Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy for nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve and nucleos(t)ide analogue-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients

Changes in liver stiffness values assessed using transient elastography in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Regression of liver fibrosis during antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients has been demonstrated, but data on the influence of long-term treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) on liver stiffness (LS) measured by transient elastography are scarce. We aimed to investigate the changes in LS values during the 144-week TDF therapy in treatment-naïve CHB patients.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted from April 2015 to July 2020 at CHA Bundang Medical Center. Laboratory tests and LS measurements were performed at baseline and repeated at weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 144. A significant decline in LS was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in LS value at week 96 from baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 48 treatment-naïve CHB patients initiating TDF therapy were screened, and 36 patients were included in the final analysis (median age, 46 [interquartile range, 34.5-55.8] years; 19 men [52.8%]). During TDF therapy, the median LS values decreased from 13.8 kPa at baseline to 8.7 kPa, 6.5 kPa, and 6.4 kPa at weeks 48, 96, and 144, respectively (all P < 0.001). At week 96, virological and biochemical responses were achieved in 34 (94.4%) patients and 20 (76.9%) patients, respectively. Moreover, 21 of 36 (58.3%) patients showed a significant decline in LS value. A higher baseline LS value was a single independent predictor for the reduction in LS value at week 96 from baseline (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

During the 144-week TDF therapy, LS values declined significantly in treatment-naïve CHB patients.

Switching from Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy to Tenofovir Monotherapy in Multidrug-Experienced Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: a 5-Year Experience at Two Centers

Patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who were administered tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based combination therapy after receiving multiple drugs are frequently switched to TDF monotherapy in South Korea. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching to TDF monotherapy from TDF-based combination therapy over 5 years. This was a retrospective study of multidrug-experienced CHB patients who switched from TDF-based combination therapy to TDF monotherapy after achieving a virologic response (VR; <20 IU/mL) at Konkuk University Hospital and Sanggye Paik Hospital. The biochemical response was defined as a normalized serum ALT level during follow-up. Each patient was assessed from the date of switching to TDF monotherapy to the date of the last follow-up over 5 years. A total of 39 patients who received at least one antiviral therapy before TDF-based combination therapy were analyzed. The median duration of VR before switching to TDF monotherapy was 18 months and the median duration of TDF monotherapy was 55 months. In this study, except for one patient who had poor compliance, all patients maintained a VR. Three patients had a temporarily increased HBV DNA level and 91.2% of the patients showed a biochemical response. Switching multidrug-experienced patients to TDF monotherapy is generally safe and effective.

Antiviral Efficacy of Tenofovir Monotherapy in Children with Nucleos(t)ide-naive Chronic Hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to compare the efficacy between tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and lamivudine (LMV) in children with nucleos(t)ide-naive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. Patients with CHB were treated with TDF in the immune-reactive phase and compared with a historical control group of patients treated with LMV before the TDF era.

METHODS

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA titer decrements (> 3 log₁₀ IU/mL) were monitored after treatment initiation. The treatment duration for HBV DNA clearance (< 357 IU/mL) and complete response (HBeAg loss and HBV DNA clearance) were analyzed. The follow-up period was 96 weeks.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were treated with TDF and compared with a historical control group of 24 patients treated with LMV. HBV DNA decrement (> 3 log₁₀ IU/mL) was achieved in 100% (16/16) of the TDF group but in only 62.5% (15/24) of the LMV group (P = 0.005) at 48 weeks. The HBV DNA clearance (< 357 IU/mL) in the TDF and LMV groups was, respectively, as follows: 62.5% (10/16) and 25.0% (6/24) at 12 weeks (P = 0.018), 81.3% (13/16) and 37.5% (9/24) at 24 weeks (P = 0.006), 93.8% (15/16) and 50.0% (12/24) at 48 weeks (P = 0.004), and 100% (16/16) and 54.2% (13/24) at 96 weeks (P = 0.001). Complete response occurred in 41.7% (5/12) of HBeAg-positive patients in the TDF group and 28.6% (6/21) of the LMV group at 96 weeks (P = 0.443).

CONCLUSION

TDF monotherapy for 96 weeks produced a significantly more effective virologic response than LMV monotherapy in children with nucleos(t)ide-naive CHB.

Clinical response to long-term tenofovir monotherapy in Korean chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a potent nucleotide analogue recommended as first-line monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We investigated the clinical response to TDF monotherapy in Korean CHB patients.

METHODS

A total of 90 CHB patients [55 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 35 HBeAg-negative] who received TDF monotherapy for >2year, were enrolled. Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) levels, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), HBeAg, anti-HBe and HBV DNA levels were measured during treatment. Virologic response (VR) was defined as undetectable HBV DNA level.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidences of complete virologic response (CVR) were 75.6% and 89.9% at months 12 and 24, respectively. The cumulative CVR rates were significantly higher in HBeAg-negative than HBeAg-positive group (P<0.001). HBeAg loss/seroconversion was observed in 21 (38.2%) out of 55 HBeAg-positive patients. One HBeAg-positive and 1 HBeAg-negative patients (2.2%) achieved HBsAg loss at months 6 and 8 of TDF therapy, respectively. Baseline HBV DNA level and qHBsAg were significant predictive factors for a CVR (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Virologic, serologic, biochemical responses were achieved in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients under 24-month TDF therapy. Monitoring using baseline HBV DNA and qHBsAg levels would be helpful to predict CVR.

TDF Monotherapy Is Effective Regardless of Prior Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Treatment in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in China

Background/Aims

Many patients had to transfer to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) if there is other nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) resistance. We aimed to investigate antiviral effects of TDF monotherapy between NA-naive and NA-experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients in China.

Methods

A total of 102 NA-naive and NA-experienced CHB patients with TDF monotherapy (300 mg/day) were retrospectively analyzed for useful parameters up to 72 weeks.

Results

There were 36 and 66 patients with matched HBV DNA baseline level in NA-naïve and NA-experienced group, respectively. There were no significant differences between NA-naïve and NA-experienced groups in HBV DNA levels (all P > 0.05) and HBV DNA undetectable rates (all P > 0.05) at all time points. At the end of follow-up, HBV DNA undetectable rates in NA-naïve and NA-experienced group were 96.2% (25/26) and 91.8% (45/49), respectively (P = 0.476). Baseline HBV DNA level was the only independent predictor for HBV DNA negative time (P = 0.018). In addition, 27.8% (5/18) and 11.4% (4/35) achieved HBeAg seroconversion at the end of the follow-up, respectively (P = 0.133).

Conclusions

TDF monotherapy was effective regardless of prior NA experienced. Baseline HBV DNA was a key predictive factor for HBV DNA negative time in TDF monotherapy.

Treatment Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir-Based Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B: A Real Life Cohort Study in Korea

Background & Aims

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based therapy in naïve and treatment-experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients for 96 weeks in Korean real life practice.

Methods

A total of 209 CHB patients with a prescription for TDF at the Seoul and Daejeon St. Mary’s hospitals were enrolled from December 2012 to October 2014. We compared the virological responses and evaluated the renal safety of treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients.

Results

An overall complete virological response (CVR) was achieved in 80.4% and 84.6% of patients at weeks 48 and 96, respectively. In a subgroup analysis, CVR at week 96 was present in 88.4%, 75.0%, 75.5%, and 83.3% of participants in the lamivudine-resistant (LAM-R) group, adefovir-resistant (ADV-R) group, multidrug-resistant (MDR) group, and suboptimal response group, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, ADV-R, MDR, hepatitis B virus DNA, and hepatitis B e antigen were independent predictors for CVR. With regard to renal safety, diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis, and an initial low estimated glomerular filtration rate were independent factors affecting creatinine elevation (≥0.5 mg/dL). Moreover, two patients with DM and cirrhosis experienced TDF-related Fanconi syndrome.

Conclusions

TDF-based therapy demonstrated sustained viral suppression and favorable safety during a 2-year treatment period. The LAM-R and suboptimal response groups showed comparable efficacy to the naïve group, while the ADV-R and MDR groups were significantly associated with a low CVR. Close monitoring of renal safety should be mandatory when treating CHB patients receiving TDF, particularly those with DM and cirrhosis.

Efficacy of tenofovir-based rescue therapy in patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, there are no conclusive results on the efficacy of Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with lamivudine-resistant (LAM-R).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy between TDF and TDF-based combination therapy against LAM-R HBV in CHB patients.

METHODS

Randomized and non-randomized control trials directly comparing TDF and TDF-based therapy for treatment of LAM-R CHB patients, were searched in Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE, database up to June 15, 2015. The data were analyzed with Review Manager (v.5.3).

RESULTS

Five articles (683 patients in total) met entry criteria. The overall efficacy of tenofovir-based combination therapy was not significantly better with regard to the rates of virological response (85.5% vs. 81.5%; RR=0.95, 95%CI=0.88-1.03, P=0.25), ALT normalization (61.9% vs.72.0%; RR=1.18, 95%CI=0.96-1.44, P=0.11) and HBeAg loss (17.0% vs. 18.1%; RR=1.40, 95%CI=0.78-2.49, P=0.26) compared with TDF monotherapy through 48-week treatment. Additionally, subgroup analysis showed that no significant difference was determined as TDF group compared to TDF-based group at 48weeks, in terms of rates of HBV DNA undetectability, ALT normalization and HBeAg loss in the treatment of LAM-R patients with prior failure of LAM monotherapy. Moreover, the rates of HBV DNA suppression between groups were similar through 24 or 48weeks of treatment in LAM-R patients with prior failure of LAM/ADV therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF monotherapy is as effective as TDF-based combination therapy in maintaining viral suppression in LAM-R patients with prior failure of LAM or LAM/ADV therapy.

Modeling the functional state of the reverse transcriptase of hepatitis B virus and its application to probing drug-protein interaction

BACKGROUND

Herein, the predicted atomic structures of five representative sequence variants of the reverse transcriptase protein (RT) of hepatitis B virus (HBV), sampled from patients with rapid or slow response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment, have been examined to identify structural variations between them in order to assess structural and functional properties of HBV-RT variants associated with the differential responses to TDF treatment.

RESULTS

We utilized a hybrid computational approach to model the atomistic structures of HBV-RT/DNA-RNA/dATP and HBV-RT/DNA-RNA/TFV-DP (tenofovir diphosphate) complexes with the native hybrid DNA-RNA substrate in place. Multi-nanosecond molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of HBV-RT/DNA-RNA/dATP complexes revealed strong coupling of the natural nucleotide substrate, dATP, to the active site of the RT, and the differential involvement of the two putative magnesium cations (Mg(2+)) at the active site, whereby one Mg(2+) directly bridges the interaction between dATP and HBV-RT and the other serves as a coordinator to maintain an optimal configuration of the active site. Solvated interaction energy (SIE) calculated in MD simulations of HBV-RT/DNA-RNA/TFV-DP complexes indicate no differential binding affinity between TFV-DP and HBV-RT variants identified in patients with slow or rapid response to TDF treatment.

CONCLUSION

The predicted atomic structures accurately represent functional states of HBV-RT. The equivalent interaction between TFV-DP and each examined HBV-RT variants suggests that binding affinity of TFV-DP to HBV-RT is not associated with delayed viral clearance.

Recent Advances in the Management of Chronic Hepatitis B Including Suppression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Entecavir and Interferon

At present, for adults with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, two new analogues, entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir, are recommended as the first-line therapy by the EASL (European Association for the Study of the Liver), AASLD (American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases), and APASL (Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver) guidelines. The use of pegylated interferon-α (PEG IFN-α) is recommended as the first-line therapy instead of standard IFN-α according to the above 3 guidelines. In this paper, the aim was to assess: (1) the long-term efficacy and safety as well as the resistance to ETV and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF); (2) the efficacy of PEG IFN-α; (3) the role of combination therapy with IFN plus two analogues, such as lamivudine and ETV; (4) the efficacy and safety of two analogues with cirrhosis, and (5) suppression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by ETV and IFN treatment. The results are as follows: (1) both ETV and TDF showed long-term efficacy and safety; (2) PEG IFN-α resulted in a greater decline in HBV DNA levels and a higher rate of HBeAg seroconversion; (3) combination therapy with IFN plus two analogues did not elevate the rate of sustained responses; (4) both ETV and TDF showed efficacy and safety with cirrhosis (ETV especially displayed efficacy and safety with decompensated cirrhosis), and (5) suppression of HCC was observed by ETV and IFN.

Management of entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B with adefovir-based combination therapies

AIM: To evaluate the long-term efficacy adefovir (ADV)-based combination therapies in entecavir (ETV)-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

METHODS: Fifty CHB patients with genotypic resistance to ETV at 13 medical centers in South Korea were included for the analysis. All the patients received rescue therapy with the combination of ADV plus ETV (ADV/ETV, n = 23) or ADV plus lamivudine (LMV) (ADV/LMV, n = 27) for more than 12 mo. Patients were monitored at least every 3-4 mo during ADV-based combination therapy by clinical examination as well as biochemical and virological assessments. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were measured by real-time PCR and logarithmically transformed for analysis. Cumulative rates of virologic response (VR; HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference was determined by a log-rank test. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent risk factors significantly associated with short-term and long-term VR, respectively.

RESULTS: Baseline median HBV DNA levels were 5.53 (2.81-7.63) log₁₀ IU/mL. The most commonly observed ETV genotypic mutation sites were rt184 and rt202. Patients were treated for a median of 27 (12-45) mo. Overall, cumulative VR rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 mo were 26%, 36%, 45%, and 68%, respectively. Patients treated with the ADV/ETV combination showed higher cumulative VR rates (35%, 43%, 65%, and 76%, respectively) than those with the ADV/LAM combination (18%, 30%, 30%, and 62%, respectively; P = 0.048). In the multivariate analysis, low baseline HBV DNA levels (< 5.2 log₁₀ IU/mL) and initial virologic response at 3 mo (IVR-3; HBV DNA < 3.3 log₁₀ IU/mL after 3 mo) were independent predictive factors for VR. Patients with favorable predictors achieved cumulative VR rates up to 90% at 36 mo. During the same period, the cumulative incidence of virologic breakthrough was as low as 6% in patients with the both favorable predictors.

CONCLUSION: If tenofovir is not available, ADV/ETV combination could be considered in ETV-resistant patients with low HBV DNA titers, and may be continued if IVR-3 is achieved.