The Effect of Bortezomib on Antibody-Mediated Rejection after Kidney Transplantation

A bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a large obstacle to the long-term survival of allograft kidneys. It is urgent to find novel strategies for its prevention and treatment. Bibliometric analysis is helpful in understanding the directions of one field. Hence, this study aims to analyze the state and emerging trends of AMR in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Literature on AMR in kidney transplantation from 1999 to 2022 was collected from the Web of Science Core Collection. HistCite (version 12.03.17), CiteSpace (version 6.2.R2), Bibliometrix 4.1.0 Package from R language, and Gephi (https://gephi.org) were applied to the bibliometric analysis of the annual publications, leading countries/regions, core journals, references, keywords, and trend topics.

RESULTS

A total of 2522 articles related to AMR in kidney transplantation were included in the analysis and the annual publications increased year by year. There were 10874 authors from 118 institutions located in 70 countries/regions contributing to AMR studies, and the United States took the leading position in both articles and citation scores. Halloran PF from Canada made the most contribution to AMR in kidney transplantation. The top 3 productive journals, American Journal of Transplantation, Transplantation, and Transplantation Proceedings, were associated with transplantation. Moreover, the recent trend topics mainly focused on transplant outcomes, survival, and clinical research.

CONCLUSIONS

North American and European countries/regions played central roles in AMR of kidney transplantation. Importantly, the prognosis of AMR is the hotspot in the future. Noninvasive strategies like plasma and urine dd-cfDNA may be the most potential direction in the AMR field.

Antibody-mediated rejection in xenotransplantation: Can it be prevented or reversed?

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the commonest cause of failure of a pig graft after transplantation into an immunosuppressed nonhuman primate (NHP). The incidence of AMR compared to acute cellular rejection is much higher in xenotransplantation (46% vs. 7%) than in allotransplantation (3% vs. 63%) in NHPs. Although AMR in an allograft can often be reversed, to our knowledge there is no report of its successful reversal in a pig xenograft. As there is less experience in preventing or reversing AMR in models of xenotransplantation, the results of studies in patients with allografts provide more information. These include (i) depletion or neutralization of serum anti-donor antibodies, (ii) inhibition of complement activation, (iii) therapies targeting B or plasma cells, and (iv) anti-inflammatory therapy. Depletion or neutralization of anti-pig antibody, for example, by plasmapheresis, is effective in depleting antibodies, but they recover within days. IgG-degrading enzymes do not deplete IgM. Despite the expression of human complement-regulatory proteins on the pig graft, inhibition of systemic complement activation may be necessary, particularly if AMR is to be reversed. Potential therapies include (i) inhibition of complement activation (e.g., by IVIg, C1 INH, or an anti-C5 antibody), but some complement inhibitors are not effective in NHPs, for example, eculizumab. Possible B cell-targeted therapies include (i) B cell depletion, (ii) plasma cell depletion, (iii) modulation of B cell activation, and (iv) enhancing the generation of regulatory B and/or T cells. Among anti-inflammatory agents, anti-IL6R mAb and TNF blockers are increasingly being tested in xenotransplantation models, but with no definitive evidence that they reverse AMR. Increasing attention should be directed toward testing combinations of the above therapies. We suggest that treatment with a systemic complement inhibitor is likely to be most effective, possibly combined with anti-inflammatory agents (if these are not already being administered). Ultimately, it may require further genetic engineering of the organ-source pig to resolve the problem entirely, for example, knockout or knockdown of SLA, and/or expression of PD-L1, HLA E, and/or HLA-G.

The Impact of Induction Regimes on Immune Responses in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Current standard frontline therapy for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (NDMM) involves induction therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and maintenance therapy. Major efforts are underway to understand the biological and the clinical impacts of each stage of the treatment protocols on overall survival statistics. The most routinely used drugs in the pre-ASCT "induction" regime have different mechanisms of action and are employed either as monotherapies or in various combinations. Aside from their direct effects on cancer cell mortality, these drugs are also known to have varying effects on immune cell functionality. The question remains as to how induction therapy impacts post-ASCT immune reconstitution and anti-tumor immune responses. This review provides an update on the known immune effects of melphalan, dexamethasone, lenalidomide, and bortezomib commonly used in the induction phase of MM therapy. By analyzing the actions of each individual drug on the immune system, we suggest it might be possible to leverage their effects to rationally devise more effective induction regimes. Given the genetic heterogeneity between myeloma patients, it may also be possible to identify subgroups of patients for whom particular induction drug combinations would be more appropriate.

A Comprehensive Overview of the Clinical Relevance and Treatment Options for Antibody-mediated Rejection Associated With Non-HLA Antibodies

Although solid organ transplant results have improved significantly in recent decades, a pivotal cause of impaired long-term outcome is the development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), a condition characterized by the presence of donor-specific antibodies to HLA or non-HLA antigens. Highly HLA-sensitized recipients are treated with desensitization protocols to rescue the transplantation. These and other therapies are also applied for the treatment of AMR. Therapeutic protocols include removal of antibodies, depletion of plasma and B cells, inhibition of the complement cascade, and suppression of the T-cell-dependent antibody response. As mounting evidence illustrates the importance of non-HLA antibodies in transplant outcome, there is a need to evaluate the efficacy of treatment protocols on non-HLA antibody levels and graft function. Many reviews have been recently published that provide an overview of the literature describing the association of non-HLA antibodies with rejection in transplantation, whereas an overview of the treatment options for non-HLA AMR is still lacking. In this review, we will therefore provide such an overview. Most reports showed positive effects of non-HLA antibody clearance on graft function. However, monitoring non-HLA antibody levels after treatment along with standardization of therapies is needed to optimally treat solid organ transplant recipients.

Salinosporamide A, a Marine-Derived Proteasome Inhibitor, Inhibits T Cell Activation through Regulating Proliferation and the Cell Cycle

The appropriate regulation of T cell activity under inflammatory conditions is crucial for maintaining immune homeostasis. Salinosporamide A discovered as a self-resistance product from the marine bacterium Salinospora tropica, has been used as a potent proteasome inhibitor (PI). Although PIs have been developed as novel therapeutics for autoimmune diseases, due to their immunosuppressive effect, whether salinosporamide A inhibits T cell activation remains unknown. The current study finds that salinosporamide A is not cytotoxic, but controls T cell proliferation. Results from our cell cycle arrest analysis revealed that salinosporamide A leads to cell cycle arrest and regulates the expression of cyclin-dependent kinases. Under activated conditions, salinosporamide A abrogated T cell activation by T cell receptor-mediated stimulation, in which the production of cytokines was inhibited by pretreatment with salinosporamide A. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the regulation of T cell activation by salinosporamide A is mediated by suppressing the MAPK pathway. Therefore, our results suggest that salinosporamide A effectively suppresses T cell activation through regulating T cell proliferation and the cell cycle and provides great insight into the development of novel therapeutics for autoimmune diseases or graft-versus-host disease.

Daratumumab for Treatment of Antibody-Mediated Rejection after ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation

We report the effectiveness of daratumumab, a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 on plasma cells, for therapy-refractory antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) due to blood group antibodies in a 59-year-old man who received a living ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. Standard treatment options for AMR due to blood group antibodies including immunoadsorption, lymphocyte depletion with anti-human T-lymphocyte globulins, intravenous methylprednisolone pulses and eculizumab limited tissue injury, however failed to sufficiently suppress blood group antibody production. After administration of daratumumab as a rescue therapy, blood group antibody titers decreased and remained at low levels without further immunoadsorption and allowed kidney graft function to recover.

The Role of Long-Lived Plasma Cells in Antibody-Mediated Rejection of Kidney Transplantation: An Update

Background

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) following kidney transplant is closely associated with poor prognosis of the recipients. Long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs) produce alloantibodies as long as life time and play a crucial role in ABMR.

Summary

LLPCs generate from germinal centers and reside in survival niches in the bone marrow as well as the inflamed tissues. They are the main and long-term source of the antibodies. LLPCs mediate ABMR via the generation of preformed antibodies in sensitized patients and de novo antibodies after transplantation. They have been acknowledged as the leading causes of ABMR; however, LLPCs are insensitive to traditional immunosuppressive therapy that removes B cells. Strategies targeting LLPCs, such as antithymocyte globulin, proteasome inhibitors as well as monoclonal antibodies, are promising methods to persistently and thoroughly clear the entire PC pool.

Key Message

LLPCs play an important role in ABMR by producing alloantibodies continually, and targeting LLPCs might be a novel and effective approach against ABMR.

[THE USE OF BORTEZOMIB FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC ANTIBODY MEDIATED REJECTION AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION]

(Backgrounds) The efficacy of bortezomib for chronic antibody mediated rejection (CAMR) after kidney transplantation is still obscure. (Materials and methods) CAMR were persisted in 5 recipients who were treated with plasma exchange, low dose of IVIG, steroid pulse therapy, and rituximab. 1.3 mg/m² of bortezomib was administered on days 1, 4, 8, 11. Serum creatinine (sCr) levels, anti-HLA antibodies, and histology were analyzed. (Results) Stable sCr levels were obtained in 3 out of 5 recipients. No one lost renal graft function during follow-up periods. Anti-HLA class I antibodies were significantly decreased after bortezomib treatment, however anti-HLA class II antibodies were not changed. Histology showed no improvement at 6 months after bortezomib administration. Two recipients whose sCr levels increased during follow-up had already had interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) in histology before bortezomib treatment. (Conclusions) The use of bortezomib after IF/TA could be detected in histology may not contribute to stabilize renal graft function in CAMR.

Overview of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Solid Organ Transplantation

Mechanisms of rejection, new pharmacologic approaches, and genomic medicine are major foci for current research in transplantation. It is hoped that these new agents and personalized immunosuppression will provide for less toxic regimens that are effective in preventing both acute and chronic allograft rejection. Until new agents are available, practitioners must use various combinations of currently approved agents to find the best regimens for improved long-term outcomes.

Perioperative Desensitization Improves Outcomes Among Crossmatch Positive Recipients of Deceased Donor Renal Transplants

Context:

Graft failure due to chronic rejection is greater among renal transplant patients with donor-specific antibody (DSA) than among DSA-free patients. For patients dependent on deceased donor transplantation, preoperative desensitization to eliminate DSAs may be impractical. We speculated that perioperative desensitization might eliminate preexisting DSAs and prevent de novo DSAs and improve graft outcomes. We report that brief perioperative desensitization using either intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasmapheresis/IVIG (PP/IVIG) treatment improves clinical outcomes among patients with positive crossmatches.

Design:

Immediately following deceased donor transplantation, 235 renal recipients were assigned points for PRA and flow crossmatches (FCXM): delayed graft function (DGF) ≤ 1 point received standard therapy; 2 points received high-dose IVIG; and ≥3 points received PP/IVIG. The DSAs were serially monitored by single antigen bead luminex for 1 year. Five-year clinical outcomes were determined from the chart review.

Results:

All desensitized patients had preoperatively positive FCXM with DSA. Rejection was more common ( P < .05) among desensitized than nonsensitized groups. However, overall graft survivals were similar between the groups ( P = not significant) and superior to historic untreated patients ( P < .05). Treatment with PP/IVIG more effectively eliminated preexisting DSAs (67% vs 33%, P < 0.05) than IVIG, but neither regimen prevented de novo formation of DSA (20%, P = not significant). Graft survival was >90% in all desensitizated patients with DSA elimination as well as PP/IVIG patients with residual DSA. In contrast, IVIG patients with persistent DSA had poorer graft survival (45%, P < .05).

Conclusion:

Preemptive perioperative desensitization improved overall graft survival of sensitized patients compared to historic untreated patients. Plasmapheresis/IVIG had greater impact on DSA eradication and graft survival than IVIG alone.