Comparison of Second- and Third-Generation Cephalosporin as Initial Therapy for Women with Community-Onset Uncomplicated Acute Pyelonephritis

Intravenous cefuroxime as a first-line treatment for women hospitalized for pyelonephritis

Background

Empirical treatment of pyelonephritis in the emergency ward includes broad-spectrum antibiotics. Such a strategy favours broad-spectrum antibiotic overuse. Local antibiotic stewardship teams can propose local recommendations to adapt empirical antibiotic treatment devoted to spare precious molecules that remain active on MDR bacteria, such as fluoroquinolones or other broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the incidence of urinary tract infection recurrence within 3 months after hospital discharge following empirical antibiotic therapy with cefuroxime in women with pyelonephritis in the emergency room.

Patients and methods

We conducted a retrospective, single-centre study. We identified 109 women treated for pyelonephritis, 95 with cefuroxime at any time, and 14 with only other antibiotics, and divided them into subgroups based on antibiotic switch to other molecules. We compared the incidence of urinary tract infection recurrence in the subgroups.

Results

In the group of patients treated with cefuroxime only, we identified five cases of recurrence (9.4%) in a total of 53 patients, but only 1 (1.9%) case of recurrence associated with the same uropathogen. No significant difference in clinical outcome, length of antibiotic treatment, or urinary tract infection recurrence was observed between the subgroups.

Conclusions

Our study supports that a strategy elaborated by an antibiotic stewardship team based on local ecology and aimed at proposing the narrowest-spectrum antibiotic upon treatment initiation in the emergency room is safe.

Cephalosporins for the treatment of uncomplicated pyelonephritis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The 2011 Infectious Diseases Society of America and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases guidelines recommend ciprofloxacin or sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) as first-line agents to treat uncomplicated acute pyelonephritis (APN).

OBJECTIVE

With increasing antimicrobial resistance rates and recent changes in practice patterns, the objective of this systematic review was to describe the effectiveness of cephalosporins for uncomplicated APN in more recently published literature.

METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used for reporting. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for publications between January 2010 and September 2022. Eligible articles detailed patients with uncomplicated APN, treated with first- to fourth-generation cephalosporins, and identified a clinical, microbiological, or health care utilization outcome. Studies with more than 30% of complicated APN patients, non-English-language studies, case reports, case series, pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic studies, and in vitro laboratory or animal studies were excluded. Screening, review, and extraction were performed independently by 2 researchers, plus a third for conflict resolution. Critical appraisal of studies was performed using Joanna Briggs Institute checklists.

RESULTS

Eight studies met inclusion, including 5 cohort studies (62.5%), 2 randomized controlled trials (25%), and 1 nonrandomized experimental study (12.5%). Cephalosporins most used across the studies included cefazolin, cephalexin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, cefdinir, cefditoren, and ceftriaxone. Outcomes assessed were diverse, including clinical or microbiological success and time to defervescence or symptom resolution. Cephalosporins displayed effectiveness for the treatment of acute uncomplicated APN regardless of study design or the presence of a comparison group. No trials reported inferiority of clinical treatment outcomes compared with a fluoroquinolone or SMX-TMP.

CONCLUSION

Cephalosporins may be viable treatment options for the management of uncomplicated APN.

A retrospective review of oral cephalosporins versus fluoroquinolones for the treatment of pyelonephritis

Background

The current Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis (AUP) advise caution when using oral beta-lactams due to concern for potentially inferior efficacy compared to fluoroquinolones (FQs) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; however, studies specifically evaluating the efficacy of oral cephalosporins (CPs) in AUP are limited.

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of oral CPs versus FQs for the treatment of AUP.

Design, setting and participants

This is a retrospective, chart review study conducted at a single-center, tertiary care hospital.

Measurements

The primary endpoint was treatment failure within 30 days, defined as a change in antibiotic or return to ED or clinic due to persistent symptoms. Secondary endpoints included adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and C. difficile infection (CDI) within 30 days.

Results

Of the 343 patients included in the study, treatment failure occurred in 54/338 (16.0%) patients and was similar between oral CPs and FQs (35/229 [15.3%] vs. 19/109 [17.4%]). A higher percentage of treatment failures were observed for third generation (3GC) and first generation (1GC) CPs compared to second generation CPs (2GC) (3GC: 15/65 [23.4%]; 1GC: 11/49 [22.4%]; 2GC: 9/115 [7.8%]). Documented ADRs were low (6/343 [1.7%]) and no cases of CDI were documented.

Conclusions

Oral CPs appear to be as safe and effective as FQs for the treatment of AUP. Fewer treatment failures were noted with 2GCs as compared to 3GCs and 1GCs.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Antibiotic Treatment of Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are infectious diseases that commonly occur in communities. Although several international guidelines for the management of UTIs have been available, clinical characteristics, etiology and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns may differ from country to country. This work represents an update of the 2011 Korean guideline for UTIs. The current guideline was developed by the update and adaptation method. This clinical practice guideline provides recommendations for the diagnosis and management of UTIs, including asymptomatic bacteriuria, acute uncomplicated cystitis, acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis, complicated pyelonephritis related to urinary tract obstruction, and acute bacterial prostatitis. This guideline targets community-acquired UTIs occurring among adult patients. Healthcare-associated UTIs, catheter-associated UTIs, and infections in immunocompromised patients were not included in this guideline.