Diagnostic value of 3D fast low-angle shot dynamic MRI of breast papillomas

Management of Intraductal Papilloma of the Breast Diagnosed on Core Needle Biopsy: Latest Controversies

Intraductal papillomas (IDPs), including central papilloma and peripheral papilloma, are common in the female population. Due to the lack of specific clinical manifestations of IDPs, it is easy to misdiagnose or miss diagnose. The difficulty of differential diagnosis using imaging techniques also contributes to these conditions. Histopathology is the gold standard for the diagnosis of IDPs while the possibility of under sample exists in the percutaneous biopsy. There have been some debates about how to treat asymptomatic IDPs without atypia diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB), especially when the upgrade rate to carcinoma is considered. This article concludes that further surgery is recommended for IDPs without atypia diagnosed on CNB who have high-risk factors, while appropriate imaging follow-up may be suitable for those without risk factors.

Multiple Papillomas of the Breast: A Review of Current Evidence and Challenges

Objectives: To conduct a review of evidence about papillomatosis/multiple papillomas (MP), its clinical and imaging presentation, the association between MP and malignancy and the management strategies that follow. Methods: A computerized literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar was performed up to January 2021 with the following search strategy: “papilloma” OR “intraductal papilloma” OR “intraductal papillary neoplasms” OR “papillomatosis” OR “papillary lesion” AND “breast”. Two authors independently conducted a search, screening and extraction of data from the eligible studies. Results: Of the 1881 articles identified, 29 articles met the inclusion criteria. The most common breast imaging methods (mammography, ultrasound) showed few specific signs of MP, and evidence about magnetic resonance imaging were weak. Regarding the association between MP and malignancy, the risk of underestimation to biopsy methods and the frequent coexistence of MP and other high-risk lesions needs to be taken into consideration. Results about the risk of developing breast carcinoma of patients affected by MP were inconsistent. Conclusions: MP is a challenge for all breast specialists, and familiarity with its features is required to make the correct diagnosis. Further studies are needed to evaluate the factors to take into account to plan management, time of follow-up and imaging methods.

Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI in identifying lesions requiring excision for patients with suspicious nipple discharge but normal mammograms and ultrasounds.

METHODS

Between September 2013 and May 2019, 106 female participants (mean age 57.9 years) were consecutively included in this prospective multicenter study; 102 were retained for analysis. MRI was considered negative in the absence of suspicious enhancement and positive in cases of ipsilateral abnormal enhancement (BI-RADS 3 to 5). Final diagnoses were based on histological findings of surgical or percutaneous biopsies or at 1-year follow-up. We considered all lesions requiring excision found on pathology (papilloma, atypia, nipple adenomatosis, or cancer) as positive results. We considered spontaneous resolution of the discharge at 1 year as a negative result.

RESULTS

MRI showed ipsilateral abnormal enhancement in 54 patients (53%) revealing 46 lesions requiring excision (31 benign papillomas, 5 papillomas with atypia, 2 nipple adenomatosis, and 8 cancers) and 8 benign lesions not requiring excision. No suspicious enhancement was found in the remaining 48 participants (47%). Forty-two were followed up at 1 year with spontaneous resolution of the discharge and six underwent surgery (revealing 2 benign papillomas). MRI diagnostic accuracy for the detection of a lesion requiring excision was as follows: sensitivity 96%, specificity 85%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 96%.

CONCLUSION

In patients with suspicious nipple discharge and normal mammogram and ultrasound, MRI demonstrates excellent performance to identify lesions for which excision is required. Normal MRI indicates it is safe to propose follow-up only management, thus avoiding unnecessary duct excision.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02819362 KEY POINTS: • Breast MRI can be useful for the management of patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammogram and ultrasound. • MRI detected a lesion requiring excision in 46 participants (45%) with unexplained discharge. • If breast MRI is negative, follow-up is a safe alternative for these patients.

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in detection and surgical treatment of breast intraductal papillomas

Background

Intraductal papillomas are discrete benign tumors of the breast duct epithelium. Due to the risk of subsequent carcinoma, a surgical excision is generally recommended as a precaution. However, it is difficult to initially diagnose and accurately locate the lesions both in pre-surgery and surgery periods.

Methods

Retrospectively analyzed 245 patients, with a pathologically proven breast intraductal papillomas. All the patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and ultrasound examination(s) pre-surgery and/or in surgery. All the patients who underwent surgery were divided into four groups according to the following operation method type(s): ultrasound & clinical examination excision, methylene blue notation excision, methylene blue notation & MRI guide excision, and MRI guide excision. Then, the differences between the last two MRI guide excisions and the first two conventional methods were analyzed. Afterwards, 238 patients were followed up for recurrence checks. SPSS 19.0 statistical software was used and the results of P<0.05 being considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 161 (65.7%) and 48 (19.6%) patients were pathological diagnosed of solitary and multiple papilloma separately, and 36 (14.7%) patients had papillomatosis; 168 and 243 cases with positive signs, which were detected in all 245 patients who had underwent ultrasound and MRI examination(s), with the detection rate being 68.6% and 99.0% respectively. MRI imaging could clearly present mass-like lesions (solitary and multiple mass) and non-mass like lesions (ductal and regional). Whereas, ultrasound imaging could barely show mass-like (solitary and multiple mass) lesions. In surgery, when compared with traditional methods, MRI imaging could also more accurately locate the lesions and guide the excision. MRI guidance is both applicable to patients with and without nipple discharge, in addition to those who show no abnormal signs in ultrasound imaging. The recurrence-free survival time with traditional surgery methods was significantly lower than those in the MRI guide groups.

Conclusions

MRI is accurate at the detection, localization and resection range of intraductal papilloma lesions; all capabilities which are critical to successful breast surgery.

Benign Breast Tumours - Diagnosis and Management

With improvements in breast imaging, mammography, ultrasound and minimally invasive interventions, the detection of early breast cancer, non-invasive cancers, lesions of uncertain malignant potential, and benign lesions has increased. However, with the improved diagnostic capabilities comes a substantial risk of false-positive benign lesions and vice versa false-negative malignant lesions. A statement is provided on the manifestation, imaging, and diagnostic verification of isolated benign breast tumours that have a frequent manifestation, in addition to general therapy management recommendations. Histological evaluation of benign breast tumours is the most reliable diagnostic method. According to the S3 guideline and information gained from analysis of the literature, preference is to be given to core biopsy for each type of tumour as the preferred diagnostic method. An indication for open biopsy is also to be established should the tumour increase in size in the follow-up interval, after recurring discrepancies in the vacuum biopsy results, or at the request of the patient. As an alternative, minimally invasive procedures such as therapeutic vacuum biopsy, cryoablation or high-intensity focused ultrasound are also becoming possible alternatives in definitive surgical management. The newer minimally invasive methods show an adequate degree of accuracy and hardly any restrictions in terms of post-interventional cosmetics so that current requirements of extensive breast imaging can be thoroughly met.

Diagnosis of Nipple Discharge: Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography in Comparison with Ductoscopy

Background:

Pathologic nipple discharge, which is a common reason for referral to the breast imaging service, refers to spontaneous or bloody nipple discharge that arises from a single duct. The most common cause of nipple discharge is benign breast lesions, such as solitary intraductal papilloma and papillomatosis. Nevertheless, in rare cases, a malignant cause of nipple discharge can be found.

Aims:

To study the diagnostic value of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ductoscopy in patients with pathologic nipple discharge, compare their efficacy, and investigate the importance of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of intraductal pathologies.

Study Design:

Diagnostic accuracy study.

Methods:

Fifty patients with pathologic nipple discharge were evaluated by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Of these, 44 ductoscopic investigations were made. The patients were classified according to magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and ductoscopy findings. A total of 25 patients, whose findings were reported as intraductal masses, underwent surgery oincluding endoscopic excision for two endoscopic excision. Findings were compared with the pathology results that were accepted as the gold standard in the description of the aetiology of nipple discharge. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography and ductoscopy findings were analysed comparatively in patients who had no surgery.

Results:

Intraductal masses were reported in 26 patients, 20 of whom operated and established accurate diagnosis of 18 patients on magnetic resonance imaging. According to the ultrasonography, intraductal masses were identified in 22 patients, 17 of whom underwent surgery. Ultrasonography established accurate diagnoses in 15 patients. Intraductal mass was identified in 22 patients and ductoscopy established accurate diagnoses based on histopathologic results in 16 patients. The sensitivities of methods were 75% in ultrasonography, 90% in magnetic resonance imaging, and 94.6% in ductoscopy. The specificities were 66.7% in ultrasonography, 66.7% in magnetic resonance imaging, and 40% in ductoscopy. Intraductal papillomas were mostly observed as oval nodules with well-circumscribed smooth margins within dilated ducts and persistant in the dynamic analysis. Lesions that protruded into the lumen of the ducts, either solitary or multiple, were characteristic ductoscopy findings of our patients who were diagnosed as having papilloma/papillomatosis.

Conclusion:

Magnetic resonance imaging and ductoscopy had no statistical superiority over each other, however they were superior to ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pathologic nipple discharge. Magnetic resonance imaging may be highly sensitive for diagnosing nipple discharge with new techniques and sequences and a non-invasive method that more advantageous for showing ductal tree visualization and is able to detect completely obstructed intraductal lesions.

MRI characteristics of intraductal papilloma

BACKGROUND

Intraductal papilloma (IDP) is the most common pathological finding in women with pathological nipple discharge. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown potential for characterizing breast tumors; however, MRI findings of IDPs are inconclusive, and certain diagnostic standards are lacking.

PURPOSE

To characterize the MRI features of IDP from a relatively large cohort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed from 358 women with IDPs that were confirmed by histopathology. The clinical and imaging findings in 70 patients who underwent preoperative MRI were analyzed. MRI analyses included morphology and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

RESULTS

In 70 patients, 77 IDPs were detected on MRI, which revealed the following three patterns: small luminal mass papillomas; tumor-like papillomas; and MRI-occult papillomas. Fourteen IDPs involved small, oval, smooth, and contrast-enhanced masses at the posterior end of the enlarged duct corresponding to small luminal mass papillomas. Seven IDPs had large diameters along the direction of the breast duct, indicating the typical MRI findings for IDP. Of 47 tumor-like papillomas, 16 cases showed large diameters along the direction of the breast duct and close to the nipple (within 4 cm), seven cases resembled invasive breast cancer on MRI, and the remaining 24 were (24/47) undistinguishable from other benign breast diseases. Sixteen IDPs were MRI-occult papillomas that could not be distinguished from the surrounding benign disease by either contrast-enhanced MRI or fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI.

CONCLUSION

Small luminal mass papillomas or tumor-like papillomas with the largest diameters along the direction of the breast duct and close to the nipple (within 4 cm) might be the typical MRI findings for IDPs.

3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail

OBJECTIVES

To compare 3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with galactography for detection of benign and malignant causes of nipple discharge in patients with negative mammography and ultrasound.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 56 breasts of 50 consecutive patients with nipple discharge who had inconspicuous mammography and ultrasound, using 3.0 Tesla breast MRI with a dedicated 16-channel breast coil, and then compared the results with galactography. Histopathological diagnoses and follow-ups were used as reference standard. Lesion size estimated on MRI was compared with the size at histopathology.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity of MRI vs. galactography for detecting pathologic findings were 95.7 % vs. 85.7 % and 69.7 % vs. 33.3 %, respectively. For the supposed concrete pathology based on MRI findings, the specificity was 67.6 % and the sensitivity 77.3 % (PPV 60.7 %, NPV 82.1 %). Eight malignant lesions were detected (14.8 %). The estimated size at breast MRI showed excellent correlation with the size at histopathology (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.95, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI of the breast at 3.0 Tesla is an accurate imaging test and can replace galactography in the workup of nipple discharge in patients with inconspicuous mammography and ultrasound.

KEY POINTS

• Breast MRI is an excellent diagnostic tool for patients with nipple discharge. • MRI of the breast reveals malignant lesions despite inconspicuous mammography and ultrasound. • MRI of the breast has greater sensitivity and specificity than galactography. • Excellent correlation of lesion size measured at MRI and histopathology was found.

Magnetic resonance imaging features of papillary breast lesions

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of the papillary lesions of the breast and their morphological relationship with the mammary ducts. The potential diagnostic contributory role of ductal oriented protocols to conventional dynamic magnetic resonance examination was also explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from 46 patients who had been diagnosed with papillary breast lesions and undergone magnetic resonance examination. The presence of dilated ducts and their morphological relation with the lesion were recorded. Lesions were classified as follows: papilloma, papillomatosis and malignant papillary lesion. Statistical difference between groups was studied for each morphological and dynamic lesion characteristic.

RESULTS

Dilated ducts and characteristics of intraductal material can be identified by magnetic resonance imaging. Certain MRI findings such as a mass with crescentic peripheral fluid or focal intraductal mass on T2 weighted images may suggest the presence of an intraductal/papillary lesion. In this respect, non-fatsat T2 weighted images appear particularly useful. There was a significant difference between papilloma and papillomatosis with regard to segmental and heterogeneous contrast enhancement (p<0.05 for both comparisons). In addition, there was a significant difference between papillomas and carcinomas with regard to homogenous, heterogeneous and segmental contrast enhancement (p<0.05 for all). On the other hand, papillomatosis and carcinoma did not differ significantly in terms of any of the morphological or dynamical MR criteria compared.

CONCLUSION

Papillary lesions can be detected by MRI. Despite some overlaps in MRI findings between carcinoma, papilloma and papillomatosis, MRI may help differentiate these lesions. Major benefit of retroareolar imaging appears to arise from its ability to demonstrate ductal relation and extension of contrast enhanced regions.

MRI features of intraductal papilloma of the breast: sheep in wolf's clothing?

BACKGROUND

Intraductal papillomas often present as small, smooth masses, dilated ducts or microcalcifications at mammography and as smooth, hypoechoic masses at sonography. At magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), intraductal papillomas often present as small smooth masses, however, often with strong enhancement with type 2 or 3 time intensity curves. The result of the MR analysis is therefore not infrequently inconclusive in order to characterize the mass as benign or malignant.

PURPOSE

To characterize the appearance of intraductal papillomas of the breast at MRI, and determine whether the application of diagnostic rules described in literature could contribute to correctly classifying the lesions as benign.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty patients with histologically proven intraductal papillomas were included. Two radiologists independently reviewed the MR images of the breast. The BI-RADS(®) nomenclature was used to describe morphology and contrast-enhancement kinetics. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of the MR images by the two investigators was performed. Kappa coefficient was calculated as index for the level of agreement. Subsequently, three sets of diagnostic rules, including the Göttinger score described by Fischer and the interpretation flowcharts according to Kinkel and to Tozaki were applied to characterize whether a biopsy should be recommended or not.

RESULTS

All papillomas presented as masses on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Only five papillomas showed a round, oval, or lobulated shape combined with smooth margins and continuous rise of the time intensity curve. Using the Göttingen score, biopsy would be recommended in 16 patients. Based on the interpretation flowcharts of Kinkel and of Tozaki, an additional 13 and 10 papillomas, respectively, were correctly classified as benign. Dilated ducts were visible in 10 patients. The interobserver agreement was good or excellent for all included variables.

CONCLUSION

Including systematic analysis of breast MRI to the diagnostic protocol and interpreting the images according to predetermined diagnostic rules, most solitary intraductal papillomas of the breast may be correctly characterized as benign.