Significance of myositis autoantibody in patients with idiopathic interstitial lung disease

Diagnosis of myositis-associated interstitial lung disease: Utility of the myositis autoantibody line immunoassay

OBJECTIVES

The detection of myositis autoantibodies (MA) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) has major implications for diagnosis and management, especially amyopathic and forme frustes of idiopathic inflammatory myositis-associated ILD (IIM-ILD). Use of the MA line immunoblot assay (MA-LIA) in non-rheumatological cohorts remains unvalidated. We assessed the diagnostic performance of the MA-LIA and explored combined models with clinical variables to improve identification of patients with IIM-ILD.

METHODS

Consecutive patients referred to a specialist ILD clinic, with ILD-diagnosis confirmed at multidisciplinary meeting, and MA-LIA performed within six months of baseline were included. Pre-specified MA-LIA thresholds were evaluated for IIM-ILD diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total 247 ILD patients were included (IIM-ILD n = 12, non-IIM connective tissue disease-associated ILD [CTD-ILD] n = 52, idiopathic interstitial pneumonia [IIP] n = 115, other-ILD n = 68). Mean age was 64.8 years, with 45.3% female, mean FVC 75.5% and DLCO 59.2% predicted. MA were present in 13.8% overall and 83.3% of IIM-ILD patients. The most common MA in IIM-ILD and non-IIM ILD patients were anti-Jo-1 (prevalence 40%) and anti-PMScl (29.2%) autoantibodies respectively. The pre-specified low-positive threshold (>10 signal intensity) had the highest discriminative capacity for IIM-ILD (AUC 0.86). Combining MA-LIA with age, gender, clinical CTD-manifestations and an overlap non-specific interstitial pneumonia/organising pneumonia pattern on HRCT improved discrimination for IIM-ILD (AUC 0.96).

CONCLUSION

The MA-LIA is useful to support a diagnosis of IIM-ILD as a complement to multi-disciplinary ILD assessment. Clinical interpretation is optimised by consideration of the strength of the MA-LIA result together with clinical and radiological features of IIM-ILD.

Real world utilization of the myositis autoantibody panel

OBJECTIVE

Myositis autoantibody panel results can offer diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with concern for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). However, there has been widespread utilization of myositis autoantibody testing clinically, often in situations where concern for an IIM is unclear. We sought to determine ordering practices and factors predicting positive results on ordered myositis antibody panels.

METHODS

We included all patients in the Duke University Health System who had a "myositis antibody panel" ordered from October 2014 through December 2016. Retrospective chart review was performed evaluating antibody positivity, provider specialty, ordering location, demographics, medical history, review of systems (ROS), physical examination (PE), and laboratory values. Fisher's exact and t test tests and backward multivariable regression analysis were performed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 642 unique tests obtained with 114 positive autoantibodies (17.7%) over the 26-month period. Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) were the most common and anti-Mi-2 was the most frequent (40% of MSAs). Pulmonology providers ordered the majority of tests (383; 59.6%). Adult Rheumatology had the highest antibody positivity rate (34.3%, p=0.0001) among specialties with at least 10 panels ordered. In backward multivariable regression analysis, factors independently associated with a positive myositis antibody panel were chronic corticosteroid use (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.30-3.38) and sclerodermoid skin changes (OR: 6.89; 95% CI: 2.02-23.47).

CONCLUSION

The positivity rate of myositis antibody panel testing in this real-world clinical setting was 18%. Anti-Mi-2 antibody was the most frequent autoantibody present. Specific factors associated with positive results can be utilized to identify patients at higher risk for IIM.

KEY POINTS

• Only eighteen percent of all myositis antibody panel tests ordered returned positive. • Anti-Mi-2 antibody was the most frequent autoantibody in our cohort. • Specific factors associated with positive results can help identify patients at higher risk for IIM, particularly for non-rheumatologists.

Auto-antibody evaluation in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia and worse survival of patients with Ro52/TRIM21auto-antibody

Some patients with interstitial pneumonia (IP) have auto-antibodies, but do not fit the criteria for specific connective tissue diseases. Examination of auto-antibodies is recommended for diagnosis idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. A prospective cohort study was performed in 285 patients with IP. Eleven auto-antibodies were assessed and patients were followed for 2 years. All 285 patients underwent the myositis panel test (MPT) for 11 auto-antibodies. Among them, 23.5% (67/285) of the patients had a positive MPT and 14.7% (42/285) had connective tissue diseases. Among the 49 MPT positive patients without connective tissue diseases, 29 patients (59.2%) were positive for Ro52, including 17 patients with Ro52 mono-positivity. Among interstitial pneumonia patients without connective tissue diseases, the Ro52 mono-positive patients showed worse at 2-years survival than those who were Ro52 negative (p = 0.022, HR = 5.88, 95% CI 1.29–26.75). Most of the Ro52 positive patients also showed a low titer of anti-nucleolar antibody. About 20% of IP patients had auto-antibodies detectable by the MPT, and Ro52 positive patients accounted for more than half of the MPT positive patients without connective tissue diseases. Detection of Ro52 auto-antibodies may be useful for assessing the risk of progression in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia patients without connective tissue diseases and a low anti-nucleolar antibody titer.

Performance evaluation of a commercial line blot assay system for detection of myositis- and systemic sclerosis-related autoantibodies

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

A line blot (LB) assay is a multi-analyte platform capable of simultaneously detecting multiple anti-nuclear antibody specificities. Here, we evaluated the performance of a commercial LB assay developed for the identification of myositis- or systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related autoantibodies (autoAbs).

METHOD

We screened 300 serum samples from patients with various connective tissue diseases using an LB assay and compared the results of myositis- or SSc-related autoAbs with those identified by RNA and protein immunoprecipitation (IP) assays or indirect immunofluorescence (IIF).

RESULTS

The IP assays revealed anti-Jo-1 Abs in 14 patients, anti-EJ Abs in 12, anti-PL-7 Abs in 8, anti-PL-12 Abs in 4, anti-Mi-2 Abs in 6, anti-SRP Abs in 8, anti-topoisomerase I Abs in 54, anti-RNA polymerase III Abs in 24, anti-U3 RNP Abs in 9, anti-Th/To Abs in 9, anti-Ku Abs in 14 and anti-hUBF Abs in 4, whereas IIF identified anti-centromere in 35. Good agreement between the IP assays and the LB assay was found only for anti-Jo-1 and anti-centromere antibodies. When a cut-off was adjusted to reconcile with the results of IP assays, the detection performance of LB assay was improved for anti-EJ, anti-PL-7, anti-PL-12, anti-SRP, anti-topoisomerase I and anti-RNA polymerase III Abs. However, the results of anti-Mi-2, anti-U3 RNP, anti-Th/To, anti-hUBF and anti-Ku Abs remained discordant between the LB assay and IP assays at all cut-off levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of myositis- or SSc-related autoAbs using a commercial LB assay requires great caution since it can yield analytically false-positive or false-negative results. Key Points • A line blot (LB) assay is a multi-analyte platform capable of simultaneously detecting multiple antibodies with anti-nuclear specificities. • Detection of myositis- or systemic sclerosis-related autoantibodies using a commercial LB assay requires great caution since it can yield analytically false-positive or false-negative results.

Autoantibodies in interstitial lung diseases

The role of autoantibody testing for patients with interstitial lung disease is an evolving area. Recent guidelines recommend routine anti-nuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, and anti-citrullinated cyclic peptide antibody testing for patients undergoing diagnostic evaluation for interstitial lung disease, with further autoantibody testing reserved for selected cases guided by rheumatological features. Even this approach may miss patients with clinically significant autoantibodies when interstitial lung disease is the dominant or first manifestation of autoimmune disease. We retrospectively performed autoimmune serology in a clinically well characterised cohort of interstitial lung disease patients. Using stored serum, additional testing was performed to ensure all patients had complete autoantibody profiles including anti-nuclear antibodies, extractable nuclear antigen antibodies, double-stranded DNA antibodies, rheumatoid factor, anti-citrullinated cyclic peptide antibodies, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, and myositis antibodies. Eighty patients with interstitial lung disease, and available stored serum, were assessed. Mean age at interstitial lung disease diagnosis was 65.2 years and 42 patients were male. Positive autoimmune serology was found in 56 of 80 (70.0%) patients; the most common positive result was anti-nuclear antibodies (n=34; 42.5%). Myositis antibodies were detected in 13 of 80 (16.2%) patients. Four (5%) patients had elevated anti-citrullinated cyclic peptide antibodies, and two (2.5%) patients had detectable myeloperoxidase antibodies. Eleven (13.7%) patients with negative anti-nuclear antibodies had other significant disease associated autoantibodies. An extended panel of autoantibody testing may detect cases of connective tissue disease associated interstitial lung disease, regardless of clinical or radiological subtype, and prior to extra-pulmonary manifestations of systemic autoimmunity.