Training a Chest Compression of 6-7 cm Depth for High Quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Hospital Setting: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Can rescuers accurately deliver subtle changes to chest compression depth if recommended by future guidelines?

BACKGROUND

A recent study reported that a compression depth of 4.56 cm optimised survival following cardiac arrest, which is at variance with the current guidelines of 5.0-6.0 cm. A reduction in recommended compression depth is only likely to improve survival if healthcare professionals can accurately deliver a relatively small change in target depth. This study aimed to determine if healthcare professionals could accurately judge their delivered compression depth by 0.5 cm increments.

METHOD

This randomised interventional trial asked BLS-trained healthcare professionals to complete two minutes of continuous chest compressions on an adult manikin, randomised (without any feedback device), to compress to one of three target depth ranges of 4.0-5.0 cm, 4.5-5.5 cm or 5.0-6.0 cm, at the recommended rate of 100-120 compressions min^-1. Basic demographic data, compression rate, and compression depth were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred and one participants were recruited, of whom one withdrew. Median depths of 3.66 cm (IQR: 3.37-4.16 cm), 4.13 cm (IQR: 3.65-4.36 cm) and 4.76 cm (IQR: 4.16-5.24 cm) were found for the target depths of 4.0-5.0 cm (n = 30), 4.5-5.5 cm (n = 35) and 5.0-6.0 cm (n = 35) respectively (P < 0.001). Overall, 18 participants successfully compressed to their target depth.

CONCLUSIONS

Rescuers are able to judge 0.5 cm differences in compression depth with precision, but remain unable to accurately judge overall target depth. Reducing the current recommended compression depth to 4.56 cm is likely to result in delivered compressions significantly below the optimal depth.

In a bed or on the floor? - The effect of realistic hospital resuscitation training: A randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

In-hospital cardiac arrest has a poor prognosis and often occurs in patients lying in a hospital bed. A bed mattress is a soft compressible surface that may decrease cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality. Often hospital CPR training is performed with a manikin on the floor.

AIM

To study CPR quality following realistic CPR training with a manikin in a bed compared with one on the floor.

METHODS

We conducted a randomised controlled study. Healthcare professionals were randomised to CPR training with a manikin in a hospital bed or one on the floor. Data on CPR quality was collected from manikins. The primary outcome measure was chest compression depth.

RESULTS

In total, 108 healthcare professionals (age: 40years, female: 94%) were included. The mean chest compression depth was 39mm (standard deviation (SD): 10), for the bed group compared with 38mm (SD: 9) for the floor group, p=0.49. A post hoc analysis showed that regardless of the training method, the participants who optimised their working position by jumping onto the bed or lowering the bed had a median chest compression depth of 39mm (25th-75th percentiles: 33-45) compared with 29mm (25th-75th percentiles: 23-41) for participants who did neither, p=0.04.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in chest compression depth between healthcare professionals who trained CPR on a manikin in a hospital bed compared with one on the floor. Chest compression depth was too shallow in both groups. Irrespective of the training method, participants who optimised their working position performed deeper chest compressions.