imaging features for M-CC.

METHODS

Consecutive at-risk patients with LR-M lesions exclusively (no co-existing LR-4 and/or LR-5 lesions) were retrieved retrospectively from a prospectively collected database spanning 3 years. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (c-HCC-CCA) were classified together as M-CC. LI-RADS features determined by three independent radiologists and clinically relevant serum tumor markers were used to generate M-CC diagnostic models through logistic regression analysis against histology. Per-patient performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were included, 42.2% (19/45) with hepatocellular carcinoma, 33.3% (15/45) with ICC, 13.3% (6/45) with c-HCC-CCA, and 11.1% (5/45) with other hepatic lesions. Carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 > 38 U/mL, α-fetoprotein (AFP) > 4.8 ng/mL, and absence of the LI-RADS feature "blood products in mass" were significant predictors of M-CC. Combining three predictors demonstrated AUC of 0.862, sensitivity of 76%, and specificity of 88%. The risk of M-CC with all three criteria fulfilled was 98% (AUC, 0.690; sensitivity, 38%; specificity, 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

In at-risk patients with LR-M lesions, integrating CA19-9, AFP, and the LI-RADS feature "blood products in mass" achieved high diagnostic performance for M-CC. When all three criteria were fulfilled, the specificity for M-CC was 100%.

KEY POINTS

• In at-risk patients who had LR-M lesions exclusively (no concomitant LR-4/5 lesions), a model with carbohydrate antigen > 38 U/mL, α-fetoprotein > 4.8 ng/mL, and absence of the LI-RADS feature "blood products in mass" achieved high accuracy for diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma-containing tumors. • In patients of whom all three criteria were fulfilled, the specificity for M-CC was 100%, which might reduce or eliminate the need for biopsy confirmation.

Comparison of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound and gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid MRI for the histological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

This study aimed to compare the value of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SCEUS) with gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) for histological grading diagnosis, especially for early hepatocellular carcinoma (eHCC).

Methods

A total of 163 histopathologically confirmed HCC lesions were retrospectively collected, including 71 eHCCs (27 hypervascular, 44 non-hypervascular) and 92 advanced HCCs (adHCC) (73 hypervascular, 19 non-hypervascular). We performed SCEUS to evaluate the lesions' vascularity during the portal phase (PP) and the echogenicity during the post-vascular phase (PVP). EOB-MRI was used to determine the signal intensity between lesions and the surrounding liver parenchyma on unenhanced T1-weighted images (pre-contrast ratio) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) (post-contrast ratio).

Results

For the PP and PVP of SCEUS (for all lesions), the pre-and post-contrast ratios of EOB-MRI (for all hypervascular lesions) showed statistical differences in the diagnosis of some (but not all) histological grades. For the diagnosis of eHCC, isoechogenicity in the PVP achieved the best diagnostic efficacy [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) =0.892]. Whether used independently or in a combination of any form, all indicators failed to produce a higher diagnostic efficacy than PVP. Post- (≥0.610) and pre-contrast ratios (≥0.981) yielded acceptable diagnostic efficacy, with, respectively, accuracy levels of 69.3% and 75.5% and AUC values of 0.719 and 0.736. For eHCC diagnosis, the post-contrast ratio (≥0.625) and combined diagnosis using pre- (≥0.907) and post-contrast ratios (≥0.609) revealed the highest sensitivity (92.6%) for hypervascular lesions and perfect specificity (100%) for non-hypervascular lesions.

Conclusions

Unenhanced T1-weighted images and the HBP of EOB-MRI [regardless of the vascularity in the arterial phase (AP)], and the PP and PVP of SCEUS showed their value in the histological grading diagnosis of HCC. In particular, isoechogenicity in the PVP may have promising diagnostic utility for eHCC.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Atypical Imaging Features: Review of the Morphologic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Subtypes With Radiology-Pathology Correlation

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fastest growing cause of cancer death in the United States with the incidence rate more than doubling in 20 years. HCC is unique since a noninvasive diagnosis can be achieved with imaging alone when specific clinical criteria and imaging characteristics are met, obviating the need for tissue sampling. However, HCC is a highly heterogeneous neoplasm. Atypical HCC subtypes vary significantly in their morphology, which can be attributed to specific histologic and molecular features, and can cause deviations from the classic imaging characteristics. The different morphologic subtypes of HCC frequently present a diagnostic challenge for radiologists and pathologists since their imaging and pathologic features can overlap with those of non-HCC malignancies. Identifying an atypical subtype can have important clinical implications. Liver transplant, albeit a scarce and limited resource, is the optimal treatment for conventional HCC, potentially curing both the tumor and the underlying pre-malignant condition. Some HCC subtypes as well as mimickers are associated with unacceptably high recurrence and poor outcome after transplant, and there remains limited data on the role and prognosis of liver transplantation for treatment of rare HCC subtypes. Other subtypes tend to recur later than classic HCC, potentially requiring a different follow-up scheme. This review will discuss the appearance of different HCC subtypes in relation to their histopathologic features. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Benign focal liver lesions masquerading as primary liver cancers on MRI

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are the most common primary liver malignancies. HCC and ICC have characteristic imaging findings, but a number of benign entities can appear similar and can cause diagnostic dilemma. Ideally, accurate and timely diagnosis of these conditions can help the patient to avoid a needle biopsy or even unnecessary treatment. In this article, we present various benign liver lesions that display imaging characteristics that are similar to HCC and ICC on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and discuss salient features that may assist in accurate diagnosis.

An overview of hepatocellular carcinoma with atypical enhancement pattern: spectrum of magnetic resonance imaging findings with pathologic correlation

BACKGROUND

In the setting of cirrhotic liver, the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is straightforward when typical imaging findings consisting of arterial hypervascularity followed by portal-venous washout are present in nodules larger than 1 cm. However, due to the complexity of hepatocarcinogenesis, not all HCCs present with typical vascular behaviour. Atypical forms such as hypervascular HCC without washout, isovascular or even hypovascular HCC can pose diagnostic dilemmas. In such cases, it is important to consider also the appearance of the nodules on diffusion-weighted imaging and hepatobiliary phase. In this regard, diffusion restriction and hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase are suggestive of malignancy. If both findings are present in hypervascular lesion without washout, or even in iso- or hypovascular lesion in cirrhotic liver, HCC should be considered. Moreover, other ancillary imaging findings such as the presence of the capsule, fat content, signal intensity on T2-weighted image favour the diagnosis of HCC. Another form of atypical HCCs are lesions which show hyperintensity on hepatobiliary phase. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to provide an overview of HCCs with atypical enhancement pattern, and focus on their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to correctly characterize atypical HCC lesions in cirrhotic liver it is important to consider not only vascular behaviour of the nodule, but also ancillary MRI features, such as diffusion restriction, hepatobiliary phase hypointensity, and T2-weighted hyperintensity. Fat content, corona enhancement, mosaic architecture are other MRI feautures which favour the diagnosis of HCC even in the absence of typical vascular profile.

Studying The Imaging Properties Of Liver Tumors On Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Primovist - A Hepatospecific Paramagnetic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent

The study was performed on 25 patients diagnosed with liver tumors, assigned magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Primovist - a hepatospecific paramagnetic gadolinium-based contrast agent at the International Medical Center of Hue Central Hospital. The result is as followed: 11 HCCs, 1 biliary tract malignant tumor, 1 hepatic adenoma, 6 metastates, 2 FNH, 1 hepatic AML, 3 hemangiomas. 47 lesions in total, including 9 lesions smaller than 1cm, 12 lesions 1-2 cm, 26 lesions larger than 2 cm. All 11 HCCs are hypointense on T1W, hyperintense on T2W, intratumoral high signal on DWI, 9 cases have typical enhancement pattern on Dynamic phase (arterial enhancement with washout assessed on the portal venous phase), 10 cases have no enhancement on Hepatocellular phase. Metastasis lesions have peripheral enhancement on both arterial and venous phases, no enhancement on delayed phase due to not having hepatic cells. The the biliary tract tumor is pathologically correct, with minor peripheral enhancement 30 seconds after injection, gradual centripetal enhancement after 60 and 90 seconds, no enhancement on delayed phase due to not having hepatic cells. 3 cases with hemangiomas are hyperintense on T2WI, similar to blood vessels, hypointense on T1WI, pheripherally enhanced 30 seconds after injection, fully centripetal fill-in after 90 seconds, non-enhanced on delayed phase (20 minutes) due to not having hepatic cells. 2 cases with FNH have iso- or mildly hyperintense on T1W, isointense on T2W and hypointense on DWI, isointense on hepatocellular phase due to the reservation of hepatic cells. Liver MRI with Primovist is specific for Hepatic cells, playing a critical role in detecting small lesions and differentiating benign and malignant lesions of the liver, especially those without typical enhancement pattern on Dynamic phase.

Prediction of microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma: value of volumetric iodine quantification using preoperative dual-energy computed tomography

Background

To investigate the potential value of volumetric iodine quantification using preoperative dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with single HCC treated through surgical resection who underwent preoperative DECT. Quantitative DECT features, including normalized iodine concentration (NIC) to the aorta and mixed-energy CT attenuation value in the arterial phase, were three-dimensionally measured for peritumoral and intratumoral regions: (i) layer-by-layer analysis for peritumoral layers (outer layers 1 and 2; numbered in close order from the tumor boundary) and intratumoral layers (inner layers 1 and 2) with 2-mm layer thickness and (ii) volume of interest (VOI)-based analysis with different volume coverage (tumor itself; VOI_O1, tumor plus outer layer 1; VOI_O2, tumor plus outer layers 1 and 2; VOI_I1, tumor minus inner layer 1; VOI_I2, tumor minus inner layers 1 and 2). In addition, qualitative CT features, including peritumoral enhancement and tumor margin, were assessed. Qualitative and quantitative CT features were compared between HCC patients with and without MVI. Diagnostic performance of DECT parameters of layers and VOIs was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results

A total of 36 patients (24 men, mean age 59.9 ± 8.5 years) with MVI (n = 14) and without MVI (n = 22) were included. HCCs with MVI showed significantly higher NICs of outer layer 1, outer layer 2, VOI_O1, and VOI_O2 than those without MVI (P = 0.01, 0.04, 0.02, 0.02, respectively). Among the NICs of layers and VOIs, the highest area under the curve was obtained in outer layer 1 (0.747). Qualitative features, including peritumoral enhancement and tumor margin, and the mean CT attenuation of each layer and each VOI were not significantly different between HCCs with and without MVI (both P >  0.05).

Conclusions

Volumetric iodine quantification of peritumoral and intratumoral regions in arterial phase using DECT may help predict the MVI of HCC.

Hepatic tumors: pitfall in diagnostic imaging

On computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), hepatocellular tumors are characterized based on typical imaging findings. However, hepatocellular adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatocellular carcinoma can show uncommon appearances at CT and MRI, which may lead to diagnostic challenges. When assessing focal hepatic lesions, radiologists need to be aware of these atypical imaging findings to avoid misdiagnoses that can alter the management plan. The purpose of this review is to illustrate a variety of pitfalls and atypical features of hepatocellular tumors that can lead to misinterpretations providing specific clues to the correct diagnoses. (www.actabiomedica.it)

LI-RADS to categorize liver nodules in patients at risk of HCC: tool or a gadget in daily practice?

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness of liver reporting and data system (LI-RADS) to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to retrospectively evaluate its impact on the adopted therapeutic strategy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative imaging of 40 of 350 patients (median age 66, 31 M/9 F) submitted to liver resection for suspected HCC, between January 2008 and August 2019, has been retrospectively analyzed by two radiologists with different expertise, according to CT/MRI LI-RADS^® v2018, both blinded to clinical and pathological results and untrained to using aforementioned scoring system.

RESULTS

The perfect agreement between the readers was about 62.5% (25/40) (Cohen k: 0.41), better for LR-5 category (16/25) and higher in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) investigations (68%; 13/19), which has been demonstrated the modality of choice for diagnosis of high probable and certain HCC, with arterial phase hyperenhancement as the most sensitive and accurate major feature. Compared to final histology, LR4 and LR5 scores assigned by senior radiologist reached sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, PNV) and diagnostic accuracy of 90,9%, 29,0%, 93,8%, 62,5% and 87,5%, respectively, slightly higher than junior's ones. Misdiagnosis of HCC was done by both radiologists in the same two patients: 1 primary hepatic lymphoma (PHL) and 1 regenerative liver nodule (RLN). If LI-RADS would have been applied at the time of pre-surgical imaging, treatment planning would be modified in 10% of patients (4/40); the patient scheduled as LR-3 and finally resulted a focal nodular hyperplasia would have avoided liver resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of LI-RADS, especially on MRI, may provide a more accurate evaluation of suspected HCC. PHL and RLN are the Achille's heels according to our experience.

Diagnostic efficacy of dynamic liver imaging using qualitative diagnostic algorithm versus LI-RADS v2018 lexicon for atypical versus classical HCC lesions: A decade of experience from a tertiary liver institute

OBJECTIVE

To analyze and evaluate the diagnostic performance of conventional diagnostic (qualitative) imaging features versus LI-RADSv2018 lexicon for indeterminate and atypical Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on dynamic liver imaging with reference to histopathology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study (June 2009-June 2019) evaluated the performance characteristics of conventional imaging findings, versus the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LIRADS) v2018, for interpretation of indeterminate and atypical HCC, in patients who underwent subsequent histopathological analysis (gold standard). A total of 100,457 dynamic hepatobiliary CT and MR examinations were performed over ten years at our institute. Using current international imaging guidelines, 3218 patients were found to have suspected liver cancer lesions on imaging. Classical enhancement pattern of typical HCC was seen in 2916 of these patients. These patients did not require further biopsy. We enrolled, the remaining (n = 302) patients, who underwent biopsy, into our study group. Two radiologists, blinded to pathology findings, reviewed and classified these lesions, in consensus, according to LI-RADS® lexicon and as per 'conventional' (Indeterminate, Atypical HCC, Classical HCC, other malignancies) imaging. The histopathology diagnosis was considered as the final diagnosis. Alpha feto protein (AFP) levels amongst various subgroups were compared. Statistical analysis was performed to calculate the efficacy of LIRADS versus qualitative imaging parameters in comparison with histopathology.

RESULTS

A total of n = 302 patients, [89 % men (n = 269), mean age 57.08 ± 12.43 years] underwent biopsy for suspected liver lesions. Qualitative imaging had 92.3 % (CI 88.53-94.91) sensitivity, 41.4 % (CI 25.51-59.26) specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 93.7 % (CI 90.11-96.02), negative predictive value (NPV) of 36.4 % (CI 22.19-53.38), positive likelihood ratio (PLHR) of 1.575 (CI 1.40-1.77) and negative likelihood ratio of (NLHR) 0.19 (CI 0.13-0.26). It correctly classified 87.4 % of lesions diagnosed on pathology. In comparison, LI-RADS was found to have 92 % sensitivity, 55.5 % specificity, 97 % PPV, 30.3 %, NPV, PLHR 2.068 (CI 1.62-2.64), NLHR 0.15 (CI 0.11-0.18) and 89.7 % diagnostic accuracy. A total of 38 patients (17 false negative, 21 false positive lesions) had discordant diagnoses on imaging versus histopathology. The kappa agreement between LIRADs and qualitative Imaging was found to be 0.77 ± .07 (p < 0.001). LIRADS and qualitative imaging collectively had 97 % sensitivity, 30 % specificity, 91.9 % PPV, 55.6 % NPV, PLHR of 1.39 (CI 1.27-1.51) and NLHR of 0.09 (0.048-0.19) which was better than, either reporting system, independently.

CONCLUSION

It was observed that the LI-RADS v2018 lexicon with qualitative imaging as a combination technique added extra value in interpretation of atypical HCC or indeterminate lesions on dynamic CT and MRI compared to either as 'stand- alone' reporting systems.