1
|
Carollo M, Crisafulli S, Vitturi G, Besco M, Hinek D, Sartorio A, Tanara V, Spadacini G, Selleri M, Zanconato V, Fava C, Minuz P, Zamboni M, Trifirò G. Clinical impact of medication review and deprescribing in older inpatients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024. [PMID: 38822740 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2024] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polypharmacy is a primary risk factor for the prescription of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and ultimately, adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Medication review and deprescribing represent effective strategies to simplify therapeutic regimens, minimize risks, and reduce PIM prescriptions. This systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental and observational studies aimed to evaluate the impact of different medication review and deprescribing interventions in hospitalized older patients. METHODS Experimental and observational prospective cohort studies evaluating the clinical effects of medication review and deprescribing strategies in older hospitalized patients were searched in the bibliographic databases, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, from inception until January 8, 2024. A narrative synthesis of the results was provided, along with a meta-analysis of dichotomous data (i.e., re-hospitalizations and mortality). RESULTS Overall, 21 randomized controlled trials, 7 non-randomized interventional studies, and 2 prospective cohort studies were included in the systematic review. Of these, 14 (46.7%) assessed medication appropriateness as the primary outcome, while the remaining evaluated clinical outcomes (e.g., length of hospital stay, hospital readmissions, emergency department visits, and incidence of ADRs) and/or quality of life. The meta-analysis revealed a slight but statistically significant 8% reduction in hospital readmissions (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.85-0.99) following medication review and deprescribing, but no significant impact on mortality (HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-1.00). Of the 30 included studies, 21 were considered at high risk of bias, mostly due to potential deviations from intended interventions and randomization processes. The remaining nine studies had "some concerns" (eight studies) or were considered at "low" risk of bias (one study). CONCLUSION Medication review and deprescribing are associated with potential benefits in reducing hospital readmission rates among hospitalized older patients, particularly through the reduction of PIM prescriptions. The integration of thorough medication review and deprescribing protocols in hospital settings may improve post-discharge outcomes and reduce overall healthcare costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Carollo
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Vitturi
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Matilde Besco
- Department of Medicine, Geriatrics Division, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Damiano Hinek
- Department of Pharmacy, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Sartorio
- Department of Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine C, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Valentina Tanara
- Department of Pharmacy, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Spadacini
- Department of Medicine, Geriatrics Division, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Margherita Selleri
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Valentina Zanconato
- Department of Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine C, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Cristiano Fava
- Department of Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine C, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Pietro Minuz
- Department of Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine C, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Mauro Zamboni
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatric and Gynecology, Section of Geriatric Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Gianluca Trifirò
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prabahar K, Alhawiti MS, Yosef AM, Alqarni RS, Sayd FY, Alsharif MO, Subramani V, Alshareef H, Hamdan AME, Alqifari S, Alqarni GS, Yousuf SM. Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Hospitalized Older Patients in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia Using 2023 Beers Criteria: A Retrospective Multi-Centric Study. J Multidiscip Healthc 2024; 17:1971-1979. [PMID: 38706504 PMCID: PMC11070160 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s461180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Older persons are frequently prescribed several medications; therefore, inappropriate medication prescriptions are common. Prescribing potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) poses a serious risk and hence, we aimed to assess the PIMs in older patients in Tabuk, using the 2023 Beers criteria. Patients and Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out, including older persons ≥65 years of age admitted in two government hospitals from June 2022 to May 2023, and prescribed with five or more medications. PIMs were assessed using the 2023 Beers criteria. Descriptive analysis was performed for the categorical and continuous variables. Logistic regression was used to assess the influence of age, gender, number of medications and comorbidities on PIMs using SPSS version 27. Results The study included 420 patients. The mean age of the participants was 75.52 ± 8.70 years (range, 65-105 years). There was a slightly higher proportion of females (52%). The prevalence of PIMs was 81.43%, where 35.41% were prescribed one PIM, 26.48% were prescribed two PIMs, and 17.32% were prescribed three PIMs. The proportion of medications considered potentially inappropriate among older patients was 70.11%, and proton pump inhibitors were the most commonly prescribed medication (52.99%). The proportion of medications to be used with caution was 19.55%, with diuretics being the most frequently administered medication (91.43%). Gender and comorbidity did not influence PIMs, but age and number of medications significantly influenced the likelihood of PIMs. Conclusion PIMs are prevalent among older people and are significantly associated with age and multiple medications. Caution should be exercised while prescribing medications to older persons. Frequent audits should be performed to assess PIMs, and clinicians should be informed of the same to avoid serious outcomes associated with PIMs. Interventions designed to reduce PIM need to be initiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kousalya Prabahar
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | | | - Fai Yahya Sayd
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Vikashini Subramani
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Nilgiris, TN, India
| | - Hanan Alshareef
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed M E Hamdan
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saleh Alqifari
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grigolo S, Bruschi B, Di Masi D, Bena C, Armando LG, Cena C. Identification of Barriers for Active Disease Management and of Medication-Related Problems through Therapeutic Patient Education in Older Home-Care Patients. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:231. [PMID: 38255118 PMCID: PMC10815688 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12020231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Combining therapeutic patient education (TPE) with a medication review service could foster the adoption of appropriate lifestyles by patients and support care-providers in identifying strategies to improve the quality of prescribed care. This study aimed to identify barriers experienced by patients in managing their diseases and medication-related problems. This was a monocentric, case series, observational study involving home-care patients from the Local Health Authority ASL TO4. Patients were enrolled for a TPE intervention where drug therapies and patient habits were collected through narrative interviews. Medication review was performed to identify potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs). Twenty patients (13 females) with a mean age of 74.7 years were enrolled. Patients had an average of 4.3 diseases and 80.0% of them were treated with ≥5 daily medications. The main PIPs involved ibuprofen, furosemide and pantoprazole. The qualitative analysis of the interviews identified seven macro-themes relating to different aspects of medication management: therapy; diseases; patient; patient journey; professionals; family and caregivers; drug information. The results of this study revealed some critical aspects related to the treatment path and healthcare professionals. These results will be used to plan educational interventions for polypharmacy patients to improve medication adherence and the understanding and management of diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Grigolo
- Department of Philosophy and Education Sciences, University of Turin, Via Sant’Ottavio 20, 10124 Turin, Italy; (S.G.); (B.B.); (D.D.M.)
| | - Barbara Bruschi
- Department of Philosophy and Education Sciences, University of Turin, Via Sant’Ottavio 20, 10124 Turin, Italy; (S.G.); (B.B.); (D.D.M.)
| | - Diego Di Masi
- Department of Philosophy and Education Sciences, University of Turin, Via Sant’Ottavio 20, 10124 Turin, Italy; (S.G.); (B.B.); (D.D.M.)
| | - Carla Bena
- Struttura Semplice Cure Domiciliari di Chivasso, Settimo Torinese, San Mauro Torinese, Via Po 11, 10034 Chivasso, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Greta Armando
- Department of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, Via Pietro Giuria 11, 10125 Turin, Italy;
| | - Clara Cena
- Department of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, Via Pietro Giuria 11, 10125 Turin, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jabri FF, Liang Y, Alhawassi TM, Johnell K, Möller J. Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Older Adults-Prevalence, Trends and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2003. [PMID: 37510444 PMCID: PMC10379671 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11142003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older adults are associated with drug-related problems, adverse health consequences, repeated hospital admissions and a higher risk of mortality. In Saudi Arabia and some Arab countries, studies of PIMs among large cohorts of older adults are limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of PIMs, trends and associated factors among outpatient older adults in Saudi Arabia. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out. Over three years (2017-2019), data on 23,417 people (≥65 years) were retrieved from outpatient clinics in a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. PIMs were assessed using the 2019 Beers Criteria. Covariates included sex, age, nationality, number of dispensed medications, and number of diagnoses. A generalized estimating equation model was used to assess trends and factors associated with PIMs. (3) Results: The prevalence of PIMs was high and varied between 57.2% and 63.6% over the study years. Compared with 2017, the prevalence of PIMs increased significantly, with adjusted odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence interval (95% CI)) of 1.23 (1.18-1.29) and 1.15 (1.10-1.21) for 2018 and 2019, respectively. Factors associated with being prescribed PIMs included ≥5 dispensed medications (OR_adjusted = 23.91, 95% CI = 21.47-26.64) and ≥5 diagnoses (OR_adjusted = 3.20, 95% CI = 2.88-3.56). Compared with females, males had a lower risk of being prescribed PIMs (OR_adjusted = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85-0.94); (4) Conclusions: PIMs were common with an increasing trend among older adults in Saudi Arabia. A higher number of dispensed medications, increased number of diagnoses and female sex were associated with being prescribed PIMs. Recommendations on how to optimize prescriptions and implement de-prescribing strategies are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fouad F Jabri
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, P.O. Box 50927, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, K9 Global Folkhälsa, K9 GPH, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yajun Liang
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, K9 Global Folkhälsa, K9 GPH, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tariq M Alhawassi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
- Medication Safety Research Chair, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kristina Johnell
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, C8 Medicinsk Epidemiologi och Biostatistik, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jette Möller
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, K9 Global Folkhälsa, K9 GPH, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|