Isolated bilateral abducens nerve palsy due to carotid cavernous dural arteriovenous fistula

High-flow carotid cavernous fistula and 'white eye': A rare and easily misdiagnosed presentation - A case report and literature review

The three classic symptoms of carotid cavernous fistula (CCF) are pulsating exophthalmos, bruit and conjunctival chemosis. Here, we present a clinical case of isolated abducens nerve palsy due to a high-flow CCF in an 84-year-old woman, without the typical congestive orbito-ocular features. It was a diagnostic challenge because, for patients older than 50 years with cardiovascular risk factors, ischaemic mononeuropathy is the most frequent aetiology. This case illustrates the least common type of CCF that can be easily misdiagnosed. Physicians should consider fistula as a possible diagnosis in a patient with isolated abducens nerve palsy even without the classic triad.

Bilateral sixth nerve palsies from carotid cavernous fistulas with transient worsening following transvenous embolisation

A 59-year-old man presented with a 2-week history of binocular horizontal diplopia worse when looking to the left. He was diagnosed with a left sixth nerve palsy (6 NP) and had new bilateral findings at a 2-week follow-up with new dilated episcleral blood vessels. Bilateral carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) were suspected and confirmed with CT angiography and catheter angiography. He underwent successful coil and Onyx embolisation of the left cavernous sinus and immediately noticed worsening of the double vision when looking left due to a worse left 6 NP. Three weeks later, he underwent similar treatment of the right CCF and immediately noticed worsening of the double vision when looking to the right and was found to have a worse right 6 NP. His double vision resolved 6 months later. CCFs are rare causes of bilateral 6 NPs and although there is a good prognosis, symptoms may worsen after treatment.

Indirect carotid cavernous fistula mimicking ocular myasthenia

71-year-old woman with progressive left-sided, monocular diplopia and ptosis. Her symptoms mimicked ocular myasthenia, but she had an indirect carotid cavernous fistula (CCF). She was diagnosed with monocular myasthenia gravis (negative acetylcholinesterase antibody) after a positive ice test and started on Mestinon and underwent a thymectomy complicated by a brachial plexus injury. Months later, she developed left-sided proptosis and ocular bruit. She was urgently referred to neuro-interventional surgery and was diagnosed with an indirect high-flow left CCF, which was treated with Onyx liquid and platinum coil embolisation. Mestinon was discontinued. Her ophthalmic symptoms resolved. However, she was left with a residual left arm and hand hemiparesis and dysmetria secondary to a brachial plexus injury. Indirect CCF usually can present with subtle and progressive symptoms leading to delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis. It is important for ophthalmologists to consider this differential in a patient with progressive ocular symptoms.

Anatomic Eponyms in Neuroradiology: Head and Neck

In medicine, an eponym is a word-typically referring to an anatomic structure, disease, or syndrome-that is derived from a person's name. Medical eponyms are ubiquitous and numerous. They are also at times controversial. Eponyms reflect medicine's rich and colorful history and can be useful for concisely conveying complex concepts. Familiarity with eponyms facilitates correct usage and accurate communication. In this article, 22 eponyms used to describe anatomic structures of the head and neck are discussed. For each structure, the author first provides a biographical account of the individual for whom the structure is named. An anatomic description and brief discussion of the structure's clinical relevance follow.

Direct carotid-cavernous fistula presenting with minimal symptoms and rapid angiographic progression

Most patients with direct carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) present with dramatic symptoms including proptosis, chemosis, and diplopia. We report a patient with a direct/high-flow CCF whose only initial symptom was pulse-synchronous tinnitus. Following diagnostic angiography, she developed mild symptoms and dramatic angiographic changes over a period of 3 days. Complete occlusion of the CCF and resolution of her symptoms were achieved by performing a stent-assisted coil embolization.

Isolated bilateral abducens nerves palsy due to traumatic delicate arteriovenous fistula

BACKGROUND

Ocular motor dysfunction is common in patients with head trauma. Also, traumatic lateral gaze palsy is usually associated with brain stem lesion, peripheral nerve injury with or without basilar skull fracture and lateral rectus muscle injury or entrapment. However, isolated bilateral abducens nerve palsy is extremely rare.

CASE STUDY

This study describes a case of isolated bilateral abducens nerve palsy in a 35-year-old male with head trauma without cervical and skull fractures. He was diagnosed with mild diffuse axonal injury. During his assessment, he developed mild limb weakness, an ataxic gait and impaired abductive movement in both eyes. Angiography of the left common carotid artery revealed multiple small arteriovenous fistulae in both inferior nasal conchae. After embolization, lateral gaze palsy of his eyes was significantly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this case, arteriovenous fistula should be considered as a cause of bilateral isolated abducens nerve palsy.

Isolated ocular motor nerve palsy in dural carotid-cavernous sinus fistula

The incidence of dural carotid-cavernous sinus fistula (DCCF) presenting as isolated ocular motor nerve palsies without congestive ocular features is unknown. We reviewed the DCCF patients in our hospital during the last 10 years to elucidate the clinical and neuroradiological features of DCCF with isolated ocular motor nerve palsy. Eleven amongst the 33 DCCF patients presented isolated ocular motor nerve palsy. All the 11 patients underwent brain CT/CT angiography (CTA) and/or MRI/MR angiography (MRA), before the digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The compromised nerves were the oculomotor nerve in eight (72.7%), abducens nerve in two (18.2%) and trochlear nerve in one (9.1%). Brain CT and/or CTA were conducted in four patients but all unremarkable. MRI and/or MRA were performed in nine patients and six of them showed compatible findings of DCCF. The diagnoses of DCCFs were confirmed by DSA and all were posterior-draining type. The outcome was good, with a total recovery rate of 54.5% within 12 months. Thirty-three percent (11 of 33) of our DCCF patients presented with isolated ocular motor nerve palsy, which is not uncommon. MRI and MRA are of value in the initial evaluation, but DSA is necessary for the accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.

Painful ophthalmologic disorders and eye pain for the neurologist

Neurologists should be aware of the following causes of eye pain: (1)ocular and orbital disorders with or without visible pathology of the eye (eg,redness, corneal opacity, or proptosis); (2) ophthalmologic syndromes associated with headache; and (3) headache syndromes associated with ophthalmologic findings.

Clinical review: the differential diagnosis of pain in the quiet eye

BACKGROUND

Eye pain, periorbital and retro-orbital pain, and headache or facial pain referred to the orbital region are common presenting complaints.

REVIEW SUMMARY

In this review, we discuss the etiologies of eye pain in the quiet eye, which is defined clinically as one with a clear cornea without redness or irritation of the conjunctiva or sclera.

CONCLUSIONS

The causes of eye pain may be divided into two groups: (1) those associated with abnormal localizing ophthalmologic and neuro-ophthalmologic findings (including trigeminal neuropathies);(2) those with a normal ophthalmologic and neurologic examinations. The latter group is further divided into the following subgroups: (1) specific short-lasting or long-lasting headache or eye pain syndromes; (2) pain referred to the eye from other pathologic processes (secondary eye pain) sometimes distant from structures concerned with vision; and (3) pain from orbital, superior orbital fissure, cavernous sinus, or intracranial infiltrative, neoplastic, or inflammatory disease processes with normal ophthalmologic and neuro-ophthalmologic exam. Unfortunately, in some patients, no etiology for the pain syndrome is discerned and one is left with a diagnosis of idiopathic eye pain, eye strain, or atypical facial pain.