A multicenter, randomized, open-label, therapeutic, and exploratory trial to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker (Clotinab) in high-risk patients with percutaneous coronary intervention

Efficacy of clotinab in acute myocardial infarction trial-ST elevation myocardial infarction (ECLAT-STEMI)

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the efficacy and the safety of the upstream glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa inhibitor (clotinab; ISU ABXIS, Seoul, Republic of Korea) under 600-mg clopidogrel pretreatment compared with provisional use in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 786 STEMI patients were randomized to upstream use in the emergency room (ER) (n = 392) or provisional use during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n = 394). All patients were prescribed 600-mg clopidogrel in the ER. The primary endpoint was the 30-day incidence of composite events including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke. There was no significant difference in the events that occurred in 40 patients (10.2%) in the upstream arm and 55 patients (14.0%) in the provisional arm during the 30 days (odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.45-1.08). Major bleeding was higher in the upstream arm (1.5% vs. 0%, P = 0.02). However, there was a significant reduction in 30-day composite events in the upstream arm in the high-risk population (Killip class ≥II or GRACE score >140).

CONCLUSIONS

The upstream use of clotinab under a 600-mg clopidogrel loading may not significantly reduce cardiac events following primary PCI but may improve the clinical outcome in high-risk patients.

[Therapeutic antibodies and related products: choosing the right structure for success]

Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and related-products represent the fastest growing class of therapeutics in the biotechnological and pharmaceutical industry. In just as short as 20 years, more than 30 immunoglobulins (IgG) and derivatives have been approved in a wide range of indications (oncology, inflammation and auto-immunity, transplantation, angioplasty, hematology, ophthalmology, viral infections, allergy). The mAb structure toolbox contains mouse, chimeric, humanized and human antibodies from different isotypes (IgG1, 2 and 4), as well as IgG-related products (immunoconjugates, radio-immunoconjugates, Fab fragments, Fc-fusion proteins and peptides, bispecifics). Furthermore from a structural point of view, mAb glycosylation is linked to their production systems and may impact on their effector functions and immunogenicity. Based on the current knowledge, choosing the right antibody format, isotype and glycosylation profile are some of the key issues to address early during the lead selection.

Assessment of the bioequivalence of brand and biogeneric formulations of abciximab for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome: a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled study in Korean patients

BACKGROUND

Abciximab has been found to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A previous study reported on the tolerability of biogeneric abciximab in patients with ACS. This formulation has been approved by the Korea Food and Drug Administration and is currently being marketed. Its ex vivo antiplatelet effect, however, has not been compared with that of branded abciximab.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to compare ex vivo antiplatelet activity, angiographic outcome, and bleeding complications between biogeneric and branded abciximab.

METHODS

This prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled study was conducted in Korea. Patients with ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomized to receive biogeneric abciximab or branded abciximab. All patients received intracoronary unfractionated heparin 70 IU/kg and either biogeneric or branded abciximab 0.25 mg/kg IV bolus approximately 10 minutes before undergoing PCI, followed by a 0.125 microg/kg/min 12-hour infusion of the same formulation. The antiplatelet effect of both drugs was assessed at 3 time points (at baseline, and 10 minutes and 24 hours after the end of the bolus infusion) using a validated rapid platelet-function assay.

RESULTS

In total, 37 patients (30 men and 7 women; 19 receiving biogeneric abciximab and 18 receiving branded abciximab) were included. Patient demographics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (16 men [84.2%] and 3 women [15.8%] in the biogeneric group vs 14 men [77.8%] and 4 women [22.2%] in the branded group; mean [SD] age, 65 [11] vs 60 [10] years; weight, 64.6 [8.7] vs 67.9 [10.1] kg, respectively). The bolus and the continuous infusion of the biogeneric and branded formulations achieved similar levels of platelet inhibition, with a mean (SD) inhibition of platelet aggregation >90% at 10 minutes after the end of the bolus infusion (94.7% [8.2%] vs 92.6% [16.9%], respectively; P = NS) and >65% at 24 hours (68.1% [9.8%] vs 70.9% [9.7%]; P = NS) compared with baseline. One thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding complication (retro-peritoneal hemorrhage) was reported in a patient who received biogeneric abciximab.

CONCLUSION

There were no statistically significant differences in the antiplatelet effects of these 2 formulations in this small, selected population of Korean patients with ACS.

[From orthoclone to denosumab, the fast growing market of monoclonal antibodies]

Monoclonal antibodies are a specific medicinal category within the current therapeutic armamentarium. Their market share is growing fast as they are often the only therapeutic option at some stages of certain diseases, due to their targeted action in the body and to an acceptable tolerance. The budget impact of monoclonal antibodies is increasing, leading payers and health authorities to growing attention and pressure when they have to decide on the reimbursement, coverage and pricing of these products. The launch of biosimilars after patent expiry of some of these drugs will take time in view of the complexity of these molecules, and is not likely to significantly impact the cost of these therapies.

European Medicines Agency workshop on biosimilar monoclonal antibodies: July 2, 2009, London, UK

The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) workshop on biosimilar monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), held July 2, 2009 at the EMEA headquarters in London, was a harbinger with potentially far-reaching implications for all groups interested in antibody therapeutics development. These groups include not only regulators and the innovator and generic biopharmaceutical industries, but also physicians, patients and payers. The objective of the workshop was to discuss and assess the feasibility of the development and authorization of mAbs using EMEA's biosimilar regulatory pathways. The workshop sequentially focused on questions relevant to three areas: (1) chemistry, manufacturing and controls (CMC), (2) non-clinical issues and (3) clinical issues, including outcome measures. Proceedings of the workshop are presented in Part 1 of this report, and discussed within the context of the legal, regulatory and business environments of the European Union, Asia and the United States in Parts 2, 3 and 4, respectively.