Does medical emergency team intervention reduce the prevalence of emergency endotracheal intubation complications?

Multidisciplinary Difficult Airway Team Characteristics, Airway Securement Success, and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Objective:

To investigate whether implementation of a multidisciplinary airway team was associated with improvement in (1) rate of successful airway securement at first attempt; (2) time to secure airway; and (3) overall complication rate in patients with a difficult airway, as compared with usual care.

Data Sources:

Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central, and CINAHL databases.

Review Methods:

Systematic review of literature on inpatient multidisciplinary team management of difficult airways, including all studies performed in inpatient settings, excluding studies of ventilator weaning, flight/military medicine, EXIT procedures, and simulation or educational studies. DistillerSR was used for article screening and risk of a bias assessment to evaluate article quality. Data was extracted on study design, airway team composition, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes including airway securement, complications, and mortality.

Results:

From 5323 studies screened, 19 studies met inclusion criteria with 4675 patients. Study designs included 12 quality improvement projects, 6 cohort studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial. Four studies evaluated effect of multidisciplinary difficult airway teams on airway securement; all reported higher first attempt success rate with team approach. Three studies reported time to secure the difficult airways, all reporting swifter airway securement with team approach. The most common difficult airway complications were hypoxia, esophageal intubation, hemodynamic instability, and aspiration. Team composition varied, including otolaryngologists, anesthesiologists, intensivists, nurses, and respiratory care practitioners.

Conclusion:

Multidisciplinary difficult airway teams are associated with improved clinical outcomes compared to unstructured emergency airway management; however, studies have significant heterogeneity in team composition, algorithms for airway securement, and outcomes reported. Further evidence is necessary to define the clinical efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and best practices relating to implementing difficult airway teams in inpatient settings.

Emergency tracheal intubation during off-hours is not associated with increased mortality in hospitalized patients: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The prognosis of hospitalized patients after emergent endotracheal intubation (ETI) remains poor. Our aim was to evaluate the 30-d hospitalization mortality of subjects undergoing ETI during daytime or off-hours and to analyze the possible risk factors affecting mortality.

Methods

A single-center retrospective study was performed at a university teaching facility from January 2015 to December 2018. All adult inpatients who received ETI in the general ward were included. Information on patient demographics, vital signs, ICU (Intensive care unit) admission, intubation time (daytime or off-hours), the department in which ETI was performed (surgical ward or medical ward), intubation reasons, and 30-d hospitalization mortality after ETI were obtained from a database.

Results

Over a four-year period, 558 subjects were analyzed. There were more male than female in both groups (115 [70.1%] vs 275 [69.8%]; P = 0.939). A total of 394 (70.6%) patients received ETI during off-hours. The patients who received ETI during the daytime were older than those who received ETI during off-hours (64.95 ± 17.54 vs 61.55 ± 17.49; P = 0.037). The BMI of patients who received ETI during the daytime was also higher than that of patients who received ETI during off-hours (23.08 ± 3.38 vs 21.97 ± 3.25; P < 0.001). The 30-d mortality after ETI was 66.8% (373), which included 68.0% (268) during off-hours and 64.0% (105) during the daytime (P = 0.361). Multivariate Cox regression analysis found that the significant factors for the risk of death within 30 days included ICU admission (HR 0.312, 0.176–0.554) and the department in which ETI was performed (HR 0.401, 0.247–0.653).

Conclusions

The 30-d hospitalization mortality after ETI was 66.8%, and off-hours presentation was not significantly associated with mortality. ICU admission and ETI performed in the surgical ward were significant factors for decreasing the risk of death within 30 days.

Trial registration

This trial was retrospectively registered with the registration number of ChiCTR2000038549.

Association Between Time to Defibrillation and Neurologic Outcome in Patients With In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND

The influence of time to defibrillation in patients with shockable in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) has not been fully assessed. This study investigated the association between time to defibrillation and neurologic outcome in shockable IHCA survivors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 7-year retrospective cohort study was conducted using a prospectively collected registry of adult IHCA patients. Patients whose first documented rhythm was pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation and who received defibrillation within 5 minutes were included.

RESULTS

Among 1,683 IHCA patients, 261 patients were included. At 28 days, a good neurologic outcome (Cerebral Performance Category score 1 or 2) according to time to defibrillation was seen in 49.0%, 21.1%, 13.4% and 16.5% of patients treated at <2 minutes (n = 128), 2-3 minutes (n = 55), 3-4 minutes (n = 35) and 4-5 minutes (n = 43) after IHCA, respectively. After adjusting for clinical characteristics, a graded inverse association was found after 3 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

A graded inverse association between time to defibrillation and neurologic outcome was observed beyond 3 minutes following cardiac arrest. A target time to defibrillation of <3 minutes may be a practical target goal in resource-limited hospitals.

An Observational Analysis of Medication Use During 5,727 Medical Emergency Team Activations at a Tertiary Referral Hospital

BACKGROUND

Medical emergency teams (METs) rescue deteriorating patients as the response arm of hospital rapid response systems. This study aimed to (1) investigate medication use during MET activations by describing the type, frequency and access sources of medications; and (2) assess associations between patient characteristics, MET activation criteria, and outcomes and MET medication use.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study from a prospective database of MET activations in an Australian tertiary referral hospital was undertaken. Consecutive adult MET activations over a 12-month period were included.

RESULTS

Across the study period, there were 5,727 MET activations with medications used at 33.5% (n = 1,920). Of 2,648 medications used, cardiac system agents (n = 944; 35.6%) were the most common category used, while intravenous electrolytes (n = 341; 12.9%) and opioid analgesics (n = 248; 9.4%).were the most frequently used medications. Most commonly, medications were sourced from ward stocks. High blood pressure, heart or respiratory rate, pain, and multiple activation criteria were associated with MET medication use (p < 0.001). Patients who required medications were less likely to remain on the ward, and immediate admission to the ICU was approximately doubled (odds ratio = 1.90; 95% confidence interval = 1.47-2.45).

CONCLUSION

Medication use by the MET was common and associated with escalation to intensive care. A wide variety of medications, principally from ward stocks, were used with some predictability based on activation criteria. Local system improvements have demonstrated that by focusing on common MET syndromes and medications, further investigation can refine and improve medication use and management systems for deteriorating patients.

Understanding how medications contribute to clinical deterioration and are used in rapid response systems: A comprehensive scoping review

BACKGROUND

In hospitals, rapid response systems (RRSs) identify patients who deteriorate and provide critical care at their bedsides to stabilise and escalate care. Medications, including oral and parenteral pharmaceutical preparations, are the most common intervention for hospitalised patients and the most common cause of harm. This connection between clinical deterioration and medication safety is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

To inform improvements in prevention and management of clinical deterioration, this review aimed to examine how medications contributed to clinical deterioration and how medications were used in RRSs.

REVIEW METHODS

A scoping review was undertaken of medication data reported in studies of clinical deterioration or RRSs in diverse hospital settings between 2005 and 2017. Bibliographic database searches used permutations of "rapid response system," "medical emergency team," and keyword searching with medication-related terms. Independent selection, quality assessment, and data extraction informed mapping against four medication themes: causes of deterioration, predictors of deterioration, RRS use, and management.

RESULTS

Thirty articles were reviewed. Quality was low: limited by small samples, observational, single-centre designs and few primary medication-related outcomes. Adverse drug reactions and potentially preventable medication errors, involving sedatives, analgesics, and cardiovascular agents, contributed to clinical deterioration. While sparsely reported, outcomes included death and escalation of care. In children, administration of antibiotics or nebulised medications appeared to predict subsequent deterioration. Cardiovascular medications, sedatives, and analgesics commonly were used to manage deterioration but further detail was lacking. Despite reported potential for patient harm, evaluation of medication management systems was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Medications contributed to potentially preventable clinical deterioration, with considerable harm, and were common interventions for its management. When assessing deteriorating patients or caring for patients who require escalation to critical care, clinicians should consider medication errors and adverse reactions. Studies with more specific medication-related, patient-centred end points could reduce medication-related deterioration and refine RRS medication use and management.